Re: [Sks-devel] Ports used by sks

2009-02-03 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 09:28 -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> Look, I give up.  You really really want to register it.  It's cool to  
> register stuff.  Go ahead.  I can't stop you.
No I don't want to it was just an idea, and I've already gave up
before. Just wanted to add that numbers are not only assigned for end
user protocols like http...


-- 
Christoph Anton Mitterer
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

christoph.anton.mitte...@physik.uni-muenchen.de
m...@christoph.anton.mitterer.name


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Ports used by sks

2009-02-03 Thread David Shaw

On Feb 3, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:


On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 08:35 -0500, David Shaw wrote:

Port 11370 is not user visible.

Portnumbers aren't just for end user visible standard-ports...


Look, I give up.  You really really want to register it.  It's cool to  
register stuff.  Go ahead.  I can't stop you.


The question you asked is whether you *should* register it.  The  
answer for that is still 'no', you shouldn't.  You can keep hammering  
away, but the answer will still be no, you shouldn't.  You don't  
understand, and don't want to understand, the issue involved.


David



___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Ports used by sks

2009-02-03 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 08:35 -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> Port 11370 is not user visible.
Portnumbers aren't just for end user visible standard-ports...


Regards,
-- 
Christoph Anton Mitterer
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

christoph.anton.mitte...@physik.uni-muenchen.de
m...@christoph.anton.mitterer.name


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Ports used by sks

2009-02-03 Thread David Shaw

On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:00 AM, Andy Ruddock wrote:

David Shaw wrote:

On Feb 2, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:


Also, isn't the port changeable on a per-peer basis in SKS?  If so,
there is no point in registering the port at all, as setting up a  
new

peer is a manual operation.


Well but this is also the case with the 11371 port, and basically  
with

most other protocols, too, isn't it?


No, the 11371 port is needed because it is part of the HKP protocol,
just like 80 is part of the HTTP protocol.  11370, on the other  
hand, is
just some port that SKS uses.  It's not in use by clients.  That  
port is

manually configured.


Isn't port 80 simply the default port used by http, certainly it's not
uncommon to use other ports (8080 springing to mind).
The http spec (rfc2616) says:
"The default port is TCP 80 [19], but other ports can be used."
[19] is a pointer to rfc1700 - assigned numbers.


Exactly.  Port 80 is the default port for http just like 11371 is the  
default port for HKP.  So if you said "hkp://my.keyserver" it would be  
on port 11371.  This saves users from having to know that the port is  
11371, just like users going to a web page don't need to remember to  
do something like "http://blahblah:80";.  Port 11370 is not user visible.


David



___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Ports used by sks

2009-02-02 Thread Andy Ruddock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

David Shaw wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> 
>>> Also, isn't the port changeable on a per-peer basis in SKS?  If so,
>>> there is no point in registering the port at all, as setting up a new
>>> peer is a manual operation.
>>
>> Well but this is also the case with the 11371 port, and basically with
>> most other protocols, too, isn't it?
> 
> No, the 11371 port is needed because it is part of the HKP protocol,
> just like 80 is part of the HTTP protocol.  11370, on the other hand, is
> just some port that SKS uses.  It's not in use by clients.  That port is
> manually configured.

Isn't port 80 simply the default port used by http, certainly it's not
uncommon to use other ports (8080 springing to mind).
The http spec (rfc2616) says:
"The default port is TCP 80 [19], but other ports can be used."
[19] is a pointer to rfc1700 - assigned numbers.

- --
Andy Ruddock
- 
andy.rudd...@rainydayz.org (GPG Key ID 0xA622D452)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmH62wACgkQfSkWkaYi1FJP9gCfXkNBm2tikNBaxbfPn3MLrMKt
/40An2JXYmZ4wTxwPaDMU3NuUCiEvxvR
=zMPZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Ports used by sks

2009-02-02 Thread David Shaw

On Feb 2, 2009, at 7:30 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:


Also, isn't the port changeable on a per-peer basis in SKS?  If so,
there is no point in registering the port at all, as setting up a new
peer is a manual operation.


Well but this is also the case with the 11371 port, and basically with
most other protocols, too, isn't it?


No, the 11371 port is needed because it is part of the HKP protocol,  
just like 80 is part of the HTTP protocol.  11370, on the other hand,  
is just some port that SKS uses.  It's not in use by clients.  That  
port is manually configured.


David



___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Ports used by sks

2009-02-02 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 19:21 -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> No.  You should have a document specifying what the port actually is  
> and the protocol that is used on the port before you claim it.  There  
> is a spec for 11371.  You need a spec for 11370.

I was aware of that process :-)


> Also, isn't the port changeable on a per-peer basis in SKS?  If so,  
> there is no point in registering the port at all, as setting up a new  
> peer is a manual operation.

Well but this is also the case with the 11371 port, and basically with
most other protocols, too, isn't it?


>   A SKS instance doesn't need to know a  
> well-known port to become a peer.

Well it was just an idea, when I saw that probably most keyservers
sticked with the default (11370) and this was still unassigned.

I didn't intend to step on someones feet :)

btw: I was not about to register a port number in the well-known
range ;)


Best wishes,
-- 
Christoph Anton Mitterer
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

christoph.anton.mitte...@physik.uni-muenchen.de
m...@christoph.anton.mitterer.name


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Ports used by sks

2009-02-02 Thread David Shaw

On Feb 2, 2009, at 5:44 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:


On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 15:30 -0500, David Shaw wrote:
The policy didn't exist yet when some of the early protocols got  
their

port numbers.  Certainly for the past 10 years or so, if you got one,
you got the other.  At least, that's what I was told when I  
registered

HKP (port 11371).

Yes,... and for other protocols,.. you'd have to apply specifically...
(e.g. sctp).

Anyway,.. should I apply for it now? I mean 11370?


No.  You should have a document specifying what the port actually is  
and the protocol that is used on the port before you claim it.  There  
is a spec for 11371.  You need a spec for 11370.


Also, isn't the port changeable on a per-peer basis in SKS?  If so,  
there is no point in registering the port at all, as setting up a new  
peer is a manual operation.  A SKS instance doesn't need to know a  
well-known port to become a peer.


David



___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Ports used by sks

2009-02-02 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 15:30 -0500, David Shaw wrote:
> The policy didn't exist yet when some of the early protocols got their
> port numbers.  Certainly for the past 10 years or so, if you got one,
> you got the other.  At least, that's what I was told when I registered
> HKP (port 11371).
Yes,... and for other protocols,.. you'd have to apply specifically...
(e.g. sctp).

Anyway,.. should I apply for it now? I mean 11370?

hkp-server 11370/tcp   OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver reconciliation
hkp-server 11370/udp   OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver reconciliation

or

hkp-recon  11370/tcp   OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver reconciliation
hkp-recon  11370/udp   OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver reconciliation

or

hkp-sync  11370/tcp   OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver synchronisation
hkp-sync  11370/udp   OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver synchronisation

or anything else?

Best wishes,
-- 
Christoph Anton Mitterer
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

christoph.anton.mitte...@physik.uni-muenchen.de
m...@christoph.anton.mitterer.name


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Ports used by sks

2009-02-02 Thread David Shaw
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 01:25:55PM -0700, Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:
>
> On Feb 2, 2009, at 1:19 PM, David Shaw wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 11:15:04AM -0700, Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:
>>> Is UDP really used?
>>
>> No.  The way the IETF assigns numbers, if you get the TCP number, you
>> get the UDP number with it.
>>
>> David
>
> Except for 514.
>
> :)
>
> I'm guessing this is the exception that proves the rule?

The policy didn't exist yet when some of the early protocols got their
port numbers.  Certainly for the past 10 years or so, if you got one,
you got the other.  At least, that's what I was told when I registered
HKP (port 11371).

David


___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Ports used by sks

2009-02-02 Thread Joseph Oreste Bruni


On Feb 2, 2009, at 1:19 PM, David Shaw wrote:


On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 11:15:04AM -0700, Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:

Is UDP really used?


No.  The way the IETF assigns numbers, if you get the TCP number, you
get the UDP number with it.

David


Except for 514.

:)

I'm guessing this is the exception that proves the rule?







___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Ports used by sks

2009-02-02 Thread David Shaw
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 11:15:04AM -0700, Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:
> Is UDP really used?

No.  The way the IETF assigns numbers, if you get the TCP number, you
get the UDP number with it.

David


___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Ports used by sks

2009-02-02 Thread Ryan Hunt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

11371 - De facto Key Server Port (hkp)
11370 - SKS Peering port (required to talk to other SKS servers)

You'll also find a lot of key servers running on 80 (HTTP) for web
browsers, I even offer it on 443 (HTTPS)

According to /etc/services HTTP uses both TCP & UDP, given that HKP uses
HTTP I would have to presume that UDP is required (might not be for
peering however)

- -R

Joseph Oreste Bruni wrote:
> Is UDP really used?
> 
> 
> On Feb 2, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> 
>> Hi.
>>
>> I've seen that sks (other keyservers, too??) uses
>> hkp 11371/tcp   OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver
>> hkp 11371/udp   OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver
>>
>> but also port 11370... should we apply for that port?
>> If so I could do the work if you like :-)
>>
>> Best wishes,
>> -- 
>> Christoph Anton Mitterer
>> Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
>>
>> christoph.anton.mitte...@physik.uni-muenchen.de
>> m...@christoph.anton.mitterer.name
>> ___
>> Sks-devel mailing list
>> Sks-devel@nongnu.org
>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Sks-devel mailing list
> Sks-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkmHU2kACgkQIcAiq3SnceEqeACfarek+2gU/X7Q9DXJe7DB4Oi/
zZMAn0UEb4iDLvsnLXfN3KvIWZOpeGMT
=2CFT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Ports used by sks

2009-02-02 Thread Joseph Oreste Bruni

Is UDP really used?


On Feb 2, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:


Hi.

I've seen that sks (other keyservers, too??) uses
hkp 11371/tcp   OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver
hkp 11371/udp   OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver

but also port 11370... should we apply for that port?
If so I could do the work if you like :-)

Best wishes,
--
Christoph Anton Mitterer
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

christoph.anton.mitte...@physik.uni-muenchen.de
m...@christoph.anton.mitterer.name
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel




___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


[Sks-devel] Ports used by sks

2009-02-02 Thread Christoph Anton Mitterer
Hi.

I've seen that sks (other keyservers, too??) uses
hkp 11371/tcp   OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver
hkp 11371/udp   OpenPGP HTTP Keyserver

but also port 11370... should we apply for that port?
If so I could do the work if you like :-)

Best wishes,
-- 
Christoph Anton Mitterer
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

christoph.anton.mitte...@physik.uni-muenchen.de
m...@christoph.anton.mitterer.name


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel