Re: [Slackbuilds-users] [TEST] ghostwriter homepage patch

2022-10-02 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
No Worries Dave.

Other than the ghostwriter.info corrections, I believe all the changes will
have to happen in the KDE Repo.

-- kjh

>
>
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/



Re: [Slackbuilds-users] [TEST] ghostwriter homepage patch

2022-10-01 Thread Dave W.
I don't think I'd seen the latter URL, but my reason for posting the
patch was to test if the program/help system worked with it, rather
than test that it builds, which I'd already tested.

I'm sorry for not explaining more in my original post.

On 01/10/22 23:05,
marav  put forth the proposition:
> https://github.com/KDE/
> "Official read-only mirror of the KDE project"
> Le 01/10/2022 à 22:59, Dave W. a écrit :
> > On 01/10/22 15:46,
> > Konrad J Hambrick  put forth the proposition:
> > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 3:00 PM Konrad J Hambrick
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:27 PM Dave W.  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On 01/10/22 13:18,
> > > > > Konrad J Hambrick  put forth the proposition:
> > > > > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:05 PM Konrad J 
> > > > > > Hambrick
> > > > <>
> > > Dave --
> > > What is the difference between
> > > HOMEPAGE="https://github.com/KDE/ghostwriter;
> > > and
> > > HOMEPAGE="https://invent.kde.org/office/ghostwriter;
> > > The latter seems more correct because it has all the KDE MenuItems and is
> > > referenced by the former.
> > > Just wondering ...
> > > -- kjh
> > It looks like kde.org is sync'd from github going by the commits,
> > but it is more kde-centric.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > --
> > sbo-maintainer-tools (sbolint, sbopkglint):
> > https://slackbuilds.org/repository/15.0/system/sbo-maintainer-tools/
> >
> > SBo templates:
> > https://slackbuilds.org/templates/
> >
> > How to format github downloads:
> > https://slackbuilds.org/GITHUB_URLs.txt
> > Archives -https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
> > FAQ -https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
> >

Dave

--
sbo-maintainer-tools (sbolint, sbopkglint):
https://slackbuilds.org/repository/15.0/system/sbo-maintainer-tools/

SBo templates:
https://slackbuilds.org/templates/

How to format github downloads:
https://slackbuilds.org/GITHUB_URLs.txt
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/



Re: [Slackbuilds-users] [TEST] ghostwriter homepage patch

2022-10-01 Thread marav

https://github.com/KDE/

"Official read-only mirror of the KDE project"


Le 01/10/2022 à 22:59, Dave W. a écrit :

On 01/10/22 15:46,
Konrad J Hambrick  put forth the proposition:

On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 3:00 PM Konrad J Hambrick
wrote:

On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:27 PM Dave W.  wrote:


On 01/10/22 13:18,
Konrad J Hambrick  put forth the proposition:

On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:05 PM Konrad J Hambrick

<>

Dave --
What is the difference between
HOMEPAGE="https://github.com/KDE/ghostwriter;
and
HOMEPAGE="https://invent.kde.org/office/ghostwriter;
The latter seems more correct because it has all the KDE MenuItems and is
referenced by the former.
Just wondering ...
-- kjh

It looks like kde.org is sync'd from github going by the commits,
but it is more kde-centric.

Dave

--
sbo-maintainer-tools (sbolint, sbopkglint):
https://slackbuilds.org/repository/15.0/system/sbo-maintainer-tools/

SBo templates:
https://slackbuilds.org/templates/

How to format github downloads:
https://slackbuilds.org/GITHUB_URLs.txt
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives -https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ -https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/



Re: [Slackbuilds-users] [TEST] ghostwriter homepage patch

2022-10-01 Thread Dave W.


On 01/10/22 15:46,
Konrad J Hambrick  put forth the proposition:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 3:00 PM Konrad J Hambrick 
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:27 PM Dave W.  wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 01/10/22 13:18,
> >> Konrad J Hambrick  put forth the proposition:
> >> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:05 PM Konrad J Hambrick 
> >>
> > <>
> Dave --
> What is the difference between
> HOMEPAGE="https://github.com/KDE/ghostwriter;
> and
> HOMEPAGE="https://invent.kde.org/office/ghostwriter;
> The latter seems more correct because it has all the KDE MenuItems and is
> referenced by the former.
> Just wondering ...
> -- kjh

It looks like kde.org is sync'd from github going by the commits,
but it is more kde-centric.

