Hello Marc,

There is a lot to say, but we would, I guess, gladly accept mailing list
lie contributions on the master development branch in a separated module.

I personally would enjoy providing professional support implementing
such a feature if needed.

Mailing list support is however out of scope for the current version -
no ETA should be expected out of it.

James is also a flexible email platform: everyone can develop their own
mailet/matchers and implement mailing lists without it ever needing to
land on the mainstream James project.

That being said, I have doubts about the
one-mail-server-to-rule-them-all approach IMO have some limits. Mailing
list are well handled by mature software (eg: mailman) easy to use in
combination with any email server, including James. I hardly see the
need to include yet-another complex feature in the scope of Apache
James, but that is my own opinion (however I agree documentation / links
to tutorials on that set up could be handy - contribution welcome there
too). I would rather invest on our strength as a project, and rely on
tier software to complement our weaknesses. Mailing list but also spam
detection, and why not mail exchange (MX) are IMO good examples of where
James benefits from being coupled with other systems. (If you have a
hammer, maybe you should not use it on screws.)

Note that we have some feature covering some of the very basics:
Recipient Rewrite Table allows some kind of group alias but client
subscription / resignation, header setup are not taken into account by
this approach. Also concerning archiving PonyMail hosted by the ASF
allows to do so.

On 08/08/2021 09:29, Marc Chamberlin wrote:
> Hello - I am still limping along with James 2.3.2 and every year or
> two I come back to the Apache James website to see if mail lists are
> supported yet with the appropriate mailets and matchers necessary, in
> the latest version of Apache James. And every year or two I am
> disappointed that the documentation for mailets and matchers has not
> changed and it appears that only a couple of experimental matchers are
> supplied as part of the standard set of mailets. Not having support
> for mail lists is a show stopper for me/us and for a number of other
> reasons I would like to upgrade our servers to the current version of
> James, but can't.
>
> My questions are, is mail lists feature ever going to be supported by
> James, if so what is the expected ETA, or should I give up on James
> and invest my time and energy in some other mail server? Is there
> undocumented support for mail lists that I don't know about? It seems
> weird that only a couple of matchers are supplied and even weirder
> still that the James team is apparently not using it's own current
> server to support it's own mail list for this list - 
> server-user@james.apache.org!

We are volunteers, and rely on the ASF INFRA team for all project
resource management: website, code base, build, JIRA, and yes mails.

It's handy, and the INFRA people does an amazing job at managing all of
this! I admit that it is tempting to rely on them rather than setting up
our own custom stuff...

Use your own dogfood - I know - that's what I do as part of my job in my
company, but I personally would lack time to support James adoption
within the ASF.

Note: there had been previous discussion on backing the ASF mail stack
with James servers. I can't recall why this didn't happen - that was
before I on-boarded the project.

Cheers,

Benoit
>
>     Thanks in advance for thoughts and suggestions!    Marc C
> -- 
>
> *"The Truth is out there" - Spooky*
>
> *_   _   .   .   .       .   .   .   _   _       .   _   _   _   _   .
>       .   .   .           _   .   .       .           .   _   _      
> .   _       _   _   .   .   .       .   _   _   .       _   .   .   _
>       .   _   _           _   _       .   _       .   _   .       _  
> .   _   . *
>
> Computers: the final frontier.
> These are the voyages of the user Marc.
> His mission: to explore strange new hardware.
> To seek out new software and new applications.
> To boldly go where no Marc has gone before!
>
> (/This email is digitally signed and the electronic signature is
> attached. If you know how, you can use my public key to prove this
> email indeed came from me and has not been modified in transit. My
> public key, which can be used for sending encrypted email to me also,
> can be found at -
> https://keys.openpgp.org/search?q=m...@marcchamberlin.com or just ask
> me for it and I will send it to you as an attachment. If you don't
> understand all this geek speak, no worries, just ignore this
> explanation and ignore the signature key attached to this email (it
> will look like gibberish if you open it) and/or ask me to explain it
> further if you like./)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to