Re: [Samba] Which distribution to rollout

2004-09-23 Thread Adam Tauno Williams
 I have some reservations about fedora - I just dont know how stable it
 is for a production server (our services are mainly
 samba/ldap/ntp/ssh/rsync/clamav) - we have about 15 samba servers in
 production currently.
 RHEL - well - the cost is a factor
 gentoo - takes to long to deploy
 Mandrake 10?
 What are some of the samba users recommendations?

SuSe.  Inexpensive and pretty much gauranteed not to be dropped.  We are just
using the ordinary Pro version, it works very will.  Still does all the normal
RPM based management, and Red Carpet supports it.
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Which distribution to rollout

2004-09-23 Thread Stuart Highlander
i had the same situation here.  i happened to be running  RH (7.2) servers
and addressing vulnerabilities started to become an issue.

i went the fedora route with few problems, most of my own making.  the
upgrades went relatively smoothly.  initial issues dealt with the upgrade
picking up an old config file for a nic on one server and causing my wins
server to not be able to find the server, causing domain login problems, and
minor differences between older versions of samba and samba 3.0.  fedora
stability has not been an issue here.  all they do is run, and run, and run
.

stuart


- Original Message - 
From: Chris McKeever [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 9:44 AM
Subject: [Samba] Which distribution to rollout


 we are running an older version of RH (7.3) - and I am getting
 concerned that I may need to migrate off of it - but I dont know what
 I should move to.  Trying to formulate ideas before it becomes a 'got
 to do it now' scenario.

 I have some reservations about fedora - I just dont know how stable it
 is for a production server (our services are mainly
 samba/ldap/ntp/ssh/rsync/clamav) - we have about 15 samba servers in
 production currently.

 RHEL - well - the cost is a factor

 gentoo - takes to long to deploy

 Mandrake 10?

 What are some of the samba users recommendations?

 thanks
 -- 
 To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
 instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Which distribution to rollout

2004-09-23 Thread rruegner
Hi,
i myself have running large setups with suse 9,
but debian ( the new comes now up ) is always a good choice
Regards
Chris McKeever schrieb:
we are running an older version of RH (7.3) - and I am getting
concerned that I may need to migrate off of it - but I dont know what
I should move to.  Trying to formulate ideas before it becomes a 'got
to do it now' scenario.
I have some reservations about fedora - I just dont know how stable it
is for a production server (our services are mainly
samba/ldap/ntp/ssh/rsync/clamav) - we have about 15 samba servers in
production currently.
RHEL - well - the cost is a factor
gentoo - takes to long to deploy
Mandrake 10?
What are some of the samba users recommendations?
thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Which distribution to rollout

2004-09-23 Thread Daniel Ramaley
I run Samba on OpenBSD. It isn't Linux, but it is free and works very 
well. It also isn't likely to go away or move to a less stable 
development any time soon.

On Thursday 23 September 2004 09:44 am, Chris McKeever wrote:
we are running an older version of RH (7.3) - and I am getting
concerned that I may need to migrate off of it - but I dont know what
I should move to.  Trying to formulate ideas before it becomes a 'got
to do it now' scenario.

I have some reservations about fedora - I just dont know how stable it
is for a production server (our services are mainly
samba/ldap/ntp/ssh/rsync/clamav) - we have about 15 samba servers in
production currently.

RHEL - well - the cost is a factor

gentoo - takes to long to deploy

Mandrake 10?

What are some of the samba users recommendations?

thanks

-- 

Dan Ramaley
Digital Media Library Specialist
(515) 271-1934
Cowles Library 140, Drake University

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Which distribution to rollout

2004-09-23 Thread Christian Merrill
Daniel Ramaley wrote:
I run Samba on OpenBSD. It isn't Linux, but it is free and works very 
well. It also isn't likely to go away or move to a less stable 
development any time soon.

On Thursday 23 September 2004 09:44 am, Chris McKeever wrote:
 

we are running an older version of RH (7.3) - and I am getting
concerned that I may need to migrate off of it - but I dont know what
I should move to.  Trying to formulate ideas before it becomes a 'got
to do it now' scenario.
I have some reservations about fedora - I just dont know how stable it
is for a production server (our services are mainly
samba/ldap/ntp/ssh/rsync/clamav) - we have about 15 samba servers in
production currently.
RHEL - well - the cost is a factor
gentoo - takes to long to deploy
Mandrake 10?
What are some of the samba users recommendations?
thanks
   

 

I think to some degree it depends on what your implimentation of samba 
is like...As in are you doing relatively simple file sharing or are you 
making use of all the bells and whistles available (winbind, kerberos 
integration, etc.).  If you have a relatively simple configuration and 
this is in a production environment then shell out the money for RHEL or 
Suse (trying not to be too biased) and enjoy being on a relatively 
stable unchanging and *supported* OS.

If your configuration is more complex then you probably want to avoid 
those platforms as they try to update very infrequently.  Samba tends to 
be in a constant state of change and of course it has to deal with 
reacting to whatever Microsoft decides to do...for simple configurations 
this doesn't tend to matter, but if you're using some of the more 
powerful features of Samba then you probably have to look forward to 
having to upgrade on a regular basis.  In that case you should probably 
go with whatever is free and comfortable for you to use.

Christian
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Which distribution to rollout

2004-09-23 Thread Chris
On Thursday 23 September 2004 10:44 am, Chris McKeever wrote:
 gentoo - takes to long to deploy

I had been using SuSE for servers, still have 3 running version 7.3 but my 6 
most recent server installs have been Gentoo. I actually find them (the 
Gentoo servers) much easier to maintain and keep up-to-date. Deployment on 
server grade hardware with no X is really pretty quick.

Chris
-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba


Re: [Samba] Which distribution to rollout

2004-09-23 Thread Daniel Ramaley
A good point. I currently have three OpenBSD Samba servers that i 
administer. Two are fairly simple, just doing file and printer sharing 
to a workgroup. The other is a member of an Active Directory domain. 
Right now it is just doing file sharing, but it had to be tied in with 
Kerberos and everything else necessary to make Active Directory happy.

I think to some degree it depends on what your implimentation of samba
is like...As in are you doing relatively simple file sharing or are
 you making use of all the bells and whistles available (winbind,
 kerberos integration, etc.).  If you have a relatively simple
 configuration and this is in a production environment then shell out
 the money for RHEL or Suse (trying not to be too biased) and enjoy
 being on a relatively stable unchanging and *supported* OS.

If your configuration is more complex then you probably want to avoid
those platforms as they try to update very infrequently.  Samba tends
 to be in a constant state of change and of course it has to deal with
 reacting to whatever Microsoft decides to do...for simple
 configurations this doesn't tend to matter, but if you're using some
 of the more powerful features of Samba then you probably have to look
 forward to having to upgrade on a regular basis.  In that case you
 should probably go with whatever is free and comfortable for you to
 use.

Christian

-- 

Dan Ramaley
Digital Media Library Specialist
(515) 271-1934
Cowles Library 140, Drake University

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:  http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba