[Samba] samba auth problems in RH9 w/ log

2003-06-18 Thread Seth Hollen
I have samba version 2.2.7a security-rollup fix from redhat running as a
simple file server for about a dozen computers. the computers are all win2k
except for 1 win98 and 1 winxp pro. I am having problems with nmbd dying and
not restarting as some others in the list have has but I am also having a
problem w/ 1 particular PC/username

this person often is the only one that can't get into files on the computer
(through mapped network drives) smbstatus tells me their machine is
connected but the username is nobody.

here is a recent log:
--begin log---

[2003/06/14 20:45:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:46:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:47:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:48:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:49:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:50:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:51:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:52:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:53:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:54:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:55:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:56:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:57:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:58:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:59:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:00:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:01:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:02:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:03:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:04:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:05:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:06:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:07:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:08:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:09:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:10:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:11:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:12:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:13:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:14:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(878)
  Transaction 55918 of length 133
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685)
  switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 1)
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(858)
  Domain=[]  NativeOS=[Windows 2000 2195] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2000 5.0]
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(868)
  sesssetupX:name=[]
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(297)
  push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(286)
  push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172)
  get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: 99
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(436)
  pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172)
  get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: 99
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(336)
  uid 99 

[Samba] samba auth problems in RH9 w/ log

2003-06-17 Thread Seth Hollen
I have samba version 2.2.7a security-rollup fix from redhat running as a
simple file server for about a dozen computers.
the computers are all win2k except for 1 win98 and 1 winxp pro.
I am having problems with nmbd dying and not restarting as some others in
the list have has but I am also having a problem w/ 1 particular PC/username

this person often is the only one that can't get into files on the computer
(through mapped network drives)
smbstatus tells me their machine is connected but the username is nobody.

here is a recent log:
--begin log---

[2003/06/14 20:45:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:46:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:47:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:48:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:49:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:50:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:51:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:52:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:53:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:54:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:55:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:56:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:57:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:58:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 20:59:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:00:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:01:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:02:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:03:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:04:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:05:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:06:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:07:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:08:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:09:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:10:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:11:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:12:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:13:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:14:50, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(878)
  Transaction 55918 of length 133
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685)
  switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 1)
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(858)
  Domain=[]  NativeOS=[Windows 2000 2195] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2000 5.0]
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(868)
  sesssetupX:name=[]
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(297)
  push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/uid.c:push_conn_ctx(286)
  push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(329)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172)
  get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: 99
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(436)
  pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(172)
  get_current_groups: user is in 1 groups: 99
[2003/06/14 21:15:01, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(336)
  uid 99