Re: RFR: 8284331: Add sanity check for signal handler modification warning.
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:37:26 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote: > A sanity check using "jcmd VM.info" to catch the signal handler modification > warning: it should never trigger during this test. thanks David and Alex and Chris 8-) - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8106
Re: RFR: 8284331: Add sanity check for signal handler modification warning.
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:37:26 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote: > A sanity check using "jcmd VM.info" to catch the signal handler modification > warning: it should never trigger during this test. ok - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8106
Re: RFR: 8284331: Add sanity check for signal handler modification warning.
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 03:15:09 GMT, Chris Plummer wrote: > How does this relate the failure in JDK-8285647? Is this just meant to detect > that failure, but a proper fix is still needed for it? ..it's not directly related - I had this test addition in progress already, as an addition to JDK-8283337 which fixes the modification handler being broken by a previous change (the warning was firing all the time, after JDK-8279124 and before JDK-8283337). So we should have a sanity check (this PR) which fails if the warning starts firing unnecessarily. Logged JDK-8285792 to signal that we need some more cleanup here, including the news that I think JDK-8285647 shows that we don't consistently ignore the crash_handler. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8106
Re: RFR: 8284331: Add sanity check for signal handler modification warning.
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:37:26 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote: > A sanity check using "jcmd VM.info" to catch the signal handler modification > warning: it should never trigger during this test. How does this relate the failure in JDK-8285647? Is this just meant to detect that failure, but a proper fix is still needed for it? - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8106
Re: RFR: 8284331: Add sanity check for signal handler modification warning.
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:37:26 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote: > A sanity check using "jcmd VM.info" to catch the signal handler modification > warning: it should never trigger during this test. Marked as reviewed by amenkov (Reviewer). - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8106
Re: RFR: 8284331: Add sanity check for signal handler modification warning.
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:37:26 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote: > A sanity check using "jcmd VM.info" to catch the signal handler modification > warning: it should never trigger during this test. Seems quite reasonable. - Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer). PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8106
Re: RFR: 8284331: Add sanity check for signal handler modification warning.
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:37:26 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote: > A sanity check using "jcmd VM.info" to catch the signal handler modification > warning: it should never trigger during this test. (adding a note to trigger email notification, as that appears lost...) - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8106
