Missing findsmb in current CVS SAMBA_2_2 for RedHat
Hi, I checked out SAMBA_2_2 branch yesterday, and tried to make rpm. The spec file needs /packaging/RedHat/findsmb. But it is not there. I've copied one from Mandrake and everything went fine. Please, fix. Regards, Olaf Fraczyk
Re: Changing domain passwords
James Willard wrote: By the way, is SWAT broken in the HEAD branch or is it just my configuration? Whenever I try to run it, it traps a SIGABRT and dies. The backtrace is as follows: #0 0x808e0d5 in lp_save_defaults () #1 0x808e468 in lp_load () #2 0x805ef4b in load_config () I just noticed this for testparam. I might get to chase it up, but I've CC'ed 'ab', who I think was the last person messing in that area. (It could also be somthing comleatly unrealated) Thanks, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team [EMAIL PROTECTED] Student Network Administrator, Hawker College [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net
Re: Missing findsmb in current CVS SAMBA_2_2 for RedHat
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Olaf [iso-8859-2] Fr±czyk wrote: Hi, I checked out SAMBA_2_2 branch yesterday, and tried to make rpm. The spec file needs /packaging/RedHat/findsmb. But it is not there. I've copied one from Mandrake and everything went fine. Please, fix. This file is located in script/findsmb.in and is created as part of the configure script now. My RPM builds worked fine. Are you using an old specfile by chance? cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org --http://www.plainjoe.org Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2 --I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
Makefile error when no winbind
I'm currently compiling on HP-UX 10.20. This OS does not have winbind support. In Makefile.in the variable @WINBIND_LTARGETS@ is used, but when I run configure this variable is empty because HP-UX 10.20 does not have winbind. This gives a syntax error on line 664 in the Makefile. --- Michel Stoop, Senior Network and Systems Administrator postmaster for ncg.nl, ccggron.nl and centralindustrygroup.com Numeriek Centrum Groningen B.V. Shipbuilding Services Postbus 204 9700AE Groningen +31 (0)50 541 26 32 fax: +31 (0)50 542 37 17 http://www.ncg.nl mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
Re: Makefile error when no winbind
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Michel Stoop (samba) wrote: I'm currently compiling on HP-UX 10.20. This OS does not have winbind support. In Makefile.in the variable WINBIND_LTARGETS is used, but when I run configure this variable is empty because HP-UX 10.20 does not have winbind. This gives a syntax error on line 664 in the Makefile. You didn't say what release/cvs branch you are using. I think we already fixed this in the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs code. Please retest and let me know. cheers,jerry - Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org --http://www.plainjoe.org Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2 --I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
VFS: Can you track fd (last activity on a file descriptor) ??
I looking for a way to check the last activity performed on a specific fd. What I trying to do is, see if the last action was a open while during the current write request. this will tell me that a file was opened and actually written to. when this occurs I will make a copy of file for ( FDA Part11 compliance ). The issues is that most things open with write but perform so action .. or possible not. If you right click properties in explorer it opens for write. ( I must track paired actions .. to conclude if a backup is needed or not. --- My idea is created a GLOBAL array int fd_stat[1024] = 0; 0=unused or closed 1=open for write 2=written too int stat *vfs_init - Does SAMBA already do this with the current structures ? help ... if anyone else needs Part 11 Compliance .. I will releases this if I can get it working
Re: VFS: Can you track fd (last activity on a file descriptor) ??
I think this is going to become a common question for people starting with VFS modules. The mapping of open and subsequent write calls to real world operations such as newly created, modified, etc. Sorry, I don't know the best way to do it yet. There is a 'BOOL modified' flag attached to the files struct, though I don't know in which context it's updated. Other tricks I've seen involve checking the file sizes at various stages, i.e. an open with a file size of 0 is a possible new creation, etc. Derek At 6/3/2002 10:50 AM, you wrote: I looking for a way to check the last activity performed on a specific fd. What I trying to do is, see if the last action was a open while during the current write request. this will tell me that a file was opened and actually written to. when this occurs I will make a copy of file for ( FDA Part11 compliance ). The issues is that most things open with write but perform so action .. or possible not. If you right click properties in explorer it opens for write. ( I must track paired actions .. to conclude if a backup is needed or not. --- My idea is created a GLOBAL array int fd_stat[1024] = 0; 0=unused or closed 1=open for write 2=written too int stat *vfs_init - Does SAMBA already do this with the current structures ? help ... if anyone else needs Part 11 Compliance .. I will releases this if I can get it working
Re: Missing findsmb in current CVS SAMBA_2_2 for RedHat
On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 16:18, Gerald Carter wrote: On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Olaf [iso-8859-2] Fr±czyk wrote: Hi, I checked out SAMBA_2_2 branch yesterday, and tried to make rpm. The spec file needs /packaging/RedHat/findsmb. But it is not there. I've copied one from Mandrake and everything went fine. Please, fix. This file is located in script/findsmb.in and is created as part of the configure script now. My RPM builds worked fine. Are you using an old specfile by chance? Yes you are right, I used specfile for 2.2.4. Sorry, I misguided you. Regards, Olaf
bug with profiles and logon home?
Hello, I have my profiles being saved to a certain share. However, the profiles are not always going to this share, they are sometimes being saved to the user's home directory. here is the relevant config: logon home = \\%N\%U logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u [profiles] path = /home/profiles read only = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 Any ideas as to why I am seeing this behavior ? Thank you!! -- Terry Davis http://approbation.org/
Re: Missing findsmb in current CVS SAMBA_2_2 for RedHat
On 3 Jun 2002, Olaf [iso-8859-2] Fr±czyk wrote: On Mon, 2002-06-03 at 16:18, Gerald Carter wrote: On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Olaf [iso-8859-2] Fr±czyk wrote: Hi, I checked out SAMBA_2_2 branch yesterday, and tried to make rpm. The spec file needs /packaging/RedHat/findsmb. But it is not there. I've copied one from Mandrake and everything went fine. Please, fix. This file is located in script/findsmb.in and is created as part of the configure script now. My RPM builds worked fine. Are you using an old specfile by chance? Yes you are right, I used specfile for 2.2.4. Sorry, I misguided you. No biggie. Thanks for checking on it. cheers, jerry - Hewlett-Packard http://www.hp.com SAMBA Team http://www.samba.org --http://www.plainjoe.org Sam's Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours 2ed. ISBN 0-672-32269-2 --I never saved anything for the swim back. Ethan Hawk in Gattaca--
(no subject)
WinXP allows login to expired/forbidden accounts
Hi,
I've stumbled upon this problem while trying to limit access to specific
machine to specific domain users. I did it by setting Samba to obey PAM
restrictions, and then using the pam_access PAM module ('account' clause)
to do user validation (described below).
On Win2000, this works fine - if an unauthorized user tries to login,
Win2000 says 'Account not permitted to login at this time' (or something
along those lines), and disallows the login.
But WinXP _allows_ the login to proceed, but refuses to map any drives
(home directory) and disallows access to PDC shares. In this way, the user
has access to local disks and resources.
Can someone try to replicate and find the source of this bug? I'm seeing it
on two different WinXP machines, and on no Win2k machines. Is it too late
to fix this for 2.2.5?
I'm using stock Samba 2.2.4 on RedHat 7.2 as a PDC to Win2k and WinXP domains.
-
Disallowing Samba logins of users from specific machines:
The question was how to restrict logging in from a specific machine
(kaitain.zagreb.fizika.org) only to users listed in specific UNIX groups
(ss, admins) and to root. Kaitain is a WinXP machine.
This is how I did it, using PAM and pam_access module:
1. Set the global smb.conf configuration option:
obey pam restrictions = yes
2. Modify/create your /etc/pam.d/samba configuration file
along these lines:
/etc/pam.d/samba :
-
#%PAM-1.0
auth required pam_nologin.so debug
auth required pam_stack.so service=system-auth
# [majuric] -- implement Samba login restrictions
accountrequired pam_access.so accessfile=/etc/samba/samba-access.conf
accountrequired pam_stack.so service=system-auth
sessionrequired pam_stack.so service=system-auth
password required pam_stack.so service=system-auth
-
This is a RedHat 7.2 setup, so your file (pam_stack portions in particular)
might differ. The important bit is the pam_access line.
3. Create samba-access.conf file
/etc/samba/samba-access.conf :
-
#
# [majuric] - this is a file for restriction of Samba access
# using the pam_access module. For this to work, smb.conf
# parameter obey pam restrictions = 'yes' must be set,
# and in /etc/pam.d/samba the following line must be added:
#
# auth required pam_access.so accessfile=/etc/samba/samba-access.conf
#
#
# [majuric] -- disallow logins from restricted computers
# (currently, Kaitain) to users other than root and ss and admins groups
#
-:ALL EXCEPT ss admins root: kaitain.zagreb.fizika.org
-
-
Mario Juric,
Student at Physics dept. of Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb
Voice : +385 1 3095 649 SS HFD : http://fizika.org
Mobile: +385 98 736 550 VO : http://www.astro.hr
I'm successful because I'm lucky.
The harder I work, the luckier I get.
Does ACL requires RPC?
Hi, Maybe this is the wrong place to ask this question... Can anyone tell me whether implementation of ACL in CIFS requires RPC (remote services) support or it is just sufficient to implement ACL related transactions. Thanks in advance. Igor -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] attachment: winmail.dat
Re: [PATCH] Clean up samba-2.2 for POSIX-96
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 02:52:00PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At Jeremy's request, here is a version of the POSIX-96 cleanup patches for the Samba 2.2 branch. Applied, thanks ! Jeremy.
Re: compile samba-2.2.4 on Solaris 7
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Juergen Hasch wrote: I believe the test program isn't that wrong. Wouldn't it be correct simply not to use dirent64 at all if readdir64 isn't defined ? This sounds correct to me. Although I'm trying to find a box on which readdir64 is not available. I'm checking it into SAMBA_2_2 now. cheers, jerry
Re: compile samba-2.2.4 on Solaris 7
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:31:10PM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote: Jerry == Gerald Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Eric On Thu, 30 May 2002, Eric Boehm wrote: I've seen the Eric following behavior on Solaris 8. Eric 1. compiling 32-bit with Sun Workshop, configure checks for Eric and finds readdir64... yes dirent64... yes Eric 2. compiling 32-bit with Sun Workshop, configure checks for Eric and finds readdir64... no dirent64... yes Jerry Do you mean 64-bit here for #2? Yes, I mean 64-bit. cut-and-paste too quickly, sorry. -- Eric M. Boehm /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / No HTML or RTF in mail X No proprietary word-processing Respect Open Standards / \ files in mail
