[Samba] Quoting style
Hi Kurt, you have been very active on the list lately and I really appreciate this. Still I am a little annoyed by the quoting style on the list and picked you as the most prominent example Am Donnerstag, 8. Mai 2003 15:15 schrieb Kurt Pfeifle: -- http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=sambam=105239987112360w=2 There are a lot examples like this from different posters. So no personal ofense please. The samba list is very high volume and it would be nice if it was possible to quickly scan mails for interesting content. With only a few lines of new content burried under loads of quotes, quoted quotes and so on this becomes impossible. So please be a little sensible in what you quote and life will be a lot easier for all of us. Thanks Uli -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Session and open files
Am Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2003 13:32 schrieb Iwan Davies: Hi, Hi I'm using redhat 9 I've got samba working and I have users onj the system accessing the shares, Can anyone recomend a programme that can tell me whch users have got files open on my samba box lsof (http://freshmeat.net/projects/lsof/) Thanks Welcome -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] security = problems
Am Don, 2003-04-03 um 20.49 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: password server = * And by the way, try sticking your PDC's IP in the password server line. Contrary to the documentation I have had trouble at least at join with a * as password server in smb.conf. Uli signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Samba 3.0 won't join Samba-TNG domain
Am Mit, 2003-04-02 um 18.36 schrieb Elrond: On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 03:38:23PM +0200, Uli Luckas wrote: I have sent you some patch for TNG to make it fool them. Let's see. ;-) Elrond Hi Elrond, thaks for the quick response and the patch. It was the first of three steps in the right direction. Samba 3.0 and TNG disagree at least in two more places about the name of pipes. After I 'fixed' lsarpc, samr and netlogon, to identify as 'lsass', 3.0 joind flawlessly to the domain. Am Don, 2003-04-03 um 01.23 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: As it joins a 3.0 and HEAD, NT4, Wink2k and Win2k3 domain correctly, this really could be classed as a TNG bug Andrews argument convinced me, that 3.0's idea of pipe names is also Microsoft's way. Is there any chance to get the pipe names synchronized to Micro$oft and samba 3.0/Head in TNG's CVS? Thanks a lot Uli signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] security = problems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2. edited the smb.conf file [global] remote browse sync = 40.1.142.11 40.25.17.9 40.25.12.26 40.1.129.224 40.1.129.225 remote announce = 40.1.142.11 40.25.17.9 40.25.12.26 40.1.129.224 40.1.129.225 wins proxy = yes dns proxy = yes Are the above options really what you want? Try to leave them out and if you have a wins server add: wins server = wins server ip address You only need the remote stuff if you are on a WAN. If you are this would have been nice to know ;-) If you are on a WAN make sure the above remote-IPs have really been elected as browsers in the remote network. And no, you don't need winbind if you already have unix users (or NIS users). Uli -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] security = problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2003 21:19 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: We are not using a WAN for the Samba connections, so thank you, I will take those setting out of the file. Why do I need to add the users to the smbpasswd file? You should not need to. Try and see if things go better after the remote and proxy keywords are removed. And make sure to set a wins server if and only if other servers and workstations are using it too. Uli -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+jJ9jN0tc9u1WyP0RAicoAKCQLn/Q964xIUfmECNC9fC3nYln6gCgnGMS POLG8GlKsBIJ+I5ddLjQMac= =DXhi -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3.0 won't join Samba-TNG domain
Hi, I posted this problem before in more detail (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=sambam=104756899022766w=2) but received no response. At the current state of Smaba 3.0 and Samba-TNG these two seem to be incomaptible. Samba 3.0 can't join a TNG controlled domain. I think this should affect a lot of installations as TNG as a controller and stable as file/printserver seem to be a common setup. Now I know, neither 3.0 nor TNG are stable but I would like to see the problem at least recognized so I can keep on hoping I will be able to update my fileservers to 3.0 one day :) Please give some kind of notice to this problem. It's ok if you just tell me I am too stupid and it works at other places. Thanks Uli -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] WINS on Samba
Am Die, 2003-04-01 um 16.29 schrieb Marco Calabi - T Plan S.r.l.: Dear Sirs, i'm trying to set up my samba server as WINS server in /etc/lmhosts i've defined: Most likely you won't need a lmhosts if you have wins working properly. In the tcp/ip setting, under wins server, i put the samba server address 192.168.1.1 Configure all servers to use this wins server EXCEPT the wins server itself! This is on 192.168.1.1 you have wins support = yes and no wins server entry. On all other machines samba and NT/2k you configure wins server = 192.168.1.1 (in smb.conf or the Windows network setup) Regards Uli -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 3.0 won't join TNG domain
Hi, I have a TNG-controlled domain which works fine with Win2k and samba 2.2.7 workstations. Now when I try to join a samba 3.0 workstation to this domain doing: net rpc join -U abakus\\root it fails. Setting the log level to 10 I get a lot of debug messages on the console including: ... [2003/03/13 15:49:43, 4] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:check_bind_response(1075) bind_rpc_pipe: pipe_name \PIPE\lsass != expected pipe \PIPE\lsarpcd. oh well! [2003/03/13 15:49:43, 2] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:rpc_pipe_bind(1243) rpc_pipe_bind: check_bind_response failed. ... could not initialise lsa pipe could not obtain sid for domain This seems as if 3.0 and TNG have different ideas of what the pipe should be called and I don't know who's fault this is. Any comments on this from the samba or tng developers would be welcome. Thanks Uli -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
AW: [Samba] Samba server in a failover environment
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Oktay Akbal wrote: On Wed, 12 Feb 2003, Hsu, Cheng (Consultant) wrote: But my experiment shows that I MUST explicitly join the NT domain in order for everything to work. Just a guess: Make sure that the server do not only have the same smb.conf, but also the same SID (MACHINE.SID or whatever setup of samba you use) This will not be enough in the long run... The SID is what identifies the machine all right. But on join your the machine registers a (random) password with the DC. Now if you join the second server with the same name/SID the DC will update the password to the 2nd machine's idea of what it should be and the 1st machine can't log into the domain any more :-( And it is worse... You could probably (r)sync smb.conf, MACHINE.SID plus the domain password (secrets.tdb?) between the two servers and things would work for a while. But you need to do this on a regular basis as the password is updated to a new random password every now and then (default once a week?) and the secondary server would be out of sync. Just as an suggestion to the samba team ... a hook like machine pwd update script = sync_secrets.sh in smb.conf would come in handy. Hope I was of any help Uli -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
