RE: Interested in becoming a contributor
Hi James, Thanks for those Grant! No problem: everybody benefits when people get involved. There's some documentation about it here... http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/becoming-a-committer.html basically keep doing what you're doing and the committers will take a vote to grant you full commit karma. I take it you are interested in becoming a committer? :) I read the doco at the earlier and I am definitely interested in becoming a committer, so I'll keep submitting patches. Btw, do you mind if new contributors like myself take a look at unassigned issues and attach patches? That's probably the quickest way to get some work done that everybody can use. Regards, Grant
[jira] Created: (SM-481) servicemix-http provider truncates a large xml response
servicemix-http provider truncates a large xml response --- Key: SM-481 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-481 Project: ServiceMix Type: Bug Components: servicemix-http Environment: windows xp professional. Java 1.5 Reporter: Pete Priority: Critical Fix For: incubation Attachments: soap_response.txt When using servicemix-http as a provider, our provider web service returns a very large xml response, this gets truncated somewhere in servicemix (I did notice when debugging it went down the stax xml route) We had the same problem when using SaajBinding, we fixed this locally by extending the SaajBinding and overridng the onMessageExchange in particular just after the call() we added response.saveChanges(); e.g. SOAPMessage response = connection.call(inMessage, soapEndpoint); response.saveChanges(); This I believe was a known issue using this particular SAAJ implementation, which is why saveChanges() was added to the api. see http://www.nabble.com/servicemix-http-provider-truncates-a-large-xml-response-tf1857975.html for forum post Our response xml is 673148 bytes. I have attached an example of the failing soap response. Note: you'll need to remove header stuff and save as xml. The response has a single xml element, where embedded (as a string) is another xml document - nasty I know. XML Config is !-- Http based client recieve/send html request/response passes message to a router component-- sm:activationSpec componentName=httpReceiver service=my:httpBinding endpoint=httpReceiver destinationService=my:router sm:component bean xmlns=http://xbean.org/schemas/spring/1.0; class=org.apache.servicemix.components.http.HttpConnector property name=host value=localhost / property name=port value=8912 / property name=marshaler bean class=org.apache.servicemix.components.http.HttpMarshaler / /property /bean /sm:component /sm:activationSpec Then there is an eip router that routes to sm:component http:component http:endpoints http:endpoint service=my:search endpoint=search role=provider soap=true soapAction=http://www.blah.com/blah; locationURI=http://www.blah.com:80/blah.asmx/ /http:endpoints /http:component /sm:component -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Resolved: (SM-480) Transitive dependencies of dependent projects not included in installer lib directory
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-480?page=all ] Philip Dodds resolved SM-480: - Fix Version: incubation Resolution: Fixed The problem was the different in versions between the dependency management and the transitive dependency - have added a warning and will use the version from the transitive dependency for packaging. Transitive dependencies of dependent projects not included in installer lib directory - Key: SM-480 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-480 Project: ServiceMix Type: Bug Components: tooling Versions: incubation Environment: Ubuntu Linux 5.10, Windows XP SP2 Reporter: Grant McDonald Fix For: incubation Original Estimate: 2 days Remaining: 2 days Whilst using servicemix I got a NoClassDefFound error from the servicemix-http service engine. It appears that the code in question was throwing a DecoderException which is defined in commons-codec which is a transitive dependency of commons-httpclient. This dependency was not included in the installer lib directory and is obviously quite critical to the running of httpclient. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
ServiceMix Geronimo Plugin
So Guillaume and I talked at ApacheCon EU, and we came up with the following thoughts about ServiceMix integration into Geronimo. Use Cases * Deploy combined JBI/J2EE applications. In the short term there may not be one bundle such as a ZIP or EAR containing both types of components, but they should be able to work well together. * A J2EE web application should be able to send messages to the JBI bus * A JBI service should be able to dispatch messages to a J2EE endpoint (other than just an MDB via JMS, etc.). Typically this would be a stateless session bean. * Should be able to deploy both JBI and J2EE components using the same deploy tool(s) * Eventually, should be able to deploy a combined package containing both types of components, supporting bidirectional dependencies (J2EE components send messages to JBI components in the same app and vice versa) * Manage Geronimo and ServiceMix together, via a combined admin console, combined JMX space, etc. * Share resources between Geronimo and ServiceMix * Same security realm for authentication and same Subject for authorization * Same transaction manager * Same HTTP server * Single source of SSL settings (keystores, passwords, etc.) SSL factories As I understand it, as of today: * There are GBeans to start ServiceMix in Geronimo * There is a builder to deploy JBI service assemblies to ServiceMix using the Geronimo deploy tools (I'm not clear whether this can also deploy JBI components, which actually seem more like containers) * Some work has been done to leverage the Geronimo transaction manager * The JCA flow in ServiceMix may use the Geronimo transaction manager * There is a ServiceMix admin console using the same technology as the Geronimo admin console So out of these, we have the following to-dos to create a ServiceMix plugin for Geronimo 1.1: * Try out the current ServiceMix Geronimo GBeans * Confirm whether the JCA flow uses the Geronimo transasction manager correctly * Update the GBeans to expose EJBs as endpoints for ServiceMix (perhaps leveraging JSR-181 code for mapping normalized messages to EJB invocations?) * Provide a GBean that is a client factory -- so you can map this factory into JNDI for a J2EE component, and it can look that up and use it to generate a ServiceMixClient instance * Provide factories that support both client authentication (caller specifies user/password if any) and container authentication (e.g. Subject from web app login is passed to ServiceMix as is) * Add a security provider to ServiceMix that uses Geronimo security realms to authenticate and populate a Subject * Update ServiceMix so it can use the Geronimo HTTP container for HTTP/HTTPS binding components (allowing only configuring of the part after http://host:port/context/ in the URL) * Add the glue code to deploy the ServiceMix admin screens to the Geronimo admin console when the ServiceMix features are added * Create and document sample apps to call JBI-J2EE and vice versa And the following that will require Geronimo code changes (in other words, targeting G 1.2+): * Provide a deployment unit that contains both J2EE and JBI components (either an EAR with extra content or a ZIP containing both a JBI service assembly and an EAR, etc.) * Let ServiceMix initiate HTTP bindings on new ports, wtih fully arbitrary URLs, etc. * Update Geronimo keystore provider to offer the new functions that ServiceMix needs We thought it would be best for any work done on this in the short term to happen in the ServiceMix SVN head (for GBeans and Geronimo configus) using the ServiceMix 3.0-M2-incubating ServiceMix release for the ServiceMix features, and the Geronimo 1.1 release for the Geronimo features. Anyone else have any thoughts about this? Thanks, Aaron
Re: Transitive dependency problem with jbi maven plugin
Yeah the warning is in place to just show the problem has occurred though you are right that probably managing situations like this in either changes to the dependencyManagement or the pom Cheers P On 7/3/06, Grant McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried something similar by switching off the lines I mentioned in the issue report. This had the effect of including commons-codec-1.2 instead of 1.3 which actually caused servicemix to completely crash since the versions had different encoding/decoding formats (this was using the trunk as of 2006-06-28 with a few custom patches). When I explicitly added commons-codec-1.3 as a dependency in servicemix-http this problem went away. So it may be that fine tuning is needed in some cases with regards to transitive dependencies (either that or just use the override from the parent pom. -Original Message- From: Philip Dodds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 4 July 2006 12:27 AM To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Transitive dependency problem with jbi maven plugin The problem was that the version found through the transitive dependency was not the same as the version from the top level pom's dependency management - I have switched it so that in this case a warning it thrown but the version from the transitive dependency it packaged into the installer. P On 7/2/06, Grant McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This appears to be due to line 181 in GenerateComponentMojo.java in the jbi-maven-plugin project. At this point the includes are refiltered based on the JbiResolutionListener created for the project. This seems to eject some dependencies of subprojects needs more investigation. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Transitive-dependency-problem-with-jbi-maven-plugin-tf 1879526.html#a5139375 Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
