Re: [SIESTA-L] Query regarding transmission spectrum results

2021-09-08 Por tôpico Sankushkrishna Maheshuni
Thank You, Sir.

On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 1:48 AM Nick Papior  wrote:

> Question and answer given here:
> https://mattermodeling.stackexchange.com/questions/6696/can-transmission-spectrum-value-exceed-1-within-bias-window
>
> Den fre. 3. sep. 2021 kl. 22.00 skrev Sankushkrishna Maheshuni <
> sankushnov2...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello siesta users,
>> I'm trying to simulate a ZnO nanoribbon structure in siesta. When I
>> performed the transport calculations, for a few bias points within the bias
>> window, the transmission spectrum value exceeded 1. The transmission
>> spectrum gives the probability of transmission of electrons. Since it is a
>> probability function, its value shouldn't exceed 1. Can someone help me
>> where could I be possibly going wrong? How can I solve this issue?
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> --
>> SIESTA is supported by the Spanish Research Agency (AEI) and by the
>> European H2020 MaX Centre of Excellence (http://www.max-centre.eu/)
>>
>
>
> --
> Kind regards Nick
>
> --
> SIESTA is supported by the Spanish Research Agency (AEI) and by the
> European H2020 MaX Centre of Excellence (http://www.max-centre.eu/)
>

-- 
SIESTA is supported by the Spanish Research Agency (AEI) and by the European 
H2020 MaX Centre of Excellence (http://www.max-centre.eu/)


Re: [SIESTA-L] strange force in phonon calculation

2021-09-08 Por tôpico Andrei Postnikov
Dear Ziba,it seems that you are randomly trying different options.Try to be 
more systematic.MeshCutoff of 870 Ry seems to be an overkill -but certainly not 
an error; if your tests show that you need as much as that, so be it.Did you 
have a look at your structures with visualisation tools - is everything as it 
should be, no obvious structure error?If your imaginary frequency is genuine 
and reproducible,I'd look at the eigenvector of this mode, give a small 
displacementto atoms along this eigenvector, and make the relaxation again. The 
total energy ought to be lower than in your initial starting point;this is the 
idea of an imaginary frequency: you displace the atomswithin the corresponding 
mode, and the energy goes down.Hence you were not at the equilibrium; try 
better.No way around.Best regardsAndrei Postnikov
- Ziba Torkashvand  a écrit :
>
Thank you Professor Postnikov,Here I will provide two examples of my workI have 
a hexagonal structure containing 18 atoms1. I have substituted one atom with a 
gaseous one and relaxed it up to 0.000794 eV/A and 0.00458798  kBarthen I 
calculated the phonon and fortunately, there is no negative frequency while the 
force for the first step is approximated as 0.008174 eV/A
2. I have substituted two atoms with two gaseous ones and relaxed it up to 
0.000549 eV/A and 0.00290065  kBarthen I calculated the phonon and 
unfortunately, there are frequencies as -206.30292747012965 while the force for 
the first step is approximated as 0.015862 eV/A
For both cases, I have used same inputs asFor relaxation:MeshCutoff870 Ry
DM.MixingWeight 0.02
DM.NumberPulay   3
%block kgrid_Monkhorst_Pack
6   0   0   0.0
0   6   0   0.0
0   0   1   0.0
%endblock kgrid_Monkhorst_Pack

For phonon: MeshCutoff750 Ry
DM.MixingWeight 0.02
DM.NumberPulay   8
%block kgrid_Monkhorst_Pack
3   0   0   0.0
0   3   0   0.0
0   0   1   0.0
%endblock kgrid_Monkhorst_Pack

I repeated phonon calculation for the second case with %block 
kgrid_Monkhorst_Pack
6   0   0   0.0
0   6   0   0.0
0   0   1   0.0
%endblock kgrid_Monkhorst_Pack
and the resulting force for the first step is 0.013928 eV/A
I'm confused about what is happening in these two similar examples.

-- 
SIESTA is supported by the Spanish Research Agency (AEI) and by the European 
H2020 MaX Centre of Excellence (http://www.max-centre.eu/)