Re: [Samba] Samba upgrade question
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 07:56:55AM -0800, Chernoguz, Inessa wrote: Hi All, I have a problem with upgrade samba on Solaris 10 (x86). The current version is 3.0.25b (distributed with Solaris 10). I am trying to upgrade version to 3.4.5. I compiled samba from sources, has not any problem with make and installation. Now I have 2 different versions and when I am running svcadm enable samba I am receiving old version. The old version installed under: /usr/sfw/sbin, new one under /usr/sbin... # /usr/sfw/sbin/smbd -V Version 3.0.25a # /usr/sbin/smbd -V Version 3.4.5 # ps -ef | grep smbd root 7531 7305 0 17:55:32 pts/1 0:00 grep smbd root 6981 6979 0 15:19:58 ? 0:00 /usr/sfw/sbin/smbd -D root 6979 1 0 15:19:58 ? 0:00 /usr/sfw/sbin/smbd -D Can you, please help me here? Thanks a lot, Inessa As someone already replied, you need to disable the vendor provided Samba first: # svcadm disable samba Then set up SysV init scripts for your new, custom installation of Samba or something via SMF. Alternately, Sunfreeware or Blastwave may have pre-packaged Samba installs that include these scripts. I prefer sticking with the vendor-provided packages when possible (hand built packages don't scale administratively). The latest Sun version of Samba is 3.0.37 for Solaris 10 and I believe they have a refresh due out shortly. Thanks, Ray -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba upgrade question
The key advantages of the Solaris provided version is that - someone already did the compilation work - ZFS support is included (this is backported by Sun and not included with 3.0.x source code from samba.) - nsswitch support is also enabled The big problems I had with Sun's version (which is why I also ended up recompiling) - domain trusts don't always work, and the idmap functionality is buggy. So I think 3.0.x is pretty much a dead-end at this point. According to the Oracle forums, Samba 3.4.x is included with the recent Solaris Express release- so I expect it to be included with Solaris 11 (whenever that comes out.) My guess (no evidence to back this up) is that Solaris 10 will stay on samba 3.0.x. You have to make some changes when you change versions and if they pushed that our as an automatic update it could possible break things. With the sunfreeware and blastwave versions of samba- - these might be 32-bit only. - I don't think zfs is included. - nsswitch support may or may not be included.I had problems with this with sunfreeware samba in the past. On 12/20/2010 11:34 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote: On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 07:56:55AM -0800, Chernoguz, Inessa wrote: Hi All, I have a problem with upgrade samba on Solaris 10 (x86). The current version is 3.0.25b (distributed with Solaris 10). I am trying to upgrade version to 3.4.5. I compiled samba from sources, has not any problem with make and installation. Now I have 2 different versions and when I am running svcadm enable samba I am receiving old version. The old version installed under: /usr/sfw/sbin, new one under /usr/sbin... # /usr/sfw/sbin/smbd -V Version 3.0.25a # /usr/sbin/smbd -V Version 3.4.5 # ps -ef | grep smbd root 7531 7305 0 17:55:32 pts/1 0:00 grep smbd root 6981 6979 0 15:19:58 ? 0:00 /usr/sfw/sbin/smbd -D root 6979 1 0 15:19:58 ? 0:00 /usr/sfw/sbin/smbd -D Can you, please help me here? Thanks a lot, Inessa As someone already replied, you need to disable the vendor provided Samba first: # svcadm disable samba Then set up SysV init scripts for your new, custom installation of Samba or something via SMF. Alternately, Sunfreeware or Blastwave may have pre-packaged Samba installs that include these scripts. I prefer sticking with the vendor-provided packages when possible (hand built packages don't scale administratively). The latest Sun version of Samba is 3.0.37 for Solaris 10 and I believe they have a refresh due out shortly. Thanks, Ray -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba upgrade question
You would have to define a new Solaris 10 service for the new samba. I don't know how to do this myself- the solaris documentation should say how, but it always looked pretty complicated to me. You have to define the dependencies. You are probably better off creating an /etc/init.d/samba script and sym linking it to the appropriate rc.d directions- the same way you would have done it in Solaris 9 or earlier. svcs -a will list it as a legacy service. This is what I did. You will need to use svcadm to disable the bundled samba version. I believe Solaris Express , just released, has samba 3.4.x or 3.5.x higher included. -Original Message- From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Chernoguz, Inessa Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 10:57 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] Samba upgrade question Hi All, I have a problem with upgrade samba on Solaris 10 (x86). The current version is 3.0.25b (distributed with Solaris 10). I am trying to upgrade version to 3.4.5. I compiled samba from sources, has not any problem with make and installation. Now I have 2 different versions and when I am running svcadm enable samba I am receiving old version. The old version installed under: /usr/sfw/sbin, new one under /usr/sbin... # /usr/sfw/sbin/smbd -V Version 3.0.25a # /usr/sbin/smbd -V Version 3.4.5 # ps -ef | grep smbd root 7531 7305 0 17:55:32 pts/1 0:00 grep smbd root 6981 6979 0 15:19:58 ? 0:00 /usr/sfw/sbin/smbd -D root 6979 1 0 15:19:58 ? 0:00 /usr/sfw/sbin/smbd -D Can you, please help me here? Thanks a lot, Inessa -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Samba upgrade question
confirm 91cc11461a9aa5e7548d5df97d93dade856b7c68 _ From: Chernoguz, Inessa Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 5:57 PM To: 'samba@lists.samba.org' Subject:Samba upgrade question Hi All, I have a problem with upgrade samba on Solaris 10 (x86). The current version is 3.0.25b (distributed with Solaris 10). I am trying to upgrade version to 3.4.5. I compiled samba from sources, has not any problem with make and installation. Now I have 2 different versions and when I am running svcadm enable samba I am receiving old version. The old version installed under: /usr/sfw/sbin, new one under /usr/sbin... # /usr/sfw/sbin/smbd -V Version 3.0.25a # /usr/sbin/smbd -V Version 3.4.5 # ps -ef | grep smbd root 7531 7305 0 17:55:32 pts/1 0:00 grep smbd root 6981 6979 0 15:19:58 ? 0:00 /usr/sfw/sbin/smbd -D root 6979 1 0 15:19:58 ? 0:00 /usr/sfw/sbin/smbd -D Can you, please help me here? Thanks a lot, Inessa -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
[Samba] Samba upgrade question
Hi All, I have a problem with upgrade samba on Solaris 10 (x86). The current version is 3.0.25b (distributed with Solaris 10). I am trying to upgrade version to 3.4.5. I compiled samba from sources, has not any problem with make and installation. Now I have 2 different versions and when I am running svcadm enable samba I am receiving old version. The old version installed under: /usr/sfw/sbin, new one under /usr/sbin... # /usr/sfw/sbin/smbd -V Version 3.0.25a # /usr/sbin/smbd -V Version 3.4.5 # ps -ef | grep smbd root 7531 7305 0 17:55:32 pts/1 0:00 grep smbd root 6981 6979 0 15:19:58 ? 0:00 /usr/sfw/sbin/smbd -D root 6979 1 0 15:19:58 ? 0:00 /usr/sfw/sbin/smbd -D Can you, please help me here? Thanks a lot, Inessa -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Re: [Samba] Upgrade question NT4 - Samba 3 PDC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/04/2007 12:28 PM, Dr.Peer-Joachim Koch escreveu: Hi, we want to replace our old NT4 PDC with a samba 3 PDC against LDAP. We have already 2 fileserver and a print server currently (all running samba 3) working within the old domain. Do we have to change the configuration and add the ldap parameter at those servers ? Hmmm, AFAICT, no. It should still find the password server if everything is in the proper place and with the right parameters. Or what is the best practice in this case ? If you want to have PDC/BDC strategy, one of the server will also need the ldap parameters and a slight differect smb.conf, there are advantages in having slave LDAPs (fast lookups) but there also disavantadges (more LDAPs to keep in sync when doing some maintainance). # Global parameters [global] workgroup = BGC netbios name = PRINT security = domain password server = * Kind regards, - -- Felipe Augusto van de Wiel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Coordenadoria de Tecnologia da Informação (CTI) - SEDU/PARANACIDADE http://www.paranacidade.org.br/ Phone: (+55 41 3350 3300) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFpkDMCj65ZxU4gPQRApAAAJ9WfkTD34BdjEiGabivb53Qk7XeMwCgv+q/ KTgHfQHsNCgrHRjdVrkeRp0= =glDp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Upgrade question NT4 - Samba 3 PDC
Hi, we want to replace our old NT4 PDC with a samba 3 PDC against LDAP. We have already 2 fileserver and a print server currently (all running samba 3) working within the old domain. Do we have to change the configuration and add the ldap parameter at those servers ? Or what is the best practice in this case ? # Global parameters [global] workgroup = BGC netbios name = PRINT security = domain password server = * -- Bye, Peer _ Max-Planck-Institut fuer Biogeochemie Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch Hans-Knöll Str.10Telefon: ++49 3641 57-6705 D-07745 Jena Telefax: ++49 3641 57-7705 -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Upgrade question
I am currently running Samba 3.0.6 and I want to upgrade to the newest version. But before I do I want to know is there any way I can dump the user DB such that if some thing bad happens I could load it into a fresh install of samba? OS: RedHat 9 SAMBA:3.0.6 Passwd DB: tdbsam The RedHat machine is configured as an NT PDC. When I upgrade software I would like to continue to use tdbsam as my passwd db. Thanks, Louis -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [SAMBA] Upgrade Question
Anyone? I might try with a --nodeps --force but I'd rather get the dependencies fixed... Perl 5 is no problem but I can't find any reference to CC Thanks, Brad I'm trying to upgrade from Samba 2.27 to 3.0.6rc2-1 The os is Redhat 7.3 with XFS The RPM was compiled for a src RPM this is what I get: rpm -Uvh samba-3.0.6rc2-1.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: CC is needed by samba-3.0.6rc2-1 /usr/bin/perl5 is needed by samba-3.0.6rc2-1 /usr/local/bin/perl is needed by samba-3.0.6rc2-1 What package is CC from? Where can I get it... or can I ignore this dependency? What about perl5 is that necessary? Thanks for any help you can give me! Brad Sagowitz -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [SAMBA] Upgrade Question
Brad Sagowitz wrote: Anyone? I might try with a --nodeps --force but I'd rather get the dependencies fixed... Perl 5 is no problem but I can't find any reference to CC Honestly, why would someone suggest a --nodeps and --force? You might as well be installing from source in shared locations since you're taking all of the package management out of rpm (I guess that just leaves you with r then ;) ) rpm -Uvh samba-3.0.6rc2-1.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: CC is needed by samba-3.0.6rc2-1 /usr/bin/perl5 is needed by samba-3.0.6rc2-1 /usr/local/bin/perl is needed by samba-3.0.6rc2-1 What package is CC from? Where can I get it... or can I ignore this dependency? What about perl5 is that necessary? If it says it is, then it probably is. Does the x.6rc2 package include the smbldap tools? That could be the source of the dependancy. cc (/usr/bin/cc) is provided by the gcc package on RH8, which is the closest I can get to 7.3, did you compile this yourself? If so, and you did on this machine, how you got the rpm built without cc is beyond me. The requirements also look a little silly, redhat has never, TMK, put perl in /usr/local, so it looks like the package was hacked up to be sure. -- Paul Gienger Office: 701-281-1884 Applied Engineering Inc. Information Systems Consultant Fax:701-281-1322 URL: www.ae-solutions.commailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [SAMBA] Upgrade Question
I did compile this myself on the very machine intended for the upgrade. I have /usr/bin/cc which is just a sym link to /usr/bin/gcc. the version of gcc I have is gcc-2.96-110 This was a SRPM compiled with the --with-acl option in the SPEC file. -Original Message- From: Paul Gienger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 16, 2004 9:28 AM To: Brad Sagowitz Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAMBA] Upgrade Question Brad Sagowitz wrote: Anyone? I might try with a --nodeps --force but I'd rather get the dependencies fixed... Perl 5 is no problem but I can't find any reference to CC Honestly, why would someone suggest a --nodeps and --force? You might as well be installing from source in shared locations since you're taking all of the package management out of rpm (I guess that just leaves you with r then ;) ) rpm -Uvh samba-3.0.6rc2-1.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: CC is needed by samba-3.0.6rc2-1 /usr/bin/perl5 is needed by samba-3.0.6rc2-1 /usr/local/bin/perl is needed by samba-3.0.6rc2-1 What package is CC from? Where can I get it... or can I ignore this dependency? What about perl5 is that necessary? If it says it is, then it probably is. Does the x.6rc2 package include the smbldap tools? That could be the source of the dependancy. cc (/usr/bin/cc) is provided by the gcc package on RH8, which is the closest I can get to 7.3, did you compile this yourself? If so, and you did on this machine, how you got the rpm built without cc is beyond me. The requirements also look a little silly, redhat has never, TMK, put perl in /usr/local, so it looks like the package was hacked up to be sure. -- Paul Gienger Office: 701-281-1884 Applied Engineering Inc. Information Systems Consultant Fax:701-281-1322 URL: www.ae-solutions.commailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Upgrade question
I'm trying to upgrade from Samba 2.27 to 3.0.6rc2-1 The os is Redhat 7.3 with XFS The RPM was compiled for a src RPM this is what I get: rpm -Uvh samba-3.0.6rc2-1.i386.rpm error: failed dependencies: CC is needed by samba-3.0.6rc2-1 /usr/bin/perl5 is needed by samba-3.0.6rc2-1 /usr/local/bin/perl is needed by samba-3.0.6rc2-1 What package is CC from? Where can I get it... or can I ignore this dependency? What about perl5 is that necessary? Thanks for any help you can give me! Brad Sagowitz -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Upgrade question - please be gentle! - failed dependencies?
Lat night I removed samba 3.0.3pre2 from the suse 9.0 box, then tried to install 3.0.5 from rpms from the suse ftp mirror on mirror.ac.uk - I had a lot of failed dependencies with it: error: Failed dependencies: liblber.so.199 is needed by samba-3.0.5-0.1 libldap.so.199 is needed by samba-3.0.5-0.1 libpopt.so.0 is needed by samba-3.0.5-0.1 liblber.so.199 is needed by samba-client-3.0.5-0.1 libldap.so.199 is needed by samba-client-3.0.5-0.1 libpopt.so.0 is needed by samba-client-3.0.5-0.1 liblber.so.199 is needed by samba-winbind-3.0.5-0.1 libldap.so.199 is needed by samba-winbind-3.0.5-0.1 libpopt.so.0 is needed by samba-winbind-3.0.5-0.1 samba conflicts with samba3-3.0.5-1 samba-client conflicts with samba3-client-3.0.5-1 samba-client conflicts with samba3-winbind-3.0.5-1 After hunting through google to try and find what provides these and just ending up with source code, I gave up and reinstalled 3.0.3pre2 from suse rpms, this did not comlain of any dependencies and (seemed to) install perfectly. I had to change the smb.conf, but otherwise everything seemed the same. This morning, people cannot print to its printers (access denied) and the samba log is full of this: [2004/07/30 09:58:35, 0] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:create_policy_hnd(111) create_policy_hnd: ERROR: too many handles (1025) on this pipe. [2004/07/30 09:58:35, 0] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:create_policy_hnd(111) create_policy_hnd: ERROR: too many handles (1025) on this pipe. [2004/07/30 09:58:35, 0] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:create_policy_hnd(111) create_policy_hnd: ERROR: too many handles (1025) on this pipe. [2004/07/30 09:58:35, 0] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:create_policy_hnd(111) create_policy_hnd: ERROR: too many handles (1025) on this pipe. [2004/07/30 09:58:35, 0] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:create_policy_hnd(111) create_policy_hnd: ERROR: too many handles (1025) on this pipe. Once again, google returns nothing useful. I have no clue what this could be about, any help welcome! Thanks H Craig White wrote: On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 09:34, Hamish wrote: Thanks Craig, Will it work if I remove samba 3.0.3 completely (rpm -e) and then install 3.0.5? Craig White wrote: This is an act of pure desperation and nothing that I could ever in good conscience suggest to someone. Not charming doesn't begin to describe the consequences that may occur. --- that is what I would do if it were me Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Upgrade question - please be gentle! - failed dependencies?
Thanks for you help, I tried to update with rpm -Uvh and it found a lot of failed dependencies: liblber.so.199, libldap.so.199, libpopt.so.199 etc - did you have these same problems? rruegner wrote: Hi, i have a big smb/ldap setup and running with 3.04 but with kernel 2.4.21 suse 9 and i had no Problems with updating it ( all the way up from version 3.0-3.04) it worked all like charme as before, but i recommend to use samba packs from ftp suse projects samba, or self compiledyesterday i looked there there where patched 3.04 packs against the swat sec bug ,but no 3.05 I know problems with sernet suse samba packs after update relating to cups Regards Hamish schrieb: Hello I am planning to upgrade our production samba server (3.0.3pre2-SuSE on SuSE 9.0, kernel 2.6.5-10) tonight to 3.0.5. Is there anything I should know about things breaking during this upgrade? I will just do it with `rpm -Uvh --repackage samba*` - I have tried this on a test server and it seems to work ok, but if anyone has some info that might be useful I would be grateful! Thanks H -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Upgrade question - please be gentle! - failed dependencies?
