Dear SIG Members
In its recent LACNIC 22 meeting, from 27-31 October in Santiago Chile, the
LACNIC community considered two policy proposals.
The first, a proposal to change the LACNIC PDP, failed to reach consensus and
was returned to the list. The rationale for the proposal is to respond to
Non-compliances with the policy development process as it is now defined have
been observed, particularly in regard to the specified dates/timeline. It also
seeks to implement an appeals process in case a member of the community feels
affected by decisions made during the policy development and adoption process.
https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2014-3/language/en
The second is LAC-2014-2: Modification to the text describing ASN distribution
requirements reached consensus and is now in a final comment period.
The proposal changes the ASN delegation criteria in such a way that the
multi-homing requirement is no longer a requirement. If passed, the policy
would require only that an network operator needs to interconnect with one
other network ASN that has a different routing policy to its own.
https://politicas.lacnic.net/politicas/detail/id/LAC-2014-2/language/en
Regards,
___
Adam Gosling
Internet Policy Development Consultant, APNIC
e: a...@apnic.netmailto:a...@apnic.net
p: +61 7 3858 3142
m: +61 421 456 243
www.apnic.net
___
Join the conversation: https://blog.apnic.net/
___
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
___
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
