[jira] Resolved: (SM-1048) Camel InOut support

2007-09-06 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-1048.
-

   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.2
 Assignee: Guillaume Nodet

 Camel InOut support
 ---

 Key: SM-1048
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1048
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 3.2
Reporter: Dejan Predovic
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
 Fix For: 3.2

 Attachments: inout.patch


 CamelJbiEndpoint and ToJbiProcessor do not support InOut exchanges. The 
 attached patch should add the basic support for it.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (SM-1045) Servicemix tooling changes to generate JBISharedLibraryDescriptor

2007-09-06 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet updated SM-1045:


Patch Info: [Patch Available]

 Servicemix tooling changes to generate JBISharedLibraryDescriptor
 -

 Key: SM-1045
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1045
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: tooling
Affects Versions: 3.1
 Environment: Windows, JBOSS 4.0.4-GA using servicemix deployment
Reporter: Srivatsan Sridharan
 Attachments: GenerateServiceAssemblyDescriptorMojo.java


 This is the patch that we have come up with for addrressing the issue 
 detailed in this link 
 http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-multiple-versions-of-service-units-using-artifactId-filtering-tf4215049s12049.html#a11991823
 Please let me know if the approach is correct.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Created: (SM-1049) Raise the number of http requests that can be send concurrently by servicemix-http

2007-09-06 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)
Raise the number of http requests that can be send concurrently by 
servicemix-http
--

 Key: SM-1049
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1049
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
 Fix For: 3.1.2, 3.2


The max number is always limited by the number of threads.
Setting these limits too low always leads to deadlock when under load

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (SM-1048) Camel InOut support

2007-09-06 Thread James Strachan (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40081
 ] 

James Strachan commented on SM-1048:


FWIW to ease the Camel - ServiceMix integration; Camel's Exchange now has an 
ExchangePattern enum to handle InOut, InOnly etc

 Camel InOut support
 ---

 Key: SM-1048
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1048
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 3.2
Reporter: Dejan Predovic
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
 Fix For: 3.2

 Attachments: inout.patch


 CamelJbiEndpoint and ToJbiProcessor do not support InOut exchanges. The 
 attached patch should add the basic support for it.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Resolved: (SM-1049) Raise the number of http requests that can be send concurrently by servicemix-http

2007-09-06 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1049?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-1049.
-

Resolution: Fixed
  Assignee: Guillaume Nodet

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=573238view=rev
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=573240view=rev


 Raise the number of http requests that can be send concurrently by 
 servicemix-http
 --

 Key: SM-1049
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1049
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
 Fix For: 3.1.2, 3.2


 The max number is always limited by the number of threads.
 Setting these limits too low always leads to deadlock when under load

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Resolved: (SM-1002) Service mix hangs when the # concurrent requests exceeds the maxConnectionsPerHost

2007-09-06 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-1002.
-

Resolution: Fixed
  Assignee: Guillaume Nodet

 Service mix hangs when the # concurrent requests exceeds the 
 maxConnectionsPerHost
 --

 Key: SM-1002
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1002
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: servicemix-http
 Environment: Unix, Java 1.5
Reporter: Ruwan Linton
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
 Fix For: 3.2


 When I am doing a performance test I have sent more than 40 concurrent 
 requests from a single host to servicemix, and the maxConnectionsPerHost was 
 40. It is acceptable the failing to respond when it exceeds 40 
 (maxConnectionsPerHost) concurrent requests.
 But afterward, SM hangs.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (SM-1035) Continuation problems when Max Idle Time ocurr

2007-09-06 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40085
 ] 

Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1035:
-

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=573248view=rev

 Continuation problems when Max Idle Time ocurr
 --

 Key: SM-1035
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1035
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: servicemix-http
 Environment: Servicemix 3.1
Reporter: Jorge Rodríguez Pedrianes
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
 Fix For: 3.1.2, 3.2

   Original Estimate: 2 minutes
  Remaining Estimate: 2 minutes

 HI!
 I saw in Http binding component, that if my service work too time, the 
 http endpoint retry the current request. but this it's wrong. I think that in 
 ConsumerProcessor class it's better to do this: 
 {code:title=ConsumerProcessor java|borderStyle=solid}
 ...
  public void process(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse 
 response) throws Exception {

// If the continuation is not a retry
if (!cont.isPending()  cont.isNew()) {
   ...
 }
 {code}
 Whith this we avoid put the request two times in the bus.
 Thanks.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Commented: (SM-1050) Memory Leak in http consumer processor when using SSL

2007-09-06 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_40086
 ] 

Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1050:
-

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=573248view=rev

 Memory Leak in http consumer processor when using SSL
 -

 Key: SM-1050
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1050
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: servicemix-http
Affects Versions: 3.1.1
Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
 Fix For: 3.1.2, 3.2




-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Resolved: (SM-939) CXF based Service Engine and Bnding Component

2007-09-06 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-939.


Resolution: Fixed

 CXF based Service Engine and Bnding Component
 -

 Key: SM-939
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-939
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
Assignee: Freeman Fang
Priority: Critical
 Fix For: 3.2

 Attachments: patch.txt, patch0627.txt, patch0702.txt, patch0720.txt, 
 patch0806.txt




-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Resolved: (SM-1040) flag for automatic validation of the payload by the ws engine

2007-09-06 Thread Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-1040.
-

   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.2
 Assignee: Guillaume Nodet

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=573251view=rev


 flag for automatic validation of the payload by the ws engine
 -

 Key: SM-1040
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1040
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: servicemix-jsr181
Affects Versions: 3.2
 Environment: fuse 3.2.0.0
Reporter: Michal
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
 Fix For: 3.2

 Attachments: Jsr181Endpoint.java.diff


 I have noticed that xfire does not validate the payload against the scheme 
 provided in my wsdl. 
 I found a property that can turn it on. See the ecnlosed patch.
 Following url is a more detail description of the issue:
 http://www.nabble.com/jsr181---validating-payload-tf4316406s12049.html#a12292555
 BTW, could the 'processor' field have a setter in Jsr181Endpoint class? Thus, 
 in case of a need to have custom behaviour developer might inject one.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (SM-1045) Servicemix tooling changes to generate JBISharedLibraryDescriptor

2007-09-06 Thread Srivatsan Sridharan (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Srivatsan Sridharan updated SM-1045:


Attachment: (was: GenerateServiceAssemblyDescriptorMojo_3.1_diff.txt)

 Servicemix tooling changes to generate JBISharedLibraryDescriptor
 -

 Key: SM-1045
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1045
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: tooling
Affects Versions: 3.1
 Environment: Windows, JBOSS 4.0.4-GA using servicemix deployment
Reporter: Srivatsan Sridharan
 Attachments: GenerateServiceAssemblyDescriptorMojo.java


 This is the patch that we have come up with for addrressing the issue 
 detailed in this link 
 http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-multiple-versions-of-service-units-using-artifactId-filtering-tf4215049s12049.html#a11991823
 Please let me know if the approach is correct.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.



[jira] Updated: (SM-1045) Servicemix tooling changes to generate JBISharedLibraryDescriptor

2007-09-06 Thread Srivatsan Sridharan (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Srivatsan Sridharan updated SM-1045:


Attachment: GenerateServiceAssemblyDescriptorMojo_3.1_diff.txt

Diff between the trunk and this version shows up lot of differences due to 
formatting changes. 

Attached file GenerateServiceAssemblyDescriptorMojo_3.1_diff.txt shows the 
differences with the SM 3.1 version of the file 
GenerateServiceAssemblyDescriptorMojo.java.

 Servicemix tooling changes to generate JBISharedLibraryDescriptor
 -

 Key: SM-1045
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1045
 Project: ServiceMix
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: tooling
Affects Versions: 3.1
 Environment: Windows, JBOSS 4.0.4-GA using servicemix deployment
Reporter: Srivatsan Sridharan
 Attachments: GenerateServiceAssemblyDescriptorMojo.java, 
 GenerateServiceAssemblyDescriptorMojo_3.1_diff.txt


 This is the patch that we have come up with for addrressing the issue 
 detailed in this link 
 http://www.nabble.com/Deploying-multiple-versions-of-service-units-using-artifactId-filtering-tf4215049s12049.html#a11991823
 Please let me know if the approach is correct.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.