Re: Commons DBCP and Pool 1.2
Noel, An immediate release of DBCP 1.2.1 based on CVS head sounds OK. Otherwise we'll get more of those incompatibility bug reports. I will see what I can do this weekend. -- Dirk Noel J. Bergman wrote: Dirk, Do we need to immediately issue a DBCP and Pool 1.2.1 with the 1.4 dependencies removed? James has 1.3 as an operational platform, and we have quite a few users who are not on 1.4. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Commons DBCP and Pool 1.2
Dirk, Do we need to immediately issue a DBCP and Pool 1.2.1 with the 1.4 dependencies removed? James has 1.3 as an operational platform, and we have quite a few users who are not on 1.4. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Commons DBCP and Pool 1.2
That's correct, there were no code changes between RC1 and 1.2 final. -- Dirk Noel J. Bergman wrote: Dirk, Can you please confirm that there were *no* changes to DBCP or Pool since the RC1 jars I had picked up for James? We're releasing this week. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Commons DBCP and Pool 1.2
Dirk, Can you please confirm that there were *no* changes to DBCP or Pool since the RC1 jars I had picked up for James? We're releasing this week. --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
