Re: [Samba] samba 3.3 for opensuse 10.2

2009-12-29 Thread peter grotz


At Dienstag, 29. Dezember 2009 08:23, Karolin Seeger has wisely spoken thusly: 

Hi Karolin,


 Hi Peter,

 On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 07:09:40PM +0100, peter grotz wrote:
 
 JM On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 5:54 AM, peter grotz peter.gr...@grotz.org 
 wrote:
  I need the rpm-files of samba 3.3 or later for opensuse 10.2.
  The repo isn´t available any more, so can anybody help me here?
 JM You need 3.3 or _later_ ?  It shipped with 3.4.2, so that would be
 JM later.  Or do you specifically need 3.3?
 
 no, you´re wrong! It´s shipped wigth 3.0.23! I hav here opensuse 10.2 
 and it´s really 3.0.23!!

 you can find a lot of Samba versions for opensuse 10.2 e.g. on
 http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/.

thanks   for  the  link. In the meantime I found it by myself, but in 
past I was avoiding  it  because  these builds work somehow differently from 
the 
normal suse-rpms.

But I´ll give it a try again.

Thanks again, Karolin!

Cheers,
Peter

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] samba 3.3 for opensuse 10.2

2009-12-29 Thread peter grotz
Hi Robert,

I think this might be a good idea but for the 10.2 would it be better 
to take the SLES 10?

-Peter

At Dienstag, 29. Dezember 2009 13:35, Robert Schetterer has wisely spoken 
thusly: 


RS Am 29.12.2009 11:33, schrieb peter grotz:
 
 
 At Dienstag, 29. Dezember 2009 08:23, Karolin Seeger has wisely spoken 
 thusly: 
 
 Hi Karolin,
 
 
 Hi Peter,
 
 On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 07:09:40PM +0100, peter grotz wrote:

 JM On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 5:54 AM, peter grotz peter.gr...@grotz.org 
 wrote:
 I need the rpm-files of samba 3.3 or later for opensuse 10.2.
 The repo isn´t available any more, so can anybody help me here?
 JM You need 3.3 or _later_ ?  It shipped with 3.4.2, so that would be
 JM later.  Or do you specifically need 3.3?

 no, you´re wrong! It´s shipped wigth 3.0.23! I hav here opensuse 10.2 
 and it´s really 3.0.23!!
 
 you can find a lot of Samba versions for opensuse 10.2 e.g. on
 http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/.
 
 thanks   for  the  link. In the meantime I found it by myself, but in 
 past I was avoiding  it  because  these builds work somehow differently from 
 the 
 normal suse-rpms.
 
 But I´ll give it a try again.
 
 Thanks again, Karolin!
 
 Cheers,
 Peter
 

RS you may also try recompile from source rpm taken out of the enterprise
RS suse 9 or 10 rep , i did this last time for having recent samba versions
RS for an old 9.3 server , it worked without problems


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

Re: [Samba] samba 3.3 for opensuse 10.2

2009-12-29 Thread peter grotz
Thanks Robert, I´ll try it!



At Dienstag, 29. Dezember 2009 16:52, Robert Schetterer has wisely spoken 
thusly: 


RS Am 29.12.2009 13:47, schrieb peter grotz:
 Hi Robert,
 
 I think this might be a good idea but for the 10.2 would it be better 
 to take the SLES 10?
 
 -Peter

RS yes try first sles 10 rpm src recompile

RS download from

RS http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/samba:/STABLE/SLE_10/src/


RS 
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:/samba:/STABLE/SLE_10/src/samba-3.4.3-10.1.src.rpm

RS do rpmbuild  --rebuild  samba-3.4.3-10.1.src.rpm etc

RS you might need to download more additional libs for recompile too


RS but after all sernet rpms should work too

 
 At Dienstag, 29. Dezember 2009 13:35, Robert Schetterer has wisely spoken 
 thusly: 
 
 
 RS Am 29.12.2009 11:33, schrieb peter grotz:


 At Dienstag, 29. Dezember 2009 08:23, Karolin Seeger has wisely spoken 
 thusly: 

 Hi Karolin,


 Hi Peter,

 On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 07:09:40PM +0100, peter grotz wrote:

 JM On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 5:54 AM, peter grotz peter.gr...@grotz.org 
 wrote:
 I need the rpm-files of samba 3.3 or later for opensuse 10.2.
 The repo isn´t available any more, so can anybody help me here?
 JM You need 3.3 or _later_ ?  It shipped with 3.4.2, so that would be
 JM later.  Or do you specifically need 3.3?

 no, you´re wrong! It´s shipped wigth 3.0.23! I hav here opensuse 10.2 
 and it´s really 3.0.23!!

 you can find a lot of Samba versions for opensuse 10.2 e.g. on
 http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/.

 thanks   for  the  link. In the meantime I found it by myself, but in 
 past I was avoiding  it  because  these builds work somehow differently 
 from the 
 normal suse-rpms.

 But I´ll give it a try again.

 Thanks again, Karolin!

 Cheers,
 Peter

 
 RS you may also try recompile from source rpm taken out of the enterprise
 RS suse 9 or 10 rep , i did this last time for having recent samba versions
 RS for an old 9.3 server , it worked without problems
 
 



-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba

[Samba] samba 3.3 for opensuse 10.2

2009-12-28 Thread peter grotz
Hallo and Merry Christmas to all!

I need the rpm-files of samba 3.3 or later for opensuse 10.2.
The repo isn´t available any more, so can anybody help me here?

Thanks in advance!

Peter

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] samba 3.3 for opensuse 10.2

2009-12-28 Thread peter grotz

JM On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 5:54 AM, peter grotz peter.gr...@grotz.org wrote:
 I need the rpm-files of samba 3.3 or later for opensuse 10.2.
 The repo isn´t available any more, so can anybody help me here?
JM You need 3.3 or _later_ ?  It shipped with 3.4.2, so that would be
JM later.  Or do you specifically need 3.3?

no, you´re wrong! It´s shipped wigth 3.0.23! I hav here opensuse 10.2 
and it´s really 3.0.23!!

Cheers

Peter

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


[Samba] loging user actions

2008-09-20 Thread peter grotz
Hallo,

from time to time some of our users delete files. But none of them do
confess that they have deleted the file.
I want to find at the samba logs which user has deleted the file. I´m
using the audit-vfs module but there are only messages about opening
and closing of files.
Can anybody give me a hint for using samba logs to find the users I´m
searching for?

Thanks in advance

Peter

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] change SID in ntuser.dat

2005-01-21 Thread peter grotz
Hi all,

I want to migrate from 2.2.6 to 3.0.10 (with ldap). Is it possible to change
the SID in the ntuser.dat on the server-saved profile?

-Peter

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] migration from 2.2.4 to 3.0.10

2005-01-18 Thread peter grotz
hi all,

I want to migrate my samba 2.2.4 pdc with roaming profiles and shares to a
new installed samba 3.0.10 pdc.
How must I go on to migrate my users and their profiles from the old server
(with smbpasswd) to the new pdc running with ldap-passbackend with out
loosing the profiles and passwords?
For the share´s and profile´s data I´m using rsync but what about the
NTUSER.dat?
Does the net vampire work with 2.2.4?

Are there any howtos for this special case?

Thanks in advance,

-Peter

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] strange error-report in smbd.log

2003-11-06 Thread peter grotz
Hi,

I found the following strange report in smbd.log (using Samba3.0.1pre2cvs):

[2003/11/05 10:10:49, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(577)
  ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy
[2003/11/05 10:10:49, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(577)
  ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy
[2003/11/05 10:10:49, 0] lib/util_str.c:safe_strcpy_fn(577)
  ERROR: NULL dest in safe_strcpy
Can anyone help me? Is this all serious?

Cheers
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] samba 2.2.8, cups and HP Designjet 5000c

2003-09-15 Thread peter grotz
Hi,

I have a problem with samba 2.2.8 and cups:

I´m using 3 printers with winXP and win98-clients: a LJ5000 with 
raw-spooling on 192.168.0.180, a local (lpt1) dj650c and a DJ5000c  with 
raw-spooling on 192.168.0.190.

While the LJ5000 and the DJ650c are working the DJ5000c doesn´t print. 
Only a file in the Samba-spolling-Dir is appearing for a few seconds 
then the job disapears but no cups-printing...

