Re: [Server-devel] OLPC XS 0.5 Released

[Martin Langhoff]

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:17 AM, Bryan Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Martin, can u provide and .md5 for this and future releases? thanks

I'll prepare that, and sign it with my GPG key. Don't know how widely
published/trusted it is, but it'll do.

My really well trusted key from a couple of years ago was taken in a
stolen laptop so I had to revoke it.

cheers,


m
-- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel

Re: [Server-devel] Mini ejabberd workplan notes...

[Martin Langhoff]

On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Douglas Bagnall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Well, it seems to work, though I have run out of time to really be sure.

Any hint as to how much you've managed t test?

 http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/dbagnall/ejabberd-rpm.git;a=summary
 http://dev.laptop.org/~dbagnall/ejabberd-xs-2.0.2-2.fc9.olpc.i386.rpm

Thanks!

 There are a mixture of our old patches and new ones from Fedora's package.

From what I see, you've added a new patch (ssl mem fix)... when you
say our old patches do you mean that Fedora has dropped? They were
carrying the same base patches we had... or did you mean a more
inclusive our.

cheers,



m
-- 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel

[Server-devel] ejabberd with postgres

[Douglas Bagnall]

[Apologies to bystanders trying to follow this email: it mainly
consists of disjointed snippets I need to tell Martin]

After a fairly straightforward substitution of postgresql for mnesia,
ejabberd's performance is spectacularly unchanged.  Of course, this is
to be expected.

Also, the behaviour of 2.0.2 is quite similar to that of 2.0.1.

2.02, postgres: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Ejabberd_resource_tests/try_9
2.01, postgres: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Ejabberd_resource_tests/try_8
2.01, mnesia:   http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Ejabberd_resource_tests/try_7

Well, actually, mnesia might have a slight edge, which can be seen in
these side by side graphs:

http://dev.laptop.org/~dbagnall/ejabberd-tests/compare2/resident_mem_max_per_conn-old_tls-2.0.2-2.0.1%20postgres-new_tls.png
http://dev.laptop.org/~dbagnall/ejabberd-tests/compare2/virtual_mem_max_per_conn-old_tls-2.0.2-2.0.1%20postgres-new_tls.png
http://dev.laptop.org/~dbagnall/ejabberd-tests/compare2/load_avg_5_median_per_conn-old_tls-2.0.2-2.0.1%20postgres-new_tls.png

(the scripts to generate these are in
http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/dbagnall/ejabberd-tests.git, and are
woefully documented).

Postgres itself consumed about 12MB through out the tests.  Most of
the time, ejabberd made very few requests: in fact most requests were
the result of my monitoring efforts.  When a bunch of hyperactivity
clients connected, there would be a flurry of activity, all of it
quite simple.

(the raw postgres log is here:
http://dev.laptop.org/~dbagnall/ejabberd-tests/logs-2008-11-28-odbc/postgresql-Thu.log
-- the bits like select password from users where username='admin'
are from my logging script).

I've pushed the changes to get postgres going with ejabberd to the
xs-config.  I used this file to create the database:

http://svn.process-one.net/ejabberd/trunk/src/odbc/pg.sql

douglas
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel