[SLUG] Logo Competition Winners
Hello SLUG, As you know we held a logo competition over the last few months. This was judged at our last meeting (by the members) and the results are below. The winning logos were (entered by): 1. http://www.slug.org.au/gallery/sluglogocomp/aaf (Jan Schmidt) 2. http://www.slug.org.au/gallery/sluglogocomp/aao (Claudio Rogers) 3. http://www.slug.org.au/gallery/sluglogocomp/aah (Jan Schmidt) Logo one will be our official logo but we plan to use Claudios animation for the website as well.As Jan Schmidt entered a reworked version of the original logo he has decided to share his prize with the original author Laura Rumble. Congratulations Claudio Rogers, Jan Schmidt and Laura Rumble. Each will be contacted by the committee about their prize book vouchers soon. Jaime Hemmett, (Slug Committee member) -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
Re: [SLUG] slug archive searching seriously broken
** Reply to note from Michael Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 07 Sep 2003 15:09:34 +1000 Does anyone else use the slug archive searching? I've never had any luck with it. Nope. I gave up on it. Its logic for what it comes up with totally eludes me. I'm serious. Google finds slug posts easier amd more correctly than the slug archive searching does. (and I thought it was me, and, was too embarassed to admit ) ditto X 2 Voytek Eymont -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
[SLUG] default snmpd read community ?
I'm staring at the /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf but I'm somewhat at loss how to read it, all I want is the default read community (which used to be 'public') relevant part of snmpd.conf is: - # First, map the community name public into a security name # sec.name source community com2sec notConfigUser default public # Second, map the security name into a group name: # groupName securityModel securityName group notConfigGroup v1 notConfigUser group notConfigGroup v2c notConfigUser # Third, create a view for us to let the group have rights to: # name incl/excl subtree mask(optional) viewsystemview included system # Finally, grant the group read-only access to the systemview view. # group context sec.model sec.level prefix read write notif access notConfigGroup any noauthexact systemview none none - so, which is the string I need to use instead of 'public' ? 'systemview' ? 'com2sec' ? ? I've tried most of above strings with no success so far... Voytek Eymont -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
[SLUG] Redhat 9 install
After a cumulative 15 man-hours wasted time, we've finally found out there are known problems with installation on systems with useful amounts of RAM. We had a successful install on a 64Mb router/firewall, but when we try to install on a 512Mb system, the install kept coming up with CD read errors - on three separate sets of CDs and three separate systems. I understand that anaconda has memory management issues. So the question is: has anyone come up with a work-around for this? Edwin Humphries, Ironstone Technology Pty Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ironstone.com.au Phone: 02 4233 2285 Fax: 02 4233 2299 Mobile: 0419 233 051 -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
Re: [SLUG] Redhat 9 install
After a cumulative 15 man-hours wasted time, we've finally found out there are known problems with installation on systems with useful amounts of RAM. We had a .. So the question is: has anyone come up with a work-around for this? Well I've only ever done FTP installs of Redhat 9. I can't afford a CD for every Linux box I run, so I have a central Installation machine which has the contents of the CDs copied into a directory. I then use the FTP Install method, using the Boot Disk, and with Redhat 9, the Device driver disk. I've litterally done hundreds of Redhat 9 installs, all worked perfectly. Redhat 9 once running, however, has more issues than you can poke a stick at! :) ---James :) Collins -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
Re: [SLUG] Redhat 9 install
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:50:07AM +1000, Edwin Humphries wrote: when we try to install on a 512Mb system, the install kept coming up with CD read errors I installed RH9.0 on a machine with 512MB of RAM without any problems at all. So the question is: has anyone come up with a work-around for this? I didn't need one :-) Cheers, John -- whois [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key id: 0xD59C360F http://kirriwa.net/john/ -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
Re: [SLUG] Redhat 9 install
I'm no expert, but I thought there was an arguement you could pass to the boot loader to specify the ammount of memory the setup program should use I cant remember how to do it, but basically instead if just hitting enter when the cd-rom boots, i think you type something like linux mem=64 or something like that...check the help screen when the cd-rom boots. This MIGHT fix the problem. I have experienced similar problems to what your describing, but not because of alot of memory, it was because of faulty memory, so you might want to make sure your memory isn't ill. - Original Message - From: Edwin Humphries [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:50 AM Subject: [SLUG] Redhat 9 install After a cumulative 15 man-hours wasted time, we've finally found out there are known problems with installation on systems with useful amounts of RAM. We had a successful install on a 64Mb router/firewall, but when we try to install on a 512Mb system, the install kept coming up with CD read errors - on three separate sets of CDs and three separate systems. I understand that anaconda has memory management issues. So the question is: has anyone come up with a work-around for this? Edwin Humphries, Ironstone Technology Pty Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ironstone.com.au Phone: 02 4233 2285 Fax: 02 4233 2299 Mobile: 0419 233 051 -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
RH9 vs RH7.3 Re: [SLUG] Redhat 9 install
I installed RH9.0 on a machine with 512MB of RAM without any problems how much does RH9 differ from RH7.3 as far as core system, TCP/IP and so on, is concerned; *not* the desktop and skins ? I know it has some new eye candy, and, Apache 2, BUT, is there any difference at TCP/IP level and stuff like that ? Voytek Eymont -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
Re: [SLUG] slug archive searching seriously broken
G'day... This has been happening for quite a while... To resolve the proble, why don't we just have a text-box linked to google that automatically adds the site:lists.slug.org.au in? (You could have the text being something to the order of Google search this mail archive) After all, this has been a longstanding problem. Warmest regards Mike --- Michael S. E. Kraus Network Administrator Capital Holdings Group (NSW) Pty Ltd p: (02) 9955 8000 Voytek Eymont [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/09/2003 07:08 AM Please respond to Voytek Eymont To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: [SLUG] slug archive searching seriously broken ** Reply to note from Michael Lake [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 07 Sep 2003 15:09:34 +1000 Does anyone else use the slug archive searching? I've never had any luck with it. Nope. I gave up on it. Its logic for what it comes up with totally eludes me. I'm serious. Google finds slug posts easier amd more correctly than the slug archive searching does. (and I thought it was me, and, was too embarassed to admit ) ditto X 2 Voytek Eymont -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
Re: [SLUG] Redhat 9 install
G'day... That could work, it'll manually tell the kernel how much memory your machine has. You may want to check the actual labelling of the kernel for the setup program though. Warmest regards Mike --- Michael S. E. Kraus Network Administrator Capital Holdings Group (NSW) Pty Ltd p: (02) 9955 8000 Chris Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/09/2003 10:05 AM To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: [SLUG] Redhat 9 install I'm no expert, but I thought there was an arguement you could pass to the boot loader to specify the ammount of memory the setup program should use I cant remember how to do it, but basically instead if just hitting enter when the cd-rom boots, i think you type something like linux mem=64 or something like that...check the help screen when the cd-rom boots. This MIGHT fix the problem. I have experienced similar problems to what your describing, but not because of alot of memory, it was because of faulty memory, so you might want to make sure your memory isn't ill. - Original Message - From: Edwin Humphries [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:50 AM Subject: [SLUG] Redhat 9 install After a cumulative 15 man-hours wasted time, we've finally found out there are known problems with installation on systems with useful amounts of RAM. We had a successful install on a 64Mb router/firewall, but when we try to install on a 512Mb system, the install kept coming up with CD read errors - on three separate sets of CDs and three separate systems. I understand that anaconda has memory management issues. So the question is: has anyone come up with a work-around for this? Edwin Humphries, Ironstone Technology Pty Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ironstone.com.au Phone: 02 4233 2285 Fax: 02 4233 2299 Mobile: 0419 233 051 -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
Re: [SLUG] slug archive searching seriously broken
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: G'day... This has been happening for quite a while... To resolve the proble, why don't we just have a text-box linked to google that automatically adds the site:lists.slug.org.au in? (You could have the text being something to the order of Google search this mail archive) After all, this has been a longstanding problem. Is there any good reason NOT to use htdig? It works fine on my sites... why go to google for internal searching? How up to date is google going to be? htdig can be as up to date as you want it to be. David. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
Re: [SLUG] slug archive searching seriously broken
quote who=David Is there any good reason NOT to use htdig? It works fine on my sites... I haven't been happy with it in the past. namazu (which handles different document types, metadata, etc. very nicely, including mhonarc archives) gave awesome results, but doesn't seem to scale very well (known problem). why go to google for internal searching? How up to date is google going to be? htdig can be as up to date as you want it to be. I think it was suggested as a handy way to tide over until the current one is unbroken. - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2004: Adelaide, Australia http://lca2004.linux.org.au/ That whole 'you complete me' thing is just tragic and totally unrealistic. Go complete yourself. - Anon -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
[SLUG] Oracle over NFS
I'm looking at setting up a new oracle install which, ideally, would access it's data over a SAN. That's not a problem, apart from the expense. Does anyone have experience in running oracle over NFS? I'm thinking of a dedicated gigabit link betwixt client and server. I'm aware of the problems with NFS, but not with NFS+Oracle, anyone got an opinion? greeno -- Tony Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
Re: [SLUG] Oracle over NFS
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 11:13, Colin Humphreys wrote: In a SAN, the storage will appear like local disk (i.e. just another SCSI device). NFS would be used if you had a NAS. Yes, I know that. I'm asking for issues with running oracle over an NFS connection as the SAN option is uber expensive. -- Tony Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
[SLUG] Postfix, SMTP, ipchains firwall or postfix.conf ?
I'm trying to setup/config Postfix on RH73 (one small step at a time); I can sent mail out from the host, but, am struggling to make it recieve anything external; from command line on the server itself , I can see Postfix is waiting: # telnet myserver.sbt.net.au 25 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to myserver.sbt.net.au. Escape character is '^]'. 220 myserver.sbt.net.au ESMTP Postfix ehlo roman.sbt.net.au 250-myserver.sbt.net.au 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 1024 250-VRFY 250-ETRN 250-XVERP 250 8BITMIME quit 221 Bye Connection closed by foreign host. BUT, If i try to telnet from another host on same LAN, I get 'connection refused' I am not sure if it's my ipchains firewall ? or, Postfix setup ? is this ipchains OK for smtp ? :input ACCEPT :forward ACCEPT :output ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 3306 -p tcp -y -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 1 -p tcp -y -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 25 -p tcp -y -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 80 -p tcp -y -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 21 -p tcp -y -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 22 -p tcp -y -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 23 -p tcp -y -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 67:68 -d 0/0 67:68 -p udp -i eth0 -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 67:68 -d 0/0 67:68 -p udp -i eth1 -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 -i lo -j ACCEPT -A input -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 0:1023 -y -j REJECT -A input -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 2049 -y -j REJECT -A input -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 0:1023 -j REJECT -A input -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 2049 -j REJECT -A input -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 6000:6009 -y -j REJECT -A input -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 7100 -y -j REJECT Voytek Eymont -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
[Fwd: RE: [SLUG] Oracle over NFS]
Passing onto the list (thanks Jill) -Forwarded Message- From: Tony Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Rowling, Jill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SLUG] Oracle over NFS Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 11:45:43 +1000 On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 11:41, Rowling, Jill wrote: The only problem I can think of is NFS timeouts clashing with any Oracle timeouts. If the database is not in use for some time, and NFS does its timeout thing (typ 30 seconds), I would read up to see if Oracle has a shorter timeout before it complains that the database is unavailable. Thats the 'gotcha' that I'd thought of. Also one of the NASs that I looked at had this terrible NFS setup where it exported everything if you wanted NFS at all. Very trusting and not secure (a Win2k box with lots of Win2k things missing from it). A Linux / BSD / Solaris NAS would be better than the off-the-shelf NASs that run Windows. Yeah, I'm looking at doing a NAS with just a big box and a bunch of RAID disks rather than a black box one. Why don't you just plug in an extra controller and add a disk array? You would get better performance. NFS is better suited to individual applications to share data or home directories amongst servers. The shared aspect is the key. 2 boxes both able to access the data (oracle and application failover), otherwise I'd disk array it. Thanks for the insights :-) TG -- Tony Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
[SLUG] Mail redirecting -
hey ppl - our server redirects any email sent to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to my boss, but he wants it to come to me from now on, because the only thing that would ever come from root are basically any errors returned by cron etc. and I am the one that needs to know of those :) hehehe I'm sure this is easy, but I can't find a thing on it anywhere... any ideas? Jared Pritchard ' 02 6882 0288 6 02 6881 6318 * 0427 813 400 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained in and accompanying this communication is strictly confidential and intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). The copyright in this communication belongs to Macquarie Telecom Pty Limited or one of its related entities. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication please delete and destroy all copies and telephone Mactel on +61 6882 0288 immediately. You should not copy, disclose or distribute this communication without the authority of Mactel. Emails may be interfered with, therefore if you have any doubts about the authenticity of an email purportedly sent by Mactel please contact Mactel immediately. attachment: winmail.dat-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
Re: [SLUG] Mail redirecting -
quote who=Jared Pritchard hey ppl - our server redirects any email sent to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to my boss, but he wants it to come to me from now on, because the only thing that would ever come from root are basically any errors returned by cron etc. and I am the one that needs to know of those :) hehehe I'm sure this is easy, but I can't find a thing on it anywhere... any ideas? It depends a little bit on which MTA you're running (Mail Transfer Agent, the bit of a mail server that sends and receives mail, but doesn't serve them via client protocols - it might be sendmail, postfix, qmail, exim or one of a few others)... It is fairly likely that if you modify /etc/aliases (verifying that it has a root: [EMAIL PROTECTED] line in it, which you want to change), and run 'newaliases' then it should work. If you're running something that is oddly different to MTA norms (such as qmail), this won't work. :-) Worth figuring out which MTA you're running anyway, so you know what to read up on when you encounter problems in the future. :-) - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2004: Adelaide, Australia http://lca2004.linux.org.au/ W.O.R.K: Weekend Over, Resume the Killings. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
Re: [SLUG] Mail redirecting -
Check your /etc/aliases fileor it may be somewhere else depeding on distro Jared Pritchard wrote: hey ppl - our server redirects any email sent to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to my boss, but he wants it to come to me from now on, because the only thing that would ever come from root are basically any errors returned by cron etc. and I am the one that needs to know of those :) hehehe I'm sure this is easy, but I can't find a thing on it anywhere... any ideas? Jared Pritchard ' 02 6882 0288 6 02 6881 6318 * 0427 813 400 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained in and accompanying this communication is strictly confidential and intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). The copyright in this communication belongs to Macquarie Telecom Pty Limited or one of its related entities. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication please delete and destroy all copies and telephone Mactel on +61 6882 0288 immediately. You should not copy, disclose or distribute this communication without the authority of Mactel. Emails may be interfered with, therefore if you have any doubts about the authenticity of an email purportedly sent by Mactel please contact Mactel immediately. -- Phil Scarratt Draxsen Technologies IT Contractor 0403 53 12 71 -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
Re: [SLUG] Mail redirecting -
Alternatively, have .forward file Warmest regards Mike --- Michael S. E. Kraus Network Administrator Capital Holdings Group (NSW) Pty Ltd p: (02) 9955 8000 Phil Scarratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/09/2003 12:22 PM To:Jared Pritchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [SLUG] Mail redirecting - Check your /etc/aliases fileor it may be somewhere else depeding on distro Jared Pritchard wrote: hey ppl - our server redirects any email sent to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to my boss, but he wants it to come to me from now on, because the only thing that would ever come from root are basically any errors returned by cron etc. and I am the one that needs to know of those :) hehehe I'm sure this is easy, but I can't find a thing on it anywhere... any ideas? Jared Pritchard ' 02 6882 0288 6 02 6881 6318 * 0427 813 400 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained in and accompanying this communication is strictly confidential and intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). The copyright in this communication belongs to Macquarie Telecom Pty Limited or one of its related entities. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication please delete and destroy all copies and telephone Mactel on +61 6882 0288 immediately. You should not copy, disclose or distribute this communication without the authority of Mactel. Emails may be interfered with, therefore if you have any doubts about the authenticity of an email purportedly sent by Mactel please contact Mactel immediately. -- Phil Scarratt Draxsen Technologies IT Contractor 0403 53 12 71 -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
Re: [SLUG] Redhat 9 install
linux mem=512M noprobe At the boot prompt hit F4 for kernel arguments. ~~~ Im online, therefore I am! ~~~ Original Message Follows From: Chris Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SLUG] Redhat 9 install Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:05:24 +1000 I'm no expert, but I thought there was an arguement you could pass to the boot loader to specify the ammount of memory the setup program should use I cant remember how to do it, but basically instead if just hitting enter when the cd-rom boots, i think you type something like linux mem=64 or something like that...check the help screen when the cd-rom boots. This MIGHT fix the problem. I have experienced similar problems to what your describing, but not because of alot of memory, it was because of faulty memory, so you might want to make sure your memory isn't ill. - Original Message - From: Edwin Humphries [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:50 AM Subject: [SLUG] Redhat 9 install After a cumulative 15 man-hours wasted time, we've finally found out there are known problems with installation on systems with useful amounts of RAM. We had a successful install on a 64Mb router/firewall, but when we try to install on a 512Mb system, the install kept coming up with CD read errors - on three separate sets of CDs and three separate systems. I understand that anaconda has memory management issues. So the question is: has anyone come up with a work-around for this? Edwin Humphries, Ironstone Technology Pty Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ironstone.com.au Phone: 02 4233 2285 Fax: 02 4233 2299 Mobile: 0419 233 051 -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug _ Hot chart ringtones and polyphonics. Go to http://ninemsn.com.au/mobilemania/default.asp -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
Re: [SLUG] Postfix, SMTP, ipchains firwall or postfix.conf ?
I think postfix installs as listening to loacl host only.. Try going to: /etc/postfix/main.cf Comment out: inet_interfaces = localhost and uncomment inet_interfaces = all Paul On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 21:59, Voytek Eymont wrote: I'm trying to setup/config Postfix on RH73 (one small step at a time); I can sent mail out from the host, but, am struggling to make it recieve anything external; from command line on the server itself , I can see Postfix is waiting: # telnet myserver.sbt.net.au 25 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to myserver.sbt.net.au. Escape character is '^]'. 220 myserver.sbt.net.au ESMTP Postfix ehlo roman.sbt.net.au 250-myserver.sbt.net.au 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 1024 250-VRFY 250-ETRN 250-XVERP 250 8BITMIME quit 221 Bye Connection closed by foreign host. BUT, If i try to telnet from another host on same LAN, I get 'connection refused' I am not sure if it's my ipchains firewall ? or, Postfix setup ? is this ipchains OK for smtp ? :input ACCEPT :forward ACCEPT :output ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 3306 -p tcp -y -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 1 -p tcp -y -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 25 -p tcp -y -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 80 -p tcp -y -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 21 -p tcp -y -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 22 -p tcp -y -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 23 -p tcp -y -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 67:68 -d 0/0 67:68 -p udp -i eth0 -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 67:68 -d 0/0 67:68 -p udp -i eth1 -j ACCEPT -A input -s 0/0 -d 0/0 -i lo -j ACCEPT -A input -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 0:1023 -y -j REJECT -A input -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 2049 -y -j REJECT -A input -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 0:1023 -j REJECT -A input -p udp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 2049 -j REJECT -A input -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 6000:6009 -y -j REJECT -A input -p tcp -s 0/0 -d 0/0 7100 -y -j REJECT Voytek Eymont -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
[SLUG] more ibook issues
Hi All, I have two questions. Firstly I have set up ALSA on my ibook which is working, however the sound is very soft, even with the mixer to max. Is there a way of adjusting what the mixer thinks should be the max and min volume? Secondly I have compiled and installed mplayer, however when I went to grab the codecs I realized that they are binary x86 codecs only. How can I go about getting codecs for ppc? Cheers, Adam. -- Adam Hewitt - CCNA, LCP Senior Network Engineer GLOBAL DIAL PTY LTD PO BOX 829 Claremont, Western Australia 6910 Suite 1/278 Stirling Highway, Claremont WA 6010 Telephone: +61 8 9383 1800Facsimile: +61 8 9383 2818 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: www.globaldial.com The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify us via email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
RE: [SLUG] Mail redirecting -
Check your /etc/aliases file -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 9 September 2003 5:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SLUG] Mail redirecting - hey ppl - our server redirects any email sent to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' to my boss, but he wants it to come to me from now on, because the only thing that would ever come from root are basically any errors returned by cron etc. and I am the one that needs to know of those :) hehehe I'm sure this is easy, but I can't find a thing on it anywhere... any ideas? Jared Pritchard ' 02 6882 0288 6 02 6881 6318 * 0427 813 400 * [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained in and accompanying this communication is strictly confidential and intended solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). The copyright in this communication belongs to Macquarie Telecom Pty Limited or one of its related entities. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication please delete and destroy all copies and telephone Mactel on +61 6882 0288 immediately. You should not copy, disclose or distribute this communication without the authority of Mactel. Emails may be interfered with, therefore if you have any doubts about the authenticity of an email purportedly sent by Mactel please contact Mactel immediately. File: ATT00011.txt attachment: winmail.dat-- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
[SLUG] airsnort
Hi All, Just wondering if anyone has managed to get airsnort working with their apple airport card? There is a link from the airsnort homepage, however it seems to be broken. Cheers, Adam. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
