[Samba] Upgrade from Samba 3.0.33 to 3.5.8 woes

2011-03-22 Thread Ryan Pugatch
Greetings,

I just did a major upgrade to our Samba infrastructure.

I previously had a domain controller and share running 3.0.33 (on one
box, one samba instance)

I set up a new domain controller running 3.5.8, made that the PDC for
our domain, and changed the (now former) domain controller running
3.0.33 to just be a member.  Additionally, we moved the IP from the
old DC to the new DC (and subsequently gave the former DC, now just a
member and file share a new IP)

Now I am having some strange issues.

Windows machines in our London office (which is connected via a tunnel
between some Cisco ASA's from HQ to London) can no longer see the
domain (which is at HQ) UNLESS we disable the Windows firewall on the
workstations OR add exceptions to the firewall for the PDC.  Machines
at HQ see the domain fine.  Now, the PDC has the SAME IP as the old
domain.  So it's not like the rules would need to be any different
anyway.  Frankly, I don't quite understand how this worked before -
but it did!  Did something change between 3.0.x and 3.5.x which would
cause this behavior and is there a fix?  I am hoping to not have to
run through and change all of the firewalls on all of our workstations
(especially since we can't do so via netlogon scripts etc as they
won't see the domain!)  Worth noting, our machines all have an lmhosts
file which tells them where to go for the domain, hence why we moved
the IP from the old dc to the new dc.

Second problem.. users can't access our file share (which was formerly
the domain controller, now just a member) when connected via our VPN
(a juniper ssl vpn).  The VPN drops them into the same network as if
they are in the office -- and it works fine if you are in the office.
Yet, if you come in via VPN you received no logon servers available
errors.  Mac users connecting to the file share via SMB have no
problem.  The following error is logged in smbd.log (redacted my
specific names):

 domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user
$username in domain $mydomain to Domain controller $mypdc. Error was
NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL.



Happy to provide any additional info.. I'm baffled!  All of this
worked before without problems.

Thanks,
Ryan
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Upgrade from Samba 3.0.33 to 3.5.8 woes

2011-03-22 Thread Ryan Pugatch
The new DC has a new time.  We do use LDAP.  Which SID are you
referring to?  The local SID is new on the new DC, but the domain sids
are the same.

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:23 PM,  gu...@lorenzutti.com.ar wrote:
 The same happend to me.
 But I didn't have the time to analize the problem. I solve it by changing
 the name of the server. Same ip, but new name and everything works now.

 It would be great to know if there is another workaround.

 Did you keep the sid of the pdc after the change?
 Did you use ldap?

 Bye.

 Greetings,

 I just did a major upgrade to our Samba infrastructure.

 I previously had a domain controller and share running 3.0.33 (on one
 box, one samba instance)

 I set up a new domain controller running 3.5.8, made that the PDC for
 our domain, and changed the (now former) domain controller running
 3.0.33 to just be a member.  Additionally, we moved the IP from the
 old DC to the new DC (and subsequently gave the former DC, now just a
 member and file share a new IP)

 Now I am having some strange issues.

 Windows machines in our London office (which is connected via a tunnel
 between some Cisco ASA's from HQ to London) can no longer see the
 domain (which is at HQ) UNLESS we disable the Windows firewall on the
 workstations OR add exceptions to the firewall for the PDC.  Machines
 at HQ see the domain fine.  Now, the PDC has the SAME IP as the old
 domain.  So it's not like the rules would need to be any different
 anyway.  Frankly, I don't quite understand how this worked before -
 but it did!  Did something change between 3.0.x and 3.5.x which would
 cause this behavior and is there a fix?  I am hoping to not have to
 run through and change all of the firewalls on all of our workstations
 (especially since we can't do so via netlogon scripts etc as they
 won't see the domain!)  Worth noting, our machines all have an lmhosts
 file which tells them where to go for the domain, hence why we moved
 the IP from the old dc to the new dc.

 Second problem.. users can't access our file share (which was formerly
 the domain controller, now just a member) when connected via our VPN
 (a juniper ssl vpn).  The VPN drops them into the same network as if
 they are in the office -- and it works fine if you are in the office.
 Yet, if you come in via VPN you received no logon servers available
 errors.  Mac users connecting to the file share via SMB have no
 problem.  The following error is logged in smbd.log (redacted my
 specific names):

  domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user
 $username in domain $mydomain to Domain controller $mypdc. Error was
 NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL.



 Happy to provide any additional info.. I'm baffled!  All of this
 worked before without problems.

 Thanks,
 Ryan
 --
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba




-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


[Samba] Windows password complexity dialog displays incorrect information (using crackcheck)

2008-10-14 Thread Ryan Pugatch
Hi everyone,



I am using crackcheck to enforce password complexity requirements on my 
PDC.  Windows obeys these password requirements, but the dialog box that 
pops up doesn't display the correct information.  This posting describes 
the same issue: http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2007-May/131795.html



However, I'm not trying to change the message completely -- I just want it 
to provide the correct information.



I don't think changing the local group policy will work, and I'd prefer not 
to have to push changes to local policy to each computer.



Thanks in advance for any ideas.



-Ryan
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba