[SC-L] Secured Coding
As quoted in a recent email from the article, A Patch is a Patch, Antone Gonsalves, Editor for InternetWeek: To read the entire article use the following link: http://update.internetweek.com/cgi-bin4/DM/y/ekcm0GPBjC0G4X0BbSA0At Whether we're willing to accept it or not, bulletproof software doesn't exist. Some applications are more secure than others, and some vendors could do more to protect customers. But at the end of the day, we're responsible for our own safety. Build your defenses, as best you can, and then try not to worry. If it helps, just think how small your problems are in relation to the universe. I truly believe this as no matter how secured we make our programs there will always be someone to figure how to break it. Regards, George Greenarrow1 InNetInvestigations-Forensics
Re: [SC-L] Secured Coding
so the question then is how do we security professionals catch up to where the anasazis were 700 hundred years ago: http://riskman.typepad.com/perilocity/2004/08/cliff_forts_vs_.html -gp Quoting Greenarrow 1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: As quoted in a recent email from the article, A Patch is a Patch, Antone Gonsalves, Editor for InternetWeek: To read the entire article use the following link: http://update.internetweek.com/cgi-bin4/DM/y/ekcm0GPBjC0G4X0BbSA0At Whether we're willing to accept it or not, bulletproof software doesn't exist. Some applications are more secure than others, and some vendors could do more to protect customers. But at the end of the day, we're responsible for our own safety. Build your defenses, as best you can, and then try not to worry. If it helps, just think how small your problems are in relation to the universe. I truly believe this as no matter how secured we make our programs there will always be someone to figure how to break it. Regards, George Greenarrow1 InNetInvestigations-Forensics
