Re: RFR: 8257788: Class fields could be local in the SunJSSE provider
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 22:58:07 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote: > In the SunJSSE provider implementation, there are a few class fields are not > used other than the constructors. Those fields could be removed and replaced > with local variables. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8257788 Looks fine to me. - Marked as reviewed by shade (Reviewer). PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1634
Re: RFR: 8257788: Class fields could be local in the SunJSSE provider
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 22:58:07 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote: > In the SunJSSE provider implementation, there are a few class fields are not > used other than the constructors. Those fields could be removed and replaced > with local variables. > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8257788 Looks good to me. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1634
RFR: 8257788: Class fields could be local in the SunJSSE provider
In the SunJSSE provider implementation, there are a few class fields are not used other than the constructors. Those fields could be removed and replaced with local variables. Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8257788 - Commit messages: - 8257788: Class fields could be local in the SunJSSE provider Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1634/files Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=1634=00 Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8257788 Stats: 15 lines in 4 files changed: 0 ins; 11 del; 4 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1634.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/1634/head:pull/1634 PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1634
