Re: [Samba] Samba 4 posixGroup mapping

2012-02-07 Thread steve

Hi Geza, hi everyone
I had a go at the script:
s4user
where  is a posiixGroup'ified group from samba-tool group 
add.

cat s4user
#!/bin/sh
echo "Creating s4 posix user "$1
echo "Pls enter pwd for "$1
samba-tool user add $1
echo "dn: cn=$1,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site
changetype: modify
add: objectclass
objectclass: posixaccount
-
add: uidnumber
uidnumber: $2
-
add: gidnumber
gidnumber: $3
-
add:unixhomedirectory
unixhomedirectory: /home/CACTUS/$1
-
add: loginshell
loginshell: /bin/bash" > $1
#ldbmodify -f /some/temporary-file ###can't get the syntax!###
ldapmodify -h 192.168.1.3 -D cn=Administrator,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site -f 
$1 -Y GSSAPI

samba-tool group addmembers $4 $1
mkdir /home/CACTUS/$1
chown $1:$4 /home/CACTUS/$1
rm $1
echo $1 "rfc2307-ified"

and:

./s4user steve6 330 2000 suseusers
Creating s4 posix user steve6
Pls enter pwd for steve6
New Password:
User 'steve6' created successfully
SASL/GSSAPI authentication started
SASL username: administra...@hh3.site
SASL SSF: 56
SASL data security layer installed.
modifying entry "cn=steve6,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site"
Added members to group suseusers
steve6 rfc2307-ified
hh3:/home/steve # exit
exit
steve@hh3:~> su steve6
Password:
Warning: Your password will expire in 41 days on Tue 20 Mar 2012 14:52:02
CET
steve6@hh3:/home/steve> cd ../CACTUS/steve6
steve6@hh3:~> touch hola
steve6@hh3:~> ls -la
total 12
drwxr-xr-x  2 steve6 suseusers 4096 Feb  7 14:53 .
drwxr-xr-x 10 root   root  4096 Feb  7 14:52 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 steve6 suseusers0 Feb  7 14:53 hola
-rw---  1 steve6 suseusers   48 Feb  7 14:52 .xauthoa0jlX
steve6@hh3:~>

Yeah!

I need to tidy the script up a bit and particularly look for the nslcd 
pid before continuing.

As usual, a few qns. Sorry.
1. As this ignores winbind, is there any need to use winbind like uid's?
2. I can't get the syntax for ldbmodify:(
3. Is there a cheap way to get the next available uid from ldap? I 
thought of sticking a base id in a file and incrementing it each time 
s4user was called. Then pulling it back from the file when the script 
was called for the next user.


Cheers,
Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba 4 posixGroup mapping

2012-02-07 Thread steve



Hi,

I use Samba3/OpenLDAP in production and create my users using similar
scripts, so no it shouldn't be difficult, something like:

#!/bin/sh

samba-tool user add $1 ..

echo "dn: cn=$1,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site
changetype: modify
add: objectclass
objectclass: posixaccount
-
add: objectclass
objectclass: shadowaccount
-
add: uidnumber
uidnumber: $2
-
add: gidnumber
gidnumber: $3
-
add:unixhomedirectory
unixhomedirectory: $4
-
add: loginshell
loginshell: $5">/some/temporary-file

ldbmodify -f /some/temporary-file

rm /some/temporary-file

Please take into account that it is just a very rough example I've put
up in less than a minute.

Regards

Geza
We use Samba3/openldap in real life too:) When I'm not there, they use 
The Yast GUI which has quite a nice point and click LDAP user and 
group module which links to the samba3 schema.


Your echo ...>  /some/temporary-file is a good idea. Would you include 
a default group for the user perhaps? e.g.

samba-tool group addmembers $6 $1
($6 would already exist)

Looking good. Thanks for your time. Will report back.
Cheers,
Steve



Hi Geza, hi everyone.
I had a go at the script. I called it s4user and got it down to 4 
parameters:

s4user

chmod +x s4user
cat s4user
#!/bin/sh
echo "Creating s4 posix user "$1
echo "Pls enter pwd for "$1
samba-tool user add $1
echo "dn: cn=$1,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site
changetype: modify
add: objectclass
objectclass: posixaccount
-
add: uidnumber
uidnumber: $2
-
add: gidnumber
gidnumber: $3
-
add:unixhomedirectory
unixhomedirectory: /home/CACTUS/$1
-
add: loginshell
loginshell: /bin/bash" > $1
#ldbmodify -f /some/temporary-file
ldapmodify -h 192.168.1.3 -D cn=Administrator,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site -f 
$1 -Y GSSAPI

samba-tool group addmembers $4 $1
mkdir /home/CACTUS/$1
chown $1:$4 /home/CACTUS/$1

./s4user steve6 330 2000 suseusers
Creating s4 posix user steve6
Pls enter pwd for steve6
New Password:
User 'steve6' created successfully
SASL/GSSAPI authentication started
SASL username: administra...@hh3.site
SASL SSF: 56
SASL data security layer installed.
modifying entry "cn=steve6,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site"
Added members to group suseusers
hh3:/home/steve # exit
exit
steve@hh3:~> su steve6
Password:
Warning: Your password will expire in 41 days on Tue 20 Mar 2012 14:52:02
CET
steve6@hh3:/home/steve> cd ../CACTUS/steve6
steve6@hh3:~> touch hola
steve6@hh3:~> ls -la
total 12
drwxr-xr-x  2 steve6 suseusers 4096 Feb  7 14:53 .
drwxr-xr-x 10 root   root  4096 Feb  7 14:52 ..
-rw-r--r--  1 steve6 suseusers0 Feb  7 14:53 hola
-rw---  1 steve6 suseusers   48 Feb  7 14:52 .xauthoa0jlX
steve6@hh3:~>

Yeah!
I need to tidy the script up a bit and maybe put some stuff in like 
checking for the nslcd pid and put a 'usage:' message.


Just a couple of qns.
1. I couldn't get ldbmodify to work, which is why I used ldapmodify 
instead. Any idea of the syntax?
2. This now bypasses winbind completely. I just happened to use a uid in 
the range that winbind uses. Are there any rules for choosing uid numbers?
4. Is there an easy way to find the next free uid or reuse one from a 
deleted user?

Cheers,
Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba 4 posixGroup mapping

2012-02-07 Thread steve

On 07/02/12 06:57, Gémes Géza wrote:

2012-02-06 23:58 keltezéssel, steve írta:

On 02/06/2012 08:10 PM, Gémes Géza wrote:

2012-02-06 09:29 keltezéssel, steve írta:

On 02/06/2012 07:19 AM, Gémes Géza wrote:

2012-02-06 01:27 keltezéssel, steve írta:

Hi
I've created a Samba 4 group called suseusers and mixed in posixGroup
and gidNumber using samba-tool group add as a basis.

It works, e.g. when I added an existing user to the group:
getent group suseusers
suseusers:*:2000:
and
getent passwd steve4
steve4:x:319:2000:steve4:/home/CACTUS/steve4:/bin/bash
and
id
uid=319(steve4) gid=2000(suseusers) groups=2000(suseusers)

but there seems to be something wrong with getent group. A local
group
gives this:
getent group users
users:x:100:machine
x not  *

This happens both on the Samba 4 machine and a client with his /home
directory on nfs4. The uid:gid mappings and permissions are
perfect at
both ends:) But what is the difference between the group info coming
from Samba 4 and the group info coming from /etc/group? I'm sure that
this is an error on my part, but I can't force it into failing no
matter what I throw at it.
Thanks,
Steve


For an answer we would need some configuration details, first of all
nsswitch.conf, then depending on that maybe other files

Regards

Geza

Hi

/etc/nsswitch.conf
passwd: files ldap
group:  files ldap
shadow: files ldap
hosts:  files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns
networks:   files dns
services:   files
protocols:  files
rpc:files
ethers: files
netmasks:   files

Ah,  maybe this has something to do with it. For the user ldapmodify I
have:

dn: cn=steve4,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site
changetype: modify
add: objectclass
objectclass: posixaccount
-
add: objectclass
objectclass: shadowaccount
-
add: uidnumber
uidnumber: 321
-
add: gidnumber
gidnumber: 2000
-
add:unixhomedirectory
unixhomedirectory: /home/CACTUS/steve2
-
add: loginshell
loginshell: /bin/bash

and for the group I have:

dn: cn=suseusers,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site
changetype: modify
add: objectclass
objectclass: posixGroup
-
add: gidnumber
gidnumber: 2000

/etc/nslcd.conf:
uid nslcd-user
gid nslcd-user
uri ldap://192.168.1.3
base dc=hh3,dc=site
mappasswd uid  sAMAccountName
mappasswd homeDirectoryunixHomeDirectory
mapshadow uid  sAMAccountName
#mappasswd gidNumbergidNumber
sasl_mech GSSAPI
sasl_realm HH3.SITE
krb5_ccname /tmp/krb5cc_0

Then:
samba-tool group addmembers suseusers steve4

getent group suseusers
suseusers:*:2000:
Comes out with the *

But steve4 comes out correctly, as a local user would:
getent passwd steve4
steve4:x:319:2000:steve4:/home/CACTUS/steve4:/bin/bash

The only difference I see is that steve4 has a shadowaccount object
which can't be mapped for the group (because it doesn't have one). Is
there anything else here? Any other files needed?

In fact, I don't think I need shadowaccount mappings at all do I?
Isn't that where the unix passwords are stored? But that's probably
another thread.

Thanks,
Steve

I'm ot sure but maybe you should change how nslcd.conf maps group
memberships (by default it looks at membership expecting stock
posixaccount and posixgroup objectclasses, while AD uses member and
memberoff which are close but not the same).
You can safely ignore anything shadowaccont related, because you would
be better authenticating via kerberos anyway.

Regards

Geza

Hi Geza, hi everyone

This looks like good news.

I asked the nslcd author directly:


My question is, how do I extract the gid from the ldap? I've tried:
map group gid gidnumber

You shouldn't need to map the gidNumber attribute because nslcd already
uses that attribute by default. In any case if you're trying to find the
primary group of a user you should do:

   map passwd gidNumber XXX

(where XXX is the attribute in your LDAP server) The passwd map is what
defines the output of getent passwd, the group map defines the
information on groups.


That seems true. The posixGroup I defined is mapped without me doing
anything in nslcd and
map passwd gidNumber gidNumber
would seem pointless as it's already got the gidNumber.

You are right about the shadowaccount. This also solves the x and *. I
removed the objectclass shadowaccount from ldap and the map shadow uid
from nslcd and hey:
getent passwd steve4
steve4:*:319:2000:steve4:/home/CACTUS/steve4:/bin/bash

I interpret that as 'it's an x if there's a shadow entry, a * if there
isn't'

This is getting to the stage where it's not worth waiting for a
working winbind. i.e. leave the windows side as it is and go with nfs4
and rpc.idmapd for the the Linux side.

How difficult do you think it would be to script the adding of the
user posix attributes after creating the s4 user? I envisage something
like:
samba-tool user add steve --posix --defaultgroup=somegroup
Also, a startup script for samba4 and nslcd which I think should just
be a 2 liner.

Cheers,

Re: [Samba] Samba 4 posixGroup mapping

2012-02-06 Thread Gémes Géza
2012-02-06 23:58 keltezéssel, steve írta:
> On 02/06/2012 08:10 PM, Gémes Géza wrote:
>> 2012-02-06 09:29 keltezéssel, steve írta:
>>> On 02/06/2012 07:19 AM, Gémes Géza wrote:
 2012-02-06 01:27 keltezéssel, steve írta:
> Hi
> I've created a Samba 4 group called suseusers and mixed in posixGroup
> and gidNumber using samba-tool group add as a basis.
>
> It works, e.g. when I added an existing user to the group:
> getent group suseusers
> suseusers:*:2000:
> and
> getent passwd steve4
> steve4:x:319:2000:steve4:/home/CACTUS/steve4:/bin/bash
> and
> id
> uid=319(steve4) gid=2000(suseusers) groups=2000(suseusers)
>
> but there seems to be something wrong with getent group. A local
> group
> gives this:
> getent group users
> users:x:100:machine
> x not  *
>
> This happens both on the Samba 4 machine and a client with his /home
> directory on nfs4. The uid:gid mappings and permissions are
> perfect at
> both ends:) But what is the difference between the group info coming
> from Samba 4 and the group info coming from /etc/group? I'm sure that
> this is an error on my part, but I can't force it into failing no
> matter what I throw at it.
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
 For an answer we would need some configuration details, first of all
 nsswitch.conf, then depending on that maybe other files

 Regards

 Geza
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> /etc/nsswitch.conf
>>> passwd: files ldap
>>> group:  files ldap
>>> shadow: files ldap
>>> hosts:  files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns
>>> networks:   files dns
>>> services:   files
>>> protocols:  files
>>> rpc:files
>>> ethers: files
>>> netmasks:   files
>>>
>>> Ah,  maybe this has something to do with it. For the user ldapmodify I
>>> have:
>>>
>>> dn: cn=steve4,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site
>>> changetype: modify
>>> add: objectclass
>>> objectclass: posixaccount
>>> -
>>> add: objectclass
>>> objectclass: shadowaccount
>>> -
>>> add: uidnumber
>>> uidnumber: 321
>>> -
>>> add: gidnumber
>>> gidnumber: 2000
>>> -
>>> add:unixhomedirectory
>>> unixhomedirectory: /home/CACTUS/steve2
>>> -
>>> add: loginshell
>>> loginshell: /bin/bash
>>>
>>> and for the group I have:
>>>
>>> dn: cn=suseusers,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site
>>> changetype: modify
>>> add: objectclass
>>> objectclass: posixGroup
>>> -
>>> add: gidnumber
>>> gidnumber: 2000
>>>
>>> /etc/nslcd.conf:
>>> uid nslcd-user
>>> gid nslcd-user
>>> uri ldap://192.168.1.3
>>> base dc=hh3,dc=site
>>> mappasswd uid  sAMAccountName
>>> mappasswd homeDirectoryunixHomeDirectory
>>> mapshadow uid  sAMAccountName
>>> #mappasswd gidNumbergidNumber
>>> sasl_mech GSSAPI
>>> sasl_realm HH3.SITE
>>> krb5_ccname /tmp/krb5cc_0
>>>
>>> Then:
>>> samba-tool group addmembers suseusers steve4
>>>
>>> getent group suseusers
>>> suseusers:*:2000:
>>> Comes out with the *
>>>
>>> But steve4 comes out correctly, as a local user would:
>>> getent passwd steve4
>>> steve4:x:319:2000:steve4:/home/CACTUS/steve4:/bin/bash
>>>
>>> The only difference I see is that steve4 has a shadowaccount object
>>> which can't be mapped for the group (because it doesn't have one). Is
>>> there anything else here? Any other files needed?
>>>
>>> In fact, I don't think I need shadowaccount mappings at all do I?
>>> Isn't that where the unix passwords are stored? But that's probably
>>> another thread.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Steve
>> I'm ot sure but maybe you should change how nslcd.conf maps group
>> memberships (by default it looks at membership expecting stock
>> posixaccount and posixgroup objectclasses, while AD uses member and
>> memberoff which are close but not the same).
>> You can safely ignore anything shadowaccont related, because you would
>> be better authenticating via kerberos anyway.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Geza
> Hi Geza, hi everyone
>
> This looks like good news.
>
> I asked the nslcd author directly:
> 
>
> My question is, how do I extract the gid from the ldap? I've tried:
> map group gid gidnumber
>
> You shouldn't need to map the gidNumber attribute because nslcd already
> uses that attribute by default. In any case if you're trying to find the
> primary group of a user you should do:
>
>   map passwd gidNumber XXX
>
> (where XXX is the attribute in your LDAP server) The passwd map is what
> defines the output of getent passwd, the group map defines the
> information on groups.
> 
>
> That seems true. The posixGroup I defined is mapped without me doing
> anything in nslcd and
> map passwd gidNumber gidNumber
> would seem pointless as it's already got the gidNumber.
>
> You are right about the shadowaccount. This also solves the x and *. I
> removed the objectclass shadowaccount from ldap and the map shadow uid
> from nslcd and hey:
> getent passwd steve4
> steve4:*:319:2000:steve4:/home/CACTUS

Re: [Samba] Samba 4 posixGroup mapping

2012-02-06 Thread steve

On 02/06/2012 08:10 PM, Gémes Géza wrote:

2012-02-06 09:29 keltezéssel, steve írta:

On 02/06/2012 07:19 AM, Gémes Géza wrote:

2012-02-06 01:27 keltezéssel, steve írta:

Hi
I've created a Samba 4 group called suseusers and mixed in posixGroup
and gidNumber using samba-tool group add as a basis.

It works, e.g. when I added an existing user to the group:
getent group suseusers
suseusers:*:2000:
and
getent passwd steve4
steve4:x:319:2000:steve4:/home/CACTUS/steve4:/bin/bash
and
id
uid=319(steve4) gid=2000(suseusers) groups=2000(suseusers)

but there seems to be something wrong with getent group. A local group
gives this:
getent group users
users:x:100:machine
x not  *

This happens both on the Samba 4 machine and a client with his /home
directory on nfs4. The uid:gid mappings and permissions are perfect at
both ends:) But what is the difference between the group info coming
from Samba 4 and the group info coming from /etc/group? I'm sure that
this is an error on my part, but I can't force it into failing no
matter what I throw at it.
Thanks,
Steve


For an answer we would need some configuration details, first of all
nsswitch.conf, then depending on that maybe other files

Regards

Geza

Hi

/etc/nsswitch.conf
passwd: files ldap
group:  files ldap
shadow: files ldap
hosts:  files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns
networks:   files dns
services:   files
protocols:  files
rpc:files
ethers: files
netmasks:   files

Ah,  maybe this has something to do with it. For the user ldapmodify I
have:

dn: cn=steve4,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site
changetype: modify
add: objectclass
objectclass: posixaccount
-
add: objectclass
objectclass: shadowaccount
-
add: uidnumber
uidnumber: 321
-
add: gidnumber
gidnumber: 2000
-
add:unixhomedirectory
unixhomedirectory: /home/CACTUS/steve2
-
add: loginshell
loginshell: /bin/bash

and for the group I have:

dn: cn=suseusers,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site
changetype: modify
add: objectclass
objectclass: posixGroup
-
add: gidnumber
gidnumber: 2000

/etc/nslcd.conf:
uid nslcd-user
gid nslcd-user
uri ldap://192.168.1.3
base dc=hh3,dc=site
mappasswd uid  sAMAccountName
mappasswd homeDirectoryunixHomeDirectory
mapshadow uid  sAMAccountName
#mappasswd gidNumbergidNumber
sasl_mech GSSAPI
sasl_realm HH3.SITE
krb5_ccname /tmp/krb5cc_0

Then:
samba-tool group addmembers suseusers steve4

getent group suseusers
suseusers:*:2000:
Comes out with the *

But steve4 comes out correctly, as a local user would:
getent passwd steve4
steve4:x:319:2000:steve4:/home/CACTUS/steve4:/bin/bash

The only difference I see is that steve4 has a shadowaccount object
which can't be mapped for the group (because it doesn't have one). Is
there anything else here? Any other files needed?

In fact, I don't think I need shadowaccount mappings at all do I?
Isn't that where the unix passwords are stored? But that's probably
another thread.

Thanks,
Steve

I'm ot sure but maybe you should change how nslcd.conf maps group
memberships (by default it looks at membership expecting stock
posixaccount and posixgroup objectclasses, while AD uses member and
memberoff which are close but not the same).
You can safely ignore anything shadowaccont related, because you would
be better authenticating via kerberos anyway.

Regards

Geza

Hi Geza, hi everyone

This looks like good news.

I asked the nslcd author directly:


My question is, how do I extract the gid from the ldap? I've tried:
map group gid gidnumber

You shouldn't need to map the gidNumber attribute because nslcd already
uses that attribute by default. In any case if you're trying to find the
primary group of a user you should do:

  map passwd gidNumber XXX

(where XXX is the attribute in your LDAP server) The passwd map is what
defines the output of getent passwd, the group map defines the
information on groups.


That seems true. The posixGroup I defined is mapped without me doing anything 
in nslcd and
map passwd gidNumber gidNumber
would seem pointless as it's already got the gidNumber.

You are right about the shadowaccount. This also solves the x and *. I removed 
the objectclass shadowaccount from ldap and the map shadow uid from nslcd and 
hey:
getent passwd steve4
steve4:*:319:2000:steve4:/home/CACTUS/steve4:/bin/bash

I interpret that as 'it's an x if there's a shadow entry, a * if there isn't'

This is getting to the stage where it's not worth waiting for a working 
winbind. i.e. leave the windows side as it is and go with nfs4 and rpc.idmapd 
for the the Linux side.

How difficult do you think it would be to script the adding of the user posix 
attributes after creating the s4 user? I envisage something like:
samba-tool user add steve --posix --defaultgroup=somegroup
Also, a startup script for samba4 and nslcd which I think should just be a 2 
liner.

Cheers,
Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read th

Re: [Samba] Samba 4 posixGroup mapping

2012-02-06 Thread Gémes Géza
2012-02-06 09:29 keltezéssel, steve írta:
> On 02/06/2012 07:19 AM, Gémes Géza wrote:
>> 2012-02-06 01:27 keltezéssel, steve írta:
>>> Hi
>>> I've created a Samba 4 group called suseusers and mixed in posixGroup
>>> and gidNumber using samba-tool group add as a basis.
>>>
>>> It works, e.g. when I added an existing user to the group:
>>> getent group suseusers
>>> suseusers:*:2000:
>>> and
>>> getent passwd steve4
>>> steve4:x:319:2000:steve4:/home/CACTUS/steve4:/bin/bash
>>> and
>>> id
>>> uid=319(steve4) gid=2000(suseusers) groups=2000(suseusers)
>>>
>>> but there seems to be something wrong with getent group. A local group
>>> gives this:
>>> getent group users
>>> users:x:100:machine
>>> x not  *
>>>
>>> This happens both on the Samba 4 machine and a client with his /home
>>> directory on nfs4. The uid:gid mappings and permissions are perfect at
>>> both ends:) But what is the difference between the group info coming
>>> from Samba 4 and the group info coming from /etc/group? I'm sure that
>>> this is an error on my part, but I can't force it into failing no
>>> matter what I throw at it.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Steve
>>>
>> For an answer we would need some configuration details, first of all
>> nsswitch.conf, then depending on that maybe other files
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Geza
> Hi
>
> /etc/nsswitch.conf
> passwd: files ldap
> group:  files ldap
> shadow: files ldap
> hosts:  files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns
> networks:   files dns
> services:   files
> protocols:  files
> rpc:files
> ethers: files
> netmasks:   files
>
> Ah,  maybe this has something to do with it. For the user ldapmodify I
> have:
>
> dn: cn=steve4,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site
> changetype: modify
> add: objectclass
> objectclass: posixaccount
> -
> add: objectclass
> objectclass: shadowaccount
> -
> add: uidnumber
> uidnumber: 321
> -
> add: gidnumber
> gidnumber: 2000
> -
> add:unixhomedirectory
> unixhomedirectory: /home/CACTUS/steve2
> -
> add: loginshell
> loginshell: /bin/bash
>
> and for the group I have:
>
> dn: cn=suseusers,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site
> changetype: modify
> add: objectclass
> objectclass: posixGroup
> -
> add: gidnumber
> gidnumber: 2000
>
> /etc/nslcd.conf:
> uid nslcd-user
> gid nslcd-user
> uri ldap://192.168.1.3
> base dc=hh3,dc=site
> mappasswd uid  sAMAccountName
> mappasswd homeDirectoryunixHomeDirectory
> mapshadow uid  sAMAccountName
> #mappasswd gidNumbergidNumber
> sasl_mech GSSAPI
> sasl_realm HH3.SITE
> krb5_ccname /tmp/krb5cc_0
>
> Then:
> samba-tool group addmembers suseusers steve4
>
> getent group suseusers
> suseusers:*:2000:
> Comes out with the *
>
> But steve4 comes out correctly, as a local user would:
> getent passwd steve4
> steve4:x:319:2000:steve4:/home/CACTUS/steve4:/bin/bash
>
> The only difference I see is that steve4 has a shadowaccount object
> which can't be mapped for the group (because it doesn't have one). Is
> there anything else here? Any other files needed?
>
> In fact, I don't think I need shadowaccount mappings at all do I?
> Isn't that where the unix passwords are stored? But that's probably
> another thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
I'm ot sure but maybe you should change how nslcd.conf maps group
memberships (by default it looks at membership expecting stock
posixaccount and posixgroup objectclasses, while AD uses member and
memberoff which are close but not the same).
You can safely ignore anything shadowaccont related, because you would
be better authenticating via kerberos anyway.

Regards

Geza
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba 4 posixGroup mapping

2012-02-06 Thread steve

On 02/06/2012 07:19 AM, Gémes Géza wrote:

2012-02-06 01:27 keltezéssel, steve írta:

Hi
I've created a Samba 4 group called suseusers and mixed in posixGroup
and gidNumber using samba-tool group add as a basis.

It works, e.g. when I added an existing user to the group:
getent group suseusers
suseusers:*:2000:
and
getent passwd steve4
steve4:x:319:2000:steve4:/home/CACTUS/steve4:/bin/bash
and
id
uid=319(steve4) gid=2000(suseusers) groups=2000(suseusers)

but there seems to be something wrong with getent group. A local group
gives this:
getent group users
users:x:100:machine
x not  *

This happens both on the Samba 4 machine and a client with his /home
directory on nfs4. The uid:gid mappings and permissions are perfect at
both ends:) But what is the difference between the group info coming
from Samba 4 and the group info coming from /etc/group? I'm sure that
this is an error on my part, but I can't force it into failing no
matter what I throw at it.
Thanks,
Steve


For an answer we would need some configuration details, first of all
nsswitch.conf, then depending on that maybe other files

Regards

Geza

Hi

/etc/nsswitch.conf
passwd: files ldap
group:  files ldap
shadow: files ldap
hosts:  files mdns4_minimal [NOTFOUND=return] dns
networks:   files dns
services:   files
protocols:  files
rpc:files
ethers: files
netmasks:   files

Ah,  maybe this has something to do with it. For the user ldapmodify I 
have:


dn: cn=steve4,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site
changetype: modify
add: objectclass
objectclass: posixaccount
-
add: objectclass
objectclass: shadowaccount
-
add: uidnumber
uidnumber: 321
-
add: gidnumber
gidnumber: 2000
-
add:unixhomedirectory
unixhomedirectory: /home/CACTUS/steve2
-
add: loginshell
loginshell: /bin/bash

and for the group I have:

dn: cn=suseusers,cn=Users,dc=hh3,dc=site
changetype: modify
add: objectclass
objectclass: posixGroup
-
add: gidnumber
gidnumber: 2000

/etc/nslcd.conf:
uid nslcd-user
gid nslcd-user
uri ldap://192.168.1.3
base dc=hh3,dc=site
mappasswd uid  sAMAccountName
mappasswd homeDirectoryunixHomeDirectory
mapshadow uid  sAMAccountName
#mappasswd gidNumbergidNumber
sasl_mech GSSAPI
sasl_realm HH3.SITE
krb5_ccname /tmp/krb5cc_0

Then:
samba-tool group addmembers suseusers steve4

getent group suseusers
suseusers:*:2000:
Comes out with the *

But steve4 comes out correctly, as a local user would:
getent passwd steve4
steve4:x:319:2000:steve4:/home/CACTUS/steve4:/bin/bash

The only difference I see is that steve4 has a shadowaccount object which can't 
be mapped for the group (because it doesn't have one). Is there anything else 
here? Any other files needed?

In fact, I don't think I need shadowaccount mappings at all do I? Isn't that 
where the unix passwords are stored? But that's probably another thread.

Thanks,
Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


Re: [Samba] Samba 4 posixGroup mapping

2012-02-05 Thread Gémes Géza
2012-02-06 01:27 keltezéssel, steve írta:
> Hi
> I've created a Samba 4 group called suseusers and mixed in posixGroup
> and gidNumber using samba-tool group add as a basis.
>
> It works, e.g. when I added an existing user to the group:
> getent group suseusers
> suseusers:*:2000:
> and
> getent passwd steve4
> steve4:x:319:2000:steve4:/home/CACTUS/steve4:/bin/bash
> and
> id
> uid=319(steve4) gid=2000(suseusers) groups=2000(suseusers)
>
> but there seems to be something wrong with getent group. A local group
> gives this:
> getent group users
> users:x:100:machine
> x not  *
>
> This happens both on the Samba 4 machine and a client with his /home
> directory on nfs4. The uid:gid mappings and permissions are perfect at
> both ends:) But what is the difference between the group info coming
> from Samba 4 and the group info coming from /etc/group? I'm sure that
> this is an error on my part, but I can't force it into failing no
> matter what I throw at it.
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
For an answer we would need some configuration details, first of all
nsswitch.conf, then depending on that maybe other files

Regards

Geza
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba


[Samba] Samba 4 posixGroup mapping

2012-02-05 Thread steve

Hi
I've created a Samba 4 group called suseusers and mixed in posixGroup 
and gidNumber using samba-tool group add as a basis.


It works, e.g. when I added an existing user to the group:
getent group suseusers
suseusers:*:2000:
and
getent passwd steve4
steve4:x:319:2000:steve4:/home/CACTUS/steve4:/bin/bash
and
id
uid=319(steve4) gid=2000(suseusers) groups=2000(suseusers)

but there seems to be something wrong with getent group. A local group 
gives this:

getent group users
users:x:100:machine
x not  *

This happens both on the Samba 4 machine and a client with his /home 
directory on nfs4. The uid:gid mappings and permissions are perfect at 
both ends:) But what is the difference between the group info coming 
from Samba 4 and the group info coming from /etc/group? I'm sure that 
this is an error on my part, but I can't force it into failing no matter 
what I throw at it.

Thanks,
Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba