Re: [Sks-devel] SKS peering request [sks-server.randala.com]

2014-04-05 Thread Martin Papik


Thank you very much Jerzy, however I'm facing some problems. I wonder if 
you have any insight. I'm new to sks, but it seems to me that there 
might be an apache proxy intercepting the connections and interfering 
somehow. I don't see my server in 
http://keyserver.kolosowscy.pl:11371/pks/lookup?op=stats, but the sks 
servers are talking to each other on 11370 so I'm assuming there's some 
kind of asymmetric setup.


Any help would be appreciated.

Martin

In the log I see  (after incrementing http_fetch_size to 1000 to reduce 
the number of entries).


2014-04-05 08:43:40 address for keyserver.kolosowscy.pl:11370 changed 
from [] to [ADDR_INET [176.241.243.15]:11370, ADDR_INET 
[2002:b0f1:f30f::1]:11370]
2014-04-05 08:44:06 6064 hashes recovered from ADDR_INET 
[176.241.243.15]:11371
2014-04-05 08:44:11 Requesting 1000 missing keys from ADDR_INET 
[176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with 0005AB14802673F046EC31CC93AC36DC
2014-04-05 08:44:11 Error getting missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML 
PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN\)
2014-04-05 08:44:11 Requesting 1000 missing keys from ADDR_INET 
[176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with 29DF15D7EF250667DE9012CDF6891CE7
2014-04-05 08:44:11 Error getting missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML 
PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN\)
2014-04-05 08:44:11 Requesting 1000 missing keys from ADDR_INET 
[176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with 54ABD9C187E4555DB2377ABFCD29D8B8
2014-04-05 08:44:11 Error getting missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML 
PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN\)
2014-04-05 08:44:11 Requesting 1000 missing keys from ADDR_INET 
[176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with 7E819BE55160DDBD06E480F74F1D6017
2014-04-05 08:44:11 Error getting missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML 
PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN\)
2014-04-05 08:44:11 Requesting 1000 missing keys from ADDR_INET 
[176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with A7E5518397DB6A961E9FB8B59C1391D6
2014-04-05 08:44:11 Error getting missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML 
PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN\)
2014-04-05 08:44:12 Requesting 1000 missing keys from ADDR_INET 
[176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with D348A85B40F5C08C3CA2E9AB09EF2CB0
2014-04-05 08:44:12 Error getting missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML 
PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN\)
2014-04-05 08:44:12 Requesting 64 missing keys from ADDR_INET 
[176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with FD40B34ECD8971CFCECF9E79D48772F0
2014-04-05 08:44:12 Error getting missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML 
PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN\)


The tcpdump output contains (looks like HTTP 0.9, no host header in the 
request, no HTTP headers in the response).


Request to 176.241.243.15:11371

POST /pks/hashquery
content-length: 24

Response from 176.241.243.15:11371

!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN
htmlhead
title502 Proxy Error/title
/headbody
h1Proxy Error/h1
pThe proxy server received an invalid
response from an upstream server.br /
The proxy server could not handle the request ema 
href=/pks/hashqueryPOSTnbsp;/pks/hashquery/a/em.p

Reason: strongError reading from remote server/strong/p/p
hr
addressApache Server at keyserver.kolosowscy.pl Port 80/address
/body/html




On 04/05/2014 04:21 AM, Jerzy Ko?osowski wrote:

Hi,

I added your server. My line to add:

keyserver.kolosowscy.pl 11370 # Jerzy Kolosowski
je...@kolosowscy.pl

Rgds,

Jerzy Ko?osowski

Dnia s'roda, 2 kwietnia 2014 05:50:52 Martin Papik pisze:

Hi everyone,

I've just configured sks 1.1.1 (default on Ubuntu) on
sks-server.randala.com. The machine has IPv6 but SKS has not yet been
assigned an address. I wonder, is there an advantage (e.g. in terms of
peering)? The server is located in Germany/EU. For now I'm deploying

the

server for RD as a proxy for my private server (behind my ISPs
randomized NAT).

You may contact me if you have further questions or for any issues,
operational or otherwise.

Loaded from: http://keys.niif.hu/keydump/ [2014-03-31? ... köszönöm]
Loaded: 3583821 keys

Line to add to /etc/sks/membership

sks-server.randala.com 11370

Thank you.

Martin

___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] SKS peering request [sks-server.randala.com]

2014-04-05 Thread BluKeyserver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Martin,

Quoting from https://bitbucket.org/skskeyserver/sks-keyserver/wiki/Peering

'Versions prior to 1.1.2 have a severe interoperability bug (POST
requests for exchanging keys are HTTP/0.9, does not work with modern
setups having reverse HTTP proxies in front as a best practice.'

Perhaps it's a time to ditch the 1.1.1 and try to compile 1.1.4 instead ?

Also, I have noticed, that you did not enable the built-in www server:

'Page not found: /var/lib/sks/www/index.html'

Regards,
H.Storm [TheBluProject]

On 05/04/2014 07:52, Martin Papik wrote:
 
 Thank you very much Jerzy, however I'm facing some problems. I
 wonder if you have any insight. I'm new to sks, but it seems to me
 that there might be an apache proxy intercepting the connections
 and interfering somehow. I don't see my server in 
 http://keyserver.kolosowscy.pl:11371/pks/lookup?op=stats, but the
 sks servers are talking to each other on 11370 so I'm assuming
 there's some kind of asymmetric setup.
 
 Any help would be appreciated.
 
 Martin
 
 In the log I see  (after incrementing http_fetch_size to 1000 to
 reduce the number of entries).
 
 2014-04-05 08:43:40 address for keyserver.kolosowscy.pl:11370
 changed from [] to [ADDR_INET [176.241.243.15]:11370, ADDR_INET 
 [2002:b0f1:f30f::1]:11370] 2014-04-05 08:44:06 6064 hashes
 recovered from ADDR_INET [176.241.243.15]:11371 2014-04-05
 08:44:11 Requesting 1000 missing keys from ADDR_INET 
 [176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with
 0005AB14802673F046EC31CC93AC36DC 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Error getting
 missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML
 2.0//EN\) 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Requesting 1000 missing keys from
 ADDR_INET [176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with
 29DF15D7EF250667DE9012CDF6891CE7 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Error getting
 missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML
 2.0//EN\) 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Requesting 1000 missing keys from
 ADDR_INET [176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with
 54ABD9C187E4555DB2377ABFCD29D8B8 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Error getting
 missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML
 2.0//EN\) 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Requesting 1000 missing keys from
 ADDR_INET [176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with
 7E819BE55160DDBD06E480F74F1D6017 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Error getting
 missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML
 2.0//EN\) 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Requesting 1000 missing keys from
 ADDR_INET [176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with
 A7E5518397DB6A961E9FB8B59C1391D6 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Error getting
 missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML
 2.0//EN\) 2014-04-05 08:44:12 Requesting 1000 missing keys from
 ADDR_INET [176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with
 D348A85B40F5C08C3CA2E9AB09EF2CB0 2014-04-05 08:44:12 Error getting
 missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML
 2.0//EN\) 2014-04-05 08:44:12 Requesting 64 missing keys from
 ADDR_INET [176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with
 FD40B34ECD8971CFCECF9E79D48772F0 2014-04-05 08:44:12 Error getting
 missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML
 2.0//EN\)
 
 The tcpdump output contains (looks like HTTP 0.9, no host header in
 the request, no HTTP headers in the response).
 
 Request to 176.241.243.15:11371
 
 POST /pks/hashquery content-length: 24
 
 Response from 176.241.243.15:11371
 
 !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN htmlhead 
 title502 Proxy Error/title /headbody h1Proxy Error/h1 
 pThe proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream
 server.br / The proxy server could not handle the request ema 
 href=/pks/hashqueryPOSTnbsp;/pks/hashquery/a/em.p Reason:
 strongError reading from remote server/strong/p/p hr 
 addressApache Server at keyserver.kolosowscy.pl Port
 80/address /body/html
 
 
 
 
 On 04/05/2014 04:21 AM, Jerzy Ko?osowski wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I added your server. My line to add:
 
 keyserver.kolosowscy.pl 11370 # Jerzy Kolosowski 
 je...@kolosowscy.pl
 
 Rgds,
 
 Jerzy Ko?osowski
 
 Dnia ?roda, 2 kwietnia 2014 05:50:52 Martin Papik pisze:
 Hi everyone,
 
 I've just configured sks 1.1.1 (default on Ubuntu) on 
 sks-server.randala.com. The machine has IPv6 but SKS has not
 yet been assigned an address. I wonder, is there an advantage
 (e.g. in terms of peering)? The server is located in
 Germany/EU. For now I'm deploying
 the
 server for RD as a proxy for my private server (behind my
 ISPs randomized NAT).
 
 You may contact me if you have further questions or for any
 issues, operational or otherwise.
 
 Loaded from: http://keys.niif.hu/keydump/ [2014-03-31? ...
 köszönöm] Loaded: 3583821 keys
 
 Line to add to /etc/sks/membership
 
 sks-server.randala.com 11370
 
 Thank you.
 
 Martin
 
 ___ Sks-devel
 mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org 
 https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
 
 
 ___ Sks-devel
 mailing list Sks-devel@nongnu.org 
 

Re: [Sks-devel] SKS peering request [sks-server.randala.com]

2014-04-05 Thread Martin Papik


Thank you, I've upgraded to 1.1.3, although why Ubuntu didn't install 
that one without an explicit parameter boggles me a bit. Oh well. Is 
that sufficient, or will I have to install the very latest from source?


The web server is enabled, there's just no main page in the directory yet.

I see Error fetching key from hash  : Not_found messages in the 
log though, is this normal? The hashes update, so I'm not overly 
worried, just want to know if this is normal.


Anyway, thanks again for taking the time to assist me.

Martin

On 04/05/2014 04:38 PM, BluKeyserver wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Martin,

Quoting from https://bitbucket.org/skskeyserver/sks-keyserver/wiki/Peering

'Versions prior to 1.1.2 have a severe interoperability bug (POST
requests for exchanging keys are HTTP/0.9, does not work with modern
setups having reverse HTTP proxies in front as a best practice.'

Perhaps it's a time to ditch the 1.1.1 and try to compile 1.1.4 instead ?

Also, I have noticed, that you did not enable the built-in www server:

'Page not found: /var/lib/sks/www/index.html'

Regards,
H.Storm [TheBluProject]

On 05/04/2014 07:52, Martin Papik wrote:

Thank you very much Jerzy, however I'm facing some problems. I
wonder if you have any insight. I'm new to sks, but it seems to me
that there might be an apache proxy intercepting the connections
and interfering somehow. I don't see my server in
http://keyserver.kolosowscy.pl:11371/pks/lookup?op=stats, but the
sks servers are talking to each other on 11370 so I'm assuming
there's some kind of asymmetric setup.

Any help would be appreciated.

Martin

In the log I see  (after incrementing http_fetch_size to 1000 to
reduce the number of entries).

2014-04-05 08:43:40 address for keyserver.kolosowscy.pl:11370
changed from [] to [ADDR_INET [176.241.243.15]:11370, ADDR_INET
[2002:b0f1:f30f::1]:11370] 2014-04-05 08:44:06 6064 hashes
recovered from ADDR_INET [176.241.243.15]:11371 2014-04-05
08:44:11 Requesting 1000 missing keys from ADDR_INET
[176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with
0005AB14802673F046EC31CC93AC36DC 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Error getting
missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML
2.0//EN\) 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Requesting 1000 missing keys from
ADDR_INET [176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with
29DF15D7EF250667DE9012CDF6891CE7 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Error getting
missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML
2.0//EN\) 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Requesting 1000 missing keys from
ADDR_INET [176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with
54ABD9C187E4555DB2377ABFCD29D8B8 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Error getting
missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML
2.0//EN\) 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Requesting 1000 missing keys from
ADDR_INET [176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with
7E819BE55160DDBD06E480F74F1D6017 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Error getting
missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML
2.0//EN\) 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Requesting 1000 missing keys from
ADDR_INET [176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with
A7E5518397DB6A961E9FB8B59C1391D6 2014-04-05 08:44:11 Error getting
missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML
2.0//EN\) 2014-04-05 08:44:12 Requesting 1000 missing keys from
ADDR_INET [176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with
D348A85B40F5C08C3CA2E9AB09EF2CB0 2014-04-05 08:44:12 Error getting
missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML
2.0//EN\) 2014-04-05 08:44:12 Requesting 64 missing keys from
ADDR_INET [176.241.243.15]:11371, starting with
FD40B34ECD8971CFCECF9E79D48772F0 2014-04-05 08:44:12 Error getting
missing keys: Failure(!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC \-//IETF//DTD HTML
2.0//EN\)

The tcpdump output contains (looks like HTTP 0.9, no host header in
the request, no HTTP headers in the response).

Request to 176.241.243.15:11371

POST /pks/hashquery content-length: 24

Response from 176.241.243.15:11371

!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0//EN htmlhead
title502 Proxy Error/title /headbody h1Proxy Error/h1
pThe proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream
server.br / The proxy server could not handle the request ema
href=/pks/hashqueryPOSTnbsp;/pks/hashquery/a/em.p Reason:
strongError reading from remote server/strong/p/p hr
addressApache Server at keyserver.kolosowscy.pl Port
80/address /body/html




On 04/05/2014 04:21 AM, Jerzy Ko?osowski wrote:

Hi,

I added your server. My line to add:

keyserver.kolosowscy.pl 11370 # Jerzy Kolosowski
je...@kolosowscy.pl

Rgds,

Jerzy Ko?osowski

Dnia ?roda, 2 kwietnia 2014 05:50:52 Martin Papik pisze:

Hi everyone,

I've just configured sks 1.1.1 (default on Ubuntu) on
sks-server.randala.com. The machine has IPv6 but SKS has not
yet been assigned an address. I wonder, is there an advantage
(e.g. in terms of peering)? The server is located in
Germany/EU. For now I'm deploying

the

server for RD as a proxy for my private server (behind my
ISPs randomized NAT).

You may contact me if you have further questions or for any
issues,