Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
Le mercredi 18 mai 2011 à 15:07 +0200, Wilco Baan Hofman a écrit : On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 12:33 +0200, Michael Wood wrote: Then it seems the -F option should be removed from regpatch. Or should regpatch be replaced with something similar to the Python script you included below? My patch adds a -K option to regpatch for specifying the predef key where -F registry should be mounted. I will submit it for review soon, I'm currently experimenting a little bit, and there are still some bugs in .reg parsing Denis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
Le dimanche 15 mai 2011 à 00:28 +0200, Michael Wood a écrit : On 14 May 2011 22:09, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 May 2011 19:53, RiCH r...@richud.com wrote: Hi, Hi, Two years ago, I worked a bit on this. There was a lot of things to be done for full support of regf files patching . My patches mostly worked, but I never submitted it because I finally decided to generate .pol files with a small python script and appmently it on client side instead of patching regf files server-side. So I'm going to resurrect my old sources, rebase it on current git, and hope it helps... As far as I remember, there was some problems with regf format writing, and the registry files generated were sometimes corrupted. Investigating it may be quite difficult, as regf format is not simple and badly documented. But maybe some work was already done yet ? Denis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] regpatch writing to local registry hive with -F not working (registery-utils 4.0.0~alpha15~git20110124.dfsg1-2ubuntu1)
Le dimanche 15 mai 2011 à 10:26 +0200, denis bonnenfant a écrit : Le dimanche 15 mai 2011 à 00:28 +0200, Michael Wood a écrit : On 14 May 2011 22:09, Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 May 2011 19:53, RiCH r...@richud.com wrote: Hi, Hi, Two years ago, I worked a bit on this. There was a lot of things to be done for full support of regf files patching . My patches mostly worked, but I never submitted it because I finally decided to generate .pol files with a small python script and appmently it on client side instead of patching regf files server-side. So I'm going to resurrect my old sources, rebase it on current git, and hope it helps... As far as I remember, there was some problems with regf format writing, and the registry files generated were sometimes corrupted. Investigating it may be quite difficult, as regf format is not simple and badly documented. But maybe some work was already done yet ? I had a look, and the merge is not straightforward. So I have work on it a little bit. Hopefully, regf code seems corrected, so I expect some good news... Denis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