Hi, i updated my systems with the killing method rpm --nodeps --force i know this is not charming but it worked with the suse packs since samba 3.0 up to samba 3.04 but i strongly recommend to test this first on a test system Best Regards Hamish schrieb: Thanks for you help, I tried to update with rpm -Uvh and it found a lot of failed dependencies: liblber.so.199, libldap.so.199, libpopt.so.199 etc - did you have these same problems? rruegner wrote: Hi, i have a big smb/ldap setup and running with 3.04 but with kernel 2.4.21 suse 9 and i had no Problems with updating it ( all the way up from version 3.0-3.04) it worked all like charme as before, but i recommend to use samba packs from ftp suse projects samba, or self compiledyesterday i looked there there where patched 3.04 packs against the swat sec bug ,but no 3.05 I know problems with sernet suse samba packs after update relating to cups Regards Hamish schrieb: Hello I am planning to upgrade our production samba server (3.0.3pre2-SuSE on SuSE 9.0, kernel 2.6.5-10) tonight to 3.0.5. Is there anything I should know about things breaking during this upgrade? I will just do it with `rpm -Uvh --repackage samba*` - I have tried this on a test server and it seems to work ok, but if anyone has some info that might be useful I would be grateful! Thanks H -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Upgrade question - please be gentle! - failed dependencies?
This is an act of pure desperation and nothing that I could ever in good conscience suggest to someone. Not charming doesn't begin to describe the consequences that may occur. Craig On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 03:36, rruegner wrote: Hi, i updated my systems with the killing method rpm --nodeps --force i know this is not charming but it worked with the suse packs since samba 3.0 up to samba 3.04 but i strongly recommend to test this first on a test system Best Regards Hamish schrieb: Thanks for you help, I tried to update with rpm -Uvh and it found a lot of failed dependencies: liblber.so.199, libldap.so.199, libpopt.so.199 etc - did you have these same problems? rruegner wrote: Hi, i have a big smb/ldap setup and running with 3.04 but with kernel 2.4.21 suse 9 and i had no Problems with updating it ( all the way up from version 3.0-3.04) it worked all like charme as before, but i recommend to use samba packs from ftp suse projects samba, or self compiledyesterday i looked there there where patched 3.04 packs against the swat sec bug ,but no 3.05 I know problems with sernet suse samba packs after update relating to cups Regards Hamish schrieb: Hello I am planning to upgrade our production samba server (3.0.3pre2-SuSE on SuSE 9.0, kernel 2.6.5-10) tonight to 3.0.5. Is there anything I should know about things breaking during this upgrade? I will just do it with `rpm -Uvh --repackage samba*` - I have tried this on a test server and it seems to work ok, but if anyone has some info that might be useful I would be grateful! Thanks H -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Upgrade question - please be gentle! - failed dependencies?
Thanks Craig, Will it work if I remove samba 3.0.3 completely (rpm -e) and then install 3.0.5? Craig White wrote: This is an act of pure desperation and nothing that I could ever in good conscience suggest to someone. Not charming doesn't begin to describe the consequences that may occur. Craig On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 03:36, rruegner wrote: Hi, i updated my systems with the killing method rpm --nodeps --force i know this is not charming but it worked with the suse packs since samba 3.0 up to samba 3.04 but i strongly recommend to test this first on a test system Best Regards Hamish schrieb: Thanks for you help, I tried to update with rpm -Uvh and it found a lot of failed dependencies: liblber.so.199, libldap.so.199, libpopt.so.199 etc - did you have these same problems? rruegner wrote: Hi, i have a big smb/ldap setup and running with 3.04 but with kernel 2.4.21 suse 9 and i had no Problems with updating it ( all the way up from version 3.0-3.04) it worked all like charme as before, but i recommend to use samba packs from ftp suse projects samba, or self compiledyesterday i looked there there where patched 3.04 packs against the swat sec bug ,but no 3.05 I know problems with sernet suse samba packs after update relating to cups Regards Hamish schrieb: Hello I am planning to upgrade our production samba server (3.0.3pre2-SuSE on SuSE 9.0, kernel 2.6.5-10) tonight to 3.0.5. Is there anything I should know about things breaking during this upgrade? I will just do it with `rpm -Uvh --repackage samba*` - I have tried this on a test server and it seems to work ok, but if anyone has some info that might be useful I would be grateful! Thanks H -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Upgrade question - please be gentle! - failed dependencies?
