[sane-devel] (no subject)

2011-05-17 Thread Mahashai Vagisha


Dear Friends


I need some help to find linux driver for Canoscan 8000F. I opened the metal 
sheet covering the ASIC on the Main PCB. I appended the photo of it for your 
reference,  unfortunately the conference rejected it. If anyone would need the 
photo  let me know and I will send it asap. I got some more info downloaded  
for 
servicing this scanner. 


Please let me know if any of you got the driver for it.

I use Ubuntu on virtual PC but as soon as I get this driver than probably quit 
Windows for good.

Thank 
Regards
Vagisha


-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/attachments/20110517/7fae8f64/attachment.htm>


[sane-devel] Fuji Lanovia C-550.

2011-05-17 Thread m. allan noah
If you cannot run the machine due to missing software or dongle, you
cannot snoop on the communication protocol. No snoops = no reverse
engineering.

allan

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Pete Lancashire
 wrote:
> Ever since Fuji got out of the scanner biz the price has been dropping
> fast, very fast. And as usual the PC, in this case a Mac that was
> dedicated to it along with the proprietary software and lic. dongle
> are usually long gone in another direction, thats the situation this
> one is in. So far I can't even get Fuji or Agfa who resold it to even
> give me more the the usual 'we don't support it anymore, click'.
>
> HP lost the sale of 250 printers when I got that replay a few years
> ago. The short term bean counters just don't get it.
>
>> Unfortunately, at 5000 Dpi, I'd bet this thing uses some interesting 
>> compression, which could be hard to decode.
>
> 5000 x 18 x 13 ?x 48 (dpi, x, y, bits/pixel) , compression - I hope so !!!
>
> -pete
>
>
> PS C .. yes years ago, but it's like riding a bike :-)
>
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:13 PM, m. allan noah  wrote:
>> Not that I've heard. Its a pretty pricey piece to 'play with' :)
>> However, if you've got some C programming experience, you might be in
>> luck. More expensive scanners tend to have simpler protocols.
>> Unfortunately, at 5000 Dpi, I'd bet this thing uses some interesting
>> compression, which could be hard to decode.
>>
>> allan
>>
>> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Pete Lancashire
>>  wrote:
>>> Has anyone connected one of these beasts up to a Linux box and
>>> succeeded with sane ?
>>>
>>> I've been offered one at what I think is a reasonable price.
>>>
>>> -pete
>>>
>>> --
>>> sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>>> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
>>> Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
>>
>



-- 
"The truth is an offense, but not a sin"



[sane-devel] Fuji Lanovia C-550.

2011-05-17 Thread Pete Lancashire
yep, thats why my offer for this thing is only $100. Be one of those projects
with the goal of someday finding either some internal docs or a Mac with the
code and dongle. There's a 43" wide x infinate length scanner in the garage
in the same state. .. but it was "free".

-pete


On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:05 AM, m. allan noah  wrote:
> If you cannot run the machine due to missing software or dongle, you
> cannot snoop on the communication protocol. No snoops = no reverse
> engineering.
>
> allan
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Pete Lancashire
>  wrote:
>> Ever since Fuji got out of the scanner biz the price has been dropping
>> fast, very fast. And as usual the PC, in this case a Mac that was
>> dedicated to it along with the proprietary software and lic. dongle
>> are usually long gone in another direction, thats the situation this
>> one is in. So far I can't even get Fuji or Agfa who resold it to even
>> give me more the the usual 'we don't support it anymore, click'.
>>
>> HP lost the sale of 250 printers when I got that replay a few years
>> ago. The short term bean counters just don't get it.
>>
>>> Unfortunately, at 5000 Dpi, I'd bet this thing uses some interesting 
>>> compression, which could be hard to decode.
>>
>> 5000 x 18 x 13 ?x 48 (dpi, x, y, bits/pixel) , compression - I hope so !!!
>>
>> -pete
>>
>>
>> PS C .. yes years ago, but it's like riding a bike :-)
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:13 PM, m. allan noah  wrote:
>>> Not that I've heard. Its a pretty pricey piece to 'play with' :)
>>> However, if you've got some C programming experience, you might be in
>>> luck. More expensive scanners tend to have simpler protocols.
>>> Unfortunately, at 5000 Dpi, I'd bet this thing uses some interesting
>>> compression, which could be hard to decode.
>>>
>>> allan
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Pete Lancashire
>>>  wrote:
 Has anyone connected one of these beasts up to a Linux box and
 succeeded with sane ?

 I've been offered one at what I think is a reasonable price.

 -pete

 --
 sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
 http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
 Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject "unsubscribe your_password"
 ? ? ? ? ? ? to sane-devel-request at lists.alioth.debian.org

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "The truth is an offense, but not a sin"
>