Dave

--
sbo-maintainer-tools (sbolint, sbopkglint):
https://slackbuilds.org/repository/15.0/system/sbo-maintainer-tools/

SBo templates:
https://slackbuilds.org/templates/

How to format github downloads:
https://slackbuilds.org/GITHUB_URLs.txt
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/



Re: [Slackbuilds-users] [TEST] ghostwriter homepage patch

2022-10-01 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 3:00 PM Konrad J Hambrick 
wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:27 PM Dave W.  wrote:
>
>>
>> On 01/10/22 13:18,
>> Konrad J Hambrick  put forth the proposition:
>> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:05 PM Konrad J Hambrick 
>>
> <>

Dave --

What is the difference between

HOMEPAGE="https://github.com/KDE/ghostwriter;
and
HOMEPAGE="https://invent.kde.org/office/ghostwriter;

The latter seems more correct because it has all the KDE MenuItems and is
referenced by the former.

Just wondering ...

-- kjh
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/



Re: [Slackbuilds-users] [TEST] ghostwriter homepage patch

2022-10-01 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:27 PM Dave W.  wrote:

>
> On 01/10/22 13:18,
> Konrad J Hambrick  put forth the proposition:
> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:05 PM Konrad J Hambrick 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 11:07 AM Dave W.  wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi all
> > >>
> > >> Up for testing is a patch that (blindly) changes all the homepage
> > >> links in the source folder.  I've also sent a copy to the maintainer.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Dave
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks Dave !
> > >
> > > Works for me.
> > >
> > > I modified ghostwriter.SlackBuild by changing the tar command to use
> the
> > > versioned tar file and then I added one line for the patch:
> > > #--- cut  here ---
> > > --- ghostwriter.SlackBuild.orig 2022-10-01 06:14:50.794839799 -0500
> > > +++ ghostwriter.SlackBuild  2022-10-01 12:31:27.020589931 -0500
> > > @@ -71,7 +71,8 @@
> > >  mkdir -p $TMP $PKG $OUTPUT
> > >  cd $TMP
> > >  rm -rf $PRGNAM-$VERSION
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > *-tar xvf $CWD/$VERSION.tar.gz || tar xvf
> $CWD/$PRGNAM-$VERSION.tar.gz+#
> > > tar xvf $CWD/$VERSION.tar.gz || tar xvf
> $CWD/$PRGNAM-$VERSION.tar.gz+tar
> > > xvf $CWD/$PRGNAM-$VERSION.tar.gz* cd $PRGNAM-$VERSION
>
> I didn't notice the download URL.  Rebased the original commit .info
> to fix it.
>
> 
>
> Thanks Dave.

I also opened an Issue for the missing Quick Reference File via KDE >
office > ghostwriter  via the
Issues Link

-- kjh
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/



Re: [Slackbuilds-users] [TEST] ghostwriter homepage patch

2022-10-01 Thread Dave W.


On 01/10/22 13:18,
Konrad J Hambrick  put forth the proposition:
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:05 PM Konrad J Hambrick 
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 11:07 AM Dave W.  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> Up for testing is a patch that (blindly) changes all the homepage
> >> links in the source folder.  I've also sent a copy to the maintainer.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Dave
> >
> >
> > Thanks Dave !
> >
> > Works for me.
> >
> > I modified ghostwriter.SlackBuild by changing the tar command to use the
> > versioned tar file and then I added one line for the patch:
> > #--- cut  here ---
> > --- ghostwriter.SlackBuild.orig 2022-10-01 06:14:50.794839799 -0500
> > +++ ghostwriter.SlackBuild  2022-10-01 12:31:27.020589931 -0500
> > @@ -71,7 +71,8 @@
> >  mkdir -p $TMP $PKG $OUTPUT
> >  cd $TMP
> >  rm -rf $PRGNAM-$VERSION
> >
> >
> >
> > *-tar xvf $CWD/$VERSION.tar.gz || tar xvf $CWD/$PRGNAM-$VERSION.tar.gz+#
> > tar xvf $CWD/$VERSION.tar.gz || tar xvf $CWD/$PRGNAM-$VERSION.tar.gz+tar
> > xvf $CWD/$PRGNAM-$VERSION.tar.gz* cd $PRGNAM-$VERSION

I didn't notice the download URL.  Rebased the original commit .info
to fix it.



--
Dave

sbo-maintainer-tools (sbolint, sbopkglint):
https://slackbuilds.org/repository/15.0/system/sbo-maintainer-tools/

SBo templates:
https://slackbuilds.org/templates/

How to format github downloads:
https://slackbuilds.org/GITHUB_URLs.txt
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/



Re: [Slackbuilds-users] [TEST] ghostwriter homepage patch

2022-10-01 Thread Konrad J Hambrick
On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 1:05 PM Konrad J Hambrick 
wrote:

>
> On Sat, Oct 1, 2022 at 11:07 AM Dave W.  wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Up for testing is a patch that (blindly) changes all the homepage
>> links in the source folder.  I've also sent a copy to the maintainer.
>>
>> --
>> Dave
>> ___
>> SlackBuilds-users mailing list
>> SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
>> https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
>> Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
>> FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/
>
>
> Thanks Dave !
>
> Works for me.
>
> I modified ghostwriter.SlackBuild by changing the tar command to use the
> versioned tar file and then I added one line for the patch:
>
> #--- cut  here ---
> --- ghostwriter.SlackBuild.orig 2022-10-01 06:14:50.794839799 -0500
> +++ ghostwriter.SlackBuild  2022-10-01 12:31:27.020589931 -0500
> @@ -71,7 +71,8 @@
>  mkdir -p $TMP $PKG $OUTPUT
>  cd $TMP
>  rm -rf $PRGNAM-$VERSION
>
>
>
> *-tar xvf $CWD/$VERSION.tar.gz || tar xvf $CWD/$PRGNAM-$VERSION.tar.gz+#
> tar xvf $CWD/$VERSION.tar.gz || tar xvf $CWD/$PRGNAM-$VERSION.tar.gz+tar
> xvf $CWD/$PRGNAM-$VERSION.tar.gz* cd $PRGNAM-$VERSION
>  chown -R root:root .
>  find -L . \
> @@ -80,6 +81,8 @@
>   \( -perm 666 -o -perm 664 -o -perm 640 -o -perm 600 -o -perm 444 \
>-o -perm 440 -o -perm 400 \) -exec chmod 644 {} \;
>
> *+zcat $CWD/**homepage.diff.gz** |patch -b -p1 --verbose*
> *+*
>  qmake-qt5 \
>PREFIX=/usr
> # --- cut there ---
>
> The [Help][QuickReference] Link is still dead but it is dead on the KDE
> HomePage at http://wereturtle.github.io/ghostwriter/documentation.html
> too.
>
> This is a session from a Konsole  bash Command line:
>
> # --- cut  here ---
> [konrad@kjhlt7 ~]$ ghostwriter &
> [1] 16993
> [konrad@kjhlt7 ~]$ Using pandoc version 2.19.2
> Command "multimarkdown" is not available.
> Using cmark version 0.29.0
> Opening in existing browser session.
> Opening in existing browser session.
>
> [1]+  Doneghostwriter
> # --- cut there ---
>
> Attached is the ghostwriter.SlackBuild.log ... the `patch -b -p1
> --verbose` text begins at line 1250 and ends at 1497.
>
> HTH
>
> -- kjh
>

Canceled the above email ; trimmed the log and attached the trimmed log.

-- kjh
ghostwriter.SlackBuild startup  at Sat Oct  1 12:56:06 CDT 2022

<>
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|diff -Naur a/README.md b/README.md
|--- a/README.md2022-09-14 05:37:18.0 +
|+++ b/README.md2022-10-01 12:32:11.813971500 +
--
patching file README.md
Using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 2.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 12.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 137.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 172.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|diff -Naur a/releaseNotes.py b/releaseNotes.py
|--- a/releaseNotes.py  2022-09-14 05:37:18.0 +
|+++ b/releaseNotes.py  2022-10-01 12:44:39.800109346 +
--
patching file releaseNotes.py
Using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 27.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|diff -Naur a/resources/COPYING b/resources/COPYING
|--- a/resources/COPYING2022-09-14 05:37:18.0 +
|+++ b/resources/COPYING2022-10-01 13:05:26.455672366 +
--
patching file resources/COPYING
Using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 5.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|diff -Naur a/resources/images/COPYING b/resources/images/COPYING
|--- a/resources/images/COPYING 2022-09-14 05:37:18.0 +
|+++ b/resources/images/COPYING 2022-10-01 14:44:35.175956743 +
--
patching file resources/images/COPYING
Using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 18.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 33.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|diff -Naur a/resources/linux/ghostwriter.1 b/resources/linux/ghostwriter.1
|--- a/resources/linux/ghostwriter.12022-09-14 05:37:18.0 +
|+++ b/resources/linux/ghostwriter.12022-10-01 14:44:03.423120697 +
--
patching file resources/linux/ghostwriter.1
Using Plan A...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 17.
Hmm...  The next patch looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|diff -Naur a/resources/linux/ghostwriter.appdata.xml 
b/resources/linux/ghostwriter.appdata.xml
|--- a/resources/linux/ghostwriter.appdata.xml  2022-09-14 05:37:18.0 
+
|+++ b/resources/linux/ghostwriter.appdata.xml  2022-10-01 12:40:07.810513738 
+
--
patching file resources/linux/ghostwriter.appdata.xml
Using Plan A...
Hunk #1 

Re: [Slackbuilds-users] test

2018-03-18 Thread Azure Zanculmarktum
reply test
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/



Re: [Slackbuilds-users] test

2018-03-18 Thread Brenton Earl
On 03/18/2018 06:00 AM, Andrzej Telszewski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Can you see me? :-)

Yes I can.

-- 
Brenton Earl
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/



Re: [Slackbuilds-users] test

2018-03-18 Thread Andrzej Telszewski

On 18/03/18 13:10, Didier Spaier wrote:

Hi,

Le 18/03/2018 à 13:00, Andrzej Telszewski a écrit :

Hi,

Can you see me? :-)


No, there is no attached picture.

But at least we can hear you :-)


Fair enough ;-)

--
Best regards / Pozdrawiam,
Andrzej Telszewski
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/



Re: [Slackbuilds-users] test

2018-03-18 Thread Didier Spaier
Hi,

Le 18/03/2018 à 13:00, Andrzej Telszewski a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> Can you see me? :-)

No, there is no attached picture.

But at least we can hear you :-)
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
https://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - https://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - https://slackbuilds.org/faq/



Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Test for Slack version

2015-01-03 Thread Willy Sudiarto Raharjo

 What do you think about the introduction of a small test for Slackware 
 version in order to determine supported format of the package - .tgz or .txz?
 
 While not extremely important, in case if the the built packages are 
 re-distributed among computers using some cloud services, it could save space 
 and sometimes also time and money.

Slackware support both formats, so no need to check it whether it's supported 
or not
Well, unless you are running a very old Slackware release


--
Willy Sudiarto Raharjo
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/



Re: [Slackbuilds-users] Test for Slack version

2015-01-03 Thread Robby Workman
On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 10:58:44 +0200
Jānis j...@ktf.rtu.lv wrote:

 What do you think about the introduction of a small test for
 Slackware version in order to determine supported format of the
 package - .tgz or .txz?
 
 While not extremely important, in case if the the built packages are  
 re-distributed among computers using some cloud services, it could  
 save space and sometimes also time and money.


http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/2015-January/013369.html

-RW


pgp5sQqkAkcnY.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
SlackBuilds-users mailing list
SlackBuilds-users@slackbuilds.org
http://lists.slackbuilds.org/mailman/listinfo/slackbuilds-users
Archives - http://lists.slackbuilds.org/pipermail/slackbuilds-users/
FAQ - http://slackbuilds.org/faq/