Re: CS>CS - Why CS Works Better

[James Osbourne Holmes]

Excellent technique.
Have you considered:
Buccal absorption of most substances into the bloodstream  is 4 to 10 times
faster and there is no HCL to form silver chloride.  I hold the sol in my
mouth until I forget about it.

James Osbourne Holmes
a/k/a *Red Pill Media*
American State National
*http://t heamericanstatesassembly.net
<http://theamericanstatesassembly.net/>*
http://annavonreitz.com
h <http://annavonreitz.com>ttp://signinamerica.com

This private email and any attachment(s) is covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 25-10-2521 and is for the sole use of
the intended recipient and contains privileged and/or confidential
information. No monitoring of my email or other means of surveillance,
electronic and otherwise, is permitted and I reserve all my rights, without
recourse and without prejudice, nunc pro tunc.  I do not consent to anyone
tampering with, altering or delaying any incoming or outgoing communication.



On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 7:32 AM Ode Coyote 
wrote:

> Thing is, silver ions immediately form silver chloride on contact with
> stomach acid and silver chloride is almost insoluble, thus harder to absorb
> making it tough to get enough silver in there to get the job done. [Or
> maybe it does absorb, but is far less efficient as now it has to find a way
> to re-ionize ]
> Ions in the bloodstream seek out pathogens like soldiers on a mission, but
> don't "live" very long before becoming silver chloride in THAT
> location...but...they don't have to live long and dead ion killed pathogens
> shed ions to kill again.
>  Silver chloride also ionizes in the chemical soup [reinforcements
> returning from R ] and does it where it counts [vs doing nothing in the
> poop chute], but it's a slower process and not quite as efficient.
>
> *Tactic that worked for me:*  Treatment of UTI, obvious clearing of blood
> in urine, relief of severe burning and pain within 4 hours.
>
> 1/4 to 1/2 teaspoon of Baking Soda in about 1/2 cup water
>
> Drank it down, waited a few minutes.
>
> Follow that with "Silver Water" maybe a cup.
>
> Repeat now and then.
>
>
>
> *What that does:*
>
> The Baking Soda converts stomach acid into salt and carbon dioxide gas
> [BURP ! ]
>
> The salt absorbs into the blood making it "thirsty" for more water to
> flush the excess salt out with.
>
> Add "Silver Water" to satisfy the thirstinstant absorption [of ions]
> and little or no stomach acid to make "Silver Chloride"
>
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 10:13 AM James Osbourne Holmes <
> jamesosbournehol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It appears to me I lost track of things some time ago.
>>
>> James Osbourne Holmes
>> a/k/a *Red Pill Media*
>> American State National
>> *http://t heamericanstatesassembly.net
>> <http://theamericanstatesassembly.net/>*
>> http://annavonreitz.com
>> h <http://annavonreitz.com>ttp://signinamerica.com
>>
>> This private email and any attachment(s) is covered by the Electronic
>> Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 25-10-2521 and is for the sole use of
>> the intended recipient and contains privileged and/or confidential
>> information. No monitoring of my email or other means of surveillance,
>> electronic and otherwise, is permitted and I reserve all my rights, without
>> recourse and without prejudice, nunc pro tunc.  I do not consent to anyone
>> tampering with, altering or delaying any incoming or outgoing communication.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 7:42 AM  wrote:
>>
>>> https://theartofmakingcolloidalsilver.com/ionic-versus-particulate/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Phil Morrison 
>>> *Sent:* Saturday, December 12, 2020 9:58 PM
>>> *To:* silver-list@eskimo.com
>>> *Subject:* CS>CS - Why CS Works Better
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Why CS works better than EIS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://purevon.com/effectiveness
>>>
>>

Re: CS>CS - Why CS Works Better

[Ode Coyote]

Thing is, silver ions immediately form silver chloride on contact with
stomach acid and silver chloride is almost insoluble, thus harder to absorb
making it tough to get enough silver in there to get the job done. [Or
maybe it does absorb, but is far less efficient as now it has to find a way
to re-ionize ]
Ions in the bloodstream seek out pathogens like soldiers on a mission, but
don't "live" very long before becoming silver chloride in THAT
location...but...they don't have to live long and dead ion killed pathogens
shed ions to kill again.
 Silver chloride also ionizes in the chemical soup [reinforcements
returning from R ] and does it where it counts [vs doing nothing in the
poop chute], but it's a slower process and not quite as efficient.

*Tactic that worked for me:*  Treatment of UTI, obvious clearing of blood
in urine, relief of severe burning and pain within 4 hours.

1/4 to 1/2 teaspoon of Baking Soda in about 1/2 cup water

Drank it down, waited a few minutes.

Follow that with "Silver Water" maybe a cup.

Repeat now and then.



*What that does:*

The Baking Soda converts stomach acid into salt and carbon dioxide gas
[BURP ! ]

The salt absorbs into the blood making it "thirsty" for more water to flush
the excess salt out with.

Add "Silver Water" to satisfy the thirstinstant absorption [of ions]
and little or no stomach acid to make "Silver Chloride"

On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 10:13 AM James Osbourne Holmes <
jamesosbournehol...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It appears to me I lost track of things some time ago.
>
> James Osbourne Holmes
> a/k/a *Red Pill Media*
> American State National
> *http://t heamericanstatesassembly.net
> <http://theamericanstatesassembly.net/>*
> http://annavonreitz.com
> h <http://annavonreitz.com>ttp://signinamerica.com
>
> This private email and any attachment(s) is covered by the Electronic
> Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 25-10-2521 and is for the sole use of
> the intended recipient and contains privileged and/or confidential
> information. No monitoring of my email or other means of surveillance,
> electronic and otherwise, is permitted and I reserve all my rights, without
> recourse and without prejudice, nunc pro tunc.  I do not consent to anyone
> tampering with, altering or delaying any incoming or outgoing communication.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 7:42 AM  wrote:
>
>> https://theartofmakingcolloidalsilver.com/ionic-versus-particulate/
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Phil Morrison 
>> *Sent:* Saturday, December 12, 2020 9:58 PM
>> *To:* silver-list@eskimo.com
>> *Subject:* CS>CS - Why CS Works Better
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Why CS works better than EIS
>>
>>
>>
>> https://purevon.com/effectiveness
>>
>

Re: CS>CS - Why CS Works Better

[James Osbourne Holmes]

It appears to me I lost track of things some time ago.

James Osbourne Holmes
a/k/a *Red Pill Media*
American State National
*http://t heamericanstatesassembly.net
<http://theamericanstatesassembly.net/>*
http://annavonreitz.com
h <http://annavonreitz.com>ttp://signinamerica.com

This private email and any attachment(s) is covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 25-10-2521 and is for the sole use of
the intended recipient and contains privileged and/or confidential
information. No monitoring of my email or other means of surveillance,
electronic and otherwise, is permitted and I reserve all my rights, without
recourse and without prejudice, nunc pro tunc.  I do not consent to anyone
tampering with, altering or delaying any incoming or outgoing communication.



On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 7:42 AM  wrote:

> https://theartofmakingcolloidalsilver.com/ionic-versus-particulate/
>
>
>
> *From:* Phil Morrison 
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 12, 2020 9:58 PM
> *To:* silver-list@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* CS>CS - Why CS Works Better
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Why CS works better than EIS
>
>
>
> https://purevon.com/effectiveness
>

RE: CS>CS - Why CS Works Better

[abeland1]

https://theartofmakingcolloidalsilver.com/ionic-versus-particulate/

 

From: Phil Morrison  
Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2020 9:58 PM
To: silver-list@eskimo.com
Subject: CS>CS - Why CS Works Better

 

 

 

Why CS works better than EIS

 

https://purevon.com/effectiveness

Re: CS>CS - Why CS Works Better

[Ode Coyote]

*Ions, not particles, make silver toxic to bacteria *
*Rice University researchers report too small a dose may enhance microbes’
immunity *

HOUSTON – (July 11, 2012) – Rice University researchers have settled a
long-standing controversy over the mechanism by which silver nanoparticles,
the most widely used nanomaterial in the world, kill bacteria.

Their work comes with a Nietzsche-esque
 warning: Use enough. If you don’t
kill them, you make them stronger.

Scientists have long known that silver ions, which flow from nanoparticles
when oxidized, are deadly to bacteria. Silver nanoparticles are used just
about everywhere, including in cosmetics, socks, food containers,
detergents, sprays and a wide range of other products to stop the spread of
germs.

But scientists have also suspected silver nanoparticles themselves may be
toxic to bacteria, particularly the smallest of them at about 3
nanometers. *Not
so*, according to the Rice team that reported its results this month in the
American Chemical Society journal Nano Letters
.

In fact, when the possibility of ionization is taken away from silver, the
nanoparticles are practically benign in the presence of microbes, said
Pedro Alvarez, George R. Brown Professor and chair of Rice’s Civil and
Environmental Engineering Department .

“You would be surprised how often people market things without a full
mechanistic understanding of their function,” said Alvarez, who studies the
fate of nanoparticles in the environment and their potential toxicity,
particularly to humans. “The prefix ‘nano’ can be a double-edged sword. It
can help you sell a product, and in other cases it might elicit concerns
about potential unintended consequences.”

He said the straightforward answer to the decade-old question is that the
insoluble silver nanoparticles do not kill cells by direct contact. But
soluble ions, when activated via oxidation in the vicinity of bacteria, do
the job nicely.

To figure that out, the researchers had to strip the particles of their
powers. “Our original expectation was that the smaller a particle is, the
greater the toxicity,” said Zongming Xiu, a Rice postdoctoral researcher
and lead author of the paper. Xiu set out to test nanoparticles, both
commercially available and custom-synthesized from 3 to 11 nanometers, to
see whether there was a correlation between size and toxicity.

“We could not get consistent results,” he said. “It was very frustrating
and really weird.”

Xiu decided to test nanoparticle toxicity in an anaerobic environment –
that is, sealed inside a chamber with no exposure to oxygen — to control
the silver ions’ release. He found that the filtered particles were a lot
less toxic to microbes than silver ions.

Working with the lab of Rice chemist Vicki Colvin, the team then
synthesized silver nanoparticles inside the anaerobic chamber to eliminate
any chance of oxidation. “We found the particles, even up to a
concentration of 195 parts per million, were still not toxic to bacteria,”
Xiu said. “But for the ionic silver, a concentration of about 15 parts per
billion would kill all the bacteria present. That told us the particle is
7,665 times less toxic [to pathogens] than the silver ions, indicating a
negligible toxicity.”

“The point of that experiment,” Alvarez said, “was to show that a lot of
people were obtaining data that was confounded by a release of ions, which
was occurring during exposure they perhaps weren’t aware of.”

Alvarez suggested the team’s anaerobic method may be used to test many
other kinds of metallic nanoparticles for toxicity and could help fine-tune
the antibacterial qualities of silver particles. In their tests, the Rice
researchers also found evidence of hormesis
; E. coli became stimulated by
silver ions when they encountered doses too small to kill them.

“Ultimately, we want to control the rate of (ion) release to obtain the
desired concentrations that just do the job,” Alvarez said. “You don’t want
to overshoot and overload the environment with toxic ions while depleting
silver, which is a noble metal, a valuable resource – and a somewhat
expensive disinfectant. But you don’t want to undershoot, either.”

He said the finding should shift the debate over the size, shape and
coating of silver nanoparticles. “Of course they matter,” Alvarez said,
“but only indirectly, as far as these variables affect the dissolution rate
of the ions. The key determinant of toxicity [to pathogens] is the silver
ions. So the focus should be on mass-transfer processes and
controlled-release mechanisms.”

“These findings suggest that the antibacterial application of silver
nanoparticles could be enhanced and environmental impacts could be
mitigated by modulating the ion release rate, for example, through
responsive polymer coatings,” Xiu said.

Co-authors of the paper are postdoctoral 

CS>CS - Why CS Works Better

[Phil Morrison]

Why CS works better than EIS

https://purevon.com/effectiveness