Re: [Server-devel] tiny_mce Sugar theme
Hi Martin, Nothing else interesting I can think of, mostly working on cleaning up and organizing, and rebasing of off XS Moodle. And of course, making clean commits this time =). Thanks, Tarun Martin Langhoff wrote: On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Tarun Pondicherry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most of it is self contained in lib/editor/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/themes/sugar/. I suspected it'd be most :-) that's how it is usually. Those little changes... is specially good if you have them as a separate commit. Then you can say look at commit ABCD123, it has all you need, so then you can cherry-pick commits between branches. Anyway, this is great info, I'll have to come back to it later, but now that I have it, it'll be easier. Not as easy as applying a patch or a series of patches, but very good anyway. Thanks! Are there other interesting bits that are worth looking at in the Edublog branch? (Other than your oublog changes to add external blog support, I know about that :-) ) cheers, m ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
[Server-devel] What's cooking in the XS pot this week (2008-10--01)
Overall, XS 0.5 is looking shaping up nicely... and late. The F9 port took quite a bit more time to get finished off, perhaps because I tried too hard to get it work relatively well, and uncovered a whole lot of problems with it -- it was a good thing to do as we now have fixes for all of them (mostly thanks to an very responsive Fedora community), but it sure took time. Luckily, nobody is waiting for 0.5 -- not that we know of! do mention it if a delay of 0.5 impacts on your deployment -- so we'll take a bit more time to finish off the Moodle bits, SOTP and mapping out the ejabberd configuration. The idea is that XS-0.5 and later XS-0.6 should be the preferred pairing for XO-8.2, still uses the same interfaces as 0.4, but it does a whole lot more. Good nice features built on top of what we have will come with XS-0.6. This week and next I am working on Moodle from various a Moodle conferences -- my email traffic moves a bit to the moodle.org forums, unfortunately I can't CC those easily here. I might post a summary with links to interesting threads - but I'd recommend that people subscribe to 'Using Moodle' 'General Developer Forum', which is effectively 'moodle-dev' :-) Some notes from last week: - My week was focused on getting Moodle on the XS. Some progress around installation, configuration and themes, still a lot to go. (Was a short week anyway, I ran away for a long weekend sailing :-) ) - Douglas Bagnall spent quite a bit of the week trying to work out what resources ejabberd uses in various circumstances. Things did not always go his way, but he is getting there. At other times he fixed some remaining issues related to the leap from Fedoras 7 to 9, and in spare moments he worked on bug #8610 (Theme music for the XS) which might be opened as a competition once 8.2 is out of the way. On Friday he helped the Wellington testers update the XO pool to build 764, which had handily been announced just a few minutes before. cheers, martin -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
Re: [Server-devel] XS_0_4 install]
I can't remember precisely, but I thought I started ejabberd after running domain_config, but I could be mistaken. Tony, did u start ejabberd before or after running domain_config on ur latest install? On Wed, 2008-10-01 at 11:13 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Bryan Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What's more concerning to me is that ejabberd has never once worked for me out-of-box. I have always had to reinstall it before getting it to work. Has anyone out there gotten ejabberd to work consistently on new XS installs w/ reinstalling it? That sounds like you might be trying to start it before running domain_config. It's a tiny change to the installation workflow outlined in the doco, but can trip people up. We could change the init script to check for that case and refuse to start. cheers, m -- Bryan W. Berry Technology Director OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org ___ Server-devel mailing list Server-devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
