Re: [sane-devel] Imageclass D530 Scanner Support (New Patch?)
Hi gtux, please have a look at README.linux in Sane's source folder. Maybe you can solve this issue walking through the installation description. Please note, that Fedora seems to use group lp instead of group scanner. Please search @ google howto create drc files. Cheers, Rolf Am 21.10.2014 um 06:16 schrieb tx: Ok, I've solved the permissions issue in Fedora 20 by adding my user to the lp group. I can now run scanfile as a regular user and everything works fine. sane-find-scanner shows the scanner @ libusb:002:005. However, xsane doesn't see the scanner. It only sees my V4L devices @ libusb:002:003 libusb:001:002 $ sane-find-scanner found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon Inc], product=0x2775 [D530/D560]) at libusb:002:005 found USB scanner (vendor=0x147a, product=0xe018) at libusb:002:003 found USB scanner (vendor=0x15a9, product=0x0004) at libusb:001:002 Also, there is no .drc for the D530 under my ~.sane/xsane folder. There is a .drc for the Hauppauge device. How are .drc files generated and do you have any idea why xsane would not be seeing the scanner at this point? simple-scan doesn't see it either. Thanks! On Mon, October 20, 2014 9:39 pm, tx wrote: Ok, after further testing and being clued in about Invalid_argument by this link.. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/sane#Invalid_argument I am now able to scan as root, but only by giving the the full device name listed by scanfile -L. As a regular user, I only see the device name: pixma:04A92775, without the __1144T3603236 portion. Here is the command that worked, as SU. scanimage --device pixma:04A92775_1144T3603236 --format=tiff test.tiff That worked! Yay!! :) I guess my issue now is one of permissions. I thought I created a scanner group and added my user to it. I will verify that. Hopefully, once my permissions issues are fixed, I'll be able to use a SANE frontend, instead of the scanfile command. If you have any suggestions on getting these permissions fixed, it would be appreciated. I'll report back my results. Thanks again! ~gtux On Mon, October 20, 2014 8:13 pm, tx wrote: Thanks for your assistance! I'm still getting the same results: Invalid_argument $ scanimage -L device `v4l:/dev/video1' is a Noname Hauppauge WinTV-HVR1800 virtual device device `v4l:/dev/video0' is a Noname Hauppauge WinTV-HVR1800 virtual device device `pixma:04A92775' is a CANON Canon imageCLASS D530 multi-function peripheral $ scanimage -x 5 -y 5 2 pixma.log pixma.pnm [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of pixma to 11. [pixma] pixma is compiled with pthread support. [pixma] pixma version 0.17.11 [pixma] pixma_collect_devices() found Canon imageCLASS D530 at libusb:002:005 [pixma] pixma_find_scanners() found 1 devices scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument There are two scan options. One is Computer' and when selected, it flashes briefly the message Connect to computer. There is a Window's utility that I assume is used to pull/accept scans when using this option. The second options and the one I'm using here, is set to Remote Scanner and it responds with Waiting online. It appears the scanner is awaiting the commands to initiate the scan process but never gets them. SANE always responds with Invalid_argument. Where do I go from here? I can report that printing works fine with this device so it's connected and communicating properly with the computer. Thanks! ~gtux On Mon, October 20, 2014 11:44 am, Rolf Bensch wrote: Hi gtux, I just committed a working patch to Sane's git repository. If you may have problems with your installation, please follow the installation description in README.linux. Cheers, Rolf Am 18.10.2014 um 07:08 schrieb tx: More info from lsusb.. # lsusb -v Bus 002 Device 005: ID 04a9:2775 Canon, Inc. Device Descriptor: bLength18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB 2.00 bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level) bDeviceSubClass 0 bDeviceProtocol 0 bMaxPacketSize064 idVendor 0x04a9 Canon, Inc. idProduct 0x2775 bcdDevice1.00 iManufacturer 1 Canon Inc iProduct2 D530/D560 iSerial 3 1144T3603236 bNumConfigurations 1 Configuration Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 2 wTotalLength 62 bNumInterfaces 2 bConfigurationValue 1 iConfiguration 0 bmAttributes 0xc0 Self Powered MaxPower2mA Interface Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 4 bInterfaceNumber 0 bAlternateSetting 0 bNumEndpoints 3 bInterfaceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class bInterfaceSubClass 0 bInterfaceProtocol255 iInterface 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x03 EP 3 OUT bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type
Re: [sane-devel] Imageclass D530 Scanner Support (New Patch?)
Hello, On Oct 20 21:39 tx wrote (excerpt): I am now able to scan as root ... I guess my issue now is one of permissions. I did not read all the details in this mail thread but perhaps the section about scanner access permissions in http://en.opensuse.org/SDB:Configuring_Scanners might provide an usable workaround for you -- The best workaround to get those kind of issues out of sight is to use the saned... -- (of course provided you let the saned run as root). Kind Regards Johannes Meixner -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH -- Maxfeldstrasse 5 -- 90409 Nuernberg -- Germany HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendoerffer -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Re: [sane-devel] Imageclass D530 Scanner Support (New Patch?)
Thanks for the link. It contains some good info. Actually, I've been able to run scanimage as a regular user after adding the user to the lp group. I do have to specify the device as a command line argument. My current problem is that I can't use SANE frontend GUIs. Xsane and its variants are not able to detect the scanner. That's odd because scaniamge -L detects the scanner and so does sane-find-scanner. One would assume, if both of those see the scanner, the frontends would be able detect it. I don't know of anyway to specify the device on the command line when using xsane, as I do with scanimage. My initial thought was that SANE GUIs were simply frontends to scanimage. I guess that isn't the case, unless the frontends just aren't properly interfacing with scanimage. Perhaps there are still permission issues or perhaps I'm missing something. The scanimage app works well, as root or as a regular user. It scans at all resolutions and geometries. My main goal is tobe able to scan directly into GIMP but I need Frontend GUIs to function properly in order to use the GIMP plug-in. ~gtux On Tue, October 21, 2014 8:20 am, Johannes Meixner wrote: Hello, On Oct 20 21:39 tx wrote (excerpt): I am now able to scan as root ... I guess my issue now is one of permissions. I did not read all the details in this mail thread but perhaps the section about scanner access permissions in http://en.opensuse.org/SDB:Configuring_Scanners might provide an usable workaround for you -- The best workaround to get those kind of issues out of sight is to use the saned... -- (of course provided you let the saned run as root). Kind Regards Johannes Meixner -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH -- Maxfeldstrasse 5 -- 90409 Nuernberg -- Germany HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendoerffer -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Re: [sane-devel] Imageclass D530 Scanner Support (New Patch?)
Sounds like you have two copies of sane-backends (and hence, scanimage) installed. If you call the replacement copy of scanimage, it will default to using the replacement libs. You will need to setup your ld paths to load the replacement first. I continue to be surprised that distro's do this- put /usr/local/bin first in the $PATH, but not put /usr/local/lib first in ldconfig. man ldconfig might give some details, and so does section 3.1 of this doc: http://www.sane-project.org/README.linux allan On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:25 AM, tx g...@gimpchat.com wrote: Thanks for the link. It contains some good info. Actually, I've been able to run scanimage as a regular user after adding the user to the lp group. I do have to specify the device as a command line argument. My current problem is that I can't use SANE frontend GUIs. Xsane and its variants are not able to detect the scanner. That's odd because scaniamge -L detects the scanner and so does sane-find-scanner. One would assume, if both of those see the scanner, the frontends would be able detect it. I don't know of anyway to specify the device on the command line when using xsane, as I do with scanimage. My initial thought was that SANE GUIs were simply frontends to scanimage. I guess that isn't the case, unless the frontends just aren't properly interfacing with scanimage. Perhaps there are still permission issues or perhaps I'm missing something. The scanimage app works well, as root or as a regular user. It scans at all resolutions and geometries. My main goal is tobe able to scan directly into GIMP but I need Frontend GUIs to function properly in order to use the GIMP plug-in. ~gtux On Tue, October 21, 2014 8:20 am, Johannes Meixner wrote: Hello, On Oct 20 21:39 tx wrote (excerpt): I am now able to scan as root ... I guess my issue now is one of permissions. I did not read all the details in this mail thread but perhaps the section about scanner access permissions in http://en.opensuse.org/SDB:Configuring_Scanners might provide an usable workaround for you -- The best workaround to get those kind of issues out of sight is to use the saned... -- (of course provided you let the saned run as root). Kind Regards Johannes Meixner -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH -- Maxfeldstrasse 5 -- 90409 Nuernberg -- Germany HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendoerffer -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org -- well, I stand up next to a mountain- and I chop it down with the edge of my hand -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Re: [sane-devel] Imageclass D530 Scanner Support (New Patch?)
Hello, On Oct 21 10:25 tx wrote (excerpt): I don't know of anyway to specify the device on the command line when using xsane My xsane man page reads: --- SYNOPSIS xsane ... [devicename] DESCRIPTION ... To access an available device that is not known to the system, the devicename must be specified explicitly. The format of devicename is backendname:devicefile (eg: umax:/dev/sga). --- I did not verify if it actually works but I think for you xsane pixma:04A92775_1144T3603236 should (hopefully) work. Kind Regards Johannes Meixner -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH -- Maxfeldstrasse 5 -- 90409 Nuernberg -- Germany HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendoerffer -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Re: [sane-devel] Imageclass D530 Scanner Support (New Patch?)
Thanks so much for the information. You are exactly right. Fedora20_x86 installed sane libs from the repos in /usr/lib64. When I compiled from git, sane backends libs were installed in /usr/local/lib/. The path to the new scanimage binary was already first in the path: /usr/local/bin. So, the fix for me was to create a file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d named 1.sane.conf, in which I added: /usr/local/lib. I then executed ldconfig as root and all is well. :) I can now use xsane from a launcher or from GIMP. It appears to be working very well. This will make things much easier for me and considering the unbelievable deal I got on this cool multifunction printer, I'm doing the happy dance. A big kudos to everyone who helped get the D530 operational in SANE and a big thank you to all who helped me get this working in Fedora 20_x86. ~gtux On Tue, October 21, 2014 10:45 am, m. allan noah wrote: Sounds like you have two copies of sane-backends (and hence, scanimage) installed. If you call the replacement copy of scanimage, it will default to using the replacement libs. You will need to setup your ld paths to load the replacement first. I continue to be surprised that distro's do this- put /usr/local/bin first in the $PATH, but not put /usr/local/lib first in ldconfig. man ldconfig might give some details, and so does section 3.1 of this doc: http://www.sane-project.org/README.linux allan On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:25 AM, tx g...@gimpchat.com wrote: Thanks for the link. It contains some good info. Actually, I've been able to run scanimage as a regular user after adding the user to the lp group. I do have to specify the device as a command line argument. My current problem is that I can't use SANE frontend GUIs. Xsane and its variants are not able to detect the scanner. That's odd because scaniamge -L detects the scanner and so does sane-find-scanner. One would assume, if both of those see the scanner, the frontends would be able detect it. I don't know of anyway to specify the device on the command line when using xsane, as I do with scanimage. My initial thought was that SANE GUIs were simply frontends to scanimage. I guess that isn't the case, unless the frontends just aren't properly interfacing with scanimage. Perhaps there are still permission issues or perhaps I'm missing something. The scanimage app works well, as root or as a regular user. It scans at all resolutions and geometries. My main goal is tobe able to scan directly into GIMP but I need Frontend GUIs to function properly in order to use the GIMP plug-in. ~gtux On Tue, October 21, 2014 8:20 am, Johannes Meixner wrote: Hello, On Oct 20 21:39 tx wrote (excerpt): I am now able to scan as root ... I guess my issue now is one of permissions. I did not read all the details in this mail thread but perhaps the section about scanner access permissions in http://en.opensuse.org/SDB:Configuring_Scanners might provide an usable workaround for you - - The best workaround to get those kind of issues out of sight is to use the saned... - - (of course provided you let the saned run as root). Kind Regards Johannes Meixner -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH -- Maxfeldstrasse 5 -- 90409 Nuernberg -- Germany HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendoerffer -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org -- well, I stand up next to a mountain- and I chop it down with the edge of my hand -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Re: [sane-devel] Imageclass D530 Scanner Support (New Patch?)
I did not verify if it actually works but I think for you xsane pixma:04A92775_1144T3603236 should (hopefully) work. Kind Regards Johannes Meixner Yes. This did indeed work, once I resolved the LD paths problem. Doing this automatically selects my scanner so I don't have to select it from a popup list containing my ATSC card and other video/capture devices. Thanks for your assistance. Everything is working working great now! ~gtux On Tue, October 21, 2014 11:09 am, Johannes Meixner wrote: Hello, On Oct 21 10:25 tx wrote (excerpt): I don't know of anyway to specify the device on the command line when using xsane My xsane man page reads: --- SYNOPSIS xsane ... [devicename] DESCRIPTION ... To access an available device that is not known to the system, the devicename must be specified explicitly. The format of devicename is backendname:devicefile (eg: umax:/dev/sga). --- I did not verify if it actually works but I think for you xsane pixma:04A92775_1144T3603236 should (hopefully) work. Kind Regards Johannes Meixner -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH -- Maxfeldstrasse 5 -- 90409 Nuernberg -- Germany HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendoerffer -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Re: [sane-devel] Imageclass D530 Scanner Support (New Patch?)
Hi gtux, I just committed a working patch to Sane's git repository. If you may have problems with your installation, please follow the installation description in README.linux. Cheers, Rolf Am 18.10.2014 um 07:08 schrieb tx: More info from lsusb.. # lsusb -v Bus 002 Device 005: ID 04a9:2775 Canon, Inc. Device Descriptor: bLength18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB 2.00 bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level) bDeviceSubClass 0 bDeviceProtocol 0 bMaxPacketSize064 idVendor 0x04a9 Canon, Inc. idProduct 0x2775 bcdDevice1.00 iManufacturer 1 Canon Inc iProduct2 D530/D560 iSerial 3 1144T3603236 bNumConfigurations 1 Configuration Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 2 wTotalLength 62 bNumInterfaces 2 bConfigurationValue 1 iConfiguration 0 bmAttributes 0xc0 Self Powered MaxPower2mA Interface Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 4 bInterfaceNumber0 bAlternateSetting 0 bNumEndpoints 3 bInterfaceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class bInterfaceSubClass 0 bInterfaceProtocol255 iInterface 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x03 EP 3 OUT bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 11 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x84 EP 4 IN bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x85 EP 5 IN bmAttributes3 Transfer TypeInterrupt Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes bInterval 11 Interface Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 4 bInterfaceNumber1 bAlternateSetting 0 bNumEndpoints 2 bInterfaceClass 7 Printer bInterfaceSubClass 1 Printer bInterfaceProtocol 2 Bidirectional iInterface 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x01 EP 1 OUT bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 255 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x82 EP 2 IN bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 255 Device Qualifier (for other device speed): bLength10 bDescriptorType 6 bcdUSB 2.00 bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level) bDeviceSubClass 0 bDeviceProtocol 0 bMaxPacketSize064 bNumConfigurations 1 Device Status: 0x0001 Self Powered Thanks! gtux On Sat, October 18, 2014 12:50 am, tx wrote: I have included a log file, per the instructions in the January thread, which appears to be the last effort underway for this device. If your scanner has problems, please enable debug output: $ export SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA=11 and create a log file with (scan area of 5mm x 5mm in color @ 75dpi ): $ scanimage -x 5 -y 5 2 pixma.log pixma.pnm Many thanks for your help. Cheers, Rolf As Normal User: scanimage -x 5 -y 5 2 pixma.log pixma.pnm [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of pixma to 11. [pixma] pixma is compiled with pthread support. [pixma] pixma version 0.17.11 [pixma] pixma_collect_devices() found Canon imageCLASS D530 at libusb:002:005 [pixma] pixma_find_scanners() found 1 devices scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument As Normal user, specifying the device scanimage --device-name=pixma:04A92775 -x 5 -y 5 2
Re: [sane-devel] Imageclass D530 Scanner Support (New Patch?)
Thanks for your assistance! I'm still getting the same results: Invalid_argument $ scanimage -L device `v4l:/dev/video1' is a Noname Hauppauge WinTV-HVR1800 virtual device device `v4l:/dev/video0' is a Noname Hauppauge WinTV-HVR1800 virtual device device `pixma:04A92775' is a CANON Canon imageCLASS D530 multi-function peripheral $ scanimage -x 5 -y 5 2 pixma.log pixma.pnm [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of pixma to 11. [pixma] pixma is compiled with pthread support. [pixma] pixma version 0.17.11 [pixma] pixma_collect_devices() found Canon imageCLASS D530 at libusb:002:005 [pixma] pixma_find_scanners() found 1 devices scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument There are two scan options. One is Computer' and when selected, it flashes briefly the message Connect to computer. There is a Window's utility that I assume is used to pull/accept scans when using this option. The second options and the one I'm using here, is set to Remote Scanner and it responds with Waiting online. It appears the scanner is awaiting the commands to initiate the scan process but never gets them. SANE always responds with Invalid_argument. Where do I go from here? I can report that printing works fine with this device so it's connected and communicating properly with the computer. Thanks! ~gtux On Mon, October 20, 2014 11:44 am, Rolf Bensch wrote: Hi gtux, I just committed a working patch to Sane's git repository. If you may have problems with your installation, please follow the installation description in README.linux. Cheers, Rolf Am 18.10.2014 um 07:08 schrieb tx: More info from lsusb.. # lsusb -v Bus 002 Device 005: ID 04a9:2775 Canon, Inc. Device Descriptor: bLength18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB 2.00 bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level) bDeviceSubClass 0 bDeviceProtocol 0 bMaxPacketSize064 idVendor 0x04a9 Canon, Inc. idProduct 0x2775 bcdDevice1.00 iManufacturer 1 Canon Inc iProduct2 D530/D560 iSerial 3 1144T3603236 bNumConfigurations 1 Configuration Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 2 wTotalLength 62 bNumInterfaces 2 bConfigurationValue 1 iConfiguration 0 bmAttributes 0xc0 Self Powered MaxPower2mA Interface Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 4 bInterfaceNumber 0 bAlternateSetting 0 bNumEndpoints 3 bInterfaceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class bInterfaceSubClass 0 bInterfaceProtocol255 iInterface 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x03 EP 3 OUT bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 11 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x84 EP 4 IN bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x85 EP 5 IN bmAttributes3 Transfer TypeInterrupt Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes bInterval 11 Interface Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 4 bInterfaceNumber 1 bAlternateSetting 0 bNumEndpoints 2 bInterfaceClass 7 Printer bInterfaceSubClass 1 Printer bInterfaceProtocol 2 Bidirectional iInterface 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x01 EP 1 OUT bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 255 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x82 EP 2 IN bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 255 Device Qualifier (for other device speed): bLength10 bDescriptorType 6 bcdUSB 2.00 bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level) bDeviceSubClass 0 bDeviceProtocol 0 bMaxPacketSize064 bNumConfigurations 1 Device Status: 0x0001 Self Powered Thanks! gtux On Sat, October 18, 2014 12:50 am, tx wrote: I have included a log file, per the instructions in the January thread, which appears to be the last effort underway for this device. If your scanner has problems, please enable debug output: $ export SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA=11 and create a log file with (scan area of 5mm x 5mm in
Re: [sane-devel] Imageclass D530 Scanner Support (New Patch?)
Ok, after further testing and being clued in about Invalid_argument by this link.. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/sane#Invalid_argument I am now able to scan as root, but only by giving the the full device name listed by scanfile -L. As a regular user, I only see the device name: pixma:04A92775, without the __1144T3603236 portion. Here is the command that worked, as SU. scanimage --device pixma:04A92775_1144T3603236 --format=tiff test.tiff That worked! Yay!! :) I guess my issue now is one of permissions. I thought I created a scanner group and added my user to it. I will verify that. Hopefully, once my permissions issues are fixed, I'll be able to use a SANE frontend, instead of the scanfile command. If you have any suggestions on getting these permissions fixed, it would be appreciated. I'll report back my results. Thanks again! ~gtux On Mon, October 20, 2014 8:13 pm, tx wrote: Thanks for your assistance! I'm still getting the same results: Invalid_argument $ scanimage -L device `v4l:/dev/video1' is a Noname Hauppauge WinTV-HVR1800 virtual device device `v4l:/dev/video0' is a Noname Hauppauge WinTV-HVR1800 virtual device device `pixma:04A92775' is a CANON Canon imageCLASS D530 multi-function peripheral $ scanimage -x 5 -y 5 2 pixma.log pixma.pnm [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of pixma to 11. [pixma] pixma is compiled with pthread support. [pixma] pixma version 0.17.11 [pixma] pixma_collect_devices() found Canon imageCLASS D530 at libusb:002:005 [pixma] pixma_find_scanners() found 1 devices scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument There are two scan options. One is Computer' and when selected, it flashes briefly the message Connect to computer. There is a Window's utility that I assume is used to pull/accept scans when using this option. The second options and the one I'm using here, is set to Remote Scanner and it responds with Waiting online. It appears the scanner is awaiting the commands to initiate the scan process but never gets them. SANE always responds with Invalid_argument. Where do I go from here? I can report that printing works fine with this device so it's connected and communicating properly with the computer. Thanks! ~gtux On Mon, October 20, 2014 11:44 am, Rolf Bensch wrote: Hi gtux, I just committed a working patch to Sane's git repository. If you may have problems with your installation, please follow the installation description in README.linux. Cheers, Rolf Am 18.10.2014 um 07:08 schrieb tx: More info from lsusb.. # lsusb -v Bus 002 Device 005: ID 04a9:2775 Canon, Inc. Device Descriptor: bLength18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB 2.00 bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level) bDeviceSubClass 0 bDeviceProtocol 0 bMaxPacketSize064 idVendor 0x04a9 Canon, Inc. idProduct 0x2775 bcdDevice1.00 iManufacturer 1 Canon Inc iProduct2 D530/D560 iSerial 3 1144T3603236 bNumConfigurations 1 Configuration Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 2 wTotalLength 62 bNumInterfaces 2 bConfigurationValue 1 iConfiguration 0 bmAttributes 0xc0 Self Powered MaxPower2mA Interface Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 4 bInterfaceNumber 0 bAlternateSetting 0 bNumEndpoints 3 bInterfaceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class bInterfaceSubClass 0 bInterfaceProtocol255 iInterface 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x03 EP 3 OUT bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 11 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x84 EP 4 IN bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x85 EP 5 IN bmAttributes3 Transfer TypeInterrupt Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes bInterval 11 Interface Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 4 bInterfaceNumber 1 bAlternateSetting 0 bNumEndpoints 2 bInterfaceClass 7 Printer bInterfaceSubClass 1 Printer bInterfaceProtocol 2 Bidirectional iInterface 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x01 EP 1 OUT bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 255 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5
Re: [sane-devel] Imageclass D530 Scanner Support (New Patch?)
Ok, I've solved the permissions issue in Fedora 20 by adding my user to the lp group. I can now run scanfile as a regular user and everything works fine. sane-find-scanner shows the scanner @ libusb:002:005. However, xsane doesn't see the scanner. It only sees my V4L devices @ libusb:002:003 libusb:001:002 $ sane-find-scanner found USB scanner (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon Inc], product=0x2775 [D530/D560]) at libusb:002:005 found USB scanner (vendor=0x147a, product=0xe018) at libusb:002:003 found USB scanner (vendor=0x15a9, product=0x0004) at libusb:001:002 Also, there is no .drc for the D530 under my ~.sane/xsane folder. There is a .drc for the Hauppauge device. How are .drc files generated and do you have any idea why xsane would not be seeing the scanner at this point? simple-scan doesn't see it either. Thanks! On Mon, October 20, 2014 9:39 pm, tx wrote: Ok, after further testing and being clued in about Invalid_argument by this link.. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/sane#Invalid_argument I am now able to scan as root, but only by giving the the full device name listed by scanfile -L. As a regular user, I only see the device name: pixma:04A92775, without the __1144T3603236 portion. Here is the command that worked, as SU. scanimage --device pixma:04A92775_1144T3603236 --format=tiff test.tiff That worked! Yay!! :) I guess my issue now is one of permissions. I thought I created a scanner group and added my user to it. I will verify that. Hopefully, once my permissions issues are fixed, I'll be able to use a SANE frontend, instead of the scanfile command. If you have any suggestions on getting these permissions fixed, it would be appreciated. I'll report back my results. Thanks again! ~gtux On Mon, October 20, 2014 8:13 pm, tx wrote: Thanks for your assistance! I'm still getting the same results: Invalid_argument $ scanimage -L device `v4l:/dev/video1' is a Noname Hauppauge WinTV-HVR1800 virtual device device `v4l:/dev/video0' is a Noname Hauppauge WinTV-HVR1800 virtual device device `pixma:04A92775' is a CANON Canon imageCLASS D530 multi-function peripheral $ scanimage -x 5 -y 5 2 pixma.log pixma.pnm [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of pixma to 11. [pixma] pixma is compiled with pthread support. [pixma] pixma version 0.17.11 [pixma] pixma_collect_devices() found Canon imageCLASS D530 at libusb:002:005 [pixma] pixma_find_scanners() found 1 devices scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument There are two scan options. One is Computer' and when selected, it flashes briefly the message Connect to computer. There is a Window's utility that I assume is used to pull/accept scans when using this option. The second options and the one I'm using here, is set to Remote Scanner and it responds with Waiting online. It appears the scanner is awaiting the commands to initiate the scan process but never gets them. SANE always responds with Invalid_argument. Where do I go from here? I can report that printing works fine with this device so it's connected and communicating properly with the computer. Thanks! ~gtux On Mon, October 20, 2014 11:44 am, Rolf Bensch wrote: Hi gtux, I just committed a working patch to Sane's git repository. If you may have problems with your installation, please follow the installation description in README.linux. Cheers, Rolf Am 18.10.2014 um 07:08 schrieb tx: More info from lsusb.. # lsusb -v Bus 002 Device 005: ID 04a9:2775 Canon, Inc. Device Descriptor: bLength18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB 2.00 bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level) bDeviceSubClass 0 bDeviceProtocol 0 bMaxPacketSize064 idVendor 0x04a9 Canon, Inc. idProduct 0x2775 bcdDevice1.00 iManufacturer 1 Canon Inc iProduct2 D530/D560 iSerial 3 1144T3603236 bNumConfigurations 1 Configuration Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 2 wTotalLength 62 bNumInterfaces 2 bConfigurationValue 1 iConfiguration 0 bmAttributes 0xc0 Self Powered MaxPower2mA Interface Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 4 bInterfaceNumber 0 bAlternateSetting 0 bNumEndpoints 3 bInterfaceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class bInterfaceSubClass 0 bInterfaceProtocol255 iInterface 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x03 EP 3 OUT bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 11 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x84 EP 4 IN bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval
Re: [sane-devel] Imageclass D530 Scanner Support (New Patch?)
I have made further progress and believe I was able to manually apply the
patch provided by Rolf to the current version of pixma_imageclass.c from
git. After applying the patch, I am now able to see the device as a normal
user via scanimage -L
device `v4l:/dev/video1' is a Noname Hauppauge WinTV-HVR1800 virtual device
device `v4l:/dev/video0' is a Noname Hauppauge WinTV-HVR1800 virtual device
device `pixma:04A92775' is a CANON Canon imageCLASS D530 multi-function
peripheral
The first two devices are my Hauppauge HDTV ATSC card. Before applying the
patch, I did not see the pixma:04A92775 device. I also copied the rule to
/etc/udev/rules.d/, as outlined in the January post.
# Canon imageCLASS D530
ATTRS{idVendor}==04a9, ATTRS{idProduct}==2775, MODE=0664,
GROUP=scanner, ENV{libsane_matched}=yes
However, this is as far as I have been able to get. If I run the test as a
regular user, I get the invalid argument message.
$ scanimage test.pnm
scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument
or when including the device name, I am denied permissions.
$ scanimage --device-name=pixma:04A92775 test.prn
scanimage: open of device pixma:04A92775 failed: Access to resource has
been denied
If I run the test as root, I get this..
[root]# scanimage test.prn
scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument
[root]# scanimage --device-name=pixma:04A92775 test.prn
scanimage: open of device pixma:04A92775 failed: Invalid argument
I'm not sure where to go from here. Any assistance would be appreciated.
Thanks!
On Thu, October 16, 2014 9:33 am, tx wrote:
Greetings,
I have a Canon D530 Printer/Copy/Scanner and would really like to be able
to scan in Linux via sane. I'm currently using Fedora 20_x86 and would
be happy to volunteer for testing.
(vendor=0x04a9 [Canon Inc], product=0x2775 [D530/D560]) at libusb:002:008
I grabbed the latest backend from git and applied this patch from
January.
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2014-January/032066.h
tml
I assume the patch is outdated because I couldn't apply it to the source
file: pixma_imageclass.c.
Is there a new patch available that I could try.
Thanks!
gtux
--
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password
to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
--
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password
to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Re: [sane-devel] Imageclass D530 Scanner Support (New Patch?)
I forgot to include the new patch. Perhaps someone could look it over to
ensure I got it right.
*** pixma_imageclass.c 2014-10-16 08:35:04.904198000 -0400
--- pixma_imageclass-patched.c 2014-10-17 01:21:15.669433000 -0400
***
*** 96,101
--- 96,102
#define MF8030_PID 0x2707
#define IR1133_PID 0x2742
#define MF8500_PID 0x277a
+ #define D530_PID 0x2775
enum iclass_state_t
***
*** 414,421
return error;
if (s-param-source == PIXMA_SOURCE_ADF !has_paper (s))
return PIXMA_ENO_PAPER;
! /* activate only seen for generation 1 scanners */
! if (mf-generation == 1)
{
if (error = 0)
error = activate (s, 0);
--- 415,423
return error;
if (s-param-source == PIXMA_SOURCE_ADF !has_paper (s))
return PIXMA_ENO_PAPER;
! /* activate only seen for generation 1 scanners
!* but not for D530 */
! if (mf-generation == 1 s-cfg-pid != D530_PID)
{
if (error = 0)
error = activate (s, 0);
***
*** 474,482
/* set generation = 2 for new multifunctionals
* some new scanners use generation 1 protocol */
! mf-generation = (s-cfg-pid = MF8030_PID
! s-cfg-pid != MF8200_PID
! s-cfg-pid != MF8500_PID) ? 2 : 1;
PDBG (pixma_dbg (3, *iclass_open* This is a generation %d
scanner. *\n, mf-generation));
PDBG (pixma_dbg (3, Trying to clear the interrupt buffer...\n));
--- 476,487
/* set generation = 2 for new multifunctionals
* some new scanners use generation 1 protocol */
! /* set generation = 2 for new multifunctionals
!* except D530 is a generation 1 scanner */
! mf-generation = (s-cfg-pid = MF8030_PID
!s-cfg-pid != MF8200_PID
!s-cfg-pid != MF8500_PID
!s-cfg-pid != D530_PID) ? 2 : 1;
PDBG (pixma_dbg (3, *iclass_open* This is a generation %d
scanner. *\n, mf-generation));
PDBG (pixma_dbg (3, Trying to clear the interrupt buffer...\n));
***
*** 570,575
--- 575,582
if (error = 0)
error = send_scan_param (s);
if (error = 0)
+ error = query_status (s);
+ if (error = 0)
error = request_image_block (s, 0, ignore, ignore2, ignore,
ignore2);
if (error 0)
{
***
*** 794,798
--- 801,806
DEV (Canon i-SENSYS MF6680dn, MF6680, MF6680_PID, 600, 640, 877,
PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
DEV (Canon imageRUNNER 1133, iR1133, IR1133_PID, 600, 637, 877,
PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
DEV (Canon i-SENSYS MF8500C Series, MF8500C, MF8500_PID, 600, 640,
1050, PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
+ DEV (Canon imageCLASS D530, D530, D530_PID, 600, 640, 877, 0),
DEV (NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
};
Thanks!
~gtux
On Fri, October 17, 2014 2:05 am, tx wrote:
I have made further progress and believe I was able to manually apply the
patch provided by Rolf to the current version of pixma_imageclass.c from
git. After applying the patch, I am now able to see the device as a
normal user via scanimage -L
device `v4l:/dev/video1' is a Noname Hauppauge WinTV-HVR1800 virtual
device device `v4l:/dev/video0' is a Noname Hauppauge WinTV-HVR1800
virtual device device `pixma:04A92775' is a CANON Canon imageCLASS D530
multi-function peripheral
The first two devices are my Hauppauge HDTV ATSC card. Before applying
the patch, I did not see the pixma:04A92775 device. I also copied the rule
to /etc/udev/rules.d/, as outlined in the January post.
# Canon imageCLASS D530
ATTRS{idVendor}==04a9, ATTRS{idProduct}==2775, MODE=0664,
GROUP=scanner, ENV{libsane_matched}=yes
However, this is as far as I have been able to get. If I run the test as
a regular user, I get the invalid argument message. $ scanimage
test.pnm scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument
or when including the device name, I am denied permissions. $ scanimage
--device-name=pixma:04A92775 test.prn
scanimage: open of device pixma:04A92775 failed: Access to resource has
been denied
If I run the test as root, I get this..
[root]# scanimage test.prn
scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument
[root]# scanimage --device-name=pixma:04A92775 test.prn
scanimage: open of device pixma:04A92775 failed: Invalid argument
I'm not sure where to go from here. Any assistance would be appreciated.
Thanks!
On Thu, October 16, 2014 9:33 am, tx wrote:
Greetings,
I have a Canon D530 Printer/Copy/Scanner and would really like to be
able to scan in Linux via sane. I'm currently using Fedora 20_x86 and
would be happy to volunteer for testing.
(vendor=0x04a9 [Canon Inc], product=0x2775 [D530/D560]) at
libusb:002:008
I grabbed the latest backend from git and applied this patch from
January.
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2014-January/032066
.h
tml
I assume the patch is outdated because I couldn't apply it to the
source file: pixma_imageclass.c.
Is there a new patch
Re: [sane-devel] Imageclass D530 Scanner Support (New Patch?)
I have included a log file, per the instructions in the January thread,
which appears to be the last effort underway for this device.
If your scanner has problems, please enable debug output:
$ export SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA=11
and create a log file with (scan area of 5mm x 5mm in color @ 75dpi ):
$ scanimage -x 5 -y 5 2 pixma.log pixma.pnm
Many thanks for your help.
Cheers,
Rolf
As Normal User:
scanimage -x 5 -y 5 2 pixma.log pixma.pnm
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of pixma to 11.
[pixma] pixma is compiled with pthread support.
[pixma] pixma version 0.17.11
[pixma] pixma_collect_devices() found Canon imageCLASS D530 at libusb:002:005
[pixma] pixma_find_scanners() found 1 devices
scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument
As Normal user, specifying the device
scanimage --device-name=pixma:04A92775 -x 5 -y 5 2 pixma.log pixma.pnm
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of pixma to 11.
[pixma] pixma is compiled with pthread support.
[pixma] pixma version 0.17.11
[pixma] pixma_collect_devices() found Canon imageCLASS D530 at libusb:002:005
[pixma] pixma_open(): Canon imageCLASS D530
[pixma] pixma_connect() failed EACCES
[pixma] pixma_open() failed EACCES
[pixma] pixma_close(): Canon imageCLASS D530
scanimage: open of device pixma:04A92775 failed: Access to resource has
been denied
As Root..
# scanimage -x 5 -y 5 2 pixma.log pixma.pn
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of pixma to 11.
[pixma] pixma is compiled with pthread support.
[pixma] pixma version 0.17.11
[pixma] pixma_collect_devices() found Canon imageCLASS D530 at libusb:002:005
[pixma] pixma_find_scanners() found 1 devices
scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument
As Root, specifying the device..
# scanimage --device-name=pixma:04A92775 -x 5 -y 5 2 pixma.log pixma.pnm
[sanei_debug] Setting debug level of pixma to 11.
[pixma] pixma is compiled with pthread support.
[pixma] pixma version 0.17.11
[pixma] pixma_collect_devices() found Canon imageCLASS D530 at libusb:002:005
scanimage: open of device pixma:04A92775 failed: Invalid argument
Hopefully, Rolf is still willing to continue with this endeavor.
Thanks!
gtux
On Fri, October 17, 2014 2:05 am, tx wrote:
I have made further progress and believe I was able to manually apply the
patch provided by Rolf to the current version of pixma_imageclass.c from
git. After applying the patch, I am now able to see the device as a
normal user via scanimage -L
device `v4l:/dev/video1' is a Noname Hauppauge WinTV-HVR1800 virtual
device device `v4l:/dev/video0' is a Noname Hauppauge WinTV-HVR1800
virtual device device `pixma:04A92775' is a CANON Canon imageCLASS D530
multi-function peripheral
The first two devices are my Hauppauge HDTV ATSC card. Before applying
the patch, I did not see the pixma:04A92775 device. I also copied the rule
to /etc/udev/rules.d/, as outlined in the January post.
# Canon imageCLASS D530
ATTRS{idVendor}==04a9, ATTRS{idProduct}==2775, MODE=0664,
GROUP=scanner, ENV{libsane_matched}=yes
However, this is as far as I have been able to get. If I run the test as
a regular user, I get the invalid argument message. $ scanimage
test.pnm scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument
or when including the device name, I am denied permissions. $ scanimage
--device-name=pixma:04A92775 test.prn
scanimage: open of device pixma:04A92775 failed: Access to resource has
been denied
If I run the test as root, I get this..
[root]# scanimage test.prn
scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument
[root]# scanimage --device-name=pixma:04A92775 test.prn
scanimage: open of device pixma:04A92775 failed: Invalid argument
I'm not sure where to go from here. Any assistance would be appreciated.
Thanks!
On Thu, October 16, 2014 9:33 am, tx wrote:
Greetings,
I have a Canon D530 Printer/Copy/Scanner and would really like to be
able to scan in Linux via sane. I'm currently using Fedora 20_x86 and
would be happy to volunteer for testing.
(vendor=0x04a9 [Canon Inc], product=0x2775 [D530/D560]) at
libusb:002:008
I grabbed the latest backend from git and applied this patch from
January.
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2014-January/032066
.h
tml
I assume the patch is outdated because I couldn't apply it to the
source file: pixma_imageclass.c.
Is there a new patch available that I could try.
Thanks!
gtux
--
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password
to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
--
sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel
Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password
to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Re: [sane-devel] Imageclass D530 Scanner Support (New Patch?)
More info from lsusb.. # lsusb -v Bus 002 Device 005: ID 04a9:2775 Canon, Inc. Device Descriptor: bLength18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB 2.00 bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level) bDeviceSubClass 0 bDeviceProtocol 0 bMaxPacketSize064 idVendor 0x04a9 Canon, Inc. idProduct 0x2775 bcdDevice1.00 iManufacturer 1 Canon Inc iProduct2 D530/D560 iSerial 3 1144T3603236 bNumConfigurations 1 Configuration Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 2 wTotalLength 62 bNumInterfaces 2 bConfigurationValue 1 iConfiguration 0 bmAttributes 0xc0 Self Powered MaxPower2mA Interface Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 4 bInterfaceNumber0 bAlternateSetting 0 bNumEndpoints 3 bInterfaceClass 255 Vendor Specific Class bInterfaceSubClass 0 bInterfaceProtocol255 iInterface 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x03 EP 3 OUT bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 11 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x84 EP 4 IN bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x85 EP 5 IN bmAttributes3 Transfer TypeInterrupt Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0040 1x 64 bytes bInterval 11 Interface Descriptor: bLength 9 bDescriptorType 4 bInterfaceNumber1 bAlternateSetting 0 bNumEndpoints 2 bInterfaceClass 7 Printer bInterfaceSubClass 1 Printer bInterfaceProtocol 2 Bidirectional iInterface 0 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x01 EP 1 OUT bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 255 Endpoint Descriptor: bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x82 EP 2 IN bmAttributes2 Transfer TypeBulk Synch Type None Usage Type Data wMaxPacketSize 0x0200 1x 512 bytes bInterval 255 Device Qualifier (for other device speed): bLength10 bDescriptorType 6 bcdUSB 2.00 bDeviceClass0 (Defined at Interface level) bDeviceSubClass 0 bDeviceProtocol 0 bMaxPacketSize064 bNumConfigurations 1 Device Status: 0x0001 Self Powered Thanks! gtux On Sat, October 18, 2014 12:50 am, tx wrote: I have included a log file, per the instructions in the January thread, which appears to be the last effort underway for this device. If your scanner has problems, please enable debug output: $ export SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA=11 and create a log file with (scan area of 5mm x 5mm in color @ 75dpi ): $ scanimage -x 5 -y 5 2 pixma.log pixma.pnm Many thanks for your help. Cheers, Rolf As Normal User: scanimage -x 5 -y 5 2 pixma.log pixma.pnm [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of pixma to 11. [pixma] pixma is compiled with pthread support. [pixma] pixma version 0.17.11 [pixma] pixma_collect_devices() found Canon imageCLASS D530 at libusb:002:005 [pixma] pixma_find_scanners() found 1 devices scanimage: sane_start: Invalid argument As Normal user, specifying the device scanimage --device-name=pixma:04A92775 -x 5 -y 5 2 pixma.log pixma.pnm [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of pixma to 11. [pixma] pixma is compiled with pthread support. [pixma] pixma version 0.17.11 [pixma] pixma_collect_devices() found Canon imageCLASS D530 at libusb:002:005 [pixma] pixma_open(): Canon imageCLASS D530 [pixma] pixma_connect() failed EACCES [pixma] pixma_open() failed
[sane-devel] Imageclass D530 Scanner Support (New Patch?)
Greetings, I have a Canon D530 Printer/Copy/Scanner and would really like to be able to scan in Linux via sane. I'm currently using Fedora 20_x86 and would be happy to volunteer for testing. (vendor=0x04a9 [Canon Inc], product=0x2775 [D530/D560]) at libusb:002:008 I grabbed the latest backend from git and applied this patch from January. http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2014-January/032066.html I assume the patch is outdated because I couldn't apply it to the source file: pixma_imageclass.c. Is there a new patch available that I could try. Thanks! gtux -- sane-devel mailing list: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sane-devel Unsubscribe: Send mail with subject unsubscribe your_password to sane-devel-requ...@lists.alioth.debian.org
[sane-devel] Imageclass d530 scanner
Hi Gilad,
I prepared a patch for your scanner some weeks ago. But unfortunately
receiving USB data from the scanner stuck somewhere in the OS.
Fortunately you have a different OS. Pleae try the attached patch.
First you must install SANE from git as described here:
http://www.sane-project.org/README.linux.
Then patch the file backend/pixma_imageclass.c with attached
pixma_imageclass.c.patch4_all:
$ patch pixma_imageclass.c pixma_imageclass.c.patch4_all
and copy attached d530.rules to /etc/udev/rules.d/
After everything has been compiled and installed, please check if you
can access your scanner as described in README.linux.
If your scanner has problems, please enable debug output:
$ export SANE_DEBUG_PIXMA=11
and create a log file with (scan area of 5mm x 5mm in color @ 75dpi ):
$ scanimage -x 5 -y 5 2 pixma.log pixma.pnm
Many thanks for your help.
Cheers,
Rolf
Am 24.01.2014 16:39, schrieb Giladsom:
Hello there,
I just bought an Imageclass d530 printer.
I was able to activate the printer, but I cannot find any way to activate
the scanner. The computer just doesn't recognize it.
I am using UBUNTU 13.04.
Can you please help me?
Gilad
-- next part --
--- ./pixma_imageclass.c2014-01-29 16:38:27.0 +0100
+++ ../sane-backends/backend/pixma_imageclass.c 2014-01-29 16:41:42.0
+0100
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@
#define MF6680_PID 0x26fa
#define MF8030_PID 0x2707
#define IR1133_PID 0x2742
+#define D530_PID 0x2775
enum iclass_state_t
@@ -412,8 +413,9 @@
return error;
if (s-param-source == PIXMA_SOURCE_ADF !has_paper (s))
return PIXMA_ENO_PAPER;
- /* activate only seen for generation 1 scanners */
- if (mf-generation == 1)
+ /* activate only seen for generation 1 scanners
+ * but not for D530 */
+ if (mf-generation == 1 s-cfg-pid != D530_PID)
{
if (error = 0)
error = activate (s, 0);
@@ -470,8 +472,9 @@
mf-cb.cmd_header_len = 10;
mf-cb.cmd_len_field_ofs = 7;
- /* set generation = 2 for new multifunctionals */
- mf-generation = (s-cfg-pid = MF8030_PID) ? 2 : 1;
+ /* set generation = 2 for new multifunctionals
+ * except D530 is a generation 1 scanner */
+ mf-generation = (s-cfg-pid = MF8030_PID s-cfg-pid != D530_PID) ? 2
: 1;
PDBG (pixma_dbg (3, *iclass_open* This is a generation %d scanner.
*\n, mf-generation));
PDBG (pixma_dbg (3, Trying to clear the interrupt buffer...\n));
@@ -563,6 +566,8 @@
if (error = 0)
error = send_scan_param (s);
if (error = 0)
+error = query_status (s);
+ if (error = 0)
error = request_image_block (s, 0, ignore, ignore2, ignore, ignore2);
if (error 0)
{
@@ -785,5 +790,6 @@
DEV (Canon i-SENSYS MF5880dn, MF5880, MF5880_PID, 600, 640, 877,
PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
DEV (Canon i-SENSYS MF6680dn, MF6680, MF6680_PID, 600, 640, 877,
PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
DEV (Canon imageRUNNER 1133, iR1133, IR1133_PID, 600, 637, 877,
PIXMA_CAP_ADFDUP),
+ DEV (Canon imageCLASS D530, D530, D530_PID, 600, 640, 877, 0),
DEV (NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)
};
-- next part --
# Canon imageCLASS D530
ATTRS{idVendor}==04a9, ATTRS{idProduct}==2775, MODE=0664,
GROUP=scanner, ENV{libsane_matched}=yes
[sane-devel] Imageclass d530 scanner
Hello there, I just bought an Imageclass d530 printer. I was able to activate the printer, but I cannot find any way to activate the scanner. The computer just doesn't recognize it. I am using UBUNTU 13.04. Can you please help me? Gilad
