Re: NULL sessions - Listing shares anonymously - restrict anonymous

2002-11-17 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 19:40, Tim Potter wrote: 
 On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 07:32:06PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
 
   In the Samba HEAD and 3.0 branches however the parameter behaves more
   like the RestrictAnonymous registry setting.  Only 'restrict anonymous = 1' 
   is currently supported though.
  
  I'm going to do some research, and figure out exactly what 'restrict
  anonymous = 2' does.  If it denies all guest logins, then it is trivial
  to implement.
 
 I'm pretty sure that's what it does.  It would be nice to implement it 
 in terms of security descriptors for the various rpc pipes.

Actually, it allows the session setup, but denies the tree connect to IPC$.

I'm about to commit a patch to this effect, but I wasn't sure about what 
behavior we should have:

override all 'guest ok' settings for all shares

allow guest access to these shares, which implies guest IPC access (because
we allow IPC on all shares, not just IPC$ - at least that's my understanding)

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: NULL sessions - Listing shares anonymously - restrict anonymous

2002-11-16 Thread Christopher R. Hertel
Yannick Mercier wrote:
:
 Unfortunately, Ill have to back out to samba 2.2 because I'm using this
 samba server as a PDC also, and when I logon with my WinXP workstation,
 the PC reboots during Loading desktop settings
 I guess its a bug in the alpha version of samba

If the XP system reboots then there's a bug in XP.  The fact that the
alpha version of Samba excersizes the XP bug is something we will want to
fix, but XP shouldn't be rebooting on error.

Chris -)-

-- 
Samba Team -- http://www.samba.org/ -)-   Christopher R. Hertel
jCIFS Team -- http://jcifs.samba.org/   -)-   ubiqx development, uninq.
ubiqx Team -- http://www.ubiqx.org/ -)-   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnLineBook -- http://ubiqx.org/cifs/-)-   [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: NULL sessions - Listing shares anonymously - restrict anonymous

2002-11-15 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 15:08, Tim Potter wrote:
 On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:50:47PM -0500, Yannick Mercier wrote:
 
  I am running 2.2.5 and I would like to know if the
  restrict anonymous as been implemented correctly, as it was supposed
  to behave from the start, in order to deny
  ALL anonymous connections as stated in the man :
  When restrict anonymous is yes, all anonymous connections are denied no
  matter what they are for.
 
 In the Samba 2.2 branch the 'restrict anonymous' parameter behaves as
 per the manual page.  It's broken and unlikely to be fixed.
 
  Ive been reading some dev mailing lists and someone said that there would be
  0, 1 , 2 as
  possible values to the restrict anonymous option, as it been done yet ?
 
 In the Samba HEAD and 3.0 branches however the parameter behaves more
 like the RestrictAnonymous registry setting.  Only 'restrict anonymous = 1' 
 is currently supported though.

I'm going to do some research, and figure out exactly what 'restrict
anonymous = 2' does.  If it denies all guest logins, then it is trivial
to implement.

Andrew Bartlett

-- 
Andrew Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manager, Authentication Subsystems, Samba Team  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Student Network Administrator, Hawker College   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://samba.org http://build.samba.org http://hawkerc.net



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: NULL sessions - Listing shares anonymously - restrict anonymous

2002-11-15 Thread Yannick Mercier
I installed the samba-3.0alpha20 (latest I think) and restrict anonymous =
1 works
for denying the shares Listing from non-authentified users. As what Ive
read, the restrict anonymous = 2
is not implemented yet, but when it will be, it is supposed to deny all rpc
calls, which will be great

Unfortunately, Ill have to back out to samba 2.2 because Im using this samba
server as
a PDC also, and when I logon with my WinXP workstation, the PC reboots
during Loading desktop settings
I guess its a bug in the alpha version of samba




-
I'm going to do some research, and figure out exactly what 'restrict
anonymous = 2' does.  If it denies all guest logins, then it is trivial
to implement.

Andrew Bartlett

On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 15:08, Tim Potter wrote:
 On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:50:47PM -0500, Yannick Mercier wrote:

  I am running 2.2.5 and I would like to know if the
  restrict anonymous as been implemented correctly, as it was supposed
  to behave from the start, in order to deny
  ALL anonymous connections as stated in the man :
  When restrict anonymous is yes, all anonymous connections are denied no
  matter what they are for.

 In the Samba 2.2 branch the 'restrict anonymous' parameter behaves as
 per the manual page.  It's broken and unlikely to be fixed.

  Ive been reading some dev mailing lists and someone said that there
would be
  0, 1 , 2 as
  possible values to the restrict anonymous option, as it been done yet
?

 In the Samba HEAD and 3.0 branches however the parameter behaves more
 like the RestrictAnonymous registry setting.  Only 'restrict anonymous =
1'
 is currently supported though.





Re: NULL sessions - Listing shares anonymously - restrict anonymous

2002-11-14 Thread Tim Potter
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 08:50:47PM -0500, Yannick Mercier wrote:

 I am running 2.2.5 and I would like to know if the
 restrict anonymous as been implemented correctly, as it was supposed
 to behave from the start, in order to deny
 ALL anonymous connections as stated in the man :
 When restrict anonymous is yes, all anonymous connections are denied no
 matter what they are for.

In the Samba 2.2 branch the 'restrict anonymous' parameter behaves as
per the manual page.  It's broken and unlikely to be fixed.

 Ive been reading some dev mailing lists and someone said that there would be
 0, 1 , 2 as
 possible values to the restrict anonymous option, as it been done yet ?

In the Samba HEAD and 3.0 branches however the parameter behaves more
like the RestrictAnonymous registry setting.  Only 'restrict anonymous = 1' 
is currently supported though.


Tim.