havent done that , but should work Hamish schrieb: Thanks Craig, Will it work if I remove samba 3.0.3 completely (rpm -e) and then install 3.0.5? Craig White wrote: This is an act of pure desperation and nothing that I could ever in good conscience suggest to someone. Not charming doesn't begin to describe the consequences that may occur. Craig On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 03:36, rruegner wrote: Hi, i updated my systems with the killing method rpm --nodeps --force i know this is not charming but it worked with the suse packs since samba 3.0 up to samba 3.04 but i strongly recommend to test this first on a test system Best Regards Hamish schrieb: Thanks for you help, I tried to update with rpm -Uvh and it found a lot of failed dependencies: liblber.so.199, libldap.so.199, libpopt.so.199 etc - did you have these same problems? rruegner wrote: Hi, i have a big smb/ldap setup and running with 3.04 but with kernel 2.4.21 suse 9 and i had no Problems with updating it ( all the way up from version 3.0-3.04) it worked all like charme as before, but i recommend to use samba packs from ftp suse projects samba, or self compiledyesterday i looked there there where patched 3.04 packs against the swat sec bug ,but no 3.05 I know problems with sernet suse samba packs after update relating to cups Regards Hamish schrieb: Hello I am planning to upgrade our production samba server (3.0.3pre2-SuSE on SuSE 9.0, kernel 2.6.5-10) tonight to 3.0.5. Is there anything I should know about things breaking during this upgrade? I will just do it with `rpm -Uvh --repackage samba*` - I have tried this on a test server and it seems to work ok, but if anyone has some info that might be useful I would be grateful! Thanks H -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] Upgrade question - please be gentle! - failed dependencies?
On Thu, 2004-07-29 at 09:34, Hamish wrote: Thanks Craig, Will it work if I remove samba 3.0.3 completely (rpm -e) and then install 3.0.5? Craig White wrote: This is an act of pure desperation and nothing that I could ever in good conscience suggest to someone. Not charming doesn't begin to describe the consequences that may occur. --- that is what I would do if it were me Craig -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Upgrade question - please be gentle!
Hello I am planning to upgrade our production samba server (3.0.3pre2-SuSE on SuSE 9.0, kernel 2.6.5-10) tonight to 3.0.5. Is there anything I should know about things breaking during this upgrade? I will just do it with `rpm -Uvh --repackage samba*` - I have tried this on a test server and it seems to work ok, but if anyone has some info that might be useful I would be grateful! Thanks H -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Upgrade question
Hi: I want to upgrade a Fedora Core 1 Linux machine that is running Samba 3.0.2a to 3.0.5. Initially, I compiled the 3.0.2a source, with defaults, and installed. The installation resides in /usr/local/samba. Can I download the 3.0.5 source, compile and install without breaking anything? Will the configuration be broken? Does anyone know a way to do this cleanly? Anyone's help is greatly appreciated. Ron -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] Upgrade question
Hello, I have a Samba Upgrade question. I am currently running Samba 2.2.4 on a Solaris 2.6 and Solaris 2.8 server. What steps do I need to follow, to get my version to 2.2.8a. I'm required to address the security issues that fixed in that release. Thanks, Don Klarner -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
samba upgrade question
Hi whats the best way to upgrade samba, am currently running 2.0.7 and would like to upgrade to 2.2.5, the machine account is now moved to secrets.tdb, can i simply move the existing machine SID to private directory in new version or i have delete the old one and and rejoin samba again thanks in advance
Re: [Samba] samba upgrade question
HI Javid. Just type: # rpm -Uvh samba-2.2.5.i386.rpm from the directory where the package is located. Explanation: # rpm -ivh samba* installs and overwrite the config files, where as # rpm -Uvh samba* upgrades the package and leaves the config files in tact. I'm assuming you're running RedHat, otherwise wait for more replies as I have only worked with RH Linux and I don't know what the difference is. The man pages should always help in all flavours of Linux, just type # man rpm or # man what you're enquiring about. Trevor. - Original Message -. From: Javid Abdul-AJAVID1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 4:52 PM Subject: [Samba] samba upgrade question Hi whats the best way to upgrade samba, am currently running 2.0.7 and would like to upgrade to 2.2.5, the machine account is now moved to secrets.tdb, can i simply move the existing machine SID to private directory in new version or i have delete the old one and and rejoin samba again thanks in advance -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
