[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Forget the corporate media propaganda machine!  Please go to independent 
media coverage from Pacifica Radio and especially from www.democracynow.org .  
Please check it out!
  Amy

  Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: OT: Who Are You Watching to Cover the DNC?


        Dude

        I was flowing like baby during Sen. Kennedy and Michelle Obama. I felt 
a little disheartened with the announcement of the running mate choice of Biden 
on Saturday and lost some perspective. Then during the telecast of the 
convention, my brain hit reset and the enormity of it all sank into me all at 
once when Sen Kennedy took the stage. Within seconds I was overwhelmed and my 
eyes were like faucets.

        Bosco

        --- On Tue, 8/26/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

          From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: OT: Who Are You Watching to Cover the 
DNC?
          To: scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com
          Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 10:43 AM



          Amen, Brother! I also got misty-eyed when Michelle Obama was 
preceeded by that fine video retrospective, narrated by her mother's tremulous 
voice.  Did I hear it was produced by Ken Burns?

            ------------ -- Original message ------------ -- 
            From: Martin <truthseeker_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] com> 

                  And, on an entirely serious note, I admit freely that I cried 
like a newborn during Senator Kennedy's speech.

                  http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=fQUxw9aUVik

                  --- On Mon, 8/25/08, KeithBJohnson@ comcast.net 
<KeithBJohnson@ comcast.net> wrote:

                    From: KeithBJohnson@ comcast.net <KeithBJohnson@ 
comcast.net>
                    Subject: Re: [scifinoir2] Re: OT: Who Are You Watching to 
Cover the DNC?
                    To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com
                    Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 11:25 PM



                    We had the same experience, then. I was on CNN, went into 
the kitchen, realized Obama's sister wasn't being covered, and also, caught 
Carter's interview on PBS. That sold me. I've been increasingly dissatisfied 
with most news channels recently, populated as they are with large panels of 
analysts who have to shout over each other to get their five seconds' worth of 
TV time. PBS is intelligent, concise, and feels so much more relaxing. What a 
wonder not to suffer through people shouting over each other!

                      ------------ -- Original message ------------ -- 
                      From: "ravenadal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> 

                      I started with CNN on the HD TV. But when I went into the 
kitchen to
                      prepare my dinner, and didn't find the convention on any 
of the
                      network channels, I turned to PBS and stayed with PBS the 
rest of the
                      evening. No commercials, intelligent, concise commentary, 
and an
                      interview with Jimmy Carter, the greatest ex-president of 
all time, it
                      don't get much better than that!

                      Truly enjoyed the whole Michelle Obama segment from the 
video about
                      her mother and father to her brother's introduction 
through her
                      bringing her "elegant and delightful" daughters up on 
stage to Obama
                      congratulating her via videotape. 

                      ~rave!

                      --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, KeithBJohnson@ ... 
wrote:
                      >
                      > What station are you watching to cover the Democratic 
National
                      Convention? As usual, I started out with CNN, but frankly 
that
                      station's been disappointing me recently. Mayb e it 
started when t hey
                      started hiring the likes of Pat Buchanan for equal time. 
Maybe it's
                      the Glenn Becks and other shrill loudmouths they brought 
on to answer
                      the call of Fox's shrill loudmouths. Maybe it's that all 
the anchors
                      and hosts have to pimp themselves out by saying "the best 
political
                      team on television" all the time; again, in homage to 
Fox. Or maybe
                      it's just the fact that I'm tired of the same old group 
of people
                      talking all the time. Whatever. I just noticed that 
everytime I turned
                      to CNN, Wolf Blitzer or Anderson Cooper or someone was 
yammering on
                      about polls and strategies, pulling out the fancy 
electronic maps and
                      fancy computer tricks, while in the background stuff was 
going on I
                      wanted to *see*. I was really upset when Obama's sister 
spoke and CNN
                      focused on Wolf Blitzer, while her voice co
                      > uld barely be heard in the background. Then Wolf threw 
out "the Best
                      Political Team on Television" and they cut to commercial .
                      > So, as I f ind myself doing more and more recently, I 
turned to PBS
                      and Jim Lehrer's group. There I got to see Obama's sister 
speak in
                      entirety. I got professional, level-headed analysis by 
professional
                      people, without shouting, loudtalking and posing for the 
camera. I got
                      to listen to analysts actually get more than "hurry up 
you have five
                      seconds before we go to commercial", and actually get 
time to talk in
                      full conversations, without being rushed. I got 
intelligence with
                      PBS, while my beloved CNN gave me more surface and 
posturing. So it's
                      PBS that'll be my source for the rest of the DNC this 
week.
                      > What are you using for your source?
                      >


                 


       

   
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.9/1635 - Release Date: 8/26/2008 7:29 
AM

Reply via email to