Re: [Samba] RPM building tools for Samba 4.0.3 on RHEL 6 published bye me on Github
Regarding your latest samba.spec for version 4.0.4-0.1
If with_dc is activated, the build still fails with:
RPM build errors:
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib64/samba/ldb/ildap.so
As I reported before, there is an entry for ldbsamba_extensions.so
under # ldb libraries built with DC activated but not for ildap.so.
The file gets built but not packaged.
Also, the installation of the samba-libs package fails with:
error: Failed dependencies:
libdfs_server_ad.so()(64bit) is needed by
samba-libs-0:4.0.4-0.1.el6.x86_64
libdfs_server_ad.so(SAMBA_4.0.4)(64bit) is needed by
samba-libs-0:4.0.4-0.1.el6.x86_64
The query rpm --query --requires -p
samba-libs-4.0.4-0.1.el6.x86_64.rpm gives libdfs_server_ad.so as a
requirement.
Is there any reason why my previous suggestion to package
libdfs_server_ad.so in samba-libs instead of samba-dc-libs was not
accepted?
If you do that, under the condition %if %with_dc, the error
disappears. Please note that samba-libs must always be installed
before samba-dc-libs, so that the samba-dc-libs requirement at
install has already been satisfied by samba-libs.
As also reported before, the same happens with libposix_eadb.so. It is
required by samba. I suggested that it be moved to the same section as
libdfs_server_ad.so, i.e. in samba-libs under %if %with_dc.
If these two steps are taken, both build and install complete flawlessly
and you get a working AD DC installation.
If this is accepted, as a final touch and for the sake of consistency,
the %exclude for /libdfs_server_ad.so should go into LIBS, under
%if %with_dc:
%else
# formerly excluded in files dc
%exclude %{_libdir}/samba/libdfs_server_ad.so
%endif # with_dc
and the %exclude for /ildap.so and ldbsamba_extensions.so should
go into DC-LIBS, also under %if %with_dc
%else
%doc packaging/RHEL-rpms/README.dc-libs
# formerly excluded in files dc
%exclude %{_libdir}/samba/ldb/ildap.so
%exclude %{_libdir}/samba/ldb/ldbsamba_extensions.so
%endif # with_dc
Best regards
Miguel
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] RPM building tools for Samba 4.0.3 on RHEL 6 published bye me on Github
I tested the .spec file you posted today. There's still a glitch remaining. If built with the file as it is (%global with_dc 0) the packages build cleanly. However, if %global with_dc 1 is used, the build fails with the following error: RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib64/samba/ldb/ildap.so I can see that this file is excluded in the packging list pertaining to DC-LIBS, if with_dc is disabled but it is not one of the # ldb libraries built with DC activated, contrary to the other file always excluded in the Fedora .spec (ldbsamba_extensions.so), which is listed in your file. When I do a rpm query for --whatrequires both files, the answer is that no package requires either file. As such, they should probably be always excluded, as happens with the Fedora .spec file. One more thing: since Samba 4.0.4 is out now, maybe you should update your files to match? This is just a security release that presents no problem whatsoever when built with the same specs as 4.0.3. I did it and all went well. I have an experimental AD domain controller working correctly it it. Thank you again -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] RPM building tools for Samba 4.0.3 on RHEL 6 published bye me on Github
I forgot something.
%{_libdir}/samba/libdfs_server_ad.so
%{_libdir}/samba/libposix_eadb.so
As I said before, those two entries MUST be within ### LIBS, under
%if %with_dc. Otherwise, the build completes cleanly but the install
process of samba-libs and samba fails with the following:
error: Failed dependencies:
libdfs_server_ad.so()(64bit) is needed by
samba-libs-0:4.0.4-1.el6.x86_64
libdfs_server_ad.so(SAMBA_4.0.4)(64bit) is needed by
samba-libs-0:4.0.4-1.el6.x86_64
error: Failed dependencies:
libposix_eadb.so()(64bit) is needed by samba-0:4.0.3-0.6.el6.x86_64
libposix_eadb.so(SAMBA_4.0.3)(64bit) is needed by
samba-0:4.0.3-0.6.el6.x86_64
I suggest doing the described inclusions and, for the sake of
consistency, moving the correspondent exclusion to the same section:
### LIBS
%if %with_dc
%{_libdir}/samba/libdfs_server_ad.so
%{_libdir}/samba/libposix_eadb.so
%else
# formerly excluded in files dc
%exclude %{_libdir}/samba/libdfs_server_ad.so
%endif # with_dc
If these steps are taken, everything builds and installs correctly,
whether AD DC is activated or not.
The Fedora .spec file excludes samba/libdfs_server_ad.so from the
build process altogether because Fedora is not using the AD DC component
of Samba 4 due to lack of support with MIT Kerberos.
---
On the matter of the release of Samba 4.0.4, shouldn't the Obsoletes
statement now include the form Obsoletes: samba %{samba_depver}
instead of only Obsoletes: samba4 %{samba_depver}? You now need to
Obsolete all versions of Samba 4 prior to 4.0.4, both release and
pre-release.
Also, I think that the form you are still using for Provides (for
example Provides: samba4-common = %{samba_depver}) is no longer
correct. According to the Samba team conventions, after the release of
Samba 4 the form should now be Provides: samba-common = %{samba_depver}.
In a previous mail to you, I suggested:
Provides: samba = %{samba_depver}
Conflicts: samba4 %{samba_depver}
Obsoletes: samba %{samba_depver}
I used Conflicts for samba4 because there are significant
differences between the pre-release and the release versions.
Or maybe we could use two Obsoletes statements instead...
Best regards
Miguel
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] RPM building tools for Samba 4.0.3 on RHEL 6 published bye me on Github
I'll update as soon as I find cycles... Nico Kadel-Garcia Email: nka...@gmail.com Sent from iPhone On Mar 20, 2013, at 15:37, Miguel Medalha miguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote: built -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] RPM building tools for Samba 4.0.3 on RHEL 6 published bye me on Github
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Diego Remolina diego.remol...@physics.gatech.edu wrote: I think a lot of your work was probably prior to RHEL 6.4, but have you tried looking at their new SRPM for samba 4.0.0 and adapting it to 4.0.3? Unfortunately somewhere between 4.0.0 and 4.0.3. they introduced now related package dependencies on libtalloc, libtdb, libtevent, iniparser, and krb5. So the RHEL 6.4 inlcudes krb5-1.10, which eliminates one problem, but doesn't resolve the others. That's why I put updates for those as well up at https://github.com/nkadel/ and into the Samba repository building tools at https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo/. Since building with mock relies on CentOS, or Scientific Linux or a local RHEL yum repo, to have the updated packages, it's going to be a while before the new RHEL 6.4 packages are broadly available anyway. I'll yank them from github.com if and as they become available as part of 6.4 releases. http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/samba4-4.0.0-55.el6.rc4.src.rpm They have also posted the new SRPMS for the libtdb and libtalloc and other software that may be required: http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/libtalloc-2.0.7-2.el6.src.rpm http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/libtdb-1.2.10-1.el6.src.rpm http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/6Server/en/os/SRPMS/libtevent-0.9.8-8.el6.src.rpm Those are new enough for Samba 4.0.0, not for Samba 4.0.3. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] RPM building tools for Samba 4.0.3 on RHEL 6 published bye me on Github
I've been spending some time backporting Samba 4.0.3 from Fedora 19 to RHEL 6, partly as proof of concept, partly to make it available to others. I've published my work at: https://github.com/nkadel/samba4repo/ The key RPM building tools are at: https://github.com/nkadel/samba-4.0.3-srpm/ And there are dependencies listed for libtalloc, libtevent, iniparser, etc. that I've also put up at https://github.com. It works in my basic testing, but I don't have a local set of Active Directory clients and servers to play with for full testing. This includes hooks for building all the components with mock, including notes on where to get the necessary components from github.com. The README.md from that directory is below. I'm happy to make these as refined and idiot proof as anyone would like, since I'm between jobs right now, but but I don't want to confuse anyone. I've also noticed that several dependencies, such as krb5-1.10, may be already available as part of RHEL 6.4 which was released *less than 24 hours ago*. = Wrapper for SRPM building tools for Samba 4 on RHEL 6. These are rebuilt from Fedora rawhide releases, and need to be built and installed in the following order. samba4repo-6-x86_64.cfg - install in /etc/mock/ samba4repo.repo - install in /etc/yum.repos.d/. Then install and enable a yum repository on the local server, or a designated host, with this kind of layout: mkdir /var/www/linux mkdir /var/www/linux/samba4repo mkdir /var/www/linux/samba4repo/6 mkdir /var/www/linux/samba4repo/6/x86_64 createrepo /var/www/linux/samba4repo/6/x86_64 mkdir /var/www/linux/samba4repo/6/SRPMS createrepo /var/www/linux/samba4repo/6/SRPMS Set up symlinks for $releasever names in yum setups. ln -s -f -n 6 /var/www/linux/samba4repo/6.3 ln -s -f -n 6 /var/www/linux/samba4repo/6Server The make command will build all components. If they don't exist yet, they will be git cloned from https://github.com/nkadel/. The components there are somewhat interwoven with this samba4repo structure, so review it before building or deploying with it. *** NOTE: The git repos at github.com do not include the tarballs *** This is for basic security reasons: I do not want to become responsible for publishing the source code software for other people's compnents, and possibly getting hacked and corrupting your software. You'll need to get the tarballs manually, usually from the Source: locations designated in the .spec file. make install will attempt to deploy them in a designated directory for yum repository access, run createrepo, to get the packages listeed, and and clear away old mock configurations. createrepo --update and mock clean are somewhat unreliable in their behavior, so actually re-running and createrepo and using rm -rf on the mock cache works better. Samba 4.0.3 has strong dependencies on additional components that are not part of RHEL 6, or are not recent enough in RHEL 6, and need to be built and deployed for local compilation or for mock compilation. These dependencies are detailed in the Makefile, but include: iniparser krb5 libtalloc libtdb libldb libtevent Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
