Re: RFR: 8249004: Reduce ThreadsListHandle overhead in relation to direct handshakes [v13]

2021-11-08 Thread Robbin Ehn
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 23:42:07 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty  wrote:

>> A fix to reduce ThreadsListHandle overhead in relation to handshakes and
>> we add sanity checks for ThreadsListHandles higher in the call stack.
>> 
>> This fix was tested with Mach5 Tier[1-8]; Tier8 is still running.
>
> Daniel D. Daugherty has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   coleenp CR - clarify need for ThreadsListHandle in 
> JvmtiEventControllerPrivate::recompute_enabled().

Marked as reviewed by rehn (Reviewer).

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4677


Re: RFR: 8249004: Reduce ThreadsListHandle overhead in relation to direct handshakes [v13]

2021-11-07 Thread David Holmes
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 23:42:07 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty  wrote:

>> A fix to reduce ThreadsListHandle overhead in relation to handshakes and
>> we add sanity checks for ThreadsListHandles higher in the call stack.
>> 
>> This fix was tested with Mach5 Tier[1-8]; Tier8 is still running.
>
> Daniel D. Daugherty has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   coleenp CR - clarify need for ThreadsListHandle in 
> JvmtiEventControllerPrivate::recompute_enabled().

Thanks Dan - updates look good.

David

-

Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4677


Re: RFR: 8249004: Reduce ThreadsListHandle overhead in relation to direct handshakes [v13]

2021-11-05 Thread Daniel D . Daugherty
On Fri, 5 Nov 2021 23:42:07 GMT, Daniel D. Daugherty  wrote:

>> A fix to reduce ThreadsListHandle overhead in relation to handshakes and
>> we add sanity checks for ThreadsListHandles higher in the call stack.
>> 
>> This fix was tested with Mach5 Tier[1-8]; Tier8 is still running.
>
> Daniel D. Daugherty has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   coleenp CR - clarify need for ThreadsListHandle in 
> JvmtiEventControllerPrivate::recompute_enabled().

Updated comment has been pushed to this PR.

For some reason, the comments that @coleenp and I are posting in the
"Files changed" view are not showing up here.

-

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4677


Re: RFR: 8249004: Reduce ThreadsListHandle overhead in relation to direct handshakes [v13]

2021-11-05 Thread Daniel D . Daugherty
> A fix to reduce ThreadsListHandle overhead in relation to handshakes and
> we add sanity checks for ThreadsListHandles higher in the call stack.
> 
> This fix was tested with Mach5 Tier[1-8]; Tier8 is still running.

Daniel D. Daugherty has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
additional commit since the last revision:

  coleenp CR - clarify need for ThreadsListHandle in 
JvmtiEventControllerPrivate::recompute_enabled().

-

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4677/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4677/files/91173506..fe28cbe9

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=4677=12
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=4677=11-12

  Stats: 4 lines in 1 file changed: 4 ins; 0 del; 0 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4677.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4677/head:pull/4677

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4677