Can anybody help me?
Following the smb.conf, the cups.conf and printer.conf:
cups.conf:

# $Id: cupsd.conf.in,v 1.10 2002/12/17 22:08:08 mike Exp $
LogLevel info
Printcap /etc/printcap
PrintcapGUI /usr/bin/glpoptions
RequestRoot /var/spool/cups
RemoteRoot root
ServerRoot /etc/cups
Port 631
Browsing On
BrowseAllow 192.168.0.0/24
BrowseAddress 192.168.200.255
Location /
Encryption IfRequested
Satisfy All
Order Allow,Deny
#Deny From All
Allow From 127.0.0.1
Allow From 127.0.0.2
Allow From 192.168.200.*
/Location
AuthType Basic
AuthClass System
Location /admin
AuthType Basic
AuthClass System
Encryption IfRequested
Satisfy All
Order Deny,Allow
#Deny From All
Allow From 192.168
Allow From 127.0.0.1
Allow From 127.0.0.2


/Location
# End of $Id: cupsd.conf.in,v 1.10 2002/12/17 22:08:08 mike Exp $.
#
printers.conf:

# Printer configuration file for CUPS v1.1.18
# Written by cupsd on Mon 15 Sep 2003 08:00:40 GMT
Printer dj5000c
Info
Location serverraum
DeviceURI socket://dj5000.rehberger-architekten.local:9100
State Idle
Accepting Yes
JobSheets none none
QuotaPeriod 0
PageLimit 0
KLimit 0
/Printer
DefaultPrinter dj650c
Info designjet 650c
Location serverraum
DeviceURI parallel:/dev/lp0
State Idle
Accepting Yes
JobSheets none none
QuotaPeriod 0
PageLimit 0
KLimit 0
/Printer
Printer lj5000
Info laserjet 5000
Location serverraum
DeviceURI socket://hp5.rehberger-architekten.local:9100
State Idle
Accepting Yes
JobSheets none none
QuotaPeriod 0
PageLimit 0
KLimit 0
/Printer
smb.conf:

# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = SERVERS
encrypt passwords = Yes
log level = 1
syslog = 0
unix extensions = Yes
socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY
printcap name = CUPS
os level = 2
veto files = /*.eml/*.nws/riched20.dll/*.{*}/
printer admin = root
printing = cups
#   print command = lp -c -d%p -oraw;rm %s
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
read only = No
create mask = 0640
directory mask = 0750
browseable = No
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/tmp
guest ok = yes
create mask = 0600
printable = Yes
browseable = Yes
[print$]
comment = Printer Drivers
path = /var/lib/samba/drivers
write list = @ntadmin root
force group = ntadmin
create mask = 0664
directory mask = 0775
guest ok = yes
browseable = yes
read only = yes

[daten]
comment = daten
path = /daten
valid users = admin
read only = No
create mask = 0640
directory mask = 0750
Thanks

-Peter

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


[Samba] Re: samba Digest, Vol 2, Issue 40

2003-02-12 Thread peter grotz



Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2003 02:20:26 +0100
From: Michael Paarmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] fine grain perms
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: list
Message: 4

Hi!




What I mean is;

dir /a/b/c/d

condition;
1) dir abc cannot be deleted
2) dir d can be deleted
3) files in dir ab cannot be deleted
but can be created
4) files in dir cd can be deleted

As a work around I've created an empty tree structure
(a sort of template) and have just renamed the dirs
while maintaning the custom perms.

Would be nice if it were dynamic.



I have nearly the same problem. But, sorry, i don't have real solution for 
this. I try to set the permissions with the unix rights. In addition to 
create mask and directory mask i use the sticky bits to realize my 
permission structure. It's sad to say, but i think, that this to a real big 
disadvantage of Samba. If you try to set a complex permission structure, 
it's very difficult work. With Windows or especially Novell it's much more 
easier, i think.
*LOL*
Have you heard of samba with ACL?

Cheers,
Peter

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



[Samba] release-date of 3.0

2003-02-03 Thread peter grotz
To the samba-people

when can we expect a stable 3.0 release?
I´ve heard of the massive changes using ldap between 2.2.7a
and 3.0.
Does it make sense to wait for 3.0 to change my systems to ldap?

Thanks!

Peter

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba