RE: OT: suggestion! (was Re: [Samba] !!ATTENTION NEWBIES!!)

2003-02-17 Thread David Brodbeck


 -Original Message-
 From: Robert Adkins II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

   I have read a few more of your responses. It appears that you
 believe wholeheartedly that your more advanced questions are going
 unanswered simply because of the volume of lower skilled questions. 

I see it go both ways.

The really interesting problems that uncover new bugs in the Samba code
generally get a lot of attention.  (Sometimes forwarding them to
samba-technical can be productive, incidentally.)

The easy problems generally get answered eventually, too, even if it's just
with a pointer to the right section of the manual.

It's the ones in between, the tricky problems that are difficult to work
out, but probably not actual bugs, that sometimes tend to languish
unanswered.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: OT: suggestion! (was Re: [Samba] !!ATTENTION NEWBIES!!)

2003-02-17 Thread John H Terpstra
On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, David Brodbeck wrote:



  -Original Message-
  From: Robert Adkins II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

  I have read a few more of your responses. It appears that you
  believe wholeheartedly that your more advanced questions are going
  unanswered simply because of the volume of lower skilled questions.

 I see it go both ways.

 The really interesting problems that uncover new bugs in the Samba code
 generally get a lot of attention.  (Sometimes forwarding them to
 samba-technical can be productive, incidentally.)

Obviously, any real bugs need to be fixed asap. Many bugs are NOT
interesting - just a right royal pain!

 The easy problems generally get answered eventually, too, even if it's just
 with a pointer to the right section of the manual.

I can not speak for anyone else, but my approach is to look carefully at
the posting (typically about 10 seconds). I answer if:

- the user is new and shows they have tried to solve the problem

- the user is experienced and made an obvious error

- some else's help is wrong

- the problem is not well documented either in samba code or
through the mailing list archives

- the problem pertains to something I can contribute something to

I do NOT answer if the answer can be readily found. This demonstrates that
the enquirer is lazy and wants to abuse my time and energy.

 It's the ones in between, the tricky problems that are difficult to work
 out, but probably not actual bugs, that sometimes tend to languish
 unanswered.

You will note that sometimes I do NOT provide the answer, but I do ask a
question that contains the answer.

Example:

Recently someone who had a clear name resolution problem was not using
WINS. They did not want to use WINS: I do NOT have time to educate every
subscriber who does NOT WANT to use WINS as to it's benefits in a NetBIOS
over TCP/IP environment. Some of my help in this area has gone on for over
10 interchanges - and I am tired of that. So I simply sent back a reply
that asked Why are you sure you do not want to use WINS? - from that
point forward it's up to the recipient to do some more home work.

From my analysis of my January respsonses the average time I spent per
reply was around 13 minutes. Most replies take about 1-2 minutes, but a
few too MUCH longer. Several took over 1 hour.

I do carefully take note of problem areas and then try to capture useful
hints and answers. These get fed back into documentation. Most of the new
documentation is going into Samba-3.0.0. Hopefully the 3.0.0 release will
set a new standard in helpful documentation.

We need to be realistic though: the new documentation will largely close
gaps in older samba functionality. It will take a while to prepare and
include this same level of utility in documentation pertaining to new
features. This is a slow but beneficial process and is a key reason why I
often ask people who have solved a problem to document their solution and
to contribute it. Unfortunately, most people we help do NOT contribute
back in this manner (but human nature is like that).

- John T.
-- 
John H Terpstra
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



Re: OT: suggestion! (was Re: [Samba] !!ATTENTION NEWBIES!!)

2003-02-14 Thread Chris de Vidal
--- Kurt Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 wow / i did newer see such a response to a theme as
 in this case! :-O

Yeah, it actually had the opposite effect of what I
was begging people to do :-P

 here's a suggestion:
 i did send (in a view cases) a short message to this
 'NEWBEES' with 
 important internet links, such as: (e.g.)
 
 http://www.samba.org/samba/ml-etiquette.html
 http://hr.uoregon.edu/davidrl/samba/
 http://at.samba.org/samba/docs/

As did I.  The message I wanted to get across was,
Help yourself, this is why...  This is how I help
myself; here are ALL of the resources I've used!  It
just was misunderstood, I believe.  I thought I was
doing a service, but as I read it again, it looked
like an angry slam, not what I hoped.

Why can't we all get video email so inflections can be
easier seen?  (-:

I actually spend more time with my email client
helping newbies with greatly detailed letters than any
other thing.  A slam wasn't intended, and I'm sorry I
was misunderstood.

/dev/idal

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: OT: suggestion! (was Re: [Samba] !!ATTENTION NEWBIES!!)

2003-02-14 Thread Robert Adkins II
Chris,

I have read a few more of your responses. It appears that you
believe wholeheartedly that your more advanced questions are going
unanswered simply because of the volume of lower skilled questions. 

Well, how do you know that there are enough people on the
mailing list that have experienced the more advanced issues you are
experiencing? Then, out of those people, how many of those do you
believe will take their time to answer your questions? It is likely that
the number is quite low.

While I don't consider myself an expert with Samba, I can answer
a few advanced questions and a glut of basic questions. When I was in
the midst of configuring the domain controllers we are using, I read and
answered dozens upon dozens of questions, newbie and otherwise. However,
since I now have my issues resolved, I answer far fewer questions then I
did previously. 

I believe that is very common amongst users that move beyond the
basics of Samba and most other services. Once they have the majority of
their issues resolved, they move one. So, it is likely that if all the
Newbs started researching from the get go and rarely ever posted to
the Samba list with their basic questions, you would still find your
more advanced questions go unanswered.

That's just the way things go.

I would like to apologize for the feather ruffling that I have
done regarding this issue. I didn't have all the information behind your
issue until I read a few of your posts after the flames I started
fanning. I wish you the best with finding the answers to your more
advanced questions. I know that many of mine go unanswered and that is
just the way it goes. 

Regards,
Robert Adkins II
IT Manager/Buyer
Impel Industries, Inc.
586-254-5800


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Chris de Vidal
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:16 AM
To: Kurt Weiss
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: suggestion! (was Re: [Samba] !!ATTENTION NEWBIES!!)

--- Kurt Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 wow / i did newer see such a response to a theme as
 in this case! :-O

Yeah, it actually had the opposite effect of what I
was begging people to do :-P

 here's a suggestion:
 i did send (in a view cases) a short message to this
 'NEWBEES' with 
 important internet links, such as: (e.g.)
 
 http://www.samba.org/samba/ml-etiquette.html
 http://hr.uoregon.edu/davidrl/samba/
 http://at.samba.org/samba/docs/

As did I.  The message I wanted to get across was,
Help yourself, this is why...  This is how I help
myself; here are ALL of the resources I've used!  It
just was misunderstood, I believe.  I thought I was
doing a service, but as I read it again, it looked
like an angry slam, not what I hoped.

Why can't we all get video email so inflections can be
easier seen?  (-:

I actually spend more time with my email client
helping newbies with greatly detailed letters than any
other thing.  A slam wasn't intended, and I'm sorry I
was misunderstood.

/dev/idal

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba



RE: OT: suggestion! (was Re: [Samba] !!ATTENTION NEWBIES!!)

2003-02-14 Thread Chris de Vidal
--- Robert Adkins II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have read a few more of your responses. It
 appears that you
 believe wholeheartedly that your more advanced
 questions are going
 unanswered simply because of the volume of lower
 skilled questions. 

That was but one of the 5 points I was making.  The
other four:
1. Newbies, your questions will often go unanswered
2. Help yourself, here's how
3. Developers are likely to be overwhelmed by the
volume of simple questions.  I'd much rather have them
improve Samba than answer how do I mount an NT share
for the 20th time.
4. It's just disrespectful when they went to alot of
work writing documents.

 Well, how do you know that there are enough people
 on the
 mailing list that have experienced the more advanced
 issues you are
 experiencing? Then, out of those people, how many of
 those do you
 believe will take their time to answer your
 questions? It is likely that
 the number is quite low.

You really must know what questions I'd asked to say
that.  Please don't assume.

 I would like to apologize for the feather ruffling
 that I have done regarding this issue. I didn't have

 all the information behind your
 issue until I read a few of your posts after the
 flames I started fanning.

Thanks, Robert!  Apology accepted.  Please accept my
apology for being arrogant at your responses.  I
_really_did_ want to help, not bash.

/dev/idal

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day
http://shopping.yahoo.com
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba