Re: [Sks-devel] Request for SKS gossip Peers

2013-08-06 Thread Phil Pennock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160

On 2013-08-06 at 15:37 +0200, Adam Lewicki wrote:
 I have a new keyserver and am in search of peers.
 
 Please add me to your 'membership' file with the following
 entry and provide your details in return so I can do the same:
 
 keyserver.skoopsmedia.net  11370 # Adam Lewicki 0xF3E88A9F

Done, but with a...@lewicki.at added in as a contact email address.

Please add:
sks-peer.spodhuis.org 11370  # Phil Pennock keyser...@spodhuis.org 0x3903637F

Thanks,
- -Phil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iEYEAREDAAYFAlIBd6IACgkQQDBDFTkDY3+xuACfRZyNPMnguAqYhYKlqlcXaBtF
QP0An32e4Wzuh8b07vxDNyfrzAoqKaV0
=TVC2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Request for SKS gossip peers

2013-08-02 Thread Dmitry Yu Okunev (pks.mephi.ru)
Hello.

On 08/02/2013 05:40 PM, James Cloos wrote:
 I have a new keyserver and am in search of peers.
 
 Please add me to your 'membership' file with the following
 entry and provide your details in return so I can do the same:
 
 eagle.jhcloos.com  11370 # James Cloos  0xED7DAEA6

Ready. Here's mine:

keyserver.ut.mephi.ru 11370 # Dmitry Yu Okunev dyoku...@ut.mephi.ru
0x8E30679C, pks team p...@ut.mephi.ru

 
 Thank you.
 
 -JimC

-- 
Best regards, Dmitry,
head of UNIX-tech department NRNU MEPhI,
tel. 8 (495) 788-56-99, add. 8255



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Request for SKS gossip peers

2012-09-09 Thread Andreas Thulin
My bad, I sent my e-mail to the wrong receiver...

Also, a correction: I'm running sks version 1.1.3.

Please see below.

/A

2012/9/9 Andreas Thulin andreas.thu...@gmail.com

 Hi!

 I'm running Ubuntu 12.04 (64 bit) on an Asrock Ion 3D (
 http://www.asrock.com/nettop/overview.asp?Model=ION%203D%20Series#Specifications),
 2Gb RAM.

 SKS version 1.1
 Berkeley version: ? - How do I find out?

 I'm running a fastbuild (n=1), which seemed to work for a qouple of
 minutes, but then it looked like it stopped.

 Running
 # strace -p processID
 first gave a lot of reads, but then has produced nothing but

 futex(0x7f0c1db15358, FUTEX_WAIT, 2, NULL

 the last 10 hours.

 The funny thing is that something writes to the /sks/DB directory every
 now and then. It seems to happen each time I run strace, but also at other
 times. I'm thinking maybe the n=1 thing makes this fastbuild very slow,
 and the process hence should take several hours still.

 What amount of time should I expect this to take?

 Running this DB build with some sort of human readable periodic progress
 indication is of course preferrable.

 Thanks all for helpful pointers! :-)

 Best regards,
 Andreas


 2012/9/9 John Clizbe jpcli...@gingerbear.net

 Andreas Thulin wrote:
  Hi!
 
  Thanks for good advice, I'll get back on getting a dump immediately.
 Trouble
  is I tried and failed a couple of times with building the DB, and the
 sks
  binary doesn't really give any useful feedback on what I'm doing wrong.
 
  Would you say an e-mail to the sks devel sendlist explaining my
 predicament
  could be one way of getting further in the process?

 Most certainly. Most useful data would be:

 Amount of RAM, CPU architecture sometimes matters, CPU speed doesn't.

 OS/Distro and version.

 Versions of SKS and Berkeley DB.

 Was it a fastbuild or a build?

 Did it die immediately or some time later?

 Just by way of a quick check, the most common issue that I have seen is
 that
 the SKS process is run as a specific user, eg, debian_sks, and that user
 does
 not own the directory where the databases are being created, eg,
 /var/lib/sks.

  Best regards,
  Andreas

 Good Luck,
 John
 --

 John P. Clizbe  Inet: John (a) Gingerbear DAWT net
 SKS/Enigmail/PGP-EKP  or: John ( @ ) Enigmail DAWT net
 FSF Assoc #995 / FSFE Fellow #1797  hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net  or
  mailto:pgp-public-k...@gingerbear.net?subject=HELP

 Q:Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?
 A:An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels




___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Request for SKS gossip peers

2012-09-09 Thread John Clizbe
Andreas Thulin wrote:
 My bad, I sent my e-mail to the wrong receiver...
 
 Also, a correction: I'm running sks version 1.1.3.
 
 Please see below.
 
 /A
 
 2012/9/9 Andreas Thulin andreas.thu...@gmail.com
 mailto:andreas.thu...@gmail.com
 
 Hi!
 
 I'm running Ubuntu 12.04 (64 bit) on an Asrock Ion 3D
 
 (http://www.asrock.com/nettop/overview.asp?Model=ION%203D%20Series#Specifications),
 2Gb RAM.
 
 SKS version 1.1
 Berkeley version: ? - How do I find out?
 
 I'm running a fastbuild (n=1), which seemed to work for a qouple of
 minutes, but then it looked like it stopped.
 
 Running
 # strace -p processID
 first gave a lot of reads, but then has produced nothing but
 
 futex(0x7f0c1db15358, FUTEX_WAIT, 2, NULL
 
 the last 10 hours.
 
 The funny thing is that something writes to the /sks/DB directory every
 now and then. It seems to happen each time I run strace, but also at other
 times. I'm thinking maybe the n=1 thing makes this fastbuild very slow,
 and the process hence should take several hours still.

For a variety of reasons mostly personal, I have never used fastbuild only
build. n for fastbuild is the multiple of 15000 keys to load on a single pass,
For build, n is the number of key files to read in per pass. Depending on
which keydump you are using, the two may effectively be the same as 15000 is
the default number of keys to dump per file. I use n=14 (21 keys) on my
gingerbear machine which is the same hardware as the Windows XP box mentioned
below, it runs Slackware-current.

In /etc/sks, you should have a file named sksconf. Add the following two lines

pagesize:   128
ptree_pagesize: 8

The default value for pagesize is 4 (2048 bytes) and for PTree it's 1 (512
bytes). Experience has shown these to be too low. The defaults are adjusted in
the trunk version.

Make that change, stop the (fast)build. Delete any directories in /var/sks/lib
and try again. I'd use something like:

sks build -n 12 -cache 100 /var/sks/dump/*.pgp

or similar or use the build script that ships with Debian.

 What amount of time should I expect this to take?

I last built a SKS database on a Windows XP box (Athlon XP 2800+, 2.13GHz; 2GB
RAM, PATA/133 drives) back on 25 July. Times were

build:  4:18:39.734
clean:  0:03:31.031
pbuild: 1:12:11.641

That was a build with n=5. n is adjusted on each machine to a value that does
not cause swapping to occur. build depends more on the speed of your disks
than anything else.

 Running this DB build with some sort of human readable periodic progress
 indication is of course preferrable.

When I run build, I get the output like:

Build
Wed, Jul 25, 2012  1:15:51 AM
Loading keys...done
DB time:  2.95 min.  Total time: 4.74 min.
Loading keys...done
DB time:  4.88 min.  Total time: 6.74 min.
Loading keys...done
DB time:  3.69 min.  Total time: 5.28 min.
Loading keys...done
DB time:  3.78 min.  Total time: 5.29 min.
Loading keys...done
etc...

The first two lines are from my build script. clean and pbuild both have their
own log files that you can follow with 'tail -f'. clean.log tells you what
actions it is performing. pbuild.log spits out a timestamp every 5000 hashes
it processes.

 Thanks all for helpful pointers! :-)

No problem. You're welcome.

