Re: [scikit-image] 回复： Python 3 transition

[Juan Nunez-Iglesias]

I agree. I would suggest backporting bugfixes to 0.14 for 2 years, or not 
naming it LTS because 1y is not “long term” by most definitions.

imho we should aim for 1.0 for this time next year and maybe *that* can depend 
on Python >= 3.6. =)

Juan.

On 11 Nov 2017, 6:52 PM +1100, imag...@sina.com, wrote:
> Just my own opinion. we can give up python2.x      -- YXDragon
> - 原始邮件 -
> 发件人：Stefan van der Walt 
> 收件人：scikit-image@python.org
> 主题：[scikit-image] Python 3 transition
> 日期：2017年11月11日 14点34分
>
> Hi, everyone
> I'd like to make a 4th attempt to determine our transition pathway to
> Python 3. The last thread is here:
> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/scikit-image/2017-July/005304.html
> I would like to propose that the next version, 0.14 (scheduled for March
> of next year), becomes the last targeted for Python 2. It will also be
> an LTS (Long Time Support), which means we will backport serious fixes
> for a period of one year. 0.15 will then target Python >= 3.5 only
> (sorry, no f-strings yet!).
> Let me know your thoughts.
> Stéfan
> ___
> scikit-image mailing list
> scikit-image@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
> ___
> scikit-image mailing list
> scikit-image@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
___
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image

[scikit-image] Review PR #1425

[Dzung Nguyen]

Hi scikit-image core team,

I am wondering if someone could help review PR #1425
? I really
appreciate your time.

Thank you very much!
-- 
*Dzung Nguyen*

PhD Student
Electrical Engineering and Computer Science,
Northwestern University, IL, USA
http://users.eecs.northwestern.edu/~dtn419/
___
scikit-image mailing list
scikit-image@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image