should i develop a bc or a se?
for example,i have a demand:send a request to HTTP BC,HTTP BC receive a request,then send a quary command to JDBC component;JDBC get the data of database,but return to HTTP BC,the data need send to third system and deal with the data. i should develop these component? one word,these have three extranal system,data must flow in these system.if use servicemix implement the demand,i should develop these component. thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/should--i-develop-a-bc-or-a-se--tf4598864s12049.html#a13130243 Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: should i develop a bc or a se?
The difference between SE and BC is purely a logical difference. It's just a flag to set, so there's no real difference between writing a SE and writing a BC. Note that you may want to use servicemix-bean instead of writing a component. On 10/10/07, cui.hailin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in spec of jbi 1.0,SES are the business logic dreivers of the jbi system.BCS are used to send and receive message via particular protocolsand transports. i understand that BC used to connect to extranal system,SE can orchestrate BCS. HTTP BC-JDBC-RMI JDBC connect to a extranal database,RMI connect to a extranal system;but JDBC connect HTTP BC and RMI.the JDBC should be BC or SE? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/should--i-develop-a-bc-or-a-se--tf4598864s12049.html#a13130430 Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
[jira] Created: (SM-1099) EPI Content Enricher may not work if input content is a stream
EPI Content Enricher may not work if input content is a stream -- Key: SM-1099 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1099 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: Bug Components: servicemix-eip Affects Versions: 3.1 Environment: Everywhere Reporter: Martin Landua Attachments: servicemix-eip-patch-20071010.txt If a normalized message that carries a stream is being sent to a content enricher endpoint the stream may no longer be readable for combining after calling the target, if the target has read the stream. Obviously, a stream cannot be read more than once. Since the content enricher relies on the fact that the input content is an XML document, we find it appropriate to turn any source input into a dom first before sending the message to the target. Would you please kindly consider the patch that we have attached. Best Regards Martin Landua -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (SM-624) Failed unit test (servicemix-core) : org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.jms.MultipleJMSFlowTest
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Oleg Zhurakousky resolved SM-624. - Resolution: Cannot Reproduce I have ran 3.2-SNAPSHOT version of this test outside of Maven as well as with Maven and see no issues: --- T E S T S --- Running org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.jms.JMSFlowTest Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 31.812 sec Results : Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 I see this is a rather old task, but . . I got to start somewhere. Failed unit test (servicemix-core) : org.apache.servicemix.jbi.nmr.flow.jms.MultipleJMSFlowTest --- Key: SM-624 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-624 Project: ServiceMix Issue Type: Sub-task Components: servicemix-core Affects Versions: 3.0 Environment: Windows and linux Reporter: Fritz Oconer Fix For: 3.2 -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