 Best regards,
 Andreas

Good luck.
-John
-- 

John P. Clizbe  Inet: John (a) Gingerbear DAWT net
SKS/Enigmail/PGP-EKP  or: John ( @ ) Enigmail DAWT net
FSF Assoc #995 / FSFE Fellow #1797  hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net  or
 mailto:pgp-public-k...@gingerbear.net?subject=HELP

Q:Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?
A:An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Request for SKS gossip peers

2012-09-08 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On 09/08/2012 08:23 AM, Andreas Thulin wrote:
 Would you say an e-mail to the sks devel sendlist explaining my predicament
 could be one way of getting further in the process?

yes, it would.  you're already sending mail to sks-devel, you know :)

please indicate specifically what you tried, what commands you ran, etc,
and what the output or behavior was, as well as you can document it.
Also, indicate what behavior or output you expected, and perhaps
highlight the discrepancies between expected and observed results.

a good problem report will not only help you get help from
more-experienced people on the list, but it will probably also help
other people (lurkers or archive-readers) who may be running into the
same problem you are and also want to get advice.

Regards,

--dkg



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Request for SKS gossip peers

2012-09-08 Thread John Clizbe
Andreas Thulin wrote:
 Hi!
 
 Thanks for good advice, I'll get back on getting a dump immediately. Trouble
 is I tried and failed a couple of times with building the DB, and the sks
 binary doesn't really give any useful feedback on what I'm doing wrong. 
 
 Would you say an e-mail to the sks devel sendlist explaining my predicament
 could be one way of getting further in the process?

Most certainly. Most useful data would be:

Amount of RAM, CPU architecture sometimes matters, CPU speed doesn't.

OS/Distro and version.

Versions of SKS and Berkeley DB.

Was it a fastbuild or a build?

Did it die immediately or some time later?

Just by way of a quick check, the most common issue that I have seen is that
the SKS process is run as a specific user, eg, debian_sks, and that user does
not own the directory where the databases are being created, eg, /var/lib/sks.

 Best regards,
 Andreas

Good Luck,
John
-- 

John P. Clizbe  Inet: John (a) Gingerbear DAWT net
SKS/Enigmail/PGP-EKP  or: John ( @ ) Enigmail DAWT net
FSF Assoc #995 / FSFE Fellow #1797  hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net  or
 mailto:pgp-public-k...@gingerbear.net?subject=HELP

Q:Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?
A:An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Request for SKS gossip peers

2012-09-07 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
Hi.

Il 05/09/2012 11:33, Andreas Thulin ha scritto:
 Hi!
 
 I have just set up a new keyserver and would like to peer with other
 servers.
 
 Please add me to your 'membership' file with the following entry and
 provide your details in return (to andreas.thu...@gmail.com) so I can do
 the same:
 
 redundant.dyndns.org 11370 # Andreas Thulin 0x2C101354

I added your peer. Mine is:

keyserver.uz.sns.it 11370 # Giovanni Mascellani, D9AB457E

Thanks, Giovanni.
-- 
Giovanni Mascellani mascell...@poisson.phc.unipi.it
Pisa, Italy

Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani
Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...@elabor.homelinux.org



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel


Re: [Sks-devel] Request for SKS gossip peers

2012-09-07 Thread Phil Pennock
On 2012-09-05 at 20:37 -0400, Phil Pennock wrote:
 On 2012-09-05 at 11:33 +0200, Andreas Thulin wrote:
  I have just set up a new keyserver and would like to peer with other
  servers.
  
  Please add me to your 'membership' file with the following entry and
  provide your details in return (to andreas.thu...@gmail.com) so I can do
  the same:
  
  redundant.dyndns.org 11370 # Andreas Thulin 0x2C101354
 
 Is this server permanently online?  Having any teething troubles?
 Firewall?
 
 % curl -v http://redundant.dyndns.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=stats

Okay, I see the server up now, but it only has 6 keys, total, instead of
3.1 million keys.  This causes problems for your peers, because the
reconciliation protocol is not efficient given so great a discrepancy.

 It might be worth glancing at
   https://bitbucket.org/skskeyserver/sks-keyserver/wiki/Peering
 and going over your setup to be sure things are working.  Looking at the
 /pks/lookup?op=stats page on your own server can be useful.

I *seriously* recommend that you take a look at that page and get a
keydump loaded.

Regards,
-Phil

___
Sks-devel mailing list
Sks-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel