RE: (fwd) amigasamba?
CL! On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 23:08, Ulf Bertilsson wrote: I look into this in a few days. Use www.birrabrothers.com/tiger/data/samba as mirror I'm on vacation and don't have the info here. Yes, now everything is fine. -- Uber Amiga rulez ;D
RE: (fwd) amigasamba?
I look into this in a few days. Use www.birrabrothers.com/tiger/data/samba as mirror I'm on vacation and don't have the info here. -- Ulf -Original Message- From: Martin Pool [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 10:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (fwd) amigasamba? Does anyone know about this? - Forwarded message from Larry Urquhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Larry Urquhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amigasamba Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 21:28:49 -0800 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.024176, version=0.10.2 Hi. I don't know if this is the right place to ask this but I have been trying to visit the web site of www.amigasamba.org for over a week and it is off line. What's up ? I have questions to ask the administrator. Cheers Larry - End forwarded message - -- Martin
RE: Failed dependencies samba-2.2.7a-1.i386.rpm
When I use the command rpm -Uvh on samba-2.2.7a-1.i386.rpm I get the message: error failed dependencies: libcrypto.so.2 is needed by samba-2.2.7a-1.i386.rpm libcups.so.2 is needed by samba-2.2.7a-1.i386.rpm libreadline.so.4 is needed by samba-2.2.7a-1.i386.rpm libssl.so.2 is needed by samba-2.2.7a-1.i386.rpm What do I need to do? Use rpmfind (web) and update the packages mentioned ? -- Ulf
RE: Samba and PPP
Hi, Ulf Bertilsson! On 19-Feb-03, you wrote: UB ppp0: UB flags=40F1UP,POINTOPOINT,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,NOARP,SANA MTU=1500 UB inet 192.168.255.254 -- 192.168.255.253 netmask UB Hardware type: PPP UB UB Use ifconfig -h for usage. UB 16.System: UB --- cut --- UB PC has IP 192.168.255.253. UB When i try to specify a 255.255.255.252 (FFFC) netmask UB for ppp0, Samba UB adds ppp0 to the list of interfaces, but the interface just UB does not pass UB broadcasts. UB What's wrong? How to solve my problem? UB UB Pavel, UB UB I had this running on my A1200 some years ago. UB UB I think you could solve this problem with simple stuff as adding an UB lmhost file spesifying all host in your lan. UB Broadcast are not in theory needed for operation. I know. Broadcasts are not the problem itself. The problem is that Samba does not bind to ppp0 at all, it completely ignores this interface. Have you tried another tcp stack ? This causes it to be impossible to connect to the Samba server from PC side. Strange, I guess nmap'ing the ip will show no open ports ? I write about it here because i think it is not Amiga-specific problem. I've tried to list through the Samba docs, and there are some notes meaning that Samba can be used on PPP links. But there are no words about the setting up the things there. I do however remeber only having PPP interface on my A1200 with serial nullmodem to an NT4.0 server. (Miami3.2, KIck 3.1, WB3.1) Are you using amitcp ? UB Are you sure your nmbd is running fine. Of couse it does. My Amiga is connected also to a LAN via CNet card. And i work perfectly in LAN. Oki. Have a look for the new 3com pcmica drivers btw. UB The old versions (on aminet) have some issues. UB UB Try get the newest gcc based ports by Olaf (2.2.5 available also), nmbd UB is more stable here. I'll try to. More info updated on the amiga samba list. I think you can call the amiga 2.2.5 for beta and not alpha anymore. Some memory fragmentation and stuff, but works quite well. Maybe this puzzle is something Chris H like to punder about ? Why should smb bind well to PPP links ? ;D -- Ulf
RE: 2.0.7-XP compability ?
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Ulf Bertilsson wrote: Can we have a trace? Problem solved. It was an alien assign pointing to another smb.conf file.. Argh.. Still useful to debug it down. -- Ulf
Input on tuning ?
http://www.birrabrothers.com/tiger/data/samba/showoff/ AmigaOS now broke the 1mb/s barrier ;D Any input on Ethereal SMB RTT values for tuning ? Doubling TCP window gave an 10-15% increase actualy. Bottleneck now is cpu peaking at 99% at ~1MB IO. FTP peak at 1.5MB/S. Have an wonderful CRC free weekend ;) 2.2.5 rocks. -- Ulf
RE: Samba and PPP
Hello!
Could anyone of you tell me, how to configure my Samba
server to work with
PPP interfaces?
I have an Amiga machine running Samba v2.0.7. And a Windoze95 PC
connected to it via null-modem cable.
The problem is: Samba ignores all non-broadcast interfaces.
So smbd and
nmbd just do not sit on ppp0 interface, so PC can't connect
to Samba. Also
smbclient can't find my PC by name (i have to specify an -I
option), because
it ignores ppp0 too.
After examining a source code, i found the following procedure:
--- cut ---
static void add_interface(struct in_addr ip, struct in_addr nmask)
{
struct interface *iface;
if (iface_find(ip)) {
DEBUG(3,(not adding duplicate interface
%s\n,inet_ntoa(ip)));
return;
}
if (ip_equal(nmask, allones_ip)) {
DEBUG(3,(not adding non-broadcast interface
%s\n,inet_ntoa(ip)));
return;
}
iface = (struct interface *)malloc(sizeof(*iface));
if (!iface) return;
ZERO_STRUCTPN(iface);
iface-ip = ip;
iface-nmask = nmask;
iface-bcast.s_addr = MKBCADDR(iface-ip.s_addr,
iface-nmask.s_addr);
DLIST_ADD(local_interfaces, iface);
DEBUG(2,(added interface ip=%s ,inet_ntoa(iface-ip)));
DEBUG(2,(bcast=%s ,inet_ntoa(iface-bcast)));
DEBUG(2,(nmask=%s\n,inet_ntoa(iface-nmask)));
}
--- cut ---
My interfaces are:
--- cut ---
16.System: ifconfig
lo0: flags=C9UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,NOARP MTU=1536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask FF00
Hardware type: Loopback
eth0:
flags=4863UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,SANA MTU=1500
inet 10.4.20.98 netmask FFFC broadcast 10.4.20.99
Hardware type: Ethernet, address: 0:80:ad:c6:be:75
ppp0:
flags=40F1UP,POINTOPOINT,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,NOARP,SANA MTU=1500
inet 192.168.255.254 -- 192.168.255.253 netmask
Hardware type: PPP
Use ifconfig -h for usage.
16.System:
--- cut ---
PC has IP 192.168.255.253.
When i try to specify a 255.255.255.252 (FFFC) netmask
for ppp0, Samba
adds ppp0 to the list of interfaces, but the interface just
does not pass
broadcasts.
What's wrong? How to solve my problem?
Pavel,
I had this running on my A1200 some years ago.
I think you could solve this problem with simple stuff as adding an
lmhost file spesifying all host in your lan.
Broadcast are not in theory needed for operation.
There is also further mechanisms such an WINS that might help you with this issue.
Using IP based resolution should also work.
Are you sure your nmbd is running fine.
The old versions (on aminet) have some issues.
Try get the newest gcc based ports by Olaf (2.2.5 available also), nmbd is more stable
here.
Best of luck Pavel.
--
Ulf
RE: 2.0.7-XP compability ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Ulf Bertilsson wrote: I wonder what this means ?: error packet at line 878 cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) eclass=1 ecode=32 You could grab the #defines from incluee/doserr.h /* Error classes */ #define ERRDOS 0x01 /* Error is from the core DOS operating system set. */ /* SMB X/Open error codes for the ERRDOS error class */ #define ERRbadshare 32 /* Share mode on file conflict with open mode */ Jerry, How can I best identify if this is in my os custiom posix wrapper, or an issue in the samba 2.0.7 core code ? What is I disable file locking all together ? My issue is basicly that any file I modify get locked. Deleting /samba/var/locks/* and restart smbd seems to solve it. My point is, that altho samba reports or think the file is locked, it _not_ looked at local level. Any input if this is a good way to trace this issue ? Network traces, debug files etc will be available as soon as I get more time on my hands. Also let me know if anybody would work on this offlist if they feel this is off topic. -- Ulf
2.0.7-XP compability ?
[2003/01/29 23:30:25, 3] smbd/process.c:(448) switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 8) [2003/01/29 23:30:25, 3] lib/util.c:(533) unix_clean_name [/amiga-samba_2.0.7_20020825.lha] [2003/01/29 23:30:25, 3] lib/util.c:(533) unix_clean_name [amiga-samba_2.0.7_20020825.lha] [2003/01/29 23:30:25, 3] lib/util.c:(533) unix_clean_name [amiga-samba_2.0.7_20020825.lha] [2003/01/29 23:30:25, 2] smbd/open.c:(790) Share violation on file (1,1,1,8,amiga-samba_2.0.7_20020825.lha,fcbopen = 0, flags = 1) = 0 [2003/01/29 23:30:25, 3] smbd/error.c:(138) error packet at line 878 cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) eclass=1 ecode=32 [2003/01/29 23:30:25, 3] smbd/process.c:(618) Transaction 383 of length 119 -- Could I view this as an issue with Samba 2.0.7, or should this work ? I wonder what this means ?: error packet at line 878 cmd=162 (SMBntcreateX) eclass=1 ecode=32 XP junk ? Any input ? Maybe try removing locking all toghether and see if it works ? -- Ulf
RE: amiga suvival (fwd) - feedback to the Samba team!
The work Olaf did would probably be of interest to anyone trying to port Samba code to non-Posix platforms, particularly small platforms such as appliance systems. VMS must have as mentioned before addresses the same issues. I.e fork() etc.. The linked libsmb with way smaler exe files looked neat. The elephant could use some diet. -- Ulf
RE: FW: amiga suvival (fwd) - feedback to the Samba team!
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Ulf Bertilsson wrote: I think the Samba dev team could use this good message in such an dark cold winterday :) How cool is it that there are Amiga computers running Samba, even PDC functionality! :) My regards to the team for their good efforts. This is a classic post. I'm saving this one :-) Thanks. cheers, jerry We're the all old school computha nuttha! ;D Both 2.0.x and 2.2.5 are now based around an nice posix wrapper using custom gcc compiler, rather than the core custom embedded compiler. (Correction Olaf ?) To make things more fun I'm actualy running it in emulated alien evil enviroment. (X86 hosted, briged/wrapped IO space, native 68k NIC drivers) Think that's it's possible to run your old dusty 14mhz 4 meg child computer as fullblown SMB server. (I din't have NIC cards some years ago and used an nullmodem connection as link) The Amiga Samba Mailinglist now consist of 298 users :) All give their best regards to the orginal developers for their time spendt on this project and not at least your hero Olaf Barthel bringing it all down to neat slik 68k code. Do anybody beat AmigaOS KB/S vs MIPS ?... VMS ? -- Ulf Some newer grow up... Who needs fork() anyway ;D
FW: amiga suvival (fwd) - feedback to the Samba team!
I think the Samba dev team could use this good message in such an dark cold winterday :) How cool is it that there are Amiga computers running Samba, even PDC functionality! :) My regards to the team for their good efforts. cc: Olaf Barthel, the Amiga OS port maintainer. -- Ulf Amiga Samba Team Hi, *** Begin of forwarded message *** Date: 11-Dec-02 15:58:18 From: el psycho diablo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: amiga suvival --- Forwarded message follows --- After i found out samba for amiga, i do 1. bring my amiga to my company 2. install samba on the amiga 3. make samba to a PDC 4. now my amiga is a Windows Server manage all NT 4 and W2K clients I m proud about the programer kaan yazici
RE: MSLinux!?!?!?
Title: MSLinux!?!?!? Do we die from an world war III nukewar or M$ crapcode in good systems in near future ? How do we patch this ? -- Ulf This message might not be written by me. Sue /dev/nul -Original Message-From: Ryan Benner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 8:23 PMTo: Esh, Andrew; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: MSLinux!?!?!? I noticed that myself earlier today. Quite interesting. Ryan -Original Message-From: Esh, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 10:20 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: MSLinux!?!?!? Microsoft to offer Linux software? In a major strategy shift, Microsoft Corp. will introduce software based on the Linux open source operating system in 2004 ... (Copyrighted article, or I'd post it. Here's a link: ) http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/biztech/12/10/meta.linux.reut/index.html --- Andrew C. Esh mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Adaptec, Inc. 2905 Northwest Blvd., Suite 20 763-557-9005 (main) Plymouth, MN 55441-2644 USA 763-551-6418 (direct)
RE: A registry editor taking shape ...
Hi, A registry editor, editreg, is slowly taking shape in Samba-head. Goodie ;) The goal is to be able to do things like: - delete keys and values - add keys and values - change keys and values - Change the SIDS/SecDescs applied to keys. - write out the changes tree - create a tree from scratch What would be useful is some thoughts on how the interface should be constructed, as in command-line, or a .reg file of commands, etc. Commandline rocks ;) Remeber that some of us still uses alien os with no real gui. Fun project, maybe I finaly could use linux on my portable here to administrate my wintel bigboxes. -- Ulf
RE: First draft libsmbclient test program
Could we avoid the use of fork() ? :) By script useage I could enjoy small separte tools with clean output for web interface integration/GUI kit. Use plain txt files for scripting events or task to run as argument ? -- Ulf -Original Message- From: Fabien Chevalier [mailto:fchevali;supelec-rennes.fr] Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 11:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: First draft libsmbclient test program Hello, I wrote this afternoon this small test program. It does not do all what i would have liked, but it does enough to begin to compare libsmbclient releases. What it tests: -listing workgroups -listing computers -listing shares With an automated way What it does not yet: -all what remains I will go on and implement all what is missing if you feel it will be useful for you. Attached is the output generated by various libsmbclient releases + the current program sources. The first regression is between 2.2.2 and 2.2.3 The second is somewhere i don't know, but is there in 3.0alpha20 Cheers. Fabien. PS: I can make it to dlopen libsmbclient if you need it ...but I use only linux and i have no idea if it will work elsewhere. PS(2): What do you mean, Andrew, by making it scriptable ? -- Samba v2.2.1 [fabien@tux libsmb]$ lsmbctest Now running test smbc_init... Calling int smbc_init(mbc_get_auth_data_fn, int debug=0) Result : 0 Test smbc_init OK Now running test workgroups listing... Calling int smbc_opendir(const char *durl=smb://) Authentification required for SERVER CUTBIDISH SHARE IPC$ in WORKGROUP WORKGROUP. Returning Result : 11024, errno=0[Success] Calling int smbc_readdir(int dh=11024) Result : 0x400a6da0, errno=0[Success] Found entry type 1, named MDKGROUP Calling int smbc_readdir(int dh=11024) Result : 0x400a6da0, errno=0[Success] Found entry type 1, named REZ Calling int smbc_readdir(int dh=11024) Result : 0x400a6da0, errno=0[Success] Found entry type 1, named WORKGROUP Calling int smbc_readdir(int dh=11024) Result : (nil), errno=0[Success] Test workgroups listing OK Now running test smbc_closedir... Calling int smbc_closedir(int dh=11024) Result : 0, errno=0[Success] Test smbc_closedir OK Now running test machines in workgroup listing... Calling int smbc_opendir(const char *durl=smb://MDKGROUP) Authentification required for SERVER SHADOW SHARE IPC$ in WORKGROUP WORKGROUP. Returning Result : 11024, errno=0[Success] Calling int smbc_readdir(int dh=11024) Result : 0x400a6da0, errno=0[Success] Found entry type 2, named SHADOW Calling int smbc_readdir(int dh=11024) Result : (nil), errno=0[Success] Test machines in workgroup listing OK Calling int smbc_closedir(int dh=11024) Result : 0, errno=0[Success] Now running test shares on a machine listing... Calling int smbc_opendir(const char *durl=smb://SHADOW) Authentification required for SERVER SHADOW SHARE IPC$ in WORKGROUP WORKGROUP. Returning Result : 11024, errno=0[Success] Calling int smbc_readdir(int dh=11024) Result : 0x400a6da0, errno=0[Success] Found entry type 6, named IPC$ Calling int smbc_readdir(int dh=11024) Result : 0x400a6da0, errno=0[Success] Found entry type 3, named ADMIN$ Calling int smbc_readdir(int dh=11024) Result : (nil), errno=0[Success] Test shares on a machine listing OK Calling int smbc_closedir(int dh=11024) Result : 0, errno=0[Success] Test summary: smbc_init Ok smbc_closedir Ok workgroups listing Ok machines in workgroup listing Ok shares on a machine listing Ok -- Samba v2.2.2 [fabien@tux libsmb]$ lsmbctest Now running test smbc_init... Calling int smbc_init(mbc_get_auth_data_fn, int debug=0) Result : 0 Test smbc_init OK Now running test workgroups listing... Calling int smbc_opendir(const char *durl=smb://) Authentification required for SERVER CUTBIDISH SHARE IPC$ in WORKGROUP WORKGROUP. Returning Result : 11024, errno=0[Success] Calling int smbc_readdir(int dh=11024) Result : 0x400a83e0, errno=0[Success] Found entry type 1, named MDKGROUP Calling int smbc_readdir(int dh=11024) Result : 0x400a83e0, errno=0[Success] Found entry type 1, named REZ Calling int smbc_readdir(int dh=11024) Result : 0x400a83e0, errno=0[Success] Found entry type 1, named WORKGROUP Calling int smbc_readdir(int dh=11024) Result : (nil), errno=0[Success] Test workgroups listing OK Now running test smbc_closedir... Calling int smbc_closedir(int dh=11024) Result : 0, errno=0[Success] Test smbc_closedir OK Now running test machines in workgroup listing... Calling int smbc_opendir(const char *durl=smb://MDKGROUP) Authentification required for SERVER SHADOW SHARE IPC$ in WORKGROUP WORKGROUP. Returning Result : 11024, errno=0[Success] Calling int smbc_readdir(int dh=11024) Result : 0x400a83e0, errno=0[Success] Found entry type 2,
rerun autoconf ?
... creating ./config.status creating include/stamp-h creating Makefile creating script/findsmb creating include/config.h [root@box source]# make WARNING: you need to rerun autoconf -! Using FLAGS = -O -Iinclude -I./include -I./ubiqx -I./smbwrapper -I. -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. ... So.. Correct would be to ./configure then autoconf, then make - install ? Please bear with my somewhat novice *nix experience :) (Source synced with CVS, basic RH 7.2) -- Ulf
RE: 32 security group limitation ?
Is there, was there ever such a limith ? I was called by an larger ISP here. Samba server Unix only handles 32 security groups he claimed. Anyone sheer some lights ? Possibly that Linux allows a user to be in a max of 32 groups? Do you have more info? Not realy. Just that it won't work if user is memeber of more than 32 groups. I just thought I chack if there was some protocol limitation. Now it seems like an linux limitation. -- Ulf
RE: Very bad performance when copying large files from windows to samba-share
Maybe someone could take a look at this ? On Tue, 25 Jun 2002 22:13:34 +0200 Lars Heineken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let me summarize what we have: -Win98 doing a write request to the last byte of the file to be copied -My machine creates a tempfile of that size and if that takes too long we get a timeout - My questions: What is samba doing if strict allocate is set to no, is it ignoring the write request ? Does it pass the write request on to the system, and the kernel creates the tempfile ? What can I do to check who's fault the creation of the tempfile is ? Do samba always create this temp file and what is it contence ?
RE: (no subject)
On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 11:42, Ulf Bertilsson wrote: An dummy desktop.ini and some generic cached fileid to show fancy icons would be nice, but brake stuff. I would not make that. I know, it don't make sence but the idea would provide great preformance. Like, my os don't multiuser filesystem (builtin that is) Why should we waste IO to try emulate unix rights when we could just give an mask ? NT also do this crazy file IO, why not just feed it some generic stuff to keep it happy. My OS don't support half of it's operands anyway. Not to mention the file examination explorer do. Isn't the .icon stuff stured in the PX exe file resource ? (Ages size I played with it) Then my os allow many strange filenames, how should that be dealt with ? We check if the filename is OK (do not have invalid chracters) yet, if so we mangle it, but this a O(n) operation. What would the correct way be here. Bear in mind that there is more none POSIX platforms out there. An basic open() on the file first for sanity check ? -- Ulf
RE: CIFS Load Generator source available ...
Anybody with an tarball laying around ? :) -Original Message- From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CIFS Load Generator source available ... CIFS Load Generator Developed for SNIA CIFS Benchmarking Working Group Richard Sharpe Panasas, Inc Samba Team 11-Jun-2002 INTRO This is a short document on how to use the code and where it came from. BACKGROUND This code has been extracted from Samba's smbtorture utility. It is now up on the samba.org site in CVS and can be checked out with: cvs co cifs-load-gen RUNNING IT To run the code, simply execute ./bin/cifs_bm after having configured and made the code. ./bin/cifs_bm -Uuser%pass -Wworkgroup -c client-file [-N clients] \ [-Iip] [-b num] //server-or-ip/share NOTE. You need to know the max size of WriteX or ReadXs in the client file, as cifs_bm defaults to 256*1024. Use a flag of '-b num' for the block size you want. For example, '-b 1024' will give you a buffer of 1024*1024 bytes. THE CLIENT FILE The client file is essentially the same as smbtorture uses. There are a number of them in the clients directory. Each consists of a series of lines, each with either an operation to perform on the server, or one of a number of special keywords. The keywords are: BM_SETUP: Provides a series of setup operations. Currently, the driver does noting with this command, except set an internal variable called state to BM_SETUP. No measurements are taken during this phase. BM_WARMUP: Provides a series of warmup operations. Currently, the driver does nothing with this command, except set an internal variable called state to BM_WARMUP. No measurements are taken during this phase. BM_MEASURE: Provides a series of operations that will be measured. RECONNECT: Disconnect from the server and reconnect to it. SYNC n: Wait for up to n seconds for the master to say go. It waits for all the clients to SYNC. There are about 14 commands that are implemented. Look at the collection of .txt files to get an idea of what they are ... Some of the bit fields are important. For example, on an: NTCreateX file flag1 flag2 FID command, flag2 needs the 0x01 bit set if it is to ignore failures due to files already existing. An additional command is: Lock file etc ... Check the code for params for now. PROBLEMS There are still many problems. 1. It would be nice if the child/client processes would synchronise each phase with each other. A Sync command is now implemented. 2. FIND NEXT is not really implemented. This needs doing. 3. More operation types are needed. Lock is now implemented. However, see below. 4. Some way to generate a load file would be nice. 5. There is no way to specifiy a schedule of users and passwords to use to log onto the server. 6. NetBench specifies its driver file as a series of parts, each part containing a series of commands. It then randomizes the order of the parts. It would require a rewrite of cifs_bm to achieve this. 7. There is no way yet to spread the load over a series of interfaces. 8. There is no way to separate out connection to server, logging in and connection to the share. They are all one event. Thus we cannot measure the server's ability to handle logons (SessSetupX), connections (probing its ability to fork or create threads), and connecting to shares (TCON etc). This calls for commands like: Tcon share, Tdis share, etc. 9. The latency info needs to be kept in long longs, and the read and write throughput needs to be cleaned up. 10. It would be nice to have an embedded programming language, like TCL or ... 11. It has been suggested by a guy from Sun that the current model of one process per client might be affected by scheduler latencies. In addition if we want to simulate really large numbers of clients, we might need to move to a multi-threaded client. Regards - Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: CIFS Load Generator source available ...
Thanks :) I guess I'm lazy. But I'm sick in my bed here so.. -Original Message- From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:35 PM To: Ulf Bertilsson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CIFS Load Generator source available ... On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Ulf Bertilsson wrote: Anybody with an tarball laying around ? :) I have one. I can mail it to you soon, if you would like. Regards - Richard Sharpe, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Re: Very bad performance when copying large files from windows to samba-share
Title: RE: Re: Very bad performance when copying large files from windows to samba-share Any good urls to get better understanding of this ? :) -Original Message-From: Esh, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 5:01 PMTo: 'Lars Heineken'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: Re: Very bad performance when copying large files from windows to samba-share Yes, that's normal. the NBSS messages are the continuation data that does not fit into the first SMB Write packet. If you total their sizes, subtracting header information, the result will be equal to the Write Count stated in the SMB WriteRaw request which is sent in the beginning. -Original Message- From: Lars Heineken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 7:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Re: Very bad performance when copying large files from windows to samba-share Hi ! Sorry for being late. I did the ethereal-capturing. What looks very strange on first sight: About 6 of 10 packest are described as: NBSS Continuation Message. Sometimes there are 6 of them one after another. Is this normal ? Regards, Lars Heineken.
RE: Foreign environment builds...
Just to let you know I'm still working on a way to build distribution packages that are targeted different from the actual system they are being built on. Anybody got any fork() ? ;) -- Ulf Strugling with his platforms port... Who needs memory protection anyway.. =D
FW: [AmigaSamba] Re: copying 2Gb files
Any comments in proper way to handle this. In the next release of Amiga OS, OS will have hardcoded not to support larger files than 2G. Any best practice in god way to handle this with SMB ? -- On 21-Mai-02, Ulf Bertilsson wrote: [..] But back to current version of Amiga Samba, is it hardcoded to 2G ? What happends if you try ? Some sanity/error reporting API here ? I have no idea what is going to happen if you try it. Judging by how the SMB protocol evolved, my best guess is that the results won't be pretty and you shouldn't try this in your own home or a network in which you could be held liable for the consequences.
Samba-Tivoli integration ?
Hi, We seems to for some devine rason to use Tivoli for our management system. The included event/system config set where crap, and I guess I have to edit the policy files to be able to get any useful info. While I'm learning to make/edit this sets, I was pondering for some basic syslog/smbd.log parser. Do there exit such a thing ? -- Ulf
RE: [?????.]??? ?????
Hmmn, methinks we need a better spam filter... Let me know if you find a solution that is bullet prof :-) -- Ulf
