On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:03:58PM +0000, Karl Berry wrote: > gnu-games-group, gnu-network-group would be more natural to me. > > Could someone remind me if there is a reason that it needs to be a > prefix - if we need to identify the groups, could we not match on > /^gnu-\w+-group$/ instead? > > There is no reason, technical or otherwise, it's just a convention. I > have no objection to gnu-*-group. Consider that the new standard :). > > I'll write to rms next.
As far as the Savannah Hackers are concerned I guess there's no objection. The next version of Savane could include a way to link projects together, so that games could be linked to such a "group" project. That being said, the "group" project needs resources for itself (repos, webpages, etc.) so it need to be a regular project too. -- Sylvain
