Re: [Samba] write list vs read list
On Monday 14 April 2008 Chris Smith's cat, walking on the keyboard, wrote: It looks to me like you have multiple smb.conf files and you're editing the one the system is not using. Your last testparm still shows a force group parameter but there is none listed in your share definition. Also available is on by default, one less parameter you can drop to make it all more readable. I found the problemyou were almost right, except it was not another smb.conf file, but the same share defined twice in the file. Removed one of the definiton and now everything works! Thanks, Luca -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] write list vs read list
On Friday 11 April 2008 Chris Smith's cat, walking on the keyboard, wrote: [LABORATORIO_SMB] comment = Cartella privata Laboratorio path = /mnt/samba/lab_smb browsable = yes valid users = @laboratorio, @estero write list= @laboratorio read only = yes No way! I've tried to change my configuration to the following: [LABORATORIO_SMB] comment = Cartella privata Laboratorio path = /mnt/samba/lab_smb browsable = yes available = yes valid users = @laboratorio, @estero, luca.ferrari write list= @laboratorio read list = @estero, luca.ferrari writable = yes but the testparm still says: [LABORATORIO_SMB] comment = Cartella Laboratorio Sassuolo path = /mnt/samba/laboratorio_smb valid users = @laboratorio read list = @estero, luca.ferrari write list = @laboratorio force group = laboratorio read only = No so the valid users property is not changed, and in fact I'm not able to log in to the share with an account not belonging to the laboratorio group. Is there something I can check or do to get rid of this problem? Thanks, Luca -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] write list vs read list
On Monday 14 April 2008, Luca Ferrari wrote: [LABORATORIO_SMB] comment = Cartella privata Laboratorio path = /mnt/samba/lab_smb browsable = yes valid users = @laboratorio, @estero write list = @laboratorio read only = yes No way! That works for me all day long. And it was more in reference to your first post: I'd like to set a share as writable for a specific users' group, and only readable for another You can simplify as I show, you don't need a write list and a read list. If you make a share read only then it is read only by default, yet those on the write list will have write privileges. The less complicated, the easier to read and troubleshoot. [LABORATORIO_SMB] comment = Cartella privata Laboratorio path = /mnt/samba/lab_smb browsable = yes available = yes valid users = @laboratorio, @estero, luca.ferrari write list= @laboratorio read list = @estero, luca.ferrari writable = yes but the testparm still says: [LABORATORIO_SMB] comment = Cartella Laboratorio Sassuolo path = /mnt/samba/laboratorio_smb valid users = @laboratorio read list = @estero, luca.ferrari write list = @laboratorio force group = laboratorio read only = No It looks to me like you have multiple smb.conf files and you're editing the one the system is not using. Your last testparm still shows a force group parameter but there is none listed in your share definition. Also available is on by default, one less parameter you can drop to make it all more readable. -- Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] write list vs read list
On Thursday 10 April 2008 Luca Ferrari's cat, walking on the keyboard, wrote: Uhm..I've checked the file permissions, and since they are 777 I guess this is not the problem. Moreover, since I've got a NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED I think that it is something that prevents users to access the share at all. Any suggestion? It is strange, this is the definition of the share: [LABORATORIO_SMB] comment = Cartella privata Laboratorio path = /mnt/samba/lab_smb browsable = yes available = yes valid users = @laboratorio @estero luca.ferrari write list= @laboratorio read list = @estero luca.ferrari writable = yes printable = no force group = laboratorio where I've added myself to the valid and read list. Then I forced a reload of the configuration: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# /etc/init.d/samba reload * Reloading /etc/samba/smb.conf... but if I check the configuration with testparm I got: [LABORATORIO_SMB] comment = Cartella Laboratorio Sassuolo path = /mnt/samba/laboratorio_smb valid users = @laboratorio read list = @estero, luca.ferrari write list = @laboratorio force group = laboratorio read only = No as you can see the luca.ferrari user is not added to the valid users list! This could be the problem that such user always gets a NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED??? Any suggestion? Thanks, Luca -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] write list vs read list
On Wednesday 09 April 2008, Luca Ferrari wrote: [LABORATORIO_SMB] comment = Cartella privata Laboratorio path = /mnt/samba/lab_smb browsable = yes available = yes valid users = @laboratorio @estero write list = @laboratorio read list = @estero writable = yes printable = no force group = laboratorio Try: [LABORATORIO_SMB] comment = Cartella privata Laboratorio path = /mnt/samba/lab_smb browsable = yes valid users = @laboratorio, @estero write list= @laboratorio read only = yes -- Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Re: [Samba] write list vs read list
On Wednesday 9 April 2008 your cat, walking on the keyboard, wrote: However, the @estero group cannot access the share at all (NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED). What am I doing wrong? Most likely the filesystem permissions prevent users in @estero from executing or reading the /home/samba/lab_smb folder and/or the files in it. Uhm..I've checked the file permissions, and since they are 777 I guess this is not the problem. Moreover, since I've got a NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED I think that it is something that prevents users to access the share at all. Any suggestion? Thanks, Luca -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
[Samba] write list vs read list
Hi, I'd like to set a share as writable for a specific users' group, and only readable for another, so I did the following: [global] netbios name = SEDELDAP workgroup = LDAP security = user passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost/ obey pam restrictions = no ldap admin dn = cn=admin,dc=MyHost,dc=com ldap suffix = dc=MyHost,dc=com ldap group suffix = ou=Group ldap user suffix = ou=People ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers ldap idmap suffix = ou=Users ldap ssl = off domain logons = yes follow symlinks = yes wide links = yes unix extensions = no map to guest = Bad User guest account = guest.samba [LABORATORIO_SMB] comment = Cartella privata Laboratorio path = /mnt/samba/lab_smb browsable = yes available = yes valid users = @laboratorio @estero write list= @laboratorio read list = @estero writable = yes printable = no force group = laboratorio However, the @estero group cannot access the share at all (NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED). What am I doing wrong? Thanks, Luca -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RE: [Samba] write list vs read list
However, the @estero group cannot access the share at all (NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED). What am I doing wrong? Most likely the filesystem permissions prevent users in @estero from executing or reading the /home/samba/lab_smb folder and/or the files in it. Cheers Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba