Re: [Scottish] This Mailing List

2002-12-07 Thread Ismail Murat Dilek
I like it as it is too...
Steve Logan wrote:


As a long time lurker I must say I like it as it is...

Colin McKinnon wrote:


willie fleming wrote:


I am toying with the idea of splitting the list into two or possibly 
three.

I don't really feel overwhelmed by mailings. I like the mix.


and possibly 3) slug-off-topic  scurrilous rumours and cars for sale etc
 

A taste of things to come, Willie?

Colin


___
Scottish mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish








___
Scottish mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish



Re: [Scottish] This Mailing List

2002-12-07 Thread Denis Leslie

As a recently arrived lurker I agree with those who think the list is OK the 
way it is. Adding suitable tags to allow people to filter as they wish sounds 
good to me.

Denis Leslie

On Thursday 05 December 2002 22:03, you wrote:
 Hi Folks
   I've taken over the care and feeding of the mailing list to take some of
 the load off Tony.

 I am toying with the idea of splitting the list into two or possibly three.
 1) slug-announce list  -- low traffic with mostly just the formal
 notification of the monthly meeting and any other announcements
 2) slug-chat  -- medium traffic the standard mailinglist stuff

 and possibly 3) slug-off-topic  scurrilous rumours and cars for sale etc

 To acheive this we'd  need to change our hosting arrangements and Kenny
 Duffus has kindly offered to do this for us.

 Anyway, thats what I think, much more importantly, what do you lot think of
 this? And while we are at it,  please tell me how you would want to see the
 mailing list improved. I dont intend making any hasty changes and Im going
 to leave a couple of weeks so you can come back with comments, suggestions,
 flames etc

 BTW if anyone subscribed to the list from addresses that are now dormant
 (and you can remember them) let me know and I'll tidy up the subscribers
 list.

 To change any of your mailing list options in the meantime, please visit
 http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish
 Theres a link there to the archives too.

 Remember you can join us on IRC at eu.freenode.net on channel #scotlug  
 All SLUG people welcome!

___
Scottish mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish



Re: [Scottish] This Mailing List

2002-12-06 Thread Colin McKinnon
willie fleming wrote:


I am toying with the idea of splitting the list into two or possibly three.


I don't really feel overwhelmed by mailings. I like the mix.


and possibly 3) slug-off-topic  scurrilous rumours and cars for sale etc
 

A taste of things to come, Willie?

Colin


___
Scottish mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish



Re: [Scottish] This Mailing List

2002-12-06 Thread scottish+Steven . Murdoch
 I am toying with the idea of splitting the list into two or possibly three.
 1) slug-announce list  -- low traffic with mostly just the formal notification 
 of the monthly meeting and any other announcements

I like this idea, this list should be moderated and be low traffic so I think 
some people will just want to join this one so they can get official notice of 
meetings and other events.

 2) slug-chat  -- medium traffic the standard mailinglist stuff
 
 and possibly 3) slug-off-topic  scurrilous rumours and cars for sale etc

I don't like this idea. Threads tend to drift on and off topic, and having 
threads go across two different mailing lists would be tricky. Also the 
definition of Off-Topic is unclear, is this list for Linux users in Scotland, 
Open Source operating systems or Computers? Currently the list seems to be for 
messages who would interest a significant proportion of the members of the 
group and I like it that way.

Perhaps a policy requesting descriptive subject lines (and changing them if 
the topic of the thread changes,) so that people can ignore threads that are 
of no interest, would be better. Also perhaps requesting that messages not 
related to Computing should be tagged by [OT] to allow automated filtering.

Steven Murdoch.



___
Scottish mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish



RE: [Scottish] This Mailing List

2002-12-06 Thread Colin . Speirs
Title: RE: [Scottish] This Mailing List



*
This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely
 for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
*



Hi Folks
  I've taken over the care and feeding of the mailing 
 list to take some of the 
 load off Tony. 
 
 I am toying with the idea of splitting the list into two or 
 possibly three.
 1) slug-announce list -- low traffic with mostly just the 
 formal notification 
 of the monthly meeting and any other announcements
 2) slug-chat -- medium traffic the standard mailinglist stuff
 
 and possibly 3) slug-off-topic scurrilous rumours and cars 
 for sale etc


The list does not, to me, seem to be high enough traffic to make this worth your hassle. If people want a simply [OT] in the subject could be a warning and people could make filters based on that.

cds





Re: [Scottish] This Mailing List

2002-12-05 Thread Martin McCarthy
 I am toying with the idea of splitting the list into two or possibly three.

Splendid!

 1) slug-announce list  -- low traffic with mostly just the formal
 notification of the monthly meeting and any other announcements
 2) slug-chat  -- medium traffic the standard mailinglist stuff

They sound good.

 and possibly 3) slug-off-topic  scurrilous rumours and cars for sale etc

Excellent!  Especially if we don't have to subscribe to all three :-)

A thought on 1) though.  There are very few announcements other than the
monthly meeting, so consider having slug-meeting instead of
slug-announce and move the 'is anyone going to talk about anything this
month?' threads there also?

[On the subject of which...I'm still happy to talk about the care and
feeding of regular expressions sometime in the New Year if anyone is
interested.  It's occasionally handy to know that '^(Siz|Nam)e +:' is
more efficient than '^Size +:|^Name +:' on many regex engines, and even
more frequently handy to know that the difference isn't significant in
this case if one is clearer to you than the other. :-) ]

Part of me thinks there would be some value in splitting the list
further into hardware/applications/OS/other stuff...but since we're so
light on traffic anyway I think that would be pretty pointless for now.

Cheers,
M
-- 
Martin McCarthy // http://www.non-prophet.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]\\  http://www.ancient-scotland.co.uk
//http://www.ehabitat.demon.co.uk

___
Scottish mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish