Re: [Server-devel] Is a USB-Ethernet NIC appropriate for the XS?

2009-03-24 Thread Ties Stuij
So Tony suggested just using the usb-ethernet thingies for the
internet-connection. USB1.1 is, what, 700kbps? What are the chances
that we can supply the schools with more bandwidth than that?

/Ties

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:49 AM, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:
 The ever helpful cjb and Mitch_Bradley directed me to the root of the
 problem, the USB-ethernet devices I am using are USB 1.1 which has
 horrible throughput. A USB-ethernet device that supports USB 2.0 should
 fix the problem.

 That's great news!  I'll also be delighted to hear about what hw you
 find that works...

 cheers,


 m
 --
  martin.langh...@gmail.com
  mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
  - ask interesting questions
  - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
  - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
 ___
 Server-devel mailing list
 Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
 http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel

___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] Is a USB-Ethernet NIC appropriate for the XS?

2009-03-24 Thread Bryan Berry
That isn't the problem. I believe that USB 1.1 NIC's choke when they
have multiple connections. I guess the Rx polling - whatever that is -
causes so many interrupts that the NIC stops serving requests

friends on server-devel, I highly recommend you use the lsusb -v to
find out if your usb NIC is actually USB 2.0. Apparently a number of USB
NIC's on the market are advertised as USB 2.0 but are actually 1.1
  
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 14:08 +0545, Ties Stuij wrote:
 So Tony suggested just using the usb-ethernet thingies for the
 internet-connection. USB1.1 is, what, 700kbps? What are the chances
 that we can supply the schools with more bandwidth than that?
 
 /Ties
 
 On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Martin Langhoff
 martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:49 AM, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:
  The ever helpful cjb and Mitch_Bradley directed me to the root of the
  problem, the USB-ethernet devices I am using are USB 1.1 which has
  horrible throughput. A USB-ethernet device that supports USB 2.0 should
  fix the problem.
 
  That's great news!  I'll also be delighted to hear about what hw you
  find that works...
 
  cheers,
 
 
  m
  --
   martin.langh...@gmail.com
   mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
   - ask interesting questions
   - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
   - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
  ___
  Server-devel mailing list
  Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
  http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel
 
-- 
Bryan W. Berry
Technology Director
OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org

___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] Is a USB-Ethernet NIC appropriate for the XS?

2009-03-23 Thread Bryan Berry
The ever helpful cjb and Mitch_Bradley directed me to the root of the
problem, the USB-ethernet devices I am using are USB 1.1 which has
horrible throughput. A USB-ethernet device that supports USB 2.0 should
fix the problem.

BryanWB Mitch_Bradley: great, do u think I can buy a usb2 ethernet nic
for under $50? budget is tight and I need these for 15 XS's
Mitch_Bradley AX8817X and AX88772 are the chips
BryanWB Mitch_Bradley: thanks
Mitch_Bradley
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/category/category_slc.asp?CatId=589
BryanWB Mitch_Bradley: is there any reason that USB-Ethernet is
inherently unworkable or is it just a question of getting the right
usb-ethernet nic?
Mitch_Bradley USB 1.1 sucks rocks for ethernet because the polling for
rx packets kills the throughput
cjb BryanWB: no, the others are usb2
cjb what Mitch_Bradley said
BryanWB Mitch_Bradley: so usb1.1 will totally crap out w/ 20 users ?
Mitch_Bradley USB2.0 has much improved bandwidth and much lower
latency for polling
 usb1.1 will totally crap out with 1 user
BryanWB Mitch_Bradley: thanks a lot guys, you are saving my bacon
cjb BryanWB: the number of users won't affect it, other than by
sucking proportional to load
Mitch_Bradley I didn't even bother supporting USB 1.1 ethernet chips
in OFW.  It's just not worth it.
cjb anyway, yeah.  just find an asix dongle.
Mitch_Bradley try to buy a name brand device.  The no-name ones often
just don't work.

On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 15:43 +0100, Martin Langhoff wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:
  We want to use the MSI Wind PC for the XS but it has one big problem. It
  only has 1 on-board NIC and no PCI slots. As you know, the XS requires 2
  NIC's. We have tried several different USB NIC's and are having serious
  throughput problems. Is this issue one w/ the NIC or the fact that it is
  connected by USB?
 
 My main worry with USB-connected NICs would be reliability. If the NIC
 is reliable, but the throughput a bit below-par, you can still
 probably use it as the WAN NIC -- the throughput is likely to be
 constrained upstream anyway.
 
  - When you say throughput problems... what are you getting? How bad
 is it? Even if limited, would it be appropriate for the WAN port?
 
  - The problem may be specific to the driver or NIC hardware -- is
 there any discussion on the kernel dev list about it?
 
  - The problem may be with the USB bus on the MS Wind, hardware or
 drivers. Perhaps testing for bus throughput or interrupt handling
 helps?
 
  - Have you tested the reliability of the devices? This may be a larger 
 problem.
 
 cheers,
 
 
 martin
-- 
Bryan W. Berry
Technology Director
OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org

___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel


Re: [Server-devel] Is a USB-Ethernet NIC appropriate for the XS?

2009-03-23 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:49 AM, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:
 The ever helpful cjb and Mitch_Bradley directed me to the root of the
 problem, the USB-ethernet devices I am using are USB 1.1 which has
 horrible throughput. A USB-ethernet device that supports USB 2.0 should
 fix the problem.

That's great news!  I'll also be delighted to hear about what hw you
find that works...

cheers,


m
-- 
 martin.langh...@gmail.com
 mar...@laptop.org -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
___
Server-devel mailing list
Server-devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/server-devel