date:20240506

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

2024-05-06 Thread lv_hui--- via Servercert-wg

iTrusChina votes Yes to ballot SC-74

lv_...@itrus.cn

From: Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg
Date: 2024-05-05 16:24
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List
Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS 
structure according to RFC 3647
Voting begins for ballot SC-74.
SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647
Summary
The TLS Baseline Requirements require in section 2.2 that:
"The Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be 
structured in accordance with RFC 3647 and MUST include all material required 
by RFC 3647."
The intent of this language was to ensure that all CAs' CP and/or CPS documents 
contain a similar structure, making it easier to review and compare against the 
BRs. However, there was some ambiguity as to the actual structure that CAs 
should follow. After several discussions in the SCWG Public Mailing List and 
F2F meetings, it was agreed that more clarity should be added to the existing 
requirement, pointing to the outline described in section 6 of RFC 3647.
The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) and 
endorsed by Aaron Poulsen (Amazon) and Tim Hollebeek (Digicert). 
You can view the github pull request representing this ballot here. 
Motion Begins
MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of 
Publicly-Trusted TLS Server Certificates" based on Version 2.0.4 as specified 
in the following redline:
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/c4a34fe2292022e0a04ba66b5a85df75907ac2a2...f6a90e2a652fbb7a2d62a976b70f4af3adce8dae

Motion Ends
This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval 
of this ballot is as follows:
Discussion (at least 7 days)
Start time: 2024-04-25 16:30:00 UTC
End time: on or after 2024-05-02 16:30:00 UTC
Vote for approval (7 days)
Start time: 2024-05-05 8:30:00 UTC
End time: 2024-05-12 8:30:00 UTC

___
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

2024-05-06 Thread Brittany Randall via Servercert-wg

GoDaddy votes Yes on SC-74

Best,

Brittany Randall


From: Servercert-wg  on behalf of Dimitris 
Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg 
Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2024 1:24 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 

Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS 
structure according to RFC 3647

Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or 
open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 
Forward suspicious emails to isitbad@.



Voting begins for ballot SC-74.
SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647
Summary

The TLS Baseline Requirements require in section 2.2 that:

"The Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be 
structured in accordance with RFC 3647 and MUST include all material required 
by RFC 3647."

The intent of this language was to ensure that all CAs' CP and/or CPS documents 
contain a similar structure, making it easier to review and compare against the 
BRs. However, there was some ambiguity as to the actual structure that CAs 
should follow. After several discussions in the SCWG Public Mailing 
List
 and F2F meetings, it was agreed that more clarity should be added to the 
existing requirement, pointing to the outline described in section 6 of RFC 
3647.

The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) and 
endorsed by Aaron Poulsen (Amazon) and Tim Hollebeek (Digicert).

You can view the github pull request representing this ballot 
here.

Motion Begins

MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of 
Publicly-Trusted TLS Server Certificates" based on Version 2.0.4 as specified 
in the following redline:

  *   
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/c4a34fe2292022e0a04ba66b5a85df75907ac2a2...f6a90e2a652fbb7a2d62a976b70f4af3adce8dae

Motion Ends

This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval 
of this ballot is as follows:

Discussion (at least 7 days)

  *   Start time: 2024-04-25 16:30:00 UTC
  *   End time: on or after 2024-05-02 16:30:00 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days)

  *   Start time: 2024-05-05 8:30:00 UTC
  *   End time: 2024-05-12 8:30:00 UTC

___
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Re: [Servercert-wg] [EXTERNAL] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

2024-05-06 Thread Bruce Morton via Servercert-wg

Entrust votes Yes to ballot SC-74.

Bruce.

From: Servercert-wg  On Behalf Of Dimitris 
Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg
Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2024 4:24 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 

Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify 
CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

Voting begins for ballot SC-74. SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to 
RFC 3647 Summary The TLS Baseline Requirements require in section 2. 2 that: 
"The Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be 
structured in

Voting begins for ballot SC-74.

SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647
Summary

The TLS Baseline Requirements require in section 2.2 that:

"The Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be 
structured in accordance with RFC 3647 and MUST include all material required 
by RFC 3647."

The intent of this language was to ensure that all CAs' CP and/or CPS documents 
contain a similar structure, making it easier to review and compare against the 
BRs. However, there was some ambiguity as to the actual structure that CAs 
should follow. After several discussions in the SCWG Public Mailing 
List
 and F2F meetings, it was agreed that more clarity should be added to the 
existing requirement, pointing to the outline described in section 6 of RFC 
3647.

The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) and 
endorsed by Aaron Poulsen (Amazon) and Tim Hollebeek (Digicert).

You can view the github pull request representing this ballot 
here.

Motion Begins

MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of 
Publicly-Trusted TLS Server Certificates" based on Version 2.0.4 as specified 
in the following redline:

  *   
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/c4a34fe2292022e0a04ba66b5a85df75907ac2a2...f6a90e2a652fbb7a2d62a976b70f4af3adce8dae

Motion Ends

This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval 
of this ballot is as follows:

Discussion (at least 7 days)

  *   Start time: 2024-04-25 16:30:00 UTC
  *   End time: on or after 2024-05-02 16:30:00 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days)

  *   Start time: 2024-05-05 8:30:00 UTC
  *   End time: 2024-05-12 8:30:00 UTC

Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this message has 
been sent to you in error, you must not copy, distribute or disclose of the 
information it contains. Please notify Entrust immediately and delete the 
message from your system.
___
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

2024-05-06 Thread Doug Beattie via Servercert-wg

GlobalSign votes yes on SC-74.



Doug



From: Servercert-wg  On Behalf Of Dimitris 
Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg
Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2024 4:25 AM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 

Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS 
structure according to RFC 3647



Voting begins for ballot SC-74.




SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647


Summary


The TLS Baseline Requirements require in section 2.2 that:

"The Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be 
structured in accordance with RFC 3647 and MUST include all material required 
by RFC 3647."

The intent of this language was to ensure that all CAs' CP and/or CPS 
documents contain a similar structure, making it easier to review and compare 
against the BRs. However, there was some ambiguity as to the actual structure 
that CAs should follow. After several discussions in the SCWG Public Mailing 
List 
 
and F2F meetings, it was agreed that more clarity should be added to the 
existing requirement, pointing to the outline described in section 6 of RFC 
3647.

The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) and 
endorsed by Aaron Poulsen (Amazon) and Tim Hollebeek (Digicert).

You can view the github pull request representing this ballot here 
 .


Motion Begins


MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of 
Publicly-Trusted TLS Server Certificates" based on Version 2.0.4 as specified 
in the following redline:

* 
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/c4a34fe2292022e0a04ba66b5a85df75907ac2a2...f6a90e2a652fbb7a2d62a976b70f4af3adce8dae


Motion Ends


This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval 
of this ballot is as follows:


Discussion (at least 7 days)


*   Start time: 2024-04-25 16:30:00 UTC
*   End time: on or after 2024-05-02 16:30:00 UTC


Vote for approval (7 days)


*   Start time: 2024-05-05 8:30:00 UTC
*   End time: 2024-05-12 8:30:00 UTC





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

2024-05-06 Thread chtsai

TWCA votes "yes" to ballot SC-74.

From: Servercert-wg  On Behalf Of Dimitris 
Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg
Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2024 4:25 PM
To: CA/B Forum Server Certificate WG Public Discussion List 

Subject: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS 
structure according to RFC 3647

Voting begins for ballot SC-74.

SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647
Summary

The TLS Baseline Requirements require in section 2.2 that:

"The Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be 
structured in accordance with RFC 3647 and MUST include all material required 
by RFC 3647."

The intent of this language was to ensure that all CAs' CP and/or CPS documents 
contain a similar structure, making it easier to review and compare against the 
BRs. However, there was some ambiguity as to the actual structure that CAs 
should follow. After several discussions in the SCWG Public Mailing 
List
 and F2F meetings, it was agreed that more clarity should be added to the 
existing requirement, pointing to the outline described in section 6 of RFC 
3647.

The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) and 
endorsed by Aaron Poulsen (Amazon) and Tim Hollebeek (Digicert).

You can view the github pull request representing this ballot 
here.

Motion Begins

MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of 
Publicly-Trusted TLS Server Certificates" based on Version 2.0.4 as specified 
in the following redline:

  *   
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/c4a34fe2292022e0a04ba66b5a85df75907ac2a2...f6a90e2a652fbb7a2d62a976b70f4af3adce8dae

Motion Ends

This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval 
of this ballot is as follows:

Discussion (at least 7 days)

  *   Start time: 2024-04-25 16:30:00 UTC
  *   End time: on or after 2024-05-02 16:30:00 UTC

Vote for approval (7 days)

  *   Start time: 2024-05-05 8:30:00 UTC
  *   End time: 2024-05-12 8:30:00 UTC

___
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Re: [Servercert-wg] [EXTERNAL]-Re: [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

2024-05-06 Thread Pedro FUENTES via Servercert-wg

OISTE votes YES to SC-74

> 
>> Voting begins for ballot SC-74.
>> SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647
>> 
>> Summary
>> 
>> The TLS Baseline Requirements require in section 2.2 that:
>> 
>> "The Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be 
>> structured in accordance with RFC 3647 and MUST include all material 
>> required by RFC 3647."
>> 
>> The intent of this language was to ensure that all CAs' CP and/or CPS 
>> documents contain a similar structure, making it easier to review and 
>> compare against the BRs. However, there was some ambiguity as to the actual 
>> structure that CAs should follow. After several discussions in the SCWG 
>> Public Mailing List 
>> 
>>  and F2F meetings, it was agreed that more clarity should be added to the 
>> existing requirement, pointing to the outline described in section 6 of RFC 
>> 3647.
>> 
>> The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) 
>> and endorsed by Aaron Poulsen (Amazon) and Tim Hollebeek (Digicert). 
>> 
>> You can view the github pull request representing this ballot here 
>> .
>>  
>> 
>> Motion Begins
>> 
>> MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of 
>> Publicly-Trusted TLS Server Certificates" based on Version 2.0.4 as 
>> specified in the following redline:
>> 
>> https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/c4a34fe2292022e0a04ba66b5a85df75907ac2a2...f6a90e2a652fbb7a2d62a976b70f4af3adce8dae
>>  
>> 
>> Motion Ends
>> 
>> This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for 
>> approval of this ballot is as follows:
>> 
>> Discussion (at least 7 days)
>> 
>> Start time: 2024-04-25 16:30:00 UTC
>> End time: on or after 2024-05-02 16:30:00 UTC
>> Vote for approval (7 days)
>> 
>> Start time: 2024-05-05 8:30:00 UTC
>> End time: 2024-05-12 8:30:00 UTC
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Servercert-wg mailing list
>> Servercert-wg@cabforum.org 
>> https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg 
>> 
> 
> ___
> Servercert-wg mailing list
> Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.cabforum.org_mailman_listinfo_servercert-2Dwg&d=DwICAg&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf-v5A_CdpgnVfiiMM&r=-bX5hBm1IdRDykQ-dBR8tsFRCM4v1VXUyG7RZa2WqPY&m=tAz7gqc9mSDCsrsV9SOs1oBe_mVyH5Pqb5GEombe2ppEtQNBn9A1bgyopreg_GFt&s=BaMZ4wtnKrefrD489IqJzxpygBb_uRNNq3cdUkWv3BU&e=


WISeKey SA
Pedro Fuentes
CSO - Trust Services Manager
Office: + 41 (0) 22 594 30 00
Mobile: + 41 (0) 791 274 790
Address: Avenue Louis-Casaï 58 | 1216 Cointrin | Switzerland
Stay connected with WISeKey 

THIS IS A TRUSTED MAIL: This message is digitally signed with a WISeKey 
identity. If you get a mail from WISeKey please check the signature to avoid 
security risks

CONFIDENTIALITY: This email and any files transmitted with it can be 
confidential and it’s intended solely for the use of the individual or entity 
to which they are addressed. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. If you have received this email in 
error please notify the sender

DISCLAIMER: WISeKey does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of this 
message and does not accept any liability for any errors or omissions herein as 
this message has been transmitted over a public network. Internet 
communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information 
may be intercepted, corrupted, or contain viruses. Attachments to this e-

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

2024-05-06 Thread BILGEM KSM

Kamu SM votes "yes" on Ballot SC-74. 




Tuğba ÖZCAN 

Head Of e-Signature Technologies Department 



TÜBİTAK/BİLGEM/Kamu SM 

Çamlıca Mahallesi 408. Cadde No: 136 

C Blok 5. Kat Yenimahalle/Ankara 

Dahili:8543 




tugba.oz...@tubitak.gov.tr 


Kimden: "CA"  
Kime: "Dimitris Zacharopoulos, HARICA" , "CA" 
 
Gönderilenler: 5 Mayıs Pazar 2024 22:05:35 
Konu: Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS 
structure according to RFC 3647 

Mozilla votes "yes" on Ballot SC-74. 

On Sun, May 5, 2024 at 3:06 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via 
Servercert-wg < [ mailto:servercert-wg@cabforum.org | 
servercert-wg@cabforum.org ] > wrote: 



HARICA votes "yes" to ballot SC-74. 

On 5/5/2024 11:24 π.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg 
wrote: 

BQ_BEGIN
Voting begins for ballot SC-74. 
SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647 
Summary 


The TLS Baseline Requirements require in section 2.2 that: 

"The Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement MUST be 
structured in accordance with RFC 3647 and MUST include all material required 
by RFC 3647." 

The intent of this language was to ensure that all CAs' CP and/or CPS documents 
contain a similar structure, making it easier to review and compare against the 
BRs. However, there was some ambiguity as to the actual structure that CAs 
should follow. After several discussions in the [ 
https://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/servercert-wg/2023-November/004070.html | 
SCWG Public Mailing List ] and F2F meetings, it was agreed that more clarity 
should be added to the existing requirement, pointing to the outline described 
in section 6 of RFC 3647. 

The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) and 
endorsed by Aaron Poulsen (Amazon) and Tim Hollebeek (Digicert). 


You can view the github pull request representing this ballot [ 
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/pull/503 | here ] . 
Motion Begins 


MODIFY the "Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of 
Publicly-Trusted TLS Server Certificates" based on Version 2.0.4 as specified 
in the following redline: 


* [ 
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/c4a34fe2292022e0a04ba66b5a85df75907ac2a2...f6a90e2a652fbb7a2d62a976b70f4af3adce8dae
 | 
https://github.com/cabforum/servercert/compare/c4a34fe2292022e0a04ba66b5a85df75907ac2a2...f6a90e2a652fbb7a2d62a976b70f4af3adce8dae
 ] 
Motion Ends 


This ballot proposes a Final Maintenance Guideline. The procedure for approval 
of this ballot is as follows: Discussion (at least 7 days) 


* Start time: 2024-04-25 16:30:00 UTC 
* End time: on or after 2024-05-02 16:30:00 UTC 
Vote for approval (7 days) 


* Start time: 2024-05-05 8:30:00 UTC 
* End time: 2024-05-12 8:30:00 UTC 


___
Servercert-wg mailing list [ mailto:Servercert-wg@cabforum.org | 
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org ] [ 
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg | 
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg ] 



___ 
Servercert-wg mailing list 
[ mailto:Servercert-wg@cabforum.org | Servercert-wg@cabforum.org ] 
[ https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg | 
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg ] 

BQ_END


___ 
Servercert-wg mailing list 
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org 
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg 
___
Servercert-wg mailing list
Servercert-wg@cabforum.org
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

Re: [Servercert-wg] [EXTERNAL] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

Re: [Servercert-wg] [EXTERNAL]-Re: [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

Re: [Servercert-wg] [Voting Begins] Ballot SC-74 - Clarify CP/CPS structure according to RFC 3647

7 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information