[Samba] Changed network card, now can only access by IP--Can't find hostname
Windows 2000 FreeBSD 6.2 Samba 3.0.28 Any hints or ideas? Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Changed network card, now can only access by IP--Can't find hostname
At 13:43 3/8/2008, Lukasz Szybalski wrote: Read this: http://lucasmanual.com/mywiki/SambaDomainController#head-8ae23b786749b 4d46ef0e9ed22148e63eeab95e7 On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:33 PM, W. D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Windows 2000 FreeBSD 6.2 Samba 3.0.28 Any hints or ideas? Thanks. I didn't see anything that specifically relates to my situation. I've just changed out the network card and now the hostname won't show up on the network. I wrote an install procedure on how to install Samba on FreeBSD http://www.us-webmasters.com/FreeBSD/Install/Samba/, so I am looking for more detailed diagnostics or explantions. Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Changed network card, now can only access by IP--Can't find hostname
At 13:43 3/8/2008, Lukasz Szybalski wrote: Read this: http://lucasmanual.com/mywiki/SambaDomainController#head-8ae23b786749b 4d46ef0e9ed22148e63eeab95e7 On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:33 PM, W. D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Windows 2000 FreeBSD 6.2 Samba 3.0.28 Any hints or ideas? Thanks. I didn't see anything that specifically relates to my situation. I've just changed out the network card and now the hostname won't show up on the network. I wrote an install procedure on how to install Samba on FreeBSD http://www.us-webmasters.com/FreeBSD/Install/Samba/, so I am looking for more detailed diagnostics or explantions. Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: Remote Code Execution...
At 09:50 12/12/2007, Remko Lodder wrote: W. D. wrote: At 02:01 12/12/2007, Remko Lodder wrote: W. D. wrote: ...Vulnerability - CVE-2007-6015 http://www.freshports.org/net/samba3/ *samba3 3.0.26a_2,1* net http://www.freshports.org/net/ http://www.freshports.org/faq.php#watchlistcount =220 http://www.freshports.org/search.php?stype=depends_allmethod=matchquery=net/samba3 FORBIDDEN: Remote Code Execution Vulnerability - CVE-2007-6015 IGNORE: is forbidden: Remote Code Execution Vulnerability - CVE-2007-6015 11 Dec 2007 22:39:55 *3.0.26a_2,1* remko mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.freshports.org/search.php?stype=committermethod=exactquery=remko Make Samba forbidden till Timur had the time to upgrade this, because samba appears to be vulnerable to remote code execution which could harm our users. This will be removed after we have a safe version to which we can upgrade. Hat: secteam Discussed with and requested by:timur Dang! When will this be fixed? Soon, there are patches available, we just need to make sure that it doesn't bite anything while we are in a ports-slush, hence the FORBIDDEN part. Best regards, Remko Hours? Days? Weeks? The freebsd port will be up to date as soon as possible, there are fixes available already on the Samba websites.. Best regards, remko Well, it's been 2 days now. When will the code be updated in the FreeBSD ports? The version on the Samba website is 3.0.28. (http://www.Samba.org/) Why is the FreeBSD ports version stuck at 3.0.26a_2,1? If there are fixes available already on the Samba websites, why can't they be integrated into the ports? I neet to get a fileserver going right away. I would like to use Samba. Perhaps I should just load Windows on it? It seems to me that leaving a port broken like this is very unprofessional. I would expect more from the folks maintaing FreeBSD. When is it going to be fixed? Does soon mean this century? This year? When? Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: Remote Code Execution...
At 02:01 12/12/2007, Remko Lodder wrote: W. D. wrote: ...Vulnerability - CVE-2007-6015 http://www.freshports.org/net/samba3/ *samba3 3.0.26a_2,1* net http://www.freshports.org/net/ http://www.freshports.org/faq.php#watchlistcount =220 http://www.freshports.org/search.php?stype=depends_allmethod=matchquery=net/samba3 FORBIDDEN: Remote Code Execution Vulnerability - CVE-2007-6015 IGNORE: is forbidden: Remote Code Execution Vulnerability - CVE-2007-6015 11 Dec 2007 22:39:55 *3.0.26a_2,1* remko mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.freshports.org/search.php?stype=committermethod=exactquery=remko Make Samba forbidden till Timur had the time to upgrade this, because samba appears to be vulnerable to remote code execution which could harm our users. This will be removed after we have a safe version to which we can upgrade. Hat: secteam Discussed with and requested by:timur Dang! When will this be fixed? Soon, there are patches available, we just need to make sure that it doesn't bite anything while we are in a ports-slush, hence the FORBIDDEN part. Best regards, Remko Hours? Days? Weeks? Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Yikes! FreeBSD samba-3.0.26a_2, 1 is forbidden: Remote Code Execution...
...Vulnerability - CVE-2007-6015 http://www.freshports.org/net/samba3/ samba3 3.0.26a_2,1 http://www.freshports.org/net/nethttp://www.freshports.org/faq.php#watchlistcount http://www.freshports.org/search.php?stype=depends_allmethod=matchquery=net/samba3=220 FORBIDDEN: Remote Code Execution Vulnerability - CVE-2007-6015 IGNORE: is forbidden: Remote Code Execution Vulnerability - CVE-2007-6015 11 Dec 2007 22:39:55 3.0.26a_2,1 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]remkohttp://www.freshports.org/search.php?stype=committermethod=exactquery=remko Make Samba forbidden till Timur had the time to upgrade this, because samba appears to be vulnerable to remote code execution which could harm our users. This will be removed after we have a safe version to which we can upgrade. Hat:secteam Discussed with and requested by:timur Dang! When will this be fixed? Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] FreeBSD and subversion
At 06:48 10/31/2004, Ilia Chipitsine wrote: Dear Sirs! can anyone tell me how to compile subversion on FreeBSD ? I just want to checkout samba-4, but subversion totally refuses to compile. Cheers, Ilia Chipitsine How familiar are you with FreeBSD? Here are some tips about FreeBSD and Samba: http://www.US-Webmasters.com/FreeBSD/Install/Samba/ http://www.US-Webmasters.com/FreeBSD/Tips-Hints-Tricks/make-install-fails-dies-quits/ Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Can't copy/move old files?
Hi Folks, I am trying to move some old, archived Win 98 folders to my new Samba 3.0.7,1 FreeBSD file server. In the process of moving one folder, a sharing violation popped up. I Googled around and nothing similar showed up. Here are 3 of the files that wouldn't move: MSVCRT.DLL 267,536 07-26-96 12:19:22 R OLEAUT32.DLL 491,792 10-15-96 10:40:38 R COMCTL32.DLL 379,152 10-15-96 10:40:38 R Other read-only files copy just fine. Is there some problem with system DLLs not copying? I was able to copy each of these file individually, but to do that I had to get to the FreeBSD command line, delete the zero-byte file, then again do the copy or move. Any ideas about what is going on here? Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba public directory on FreeBSD
What is recommended for a public, 'free-for-all', anyone can read or write directory on FreeBSD? What are the reasons for preferring one place over another? Would these work? /usr/local/share/sambapublic/ /usr/share/sambapublic/ /home/sambapublic/ Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Samba public directory on FreeBSD
At 13:20 9/23/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is recommended for a public, 'free-for-all', anyone can read or write directory on FreeBSD? What are the reasons for preferring one place over another? Would these work? /usr/local/share/sambapublic/ /usr/share/sambapublic/ /home/sambapublic/ I recommend a separate partition, so that when it eventually gets filled up -- and these things always do -- your system will not be adversly affected. You can mount the partition wherever you want. In your three examples, sambapublic could be a file system mounted on /usr/local/share, /usr/share, or /home. Thanks for the info. I just wanted to stick with the FreeBSD standard if there was one. How can I add a new partition? Can that be done after the OS and data are on the drive? What program? What would it be called? What we are talking about here is the OS view. To the Windows user what counts is the share name. On server fattoad, any one of these directories could be shared out as pub (or whatever name you like). The windows users will not see the OS pathname. Understood. That's a neato feature of Samba. Gary Dunn Honolulu -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Re: Samba public directory on FreeBSD
At 14:26 9/23/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote: At 13:20 9/23/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is recommended for a public, 'free-for-all', anyone can read or write directory on FreeBSD? What are the reasons for preferring one place over another? Would these work? /usr/local/share/sambapublic/ /usr/share/sambapublic/ /home/sambapublic/ I recommend a separate partition, so that when it eventually gets filled up -- and these things always do -- your system will not be adversly affected. You can mount the partition wherever you want. In your three examples, sambapublic could be a file system mounted on /usr/local/share, /usr/share, or /home. Thanks for the info. I just wanted to stick with the FreeBSD standard if there was one. How can I add a new partition? Can that be done after the OS and data are on the drive? What program? What would it be called? Not practical unless you install an additional hard drive. Sticking with the drive you have, you would need to backup your data and reinstall FreeBSD from scratch. The extra partition would be created using the Disklable Editor, a sibling to / and /usr and /var and /home. That may be more work than you want to do right now. Yes, now that I've got the OS and programs loaded. In that case, if you want to try it out, use either the home partition or the var partition. We could probably spark a lively debate here as to which is better :-) Bottom line: go ahead and set up samba, to learn how it works. If you want to use it in production (serious, bullit-proof) create that special partition. Gary Dunn Honolulu Thanks for the info. I looked into this a little closer. In 'FreeBSD Unleashed', on page 38 it says: /home This is where the users' home directories are located. It is often located under the /usr partition. If you are going to have a lot of users, and you expect them to have a lot of files, you might want to put /home on its own partition, or possibly even give /home an entire disk. In 'The Complete FreeBSD' (4th edition), on page 70: Use the rest of the space on disk for a /home file system, as long as it's possible to back it up on a single tape. Otherwise, make multiple file systems. /home is the normal directory for user files. In the online handbook, http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-steps.html, Table 2-2: /usr Rest of disk All your other files will typically be stored in /usr and its subdirectories. Alrighty, then. I am confused. On the 3 boxes that I just installed FreeBSD 4.9 on, none of them even have a /home or a /usr/home directory. So, there certainly isn't a /home partition. Is /home created as its own slice in 5.x? These boxes have 80 GB hard drives and have the majority of that capacity contained in /usr. Based on all this advice and research, I think I will create a new directory under /usr called /home. Under this, I'll create /samba/public (full path: /usr/home/samba/public). Any objections, or comments? Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Samba Configuration Options for small 2-3 person office?
At 07:42 9/20/2004, Peter Risdon wrote: W. D. wrote: After 'make install', this appears: l samba configuration options qk x x x Please select desired options: x x lqqk x x x [ ] syslog With syslog support x x x x [ ] ssl With ssl supportx x x x [ ] ldap With LDAP2 support x x x x [ ] nocups Without CUPSx x x x [ ] acl With ACL supportx x x x [ ] utmp With UTMP support x x x x [ ] msdfsWith MSDFS support x x x x [ ] quotaWith Quota support x x x x [ ] recycle With Recycle Binx x A lot of users of Windows rely on having a recycle bin. I've known some even use it as a form of storage, for some bizarre reason. It's a bad one to bite you from behind if a user asks how they can undelete one of their files, so perhaps consider enabling this. Thanks! Will do. Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] RE: Samba 'make install' chokes on textproc/expat2 now openldap - FreeBSD
At 23:47 9/19/2004, W. D. wrote: At 14:24 9/19/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote: Personally, unless one has great need not to, I highly recommend upgrading to samba3 to start with. The perfomance gains alone I found well worth it. Plus if you plan to integrate into a network with 2k/XP/2K3, it will greatly improve compatibility. OK. I tried to install samba 3.0.7,1. Got the same error: === textproc/expat2 is already installed - perhaps an older version? If so, you may wish to `make deinstall' and install this port again by `make reinstall' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of textproc/expat2 without deleting it first, set the variable FORCE_PKG_REGISTER in your environment or the make install command line. === So, I went to: /usr/ports/textproc/expat2/ and entered: 'make deinstall' then entered: 'make reinstall' That seemed to work. So I went back to: /usr/ports/net/samba3/ and again entered: 'make install' Got another error: ~~ === samba-3.0.7,1 depends on shared library: ldap-2.2.7 - not found ===Verifying install for ldap-2.2.7 in /usr/ports/net/openldap22-client = You can build openldap-client-2.2.15 with the following options: WITH_SASL with (Cyrus) SASL2 support = Dependency warning: used OpenSSL version contains known vulerabilities Please update or define either WITH_OPENSSL_BASE or WITH_OPENSSL_PORT *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/prts/net/openldap22-client. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/samba3. ~~ OK. I Googled for this problem with all sorts of variations of keywords, and nothing showed that would point me in the right direction. What is the simple way to get past this and install Samba Just before the first *** Error code 1 is a hint where something was wrong. OpenLDAP never got compiled. The reason it didn't was because OpenSSL wasn't installed. I finally figured this out by doing: 'pkg_info'. My understanding is that the way that FreeBSD is designed, this isn't supposed to happen. Rather, if a dependency doesn't exist, it will automatically be built. Does this mean that the OpenLDAP port for FreeBSD needs tweaking? In any case, I went to: /usr/ports/security/openssl/ and did a 'make install'. That worked, so I went back to /usr/ports/net/samba3/ did a 'make install' and it worked this time. Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba Configuration Options for small 2-3 person office?
After 'make install', this appears: l samba configuration options qk x x x Please select desired options: x x lqqk x x x [ ] syslog With syslog support x x x x [ ] ssl With ssl supportx x x x [ ] ldap With LDAP2 support x x x x [ ] nocups Without CUPSx x x x [ ] acl With ACL supportx x x x [ ] utmp With UTMP support x x x x [ ] msdfsWith MSDFS support x x x x [ ] quotaWith Quota support x x x x [ ] recycle With Recycle Binx x x x [ ] auditWith Audit x x x x [ ] winbind With Winbindx x x x [ ] wbauth With Winbind Auth Challenge x x x mqqj x tqqu x[ OK ] Cancel x mqqj Which should be checked? Thanks for your help!!! Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Re: Samba Configuration Options for small 2-3 person office?
At 08:11 9/19/2004, Matthew Seaman wrote: Re Samba Configuration Options.emsfile://D:\Programs\Eudora\attach\Re Samba Configuration Options.ems 0880.0002 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 02:28:22AM -0500, W. D. wrote: After 'make install', this appears: l samba configuration options qk x x x Please select desired options: x x lqqk x x x [ ] syslog With syslog support x x x x [ ] ssl With ssl supportx x x x [ ] ldap With LDAP2 support x x x x [ ] nocups Without CUPSx x x x [ ] acl With ACL supportx x x x [ ] utmp With UTMP support x x x x [ ] msdfsWith MSDFS support x x x x [ ] quotaWith Quota support x x x x [ ] recycle With Recycle Binx x x x [ ] auditWith Audit x x x x [ ] winbind With Winbindx x x x [ ] wbauth With Winbind Auth Challenge x x x mqqj x tqqu x[ OK ] Cancel x mqqj Which should be checked? The answer to that depends very much on your environment and what you are trying to do with Samba. However, the rules of thumb are: * If you don't know what an option does leave it on the default setting. * Don't turn on anything unless you actually need that functionality. All of those options switch on or off corresponding optional parts of the Samba suite -- refer to the documentation supplied with the Samba sources and on the http://www.samba.org/ website to find out what they all do and to if you need them. Be prepared to iterate through re-building the port a few times until you get the settings right -- use the command 'make configure' to change the settings, as you won't automatically get that pop-up again once you've been through it once. Cheers, Matthew OK, I'm gonna leave them all blank. ;^) Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Samba 'make install' chokes on textproc/expat2
Can't get Samba 2.2.11 to install. Has anyone encountered a problem with textproc/expat2? Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] RE: Samba 'make install' chokes on textproc/expat2 now openldap
At 14:24 9/19/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote: Personally, unless one has great need not to, I highly recommend upgrading to samba3 to start with. The perfomance gains alone I found well worth it. Plus if you plan to integrate into a network with 2k/XP/2K3, it will greatly improve compatibility. OK. I tried to install samba 3.0.7,1. Got the same error: === textproc/expat2 is already installed - perhaps an older version? If so, you may wish to `make deinstall' and install this port again by `make reinstall' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of textproc/expat2 without deleting it first, set the variable FORCE_PKG_REGISTER in your environment or the make install command line. === So, I went to: /usr/ports/textproc/expat2/ and entered: 'make deinstall' then entered: 'make reinstall' That seemed to work. So I went back to: /usr/ports/net/samba3/ and again entered: 'make install' Got another error: ~~ === samba-3.0.7,1 depends on shared library: ldap-2.2.7 - not found ===Verifying install for ldap-2.2.7 in /usr/ports/net/openldap22-client = You can build openldap-client-2.2.15 with the following options: WITH_SASL with (Cyrus) SASL2 support = Dependency warning: used OpenSSL version contains known vulerabilities Please update or define either WITH_OPENSSL_BASE or WITH_OPENSSL_PORT *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/prts/net/openldap22-client. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/samba3. ~~ OK. I Googled for this problem with all sorts of variations of keywords, and nothing showed that would point me in the right direction. What is the simple way to get past this and install Samba -Original Message- From: W. D. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2004 9:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Samba 'make install' chokes on textproc/expat2 Can't get Samba 2.2.11 to install. Has anyone encountered a problem with textproc/expat2? Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] You must supply a password to make this connection - IPC$
Hi Folks, Just installed Samba 2.2.10 on my FreeBSD 4.9 computer. I can see the FreeBSD box on all of my Win 9x boxes, but when I double click on its icon, I get a rude box message that says something like: You must supply a password to make this connection Resource: \\SAMMY\IPC$ I've checked the archives and Google, and I still don't understand where the problem lies: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=sambaw=2r=1s=ipc%24q=b http://tinyurl.com/6etgn Here is my 'smb.conf' file: http://www.US-Webmasters.com/Samba/smb.conf.txt Here is the output I get from 'testparm': http://www.US-Webmasters.com/Samba/Samba-testparm-output.txt Can anyone see some glaring error I've made? Thank you so kindly if you can help!! Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] You must supply a password to make this connection - IPC$
At 06:14 8/22/2004, Kristyan Osborne wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hiya, Does the user you are logging on the Win95 box exist on the FreeBSD box?? Ta Yes. I am using 'empty' passwords for all 4 users. - - Kristyan Osborne - IT Technician Longhill High School 01273 391672 / 304086 - -- Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working properly if you open windows. Win95: A 32-bit patch for a 16-bit GUI shell running on top of an 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor by a 2-bit company who cannot stand 1 bit of competition. - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]On Behalf Of W. D. Sent: 22 August 2004 08:13 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Samba] You must supply a password to make this connection - IPC$ Hi Folks, Just installed Samba 2.2.10 on my FreeBSD 4.9 computer. I can see the FreeBSD box on all of my Win 9x boxes, but when I double click on its icon, I get a rude box message that says something like: You must supply a password to make this connection Resource: \\SAMMY\IPC$ I've checked the archives and Google, and I still don't understand where the problem lies: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=sambaw=2r=1s=ipc%24q=b http://tinyurl.com/6etgn Here is my 'smb.conf' file: http://www.US-Webmasters.com/Samba/smb.conf.txt Here is the output I get from 'testparm': http://www.US-Webmasters.com/Samba/Samba-testparm-output.txt Can anyone see some glaring error I've made? Thank you so kindly if you can help!! Start Here to Find It Fast!(tm) - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ - -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) iD8DBQFBKIAiqrr+KdRYU5gRAqyIAJ9s7zpN4yVEVDnws4KxXNURMFIFDACdEryh j+HL1mN9hoMVkEHlS0/RL2s= =ec9b -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names - http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] At 4 a.m. it finally worked...Samba 3, interdomain trust, ldap, winbind
At 21:35 11/23/2003, Carl J. Hilinski, wrote: I did spend the time to write up documentation on how to do this (I shouldn't say I wrote it...I took a lot of bits and pieces from various sources and compiled it all into one document). If anyone is interested, check out the stuff at http://www.hilinski.net/samba . The documentation is there, along with the configuration files I used. Hmmm. Seems to be looking for titus.hilinski.net, but can't find it??? Start Here to Find It Fast! - http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
