[Samba] Samba Cluster
We had tried to do this however we can see the shard storage from red hat cluster but configuring piranha is bit difficult. Could someone please guide me where to look for the documents? Regards, Rajeev -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba Cluster with ctdb drbd ocfs2 and lvm-clvm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, das someone find a solution for the snapshot Problem with clvm to use the Shadow_copy Module in Samba with the following design - RAID - Controller DRBD LVM (CLVM) OCFS2 If someone has an alternate Design for the Cluster, but it must be pcifs with resizing and snapshotting ... Thank You ! Michael -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPFR1RAAoJEL/EwdcvY5PEtQAH/25Lv/500NFJFUveDC6eZl7k NOzIs6gO/cUkMjLEdn2eVgz3nUA2RikNdkgeW+3teu6Lt6qg6Br0CRH8a1qaoxlj W+/YjHyO8rnBEiVha1od16KhsBbB/uVbhJVuYSPDp0yP7cqZzyokeB8jEVPVjkjO HIGfsdhf2ANUJrrRRI0o08DDiwly3w87nFH66tPDXjd0mDpnL/oWdfrdaGiebLvI h9q38SBt3U4pGN/B1nHNazkp8Z4TP+LTlPs6HFWY6S1hTLazaIibat+5Y64Vgykf gbUPMtdciAuSvpqsWwg+PEc6cl93iVBXx6olIMCLFvBPKvTReqIfBGeBbmO0DWs= =D1su -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba Cluster integration with W2K8R2 ADS permission problems
We have a setup with three nodes - SLES 11 SP1 + HAE addon. CTDB is managing SAMBA and winbind, I can see the shares on my shared storage from my windows machines. My problem is: CTDB-RA is inserting idmap backend = tdb2, this seems to be needed for a clustered setup. But how do I integrate with an ADS, then ? I want to manage my users and groups from the Windows ADS controllers and have SLES map them to the shares. I don't want to create users on the linux side. Kerberos seems to work, LDAP has problems. I did not get a single userid to write to any share I defined. I can only read from there, no modification is allowed. We want to build a clustered fileserver for CIFS shares, therefore we need a reliable way to integrate with an ADS. Any hints highly appreciated. - Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba Cluster Setup with CTDB problems
We have a setup with three nodes - SLES 11 SP1 + HAE addon. This is running fine, wich means: OpenAIS ist starting, we have access to a shared volume with OCFS2 filesystem, have SBD running, quorum is working as expected. CTDB is managing SAMBA and winbind. OK - this runs as long as we do not try to restart CTDB. We always have to restart the whole thing on all 3 nodes. Then CTDB dies with an unknown error. We want to build a clustered fileserver for CIFS shares, therefore we need a reliable way to integrate with an ADS. Any hints highly appreciated. - Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba Cluster Setup with CTDB problems
I have to rephrase a bit for clarification: (see below) Am 04.01.2012 20:48, schrieb Philipp Rusch - New Vision IT: We have a setup with three nodes - SLES 11 SP1 + HAE addon. This is running fine, wich means: OpenAIS ist starting, we have access to a shared volume with OCFS2 filesystem, have SBD running, quorum is working as expected. CTDB is managing SAMBA and winbind. OK - this runs as long as we do not try to restart CTDB. We always have to restart the whole thing on all 3 nodes. Otherwise CTDB dies with an unknown error. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba Cluster mit High Performance
Hello again, If you plan a PDC-BDC ctdb will not work. I have a PDC-BDC failover cluster running with glusterfs, openldap, ucarp. In theory, going the new way of samba with samba franky (samba4/samba3 merged ads) ctdb should work even in an replicating environment. Greetings Daniel --- EDV Daniel Müller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 Tübingen Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 eMail: muel...@tropenklinik.de Internet: www.tropenklinik.de --- -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im Auftrag von Michael Wandel Gesendet: Montag, 15. August 2011 10:29 An: samba@lists.samba.org Betreff: [Samba] Samba Cluster mit High Performance -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo SambaML, in the next weeks I want to setup a high perormance Cluster(2-Nodes) with Samba on Linux. Now I have to decide which Clusterfilesystem is the best one for this project, gfs2, ocfs, glusterfs. If someone has experience with this, pleas give me an answer. At the second: is it the best way to setup a active-active Cluster with ctdb ? Best regards M. Wandel m-wan...@versanet.de -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOSNi4AAoJEL/EwdcvY5PErgYH/RDSzboXKEQHdnI/x9mGkpjY QPUkP+i9t7k0mDSR1THPoXJXUNyBataYtPxIxBXAhZSU0QnKJAKP3cdSEmeDw5rh dIFORWEGcXw7qiAGlfUTr8DPOAF+bmxwFrxvelztaEG+f3bQ6mgc5aPZGtsHL7Dh lrveFcBfsCPyV8tt1F9dYED59plFNpyHnXvimbvcDFHg9VxDjmS5CKVwlU3s9Zxq MkTjvjB1BJmhmAwcyZrqySQbSNkB4px2G9GuMrAItgIJE0F4fuo6cx7tlT/EewG0 7vGB9bIDzCzQlkbaHjoJriNPZteCXRPQMOXXmfwfvYR82xON8HR09Joou5fqY9A= =uNRs -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba Cluster mit High Performance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo SambaML, in the next weeks I want to setup a high perormance Cluster(2-Nodes) with Samba on Linux. Now I have to decide which Clusterfilesystem is the best one for this project, gfs2, ocfs, glusterfs. If someone has experience with this, pleas give me an answer. At the second: is it the best way to setup a active-active Cluster with ctdb ? Best regards M. Wandel m-wan...@versanet.de -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOSNi4AAoJEL/EwdcvY5PErgYH/RDSzboXKEQHdnI/x9mGkpjY QPUkP+i9t7k0mDSR1THPoXJXUNyBataYtPxIxBXAhZSU0QnKJAKP3cdSEmeDw5rh dIFORWEGcXw7qiAGlfUTr8DPOAF+bmxwFrxvelztaEG+f3bQ6mgc5aPZGtsHL7Dh lrveFcBfsCPyV8tt1F9dYED59plFNpyHnXvimbvcDFHg9VxDjmS5CKVwlU3s9Zxq MkTjvjB1BJmhmAwcyZrqySQbSNkB4px2G9GuMrAItgIJE0F4fuo6cx7tlT/EewG0 7vGB9bIDzCzQlkbaHjoJriNPZteCXRPQMOXXmfwfvYR82xON8HR09Joou5fqY9A= =uNRs -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] samba cluster on multi tiered storage / hierarchial storage management
Le jeudi 31 janvier 2008, Volker Lendecke a écrit : On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:00:08PM +0100, Olivier Sessink wrote: Some of the data is used frequently, and some of the data is not used frequently. A policy driven hierarchial storage management solution for the samba ctdb cluster would be great. Keeping often-used blocks on a SAN with fast storage, and using cheaper storage for data that hasn't been used recently. What are good solutions in combination with samba, or should we look at something completely different ? You might seriously look at GPFS. It has really extensive data management capabilities, and te ctdb development is mainly done on GPFS these days. You can go the hardware route too. Compellent, for instance, has aging policies which do what you want. Samba doesn't even need to be aware of data ageing with such hardware. -- Francis Galiegue, One2team - [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ATTENTION : CHANGEMENT DE COORDONNÉES !] +33178945552, +33683877875, http://www.one2team.com 40 avenue Raymond Poincaré - 75116 PARIS -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] samba cluster on multi tiered storage / hierarchial storage management
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:00:08PM +0100, Olivier Sessink wrote: Some of the data is used frequently, and some of the data is not used frequently. A policy driven hierarchial storage management solution for the samba ctdb cluster would be great. Keeping often-used blocks on a SAN with fast storage, and using cheaper storage for data that hasn't been used recently. What are good solutions in combination with samba, or should we look at something completely different ? You might seriously look at GPFS. It has really extensive data management capabilities, and te ctdb development is mainly done on GPFS these days. Volker pgpQiqqGK0j5f.pgp Description: PGP signature -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] samba cluster on multi tiered storage / hierarchial storage management
Hi all, we're looking at future storage technologies and possibilities to use open source software. One thing that looks very promising already is samba clustering with ctdb. However, if we replace all file servers with a single samba cluster, that cluster needs a lot of storage space. A large SAN would do, but using fast disks for all of the storage is quite expensive. Using a mix of cheap (slow) storage and fast (expensive) storage would satisfy the needs much better. Some of the data is used frequently, and some of the data is not used frequently. A policy driven hierarchial storage management solution for the samba ctdb cluster would be great. Keeping often-used blocks on a SAN with fast storage, and using cheaper storage for data that hasn't been used recently. What are good solutions in combination with samba, or should we look at something completely different ? regards, Olivier -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] SAMBA Cluster or .......
Hello, My question is quite related to this topic. Currently I work for one of brokerages and prepare to set up domain for all employees. However I must be sure that if my PDC fails my BDC will provide all connections to roaming profiles and extra shares (to be mounted during the log in process). But additionally I want to have only ONE storage place for placing every shares and profiles. Lucky, I found one EMC disk array to be used in this solution. My idea is connect 2 server (PDC and BDC) over FCs to ONE storage. I don't have any extra software like cluster solution. Now I have almost everything UP and running but found this thread about data consistency where different Samba instances may cause data corruption. Please NEVER export the same file space via different Samba nodes, this leads to data corruption because the locks propagated have the wrong semantics Now I'm wondering if I can really do this? According to what Volker said my solution/idea is (in a word) - BROKEN :( Does this me that I must use some extra software between EMC storage and Samba instances to prevent data lost? In my situation there is a chance that PDC and BDC will server THE SAME file for different users. So looking at this topic I'd come to think that I CAN'T go production with such prepared PDC + BDC + EMC storage - am I right? If yes would anyone propose any solution for such idea? Regards, Marcin Volker Lendecke napisał(a): On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 09:02:19PM +1300, Jason Haar wrote: ?? doesn't that contradict the smb.conf man page? Kernel oplocks support allows Samba oplocks to be broken whenever a local UNIX process or NFS operation accesses a file that smbd(8) has oplocked. This allows complete data consistency between SMB/CIFS, NFS and local file access (and is a very cool feature :-) I read that as meaning you get complete data consistency between SMB, NFS and local file access :-) Ahh. I just found the posting you refer to. You're saying the above only works if the Samba server is also the NFS server? Not an NFS client? I'm really surprised at that This means that yes, we get data consistency when Samba and other Unix processes access the same file space. In this sense Samba does not count as a normal Unix process because it has to fulfil other locking requirements on behalf of its clients. It is these locking requirements that go beyond what Posix can provide that lead to data corruption when multiple Windows clients access the same file space via different Samba instances. Volker -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] SAMBA Cluster or .......
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 11:45:50AM +0100, Marcin Giedz wrote: Hello, My question is quite related to this topic. Currently I work for one of brokerages and prepare to set up domain for all employees. However I must be sure that if my PDC fails my BDC will provide all connections to roaming profiles and extra shares (to be mounted during the log in process). But additionally I want to have only ONE storage place for placing every shares and profiles. Lucky, I found one EMC disk array to be used in this solution. My idea is connect 2 server (PDC and BDC) over FCs to ONE storage. I don't have any extra software like cluster solution. Now I have almost everything UP and running but found this thread about data consistency where different Samba instances may cause data corruption. Please NEVER export the same file space via different Samba nodes, this leads to data corruption because the locks propagated have the wrong semantics Now I'm wondering if I can really do this? According to what Volker said my solution/idea is (in a word) - BROKEN :( Does this me that I must use some extra software between EMC storage and Samba instances to prevent data lost? In my situation there is a chance that PDC and BDC will server THE SAME file for different users. So looking at this topic I'd come to think that I CAN'T go production with such prepared PDC + BDC + EMC storage - am I right? If yes would anyone propose any solution for such idea? You have to be careful to do this. It's safe to do for a failover solution (no 2 Samba servers active at the same time), it's also safe for read-only shares. If you have active processes writing data simultaneously to the same file then they should be pointing at the same Samba server. Jeremy. -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
