[Samba] Upgrade
Hi people, I have a working server running beautifully, it does authentication for unix/windows users, and share folders (including home areas) and printers, with no problem, but it is Samba version 2.2.7a on a Solaris 8 machine... So it has to go... I'm planning to upgrade the machine to Solaris 9 and Samba 3.0.4, therefore, I have a few questions: 1) How do I transfer all the users with their passwords (if possible) 2) Can I have both servers running (Samba 2.2.7a and Samba 3.0.4) and force the one I want to authenticate against? how? 3) Any special recommendation to compile on Solaris9 ? like mtune/architecture optiones for configure? Thanks a lor in advance!! Pablo.- ** Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 2.2.7a to Samba 3.0.2a
Hello List, I'm planning a migration from Samba 2.2.7a to 3.0.2a, samba is actually running on Solaris 8.0 on a sun E450. Now, Looking at the smb.conf (the global parameters) what should I take care of? # Global parameters [global] domain logons = yes security = user wins support = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 log file = /var/samba/log.%m log level = 1 max log size = 0 interfaces = 10.52.1.1 10.42.1.1 domain master = Yes security mask = 0777 level2oplocks = no encrypt passwords = Yes dont descend = /proc,/dev,/etc,/usr printing = SYSV server string = Samba Server workgroup = hosts allow = 127. 10. 172.16. netbios name = ### socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE SO_RCVBUF=16384 SO_SNDBUF=16384 local master = Yes min passwd length = 6 os level = 99 oplocks = no use client driver = yes At the same question, this machine should be a domain controller (PDC?) and the preferable server, Should I take care of this in any manner? Obviously, if you can see any improvement that I could apply on Samba3.0.2a to make it work faster, I'm more than happy to do it :) Cheers!!! Pablo.- --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.657 / Virus Database: 422 - Release Date: 13/04/2004 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Cannot print
Gurus, I have a Solaris 9 server with Samba 2.2.8a installed since December 02, working perfect. Last Friday I installed the last patch cluster from Sun to the system (because of the root vulnerability), and this morning when I came the printers are not working trough samba. The shares and authentication is working without problem, but the printers not. If I try to see the preferences of a printers from a Windows XP (pro) machine I get: Printers properties cannot be displayed. Operation could not be completed Then, I didn't change anything on the smb.conf file, but here is the relevant parts: load printers = yes printcap name = lpstat printing = bsd [printers] comment = All Printers path = /usr/spool/samba browseable = no public = yes guest ok = yes writable = no printable = yes use client driver = yes Checking the logs, the only odd message related to printers that I found is: [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 3] smbd/process.c:(685) switch message SMBtrans (pid 27506) [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:(119) change_to_user: Skipping user change - already user [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:(520) trans \PIPE\ data=44 params=0 setup=2 [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:(334) named pipe command on name [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:(990) search for pipe pnum=7069 [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:(296) Got API command 0x26 on pipe spoolss (pnum 7069)free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 0 [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:(1165) Doing \PIPE\spoolss [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:(1190) api_rpcTNP: api_spoolss_rpc op 0x1d - api_rpcTNP: pipe 28777 rpc command: SPOOLSS_CLOSEPRINTER [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:(168) Policy not found: [000] 00 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1D 5B 4C 40 .[L@ [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] lib/util.c:(1549) [010] 72 6B 00 00 rk.. [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 2] rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:(263) find_printer_index_by_hnd: Printer handle not found: Policy not found: [000] 00 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1D 5B 4C 40 .[L@ [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] lib/util.c:(1549) [010] 72 6B 00 00 rk.. [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 2] rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:(263) find_printer_index_by_hnd: Printer handle not found: close_printer_handle: Invalid handle (OURS:27506:27506) [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:(1223) api_rpcTNP: bad handle fault return. [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:(444) free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 0 [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 3] smbd/process.c:(846) Transaction 38 of length 45 [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 3] smbd/process.c:(685) switch message SMBclose (pid 27506) [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:(119) change_to_user: Skipping user change - already user [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:(990) search for pipe pnum=7069 [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:(954) closed pipe name spoolss pnum=7069 (pipes_open=0) Any ideas? This is urgent for me, so I will appreciate any help. Thanks.- Pablo.- --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.609 / Virus Database: 389 - Release Date: 03/03/2004 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Cannot print UPDATE
OK, Now I manage to make it print. The only change I made was to disable spoolss. So I added to the smb.conf the following line: disable spoolss = yes I'm not too sure if this is the best option, but the errors went away, and the printers are working again. Nevertheless, I would like to know why using spoolss the printers were not working. Cheers! Pablo.- --Original Message- -From: -[EMAIL PROTECTED] -[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -mba.org] On Behalf Of Pablo Jejcic -Sent: 08 March 2004 11:57 -To: 'samba' -Subject: [Samba] Cannot print - - -Gurus, - I have a Solaris 9 server with Samba 2.2.8a installed -since December 02, working perfect. Last Friday I installed -the last patch cluster from Sun to the system (because of the -root vulnerability), and this morning when I came the -printers are not working trough samba. The shares and -authentication is working without problem, but the printers not. - If I try to see the preferences of a printers from a Windows XP -(pro) machine I get: - Printers properties cannot be displayed. Operation -could not be completed - -Then, I didn't change anything on the smb.conf file, but here -is the relevant parts: - -load printers = yes -printcap name = lpstat -printing = bsd -[printers] - comment = All Printers - path = /usr/spool/samba - browseable = no - public = yes - guest ok = yes - writable = no - printable = yes - use client driver = yes - - Checking the logs, the only odd message related to -printers that I found is: - -[2004/03/08 11:38:06, 3] smbd/process.c:(685) - switch message SMBtrans (pid 27506) -[2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:(119) - change_to_user: Skipping user change - already user -[2004/03/08 11:38:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:(520) - trans \PIPE\ data=44 params=0 setup=2 -[2004/03/08 11:38:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:(334) - named pipe command on name -[2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:(990) - search for pipe pnum=7069 -[2004/03/08 11:38:06, 3] smbd/ipc.c:(296) - Got API command 0x26 on pipe spoolss (pnum -7069)free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 0 -[2004/03/08 11:38:06, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:(1165) - Doing \PIPE\spoolss -[2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:(1190) - api_rpcTNP: api_spoolss_rpc op 0x1d - api_rpcTNP: pipe -28777 rpc command: SPOOLSS_CLOSEPRINTER [2004/03/08 11:38:06, -4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:(168) - Policy not found: [000] 00 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 -00 1D 5B 4C 40 .[L@ [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] -lib/util.c:(1549) - [010] 72 6B 00 00 rk.. -[2004/03/08 11:38:06, 2] rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:(263) - find_printer_index_by_hnd: Printer handle not found: Policy -not found: [000] 00 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1D 5B -4C 40 .[L@ [2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] lib/util.c:(1549) - [010] 72 6B 00 00 rk.. -[2004/03/08 11:38:06, 2] rpc_server/srv_spoolss_nt.c:(263) - find_printer_index_by_hnd: Printer handle not found: -close_printer_handle: Invalid handle (OURS:27506:27506) -[2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:(1223) - api_rpcTNP: bad handle fault return. -[2004/03/08 11:38:06, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:(444) - free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 0 -[2004/03/08 11:38:06, 3] smbd/process.c:(846) - Transaction 38 of length 45 -[2004/03/08 11:38:06, 3] smbd/process.c:(685) - switch message SMBclose (pid 27506) -[2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] smbd/uid.c:(119) - change_to_user: Skipping user change - already user -[2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:(990) - search for pipe pnum=7069 -[2004/03/08 11:38:06, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:(954) - closed pipe name spoolss pnum=7069 (pipes_open=0) - -Any ideas? This is urgent for me, so I will appreciate any help. - -Thanks.- - -Pablo.- - - - - - - -Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. -Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). -Version: 6.0.609 / Virus Database: 389 - Release Date: 03/03/2004 - - --- -To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the -instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba - -Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. -Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). -Version: 6.0.609 / Virus Database: 389 - Release Date: 03/03/2004 - - --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.609 / Virus Database: 389 - Release Date: 03/03/2004 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] SMB_PAM on Solaris
Hi List, We ar having quite an odd problem. Yesterday we upgrade to Samba 3.0.1, and just reuse the smb.conf. We didn't change anything else, but this morning one of the Solaris workstations couldn't login (we are using smb_pam to authenticate the users). We checked the pam.conf and smb_pam.conf files, and they look ok (just like the ones on the other machines). As a workaroubd the user is authenticating against NIS now, but we would like to have it authenticated against samba for consistecny purposes. Any thoughts? Ideas? TIA! Pablo.- --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.564 / Virus Database: 356 - Release Date: 19/01/2004 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Error on SMB Packages
List, I have been having a few problems with a couple of machines accesing my Samba server (SunOS zeusv480 5.9 Generic_112233-02 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-480R running Samba version 2.2.2). I have been playing with the parameters on smb.conf for a while now (sockets, oplocks, etc) and I couldn't improve the performance, so I decide to go for an snoop on the network card serving samba and I'm getting a few messages that I don't understand (see below); Anyone could give me a hand to get this? 0.00052 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0xa2 Name=SMB NT_CreateX FileName=???c Error=0 0.00022 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB C Code=0x24 Name=SMBlockingX FileID=0x136d #Unlocks=0x0 #Locks=0x0 Error=0 0.00024 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x24 Name=SMBlockingX FileID=0x136d #Unlocks=0x0 #Locks=0x3 Error=0 0.00036 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0x24 Name=SMBlockingX Error=0 0.00017 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x24 Name=SMBlockingX FileID=0x136d #Unlocks=0x0 #Locks=0x0 Error=0 0.00023 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0xa2 Name=SMB NT_CreateX FileID=0x136e Error=0 0.00030 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 QueryFileInfo FileID=0x136e Error=0 0.00011 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 Error=0 0.00025 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x4 Name=SMBclose FileID=0x136e Error=0 0.00017 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0x4 Name=SMBclose Error=0 0.00029 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 QueryPathInfo File=c Error=0 0.00020 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 Error=0 0.00026 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 QueryPathInfo File=c Error=0 0.00018 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 Error=0 0.00041 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0xa2 Name=SMB NT_CreateX FileName=??pc Error=0 0.00026 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0xa2 Name=SMB NT_CreateX FileID=0x136f Error=0 0.00026 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 QueryFileInfo FileID=0x136f Error=0 0.00011 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 Error=0 0.00032 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x4 Name=SMBclose FileID=0x136f Error=0 0.00016 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0x4 Name=SMBclose Error=0 0.00027 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0xa2 Name=SMB NT_CreateX FileName=??pc Error=0 0.00022 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB C Code=0x24 Name=SMBlockingX FileID=0x1368 #Unlocks=0x0 #Locks=0x0 Error=0 0.00011 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0xa2 Name=SMB NT_CreateX FileID=0x1370 Error=0 0.1 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 NBT C port=4462 0.00018 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 SetFileInfo FileID=0x1370 Error=0 0.00778 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 Error=0 0.00027 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x4 Name=SMBclose FileID=0x1370 Error=0 0.00018 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0x4 Name=SMBclose Error=0 0.00073 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 QueryFileInfo FileID=0x136d Error=0 0.00012 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 Error=0 0.00024 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 QueryFileInfo FileID=0x136d Error=0 0.9 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 Error=0 0.00086 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0xa2 Name=SMB NT_CreateX FileName=??? ? Error=0 0.00023 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0xa2 Name=SMB NT_CreateX FileID=0x1372 Error=0 0.00030 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 QueryFileInfo FileID=0x1372 Error=0 0.00017 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 Error=0 0.00024 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x4 Name=SMBclose FileID=0x1372 Error=0 Thanks in advance.- Pablo.- --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.558 / Virus Database: 350 - Release Date: 02/01/2004 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] Error on SMB Packages
I will update the patches, but this is not what is happening with my server. As mine is not rising on CPU usage. Anyway, thanks a lot, I'll update the server patches level next week... About oplocks, I played with it a little bit, it gave me a small increase in the performance, but these few machines are still having problems. I will increase the samba logging level and check that again looking for something related to the messages using snoop. Thanks a lot, I'll let you know if I find something else. Cheers! Pablo.- --Original Message- -From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Sent: 09 January 2004 14:23 -To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Subject: RE: [Samba] Error on SMB Packages - - --BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- - - -The contents of this email are intended exclusively for the -addressee. If you are not the addressee you must not read use -or disclose the email contents ; you should notify us -immediately [ by clicking Reply ] and delete this email. - -Nationwide monitors e-mails to ensure its systems operate -effectively and to minimise the risk of viruses. Whilst it -has taken reasonable steps to scan this email, it does not -accept liability for any virus that may be contained in it. - - -New I'd seen something (from Samba HOWTO Collection): - -Solaris -Locking Improvements -Some people have been experiencing problems with -F_SETLKW64/fcntl when running Samba on Solaris. The built-in -file locking mechanism was not scalable. Performance would -degrade to the point where processes would get into loops of -trying to lock a file. It would try a lock, then fail, then -try again. The lock attempt was failing before the grant was -occurring. So the visible manifestation of this would be a -handful of processes stealing all of the CPU, and when they -were truss-ed they would be stuck if F_SETLKW64 loops. - -Sun released patches for Solaris 2.6, 8, and 9. The patch for -Solaris 7 has not been released yet. - -The patch revision for 2.6 is 105181-34, for 8 is 108528-19 -and for 9 is 112233-04. - -After the install of these patches, it is recommended to -reconfigure and rebuild Samba. - -Thanks to Joe Meslovich for reporting this. - -As your patch level is 112233-02 you may need to update this! - -Cheers, - -Simon - -- -Original Message- -From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Sent: 09 January 2004 12:44 -To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Subject: [Samba] Error on SMB Packages - -List, - I have been having a few problems with a couple of -machines accesing my Samba server (SunOS zeusv480 5.9 -Generic_112233-02 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-480R running -Samba version 2.2.2). I have been playing with the parameters -on smb.conf for a while now (sockets, oplocks, etc) and I -couldn't improve the performance, so I decide to go for an -snoop on the network card serving samba and I'm getting a few -messages that I don't understand (see below); Anyone could -give me a hand to get this? - -0.00052 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0xa2 Name=SMB -NT_CreateX -FileName=???c Error=0 0.00022 - zeusv480 - -10.32.3.36 SMB C Code=0x24 Name=SMBlockingX -FileID=0x136d #Unlocks=0x0 #Locks=0x0 Error=0 0.00024 -10.32.3.36 - -zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x24 Name=SMBlockingX -FileID=0x136d #Unlocks=0x0 #Locks=0x3 Error=0 0.00036 -zeusv480 - -10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0x24 Name=SMBlockingX -Error=0 0.00017 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x24 -Name=SMBlockingX -FileID=0x136d #Unlocks=0x0 #Locks=0x0 Error=0 0.00023 -zeusv480 - -10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0xa2 Name=SMB NT_CreateX -FileID=0x136e Error=0 0.00030 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 -SMB C Code=0x32 -Name=SMBtrans2 -QueryFileInfo FileID=0x136e Error=0 0.00011 zeusv480 - -10.32.3.36 -SMB R Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 -Error=0 0.00025 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x4 -Name=SMBclose -FileID=0x136e Error=0 0.00017 zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 -SMB R Code=0x4 -Name=SMBclose Error=0 0.00029 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 -SMB C Code=0x32 -Name=SMBtrans2 -QueryPathInfo File=c -Error=0 0.00020 -zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 -Error=0 0.00026 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C Code=0x32 -Name=SMBtrans2 -QueryPathInfo File=c -Error=0 0.00018 -zeusv480 - 10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0x32 Name=SMBtrans2 -Error=0 0.00041 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 SMB C -Code=0xa2 Name=SMB -NT_CreateX -FileName=??pc Error=0 0.00026 - zeusv480 - -10.32.3.36 SMB R Code=0xa2 Name=SMB NT_CreateX -FileID=0x136f Error=0 0.00026 10.32.3.36 - zeusv480 -SMB C Code=0x32 -Name=SMBtrans2 -QueryFileInfo FileID=0x136f Error=0 0.00011 zeusv480 - -10.32.3.36 -SMB R
[Samba] Creation Permissions
Dear List, I'm having some problems with the creation permissions for files into one of my directories. This is the conf of the share: [name] Path = /my/path Valid users = (list of users) Public = no Writable = yes Printable = no Create mask = 775 Opclocks = false Level2oplocks = false The Server is running solaris 9 and Samba 2.2.2. The clients are running Windows XP Pro edition. The problem is each time that one of the users create a file/folder it is created with 755 instead of 775. What I'm doing wrong? Kind Regards. *** Pablo Jejcic Smartweb Senior system Administrator http://www.smartweb.rgu.ac.uk *** Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail. - Ralph Waldo Emerson *** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Anybody knows?
What is the meaning of this message in the log files: Smbd/nttrans.c: (1762) Call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented Samba Version: 2.2.2 Client Windows XP Professional Any ideas or anything that you can tell me will be really appreciated. Cheers! *** Pablo Jejcic Smartweb Senior system Administrator School of Computing - Robert Gordon University http://www.smartweb.rgu.ac.uk *** The greatest homage we can pay truth is to use it. - Ralph Waldo Emerson *** -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Slow Response
People, I have a Samba server installed on a Solaris 9 machine. The Samba Server is working as a Domain controller and a file server, both are working, but the response is quite slow. I've been playing with this parameters, but they don't seems to change anything (at least not a wild change): oplocks = True level2oplocks = False socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBU F=8192 Log Level log level = 1 read raw = yes write raw = yes max xmit = 65535 dead time = 15 enhanced browsing = yes If I check the logs, the only message that I'm receiving is: [2003/08/18 09:12:16, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:(1762) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. Could this have something to do with the low performance? Thanks in advance.- Pablo.- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
