Re: [SLUG] NTP time server settings

2004-09-16 Thread amos
John Clarke wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 11:23:07 +1000, Rod Butcher wrote:

Mandrake 10 provides a user-friendly install for NTP time server 
connection but it doesn't seem to actually adjust my time.. the modem 
light flickers but time doesn't change. I've tried uadelaide.edu.au and 

Check your firewall rules.  You need to allow ntp (port 123 udp) in and
out.
I don't know mandrake but I got the impression that it's standard
practice to have a rule like:
# allow established connections, or related packets
iptables --append block --match state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED
  --jump ACCEPT
which will allow a replying NTP packet pass through.  That's much
more convenient (and secure, IMHO) than completly opening the NTP port.
(in case you want to check if such a rule exists, the iptables -L output
for it looks like:
ACCEPT all  --  anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
)
Cheers,
--Amos
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Seeking GNOME application for image manipulation

2004-09-16 Thread Mary Gardiner
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004, Tony Green wrote:
 Before switching to the OSX dark (but purty) side, I used to use the 
 nautilus script function to do rotations on selected files.  I just had 
 an imagemagik script which called convert(?) with the right 
 params...

I hadn't really thought about Nautilus scripting but that might be a
go-er. (I'm not scripting averse, but a terminal doesn't let me see
photographs and Nautilus does.)

-Mary
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] NTP time server settings

2004-09-16 Thread John Clarke
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 10:31:58 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 John Clarke wrote:
  
  Check your firewall rules.  You need to allow ntp (port 123 udp) in and
  out.
 
 I don't know mandrake but I got the impression that it's standard
 practice to have a rule like:
 
 # allow established connections, or related packets
 iptables --append block --match state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED
--jump ACCEPT
 
 which will allow a replying NTP packet pass through.  That's much
 more convenient (and secure, IMHO) than completly opening the NTP port.

I agree, but I was suggesting things that might be stopping ntp from
working, not a step-by-step method of fixing it :-)

If you want to be even more paranoid (and who doesn't?), you should
only allow ntp packets out to the designated time server(s).


Cheers,

John
-- 
One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that,
lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination
of their C programs.
-- Robert Firth 
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] NTP time server settings

2004-09-16 Thread Rod Butcher
The final straw that made me switch to Linux was when I was spending 
more time downloading and applying security patches and then allowing 
and not allowing my firewall to let my computer have strange 
conversations with outside forces, most of whom I suspect were located 
in Redmond, than I was actually working. Then there was the attack of 
the bios-eating worm. My computer became Typhoid Mary and then a dead 
badger (hey, but 2.6.8 supports  CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BADGERSCSI).
In short, I kind of hoped that I could kiss firewalls and viruses 
goodbye.. I only download non-executable code and don't open 
nonauthenticated email attachments. I only compile and / or run code 
from reputable source like sourceforge, Mandrake or Mozilla.
Any other security issues here ? I thought the problem with Windows was 
the basic architecture itself, not being designed to live in a hostile 
environment whereas I understand Linux was. ??
cheers
Rod
---
Brought to you by a thunderbird, penguin, gnu and a camel

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Clarke wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 11:23:07 +1000, Rod Butcher wrote:

Mandrake 10 provides a user-friendly install for NTP time server 
connection but it doesn't seem to actually adjust my time.. the modem 
light flickers but time doesn't change. I've tried uadelaide.edu.au and 

Check your firewall rules.  You need to allow ntp (port 123 udp) in and
out.

I don't know mandrake but I got the impression that it's standard
practice to have a rule like:
# allow established connections, or related packets
iptables --append block --match state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED
  --jump ACCEPT
which will allow a replying NTP packet pass through.  That's much
more convenient (and secure, IMHO) than completly opening the NTP port.
(in case you want to check if such a rule exists, the iptables -L output
for it looks like:
ACCEPT all  --  anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
)
Cheers,
--Amos
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] USB2 speed gain

2004-09-16 Thread Simon Males
How can I be ensure that I have got the USB2 speed gain. I pluged a 
friends hard drive based mp3 player to move files across. The files were 
moving in normal USBv1 speed.

I mounted it as normal.. the only thing I can think if it the mounting. 
Below is from /etc/fstab:

/dev/sda1   /mnt/usbvfatnoauto,user,rw  0   0
--
Simon Males [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No More AOL CDs Australia - www.anticd.org
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] USB2 speed gain

2004-09-16 Thread amos
Simon Males wrote:
How can I be ensure that I have got the USB2 speed gain. I pluged a 
friends hard drive based mp3 player to move files across. The files were 
moving in normal USBv1 speed.

I mounted it as normal.. the only thing I can think if it the mounting. 
Below is from /etc/fstab:

/dev/sda1   /mnt/usbvfatnoauto,user,rw  0   0
I don't think it has anything to do with the mount.
What does lsusb -v says about the device?  I think the interesting
piece of info is bcdUSB, which on my machine gives either 1.10 or
2.00 depending on the devide.
--Amos
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] bind: rndc setup, where the keygen files go ?

2004-09-16 Thread amos
Voytek wrote:
well, using the docs you pointed out, it does tell me that the file is not
required, but, I'm still not getting past
'connect failed: connection refused'
This rings a very familiar bell - just a few weeks ago someone reportted
exactly the same error (which says that nobody is listening on that
port) with that application. Could it be that your dns server doesn't
listen on that port? Or maybe rndc tries to connect to the wrong
host/port?
Try digging up the archives of the last month or two.
Cheers,
--Amos
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Linux Databases

2004-09-16 Thread amos
Edwin Humphries wrote:
I'm trying to convert my personal PC use from Windoze to Linux. But 
there is a Win application that I've used for a long time for flat-file 
databases: Filemaker Pro. It's much better than other simple Win 
databases (eg, Access) and it isn't Microsoft!

Can anyone suggest a Linux alternative? My key database is a database of 
my experimentation with bush food plants (yes, I know geek and gardener 
seem somewhat contradictory :-). This has several fields that contain 
bitmaps (photographs of plants). I know about SQL databases, but it 
seems a tad overkill for this - and there isn't a simple GUI front-end.
If you insist on sticking with text database applications then how about
going to http://freshmeat.net and typing text database in the search
box?  Here is a quick link to get you the results (161 of them):
http://tinyurl.com/3t2ku
HTH,
--Amos
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


RE: [SLUG] smoothwall for home firewall

2004-09-16 Thread Elliott-Brennan
Hi,

I've been using Smoothwall for about a month.

I tested it using (amongst others):

http://www.grc.com/

Go to 'shields up'.

The site (though I've heard it has it's detractors) gives you an idea of
which ports are stealthed/closed/open.  One of my Win machines runs
McAfee also (paranoid, me?) and it records only general activity on my
home network - there are none of the repeated scans etc that generally
occur on the 'net.

From what I can gather, if you use the general setup, only port 113 is
shown (as closed) - apparently some IRCs don't work if this is
stealthed. I don't know if this is true as I don't use IRC software. You
can also redirect port traffic from this  port to a nonsense address
(happy to exchange mail about this - it's new to me and I'm only just
getting a chance to look at it).

From my experience, overall, it would seem that Smoothwall works well...
anybody else using it?

Patrick

-Original Message-
From: Lyle Chapman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, 16 September 2004 10:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SLUG] smoothwall for home firewall


If anyone has some input I would be grateful,

I have setup smoothwall at home and was wondering how it rates in 
security

thanks for any input or advice


Lyle Chapman

Pre-Press Supervisor
Torch Publishing Co.
47 Allingham Street, Condell Park 2200, NSW, Australia
612 9795 
http://www.torchpublishing.com.au



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] networking dilema

2004-09-16 Thread Brad Dolph
I'm hoping someone can help with a problem I am having getting a
Microsoft box and Linux box to recognise each other. The Microsoft box
is running XP Pro and the Linux box is running Fedora. The IP addresses
appear to be set up properly on each box but I cannot ping one to the
other. Both boxes work well independently.

I've checked the devices and everything seems to be working properly.
When I ping I get destination host unreachable message.

Please help
Thanks,

Brad

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


RE: [SLUG] smoothwall for home firewall

2004-09-16 Thread Phillipus Gunawan
Does anybody ever using Smoothwall with Dlink200 with
TPG?

I've tried IPCop but it seems can not connect to
Internet. the box can ping the gateaway, but unable to
ping DNS server.


--- Elliott-Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I've been using Smoothwall for about a month.
 
 I tested it using (amongst others):
 
 http://www.grc.com/
 
 Go to 'shields up'.
 
 The site (though I've heard it has it's detractors)
 gives you an idea of
 which ports are stealthed/closed/open.  One of my
 Win machines runs
 McAfee also (paranoid, me?) and it records only
 general activity on my
 home network - there are none of the repeated scans
 etc that generally
 occur on the 'net.
 
 From what I can gather, if you use the general
 setup, only port 113 is
 shown (as closed) - apparently some IRCs don't work
 if this is
 stealthed. I don't know if this is true as I don't
 use IRC software. You
 can also redirect port traffic from this  port to a
 nonsense address
 (happy to exchange mail about this - it's new to me
 and I'm only just
 getting a chance to look at it).
 
 From my experience, overall, it would seem that
 Smoothwall works well...
 anybody else using it?
 
 Patrick
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Lyle Chapman
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, 16 September 2004 10:05 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [SLUG] smoothwall for home firewall
 
 
 If anyone has some input I would be grateful,
 
 I have setup smoothwall at home and was wondering
 how it rates in 
 security
 
 thanks for any input or advice
 
 
 Lyle Chapman
 
 Pre-Press Supervisor
 Torch Publishing Co.
 47 Allingham Street, Condell Park 2200, NSW,
 Australia
 612 9795 
 http://www.torchpublishing.com.au
 
 
 
 -- 
 SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List -
 http://slug.org.au/
 Subscription info and FAQs:
 http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
 




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] networking dilema

2004-09-16 Thread Phil Scarratt
Brad Dolph wrote:
I'm hoping someone can help with a problem I am having getting a
Microsoft box and Linux box to recognise each other. The Microsoft box
is running XP Pro and the Linux box is running Fedora. The IP addresses
appear to be set up properly on each box but I cannot ping one to the
other. Both boxes work well independently.
I've checked the devices and everything seems to be working properly.
When I ping I get destination host unreachable message.
Please help
Thanks,
Brad
How are they physically connected?
Can Linux ping XP? vice-versa? neither?
What are the IP addresses?
Any firewalls?
Fil
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] networking dilema

2004-09-16 Thread Dean Hamstead
make sure they both plugged into the hub/switch properly
or crossover cable is connecting properly
(heaven forbid, check your coaxial cable is working right)
your problem from there is most likely that
you havent set your network settings correctly
you might pick something like
windows
IP 192.168.0.1
NETMASK 255.255.255.0
linux
IP 192.168.0.2
NETMASK 255.255.255.0
other settings arent really that important, make
sure they arent set or they will cause problems
then try pinging 192.168.0.1 from linux or vice versa.

Dean
Brad Dolph wrote:
I'm hoping someone can help with a problem I am having getting a
Microsoft box and Linux box to recognise each other. The Microsoft box
is running XP Pro and the Linux box is running Fedora. The IP addresses
appear to be set up properly on each box but I cannot ping one to the
other. Both boxes work well independently.
I've checked the devices and everything seems to be working properly.
When I ping I get destination host unreachable message.
Please help
Thanks,
Brad
--
WWW: http://dean.bong.com.au  LAN: http://www.bong.com.au
EMAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   or   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: 16867613
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] networking dilema

2004-09-16 Thread O Plameras
Let's see if we can get more info about your
network because as it is the info supplied is
insufficient.
On your linux box, login as root.
What is the output of 'arp' ?
For example, I get this,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] oscarp]$ su - root
Password:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# arp
Address HWtype  HWaddress   Flags 
Mask Iface
otr.noy.com.au   ether   00:11:2F:14:5A:18   
C eth0
compaq.noy.com.au   ether  00:10:5A:67:F2:A1   C 
eth0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]#

If you get something similar for your linux and Windows, this means
that your cable connections are correct. If not, you have to fix it.
If correct, the next thing to do is issue this command,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination GatewayGenmask Flags Metric 
RefUse Iface
192.168.1.0 *   255.255.255.0   U 
0  00 eth0
127.0.0.0 *  255.0.0.0
U 0  00 lo

You should get something similar to the above. If you do, it means your
Linux TCP is configured correctly and you have to go
back to your Win XP and check the TCP configuration,
Now, to be able to route IP packets outside your network your Linux
box should have a route output similar to the ff:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination GatewayGenmask Flags Metric 
RefUse Iface
192.168.1.0 *   255.255.255.0   U 
0  00 eth0
127.0.0.0 *  255.0.0.0
U 0  00 lo
default 192.168.1.100  0.0.0.0UG 
0  00  eth0

Brad Dolph wrote:
I'm hoping someone can help with a problem I am having getting a
Microsoft box and Linux box to recognise each other. The Microsoft box
is running XP Pro and the Linux box is running Fedora. The IP addresses
appear to be set up properly on each box but I cannot ping one to the
other. Both boxes work well independently.
I've checked the devices and everything seems to be working properly.
When I ping I get destination host unreachable message.
Please help
Thanks,
Brad
 

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] NTP time server settings

2004-09-16 Thread amos
Rod Butcher wrote:
The final straw that made me switch to Linux was when I was spending 
more time downloading and applying security patches and then allowing 
and not allowing my firewall to let my computer have strange 
conversations with outside forces, most of whom I suspect were located 
in Redmond, than I was actually working. Then there was the attack of 
the bios-eating worm. My computer became Typhoid Mary and then a dead 
badger (hey, but 2.6.8 supports  CONFIG_BLK_DEV_BADGERSCSI).
In short, I kind of hoped that I could kiss firewalls and viruses 
goodbye.. I only download non-executable code and don't open 
nonauthenticated email attachments. I only compile and / or run code 
I feel pretty secure running stuff as non-root, or open Microsoft Office
documents using OpenOffice (and feel he he, I wouldn't dare do THIS on
windows every time I do this). Am I too complacent?
I have yet to catch a virus on my Linux machine :). But I also run
chkrootkit from time to time and watch my logs.
from reputable source like sourceforge, Mandrake or Mozilla.
Any other security issues here ? I thought the problem with Windows was 
the basic architecture itself, not being designed to live in a hostile 
environment whereas I understand Linux was. ??
I think you are basically right - Windows was not designed for the harsh
hostile environmnet that the Internet is today (or any hostile
environment, for that matter. It's very naive actually).
But the Internet is still a hostile environment and firewalls still have
to be raised on anything connected to it.
cheers
Rod
Cheers,
--Amos
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Archlinux

2004-09-16 Thread Lindsay Holmwood
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:59:23 +1000
Michael Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 So far I have installed a base system, although as I mentioned to ctd
 lastnight it appears it lacks support out of the box for my nforce2
 onboard ethernet. Should I go grab nvidia package for support and
 patch a kernel or something? I looked at the 2.6.3 kernel tree and I
 cant see no mention of nforce2 ethernet module/drivers.

The stock Arch Linux kernel has support for it by default. I'm using Arch with
an nforce board and i'm not having any problems at all. The Arch forums and
wiki are a great resource for finding info on stuff like this.
 
 Any comments for me to go explore in attempt to get my ethernet working?

If you know what driver Linux uses just do a modprobe modname and you should
be fine. If you don't know what driver it uses, just google the chipset of the
card to find out what driver it uses. Every single network driver under Linux is
compiled as a module under Arch, so it'll be there when you modprobe it.

Good luck, and welcome to the goodness of Arch Linux. :-)

Lindsay

-- 
http://www.asymmetrics.net/~auxesis/
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] New website rocks!

2004-09-16 Thread Pia Smith
So LA have our new website. Finally! :)

http://www.linux.org.au. Any breakages reported would be much
appreciated!

Rock on Australia,
Pia
-- 
Pia Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Australia

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] New website rocks!

2004-09-16 Thread Jeff Waugh
quote who=Pia Smith

 http://www.linux.org.au

 Rock on Australia,

Phwoar! Sweet! ROCK ON AUSTRALIA!

- Jeff

-- 
linux.conf.au 2005: Canberra, Australiahttp://linux.conf.au/
 
  Whoever wrote [the Twisted documentation] uses a vivid and interesting
 style of prose which triggers pleasure. - Francois Pinard
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] MythTV vs Freevo

2004-09-16 Thread Jason Rennie
So what have people tried and what was there experience with these things ?

Any recommendations ?

Jason
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] New site

2004-09-16 Thread john gibbons
Great new web site. Congrats to all involved.
John.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Archlinux

2004-09-16 Thread Michael Fox
For archives...

The problem was the fact that 0.6 has issues with modules... modules I
had listed in the rc.conf wouldn't load at boot (but I could load them
manually via insmod pathtomodule etc)

Updated to 0.7 via internet (one of the updated packages was modules
init script) and this solved the problem.

Slowly I am configuring the machine, and with the help of Chris (ctd)
we should have some mythtv ported/compiled packages this weekend.
Hopefully these happen, otherwise I am in a bad situation.

Stay tuned... now that ethernet is working I have since installed
various stuff and its quite nice. archlinux is pretty nice in its own
sort of way.


On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 21:44:53 +1000, Lindsay Holmwood
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Thu, 16 Sep 2004 09:59:23 +1000
 Michael Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  So far I have installed a base system, although as I mentioned to ctd
  lastnight it appears it lacks support out of the box for my nforce2
  onboard ethernet. Should I go grab nvidia package for support and
  patch a kernel or something? I looked at the 2.6.3 kernel tree and I
  cant see no mention of nforce2 ethernet module/drivers.
 
 The stock Arch Linux kernel has support for it by default. I'm using Arch with
 an nforce board and i'm not having any problems at all. The Arch forums and
 wiki are a great resource for finding info on stuff like this.
 
  Any comments for me to go explore in attempt to get my ethernet working?
 
 If you know what driver Linux uses just do a modprobe modname and you should
 be fine. If you don't know what driver it uses, just google the chipset of the
 card to find out what driver it uses. Every single network driver under Linux is
 compiled as a module under Arch, so it'll be there when you modprobe it.
 
 Good luck, and welcome to the goodness of Arch Linux. :-)
 
 Lindsay
 
 --
 http://www.asymmetrics.net/~auxesis/
 
 
 --
 SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
 Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] MythTV vs Freevo

2004-09-16 Thread Michael Fox
I am yet to setup mythtv for myself, hopefully in about 3 weeks time
when my hdtv card is purchased.

In the meantime I have played around with a friends mythtv setup and
the web interface he has is quite nice. This feature alone has
interested me. I am yet to see how else you work with it.


On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 06:49:08 +1000, Jason Rennie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 So what have people tried and what was there experience with these things ?
 
 Any recommendations ?
 
 Jason
 --
 SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
 Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] networking dilema

2004-09-16 Thread DaZZa
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Brad Dolph wrote:

 I'm hoping someone can help with a problem I am having getting a
 Microsoft box and Linux box to recognise each other. The Microsoft box
 is running XP Pro and the Linux box is running Fedora. The IP addresses
 appear to be set up properly on each box but I cannot ping one to the
 other. Both boxes work well independently.

 I've checked the devices and everything seems to be working properly.
 When I ping I get destination host unreachable message.

You really haven't given enough information to diagnose this.

How are the devices connected - via a hub? Switch? Directly? Are you 100%
certain the physical media in use is functioning {are the link lights on
the hub/switch/cards active?}

Are both devices in the same IP subnet - I.E. same address range  subnet
mask? If not, do you have a routing device somewhere which knows about
both subnets involved?

For a start, what IP addresses/subnet masks are you using on each box?

What does ifconfig in the linux box show, and ipconfig /all on the windows
box show regarding the link.

DaZZa

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


RE: [SLUG] smoothwall for home firewall

2004-09-16 Thread Elliott-Brennan
Yes.

I'm using a dlink 200 USB and smoothwall. I've not used IPCOP, so,
sorry, can't help.

Patrick 





-Original Message-
From: Phillipus Gunawan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, 16 September 2004 8:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SLUG] smoothwall for home firewall


Does anybody ever using Smoothwall with Dlink200 with
TPG?

I've tried IPCop but it seems can not connect to
Internet. the box can ping the gateaway, but unable to
ping DNS server.


--- Elliott-Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I've been using Smoothwall for about a month.
 
 I tested it using (amongst others):
 
 http://www.grc.com/
 
 Go to 'shields up'.
 
 The site (though I've heard it has it's detractors)
 gives you an idea of
 which ports are stealthed/closed/open.  One of my
 Win machines runs
 McAfee also (paranoid, me?) and it records only
 general activity on my
 home network - there are none of the repeated scans
 etc that generally
 occur on the 'net.
 
 From what I can gather, if you use the general
 setup, only port 113 is
 shown (as closed) - apparently some IRCs don't work
 if this is
 stealthed. I don't know if this is true as I don't
 use IRC software. You
 can also redirect port traffic from this  port to a
 nonsense address
 (happy to exchange mail about this - it's new to me
 and I'm only just
 getting a chance to look at it).
 
 From my experience, overall, it would seem that
 Smoothwall works well...
 anybody else using it?
 
 Patrick
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Lyle Chapman
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, 16 September 2004 10:05 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [SLUG] smoothwall for home firewall
 
 
 If anyone has some input I would be grateful,
 
 I have setup smoothwall at home and was wondering
 how it rates in
 security
 
 thanks for any input or advice
 
 
 Lyle Chapman
 
 Pre-Press Supervisor
 Torch Publishing Co.
 47 Allingham Street, Condell Park 2200, NSW,
 Australia
 612 9795 
 http://www.torchpublishing.com.au
 
 
 
 --
 SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List -
 http://slug.org.au/
 Subscription info and FAQs:
 http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
 




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] Re: Re: How to fix a memory leak in an old kernel

2004-09-16 Thread chris
On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 12:21:59 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(with JRE 1.4.2-05) been more useable, but even then, when Eclipse runs 
out of memory, I have to reboot the machine.
That's very strange - have you tried restartting Eclipse? How about 
increasing the JVM's
memory limits (the -Xmx/-Xms flags)?
When Eclipse runs out of memory, I can't restart it because it crashes 
with an java.lang.OutOfMemoryError. That's why I reboot my machine.

As for increasing the memory limits, once Eclipse runs out of memory, no 
amount of memory flag tweaking will make Eclipse run again until I reboot 
the machine.

In general - a program shouldn't cause the system to require a reboot 
just by hogging memory.
I agree. However, since I'm using an earlier version of the kernel, I'm 
suspecting a kernel problem. But that's my guess.

I run Eclipse 2.1 on Windows XP Prof at work for months now and though 
it sometimes very
slow I don't remember havign to reboot Windows because of this. Now you 
are talking about
Linux, which should be much better at this.
I also run Eclipse 3.0 on Win XP Pro on a 3Ghz 1Gb P4, and it's very 
stable in that respect.

Chris

Cheers,
--Amos

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] Re: Linux Advocate for Parliament

2004-09-16 Thread pia
Hi Nicholas, 

Nicholas Tomlin writes: 

Hell SLUGers,
Interesting freudian ;) 


If elected to Parliament I will be pushing many barrows, one of them will be 
to convert the Australian computing landscape over to Open Source Software, 
But we already have the Democrats, Greens and even labor and liberal pushing 
open standards, and in some cases preference for open source. What else can 
you offer the community in terms of policy? Hell we are already involved 
helping form these policies :) 

I think most of the open source industry isn't in it to 'get M$', but rather 
to ensure an equal playing ground so the best software wins on its own 
merits, and we do have the best software ;) 

PS - A major contributing factor to the present economic collapse, is the 
anti-human, bestial policies represented by the rock-drug-sex counterculture 
which took off in the 1960s. The me first, me only policies championed 
by the counterculture, are precisely those also championed by the economic 
policies of globalisation, privatisation, etc.; indeed, the former has 
helped prepare the way for the latter. The CEC is committed, as is Mr. 
LaRouche, to urgently re-establishing a new Golden Renaissance, based upon 
the Classical tradition in art and philosophy, where the creative powers of 
each individual are fostered, to the benefit of both the individual, and of 
the entire society. 

^what does this actually mean? How does CEC plan to re-establishing a 
new Golden Renaissance and based on what Classical traditions. Does CEC 
truly believe that humankind will breakdown from a little anarchy, are we 
that fragile? I think anarchy is good, it stops small amounts of people 
getting too much power :) It promotes individual thought, it ensures that we 
don't fall into a trap of habitual behaviour based around traditions that 
may be completely irrelevant in todays society. It keeps us living fully. 

Cheers,
Pia
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


RE: [SLUG] smoothwall for home firewall

2004-09-16 Thread Kevin Fitzgerald
I use IPCOP regularly with all types of ethernet modems and routers.
Feel free to contact me if I can help.

What are the specific problems you're having?


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Elliott-Brennan
Sent: Friday, 17 September 2004 9:17 AM
To: 'Phillipus Gunawan'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SLUG] smoothwall for home firewall


Yes.

I'm using a dlink 200 USB and smoothwall. I've not used IPCOP, so,
sorry, can't help.

Patrick 





-Original Message-
From: Phillipus Gunawan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, 16 September 2004 8:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SLUG] smoothwall for home firewall


Does anybody ever using Smoothwall with Dlink200 with
TPG?

I've tried IPCop but it seems can not connect to
Internet. the box can ping the gateaway, but unable to
ping DNS server.


--- Elliott-Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Hi,
 
 I've been using Smoothwall for about a month.
 
 I tested it using (amongst others):
 
 http://www.grc.com/
 
 Go to 'shields up'.
 
 The site (though I've heard it has it's detractors)
 gives you an idea of
 which ports are stealthed/closed/open.  One of my
 Win machines runs
 McAfee also (paranoid, me?) and it records only
 general activity on my
 home network - there are none of the repeated scans
 etc that generally
 occur on the 'net.
 
 From what I can gather, if you use the general
 setup, only port 113 is
 shown (as closed) - apparently some IRCs don't work
 if this is
 stealthed. I don't know if this is true as I don't
 use IRC software. You
 can also redirect port traffic from this  port to a
 nonsense address
 (happy to exchange mail about this - it's new to me
 and I'm only just
 getting a chance to look at it).
 
 From my experience, overall, it would seem that
 Smoothwall works well...
 anybody else using it?
 
 Patrick
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Lyle Chapman
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, 16 September 2004 10:05 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [SLUG] smoothwall for home firewall
 
 
 If anyone has some input I would be grateful,
 
 I have setup smoothwall at home and was wondering
 how it rates in
 security
 
 thanks for any input or advice
 
 
 Lyle Chapman
 
 Pre-Press Supervisor
 Torch Publishing Co.
 47 Allingham Street, Condell Park 2200, NSW,
 Australia
 612 9795 
 http://www.torchpublishing.com.au
 
 
 
 --
 SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
 Subscription info and FAQs:
 http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
 




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.764 / Virus Database: 511 - Release Date: 15/09/2004
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.764 / Virus Database: 511 - Release Date: 15/09/2004
 

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] New website rocks!

2004-09-16 Thread Paul Robinson




Looks great
and works fine in Firefox 0.9. 

Checked it in IE 6 SP1 and I can't click on any link or select text on
the left hand half of the front page. Looks like a div is overlaying
it. This wouldn't be a problem except the people we're trying to move
away from windows would most likely be using IE. (exact version is
6.0.2800.1106 if anyone else can confirm).

HTH,
Paul

Jeff Waugh wrote:

  quote who="Pia Smith"

  
  
http://www.linux.org.au

  
  
  
  
Rock on Australia,

  
  
Phwoar! Sweet! ROCK ON AUSTRALIA!

- Jeff

  



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

RE: [SLUG] New website rocks!

2004-09-16 Thread Rowling, Jill
Hi all,

Yes, I can confirm under IE6 SP1 6.0.2800.1106 the left hand text is not
selectable, but I have no probs with that as it shows up fine under view
source.
Nice site though.
Cheers,

Jill.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, 17 September 2004 11:47 AM
To: SLUG
Cc: linux-aus
Subject: Re: [SLUG] New website rocks!


Looks great and works fine in Firefox 0.9. 

Checked it in IE 6 SP1 and I can't click on any link or select text on the
left hand half of the front page. Looks like a div is overlaying it. This
wouldn't be a problem except the people we're trying to move away from
windows would most likely be using IE. (exact version is 6.0.2800.1106 if
anyone else can confirm).

HTH,
Paul

Jeff Waugh wrote: 
quote who=Pia Smith

  
http://www.linux.org.au


  
Rock on Australia,


Phwoar! Sweet! ROCK ON AUSTRALIA!

- Jeff

  

--
IMPORTANT NOTICES
This email (including any documents referred to in, or attached, to this
email) may contain information that is personal, confidential or the subject
of copyright or other proprietary rights in favour of Aristocrat, its
affiliates or third parties. This email is intended only for the named
addressee. Any privacy, confidence, copyright or other proprietary rights in
favour of Aristocrat, its affiliates or third parties, is not lost because
this email was sent to you by mistake.

If you received this email by mistake you should: (i) not copy, disclose,
distribute or otherwise use it, or its contents, without the consent of
Aristocrat or the owner of the relevant rights; (ii) let us know of the
mistake by reply email or by telephone (+61 2 9413 6300); and (iii) delete
it from your system and destroy all copies.

Any personal information contained in this email must be handled in
accordance with applicable privacy laws.

Electronic and internet communications can be interfered with or affected by
viruses and other defects. As a result, such communications may not be
successfully received or, if received, may cause interference with the
integrity of receiving, processing or related systems (including hardware,
software and data or information on, or using, that hardware or software).
Aristocrat gives no assurances in relation to these matters.

If you have any doubts about the veracity or integrity of any electronic
communication we appear to have sent you, please call +61 2 9413 6300 for
clarification.
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


RE: [SLUG] Debian sarge on vmware

2004-09-16 Thread Robert Tillsley
Finally got gnome running. The vmware driver needed to have no default
depth chosen. I then got the following error when starting gnome:
oafiid:gnome_Settingsdaemon had to restart too many times or something
like that. I re-did apt-get install gnome-core and now only the
screensaver isn't working.

Robert Tillsley
 
Network Administrator
St Vincent's College
www.stvincents.nsw.edu.au


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Tillsley
 Sent: Tuesday, 14 September 2004 8:23 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [SLUG] Debian sarge on vmware
 
 
 Oops, yep, that was it. Very silly of me.
 
 Cheers
 
 Robert Tillsley
  
 Network Administrator
 St Vincent's College
 www.stvincents.nsw.edu.au
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Ryan Tsai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, 13 September 2004 11:07 AM
  To: Robert Tillsley
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [SLUG] Debian sarge on vmware
  
  
  is xserver-xfree86 installed?
  
  
  - Original Message -
  From: Robert Tillsley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 10:17 AM
  Subject: [SLUG] Debian sarge on vmware
  
  
   I've got a test server setup in vmware running sarge (2.6 kernel).
   
   I've got two problems that I'm having trouble resolving:
   
   The first is that I can't get X working. Yes I know X on a server
   shouldn't be necessary on a server, but I'm playing with 
  vmware. The
   error I get is:
   
   GDM: Xserver not found: /usr/X11R6/bin/X : -audit 0 auth
   /var/lib/gdm/:0.Xauth -nolisten tcp vt7
   Error: Command could not be executed!
   Please install the X server or edit /etc/gdm/gdm.conf to 
  point to the
   right place.
   
   Now I installed xfree68, but there is no X in that folder.
  Can anyone
   give me an idea of where to start troubleshooting?
   
   The other thing was in regard to installing the vmware
  tools. The menu
   which is meant to do it, doesn't work (I think its because its not
   designed to work with debian). Its asks if you want to and then 
   doesn't provide any feedback as to its lack of success. In 
  the bottom
   left of the vmware screen is says as it did before the 
 attempt that
   the vmware tools aren't installed. Any help would be appreciated.
   
   Cheers
   
   Robert Tillsley

   Network Administrator
   St Vincent's College
   www.stvincents.nsw.edu.au
   
   --
   SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - 
http://slug.org.au/ 
  Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
 

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] Re: New website rocks!

2004-09-16 Thread Ashley Maher
Ahh, sorry disagree.
Regards,
Ashley
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


RE: [SLUG] New website rocks!

2004-09-16 Thread Stuart Cooper
I just tried to go there again 
(http://www.linux.org.au)
and it's reverting to http://old.linux.org.au//

Maybe the new server is down-- it couldn't
handle the SLUGdot effect!!

Stuart.

Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
http://au.movies.yahoo.com
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] New website rocks!

2004-09-16 Thread Dean Hamstead
yep, something killed it good
whos hosting it, and what is it running on? (der linux, but hardware)
Dean
Stuart Cooper wrote:
I just tried to go there again 
(http://www.linux.org.au)
and it's reverting to http://old.linux.org.au//

Maybe the new server is down-- it couldn't
handle the SLUGdot effect!!
Stuart.
Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
http://au.movies.yahoo.com
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] New website rocks!

2004-09-16 Thread John Clarke
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 02:06:26 +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:

 yep, something killed it good

I've just tried from three places: work, via connect.com.au, home, via
Internode, and Zip's (Pacific) shell server (text only).  All show the
new page.

Are you sure it's not a problem at your end?


Cheers,

John
-- 
SCSI is *NOT* magic. There are *fundamental technical reasons* why 
it is necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and then. 
-- John Woods 
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] New website rocks!

2004-09-16 Thread Paul Robinson




I was seeing
the new site (hence earlier posts) but did, for about 30 mins, get
redirected to old.linux.org.au.. The new site is now back up though.

Paul

John Clarke wrote:

  On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 02:06:26 +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:

  
  
yep, something killed it good

  
  
I've just tried from three places: work, via connect.com.au, home, via
Internode, and Zip's (Pacific) shell server (text only).  All show the
new page.

Are you sure it's not a problem at your end?


Cheers,

John
  



-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Re: [SLUG] New website rocks!

2004-09-16 Thread Michael Lake
John Clarke wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 02:06:26 +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
yep, something killed it good
I've just tried from three places: work, via connect.com.au, home, via
Internode, and Zip's (Pacific) shell server (text only).  All show the
new page.
Are you sure it's not a problem at your end?
I also saw it revert to the old pages.
I wouldn't describe the new site as something that 'rocks'. What's a 
geek's definition of 'rocks' in the context of web sites ? :-)
Oh that question is prob something thats best for a slug-chat :-)

Mike
--
Michael Lake
Chemistry, Materials  Forensic Science, UTS
Ph: 9514 1725 Fx: 9514 1460

--
UTS CRICOS Provider Code:  00099F
DISCLAIMER: This email message and any accompanying attachments may contain
confidential information.  If you are not the intended recipient, do not
read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments.  If
you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately
and delete this message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and with authority,
states them to be the views the University of Technology Sydney. Before
opening any attachments, please check them for viruses and defects.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] New website rocks!

2004-09-16 Thread Dean Hamstead
NOW its working.
it was working this morning, but when i saw the post that it was
down and so i checked it and had the same result
here at work we area connected via commindico
  1   10 ms   10 ms   10 ms  172.16.2.254
  2   10 ms15 ms   10 ms  eth1-bdr3.pen.pnc.com.au [203.91.245.
  315 ms   10 ms16 ms  eth4-bdr2.pen.pnc.com.au [203.91.225.
  463 ms *   78 ms  105.54.220.203.comindico.com.au [203.
  546 ms79 ms * fe0-0.wsr01-stge-pth.comindico.com.au
8.55]
  663 ms78 ms78 ms  eftel-link.pth.comindico.com.au [203.
  762 ms63 ms   297 ms  indigo-gw.per.dft.net.au [202.61.225.
  862 ms79 ms   109 ms  digital.linux.org.au [202.0.185.5]
thats pretty close
Dean
John Clarke wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 02:06:26 +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:

yep, something killed it good

I've just tried from three places: work, via connect.com.au, home, via
Internode, and Zip's (Pacific) shell server (text only).  All show the
new page.
Are you sure it's not a problem at your end?
Cheers,
John
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [Web-team] Re: [SLUG] New website rocks!

2004-09-16 Thread Stewart Smith
First of all, thanks for the feedback - it is appreciated

Brian Robson said:
 The idea of having a new website for LA is great, but this new website
 does not ROCK at all.  It has serious design and usability errors, a
 few of which are outlined below.  But these are easily fixed.

I wouldn't really call them too serious... but you're right, they are
easily fixed. We've tried (over the past few weeks/months/whatever) to fix
up most issues with standards compliance and consistency across rendering
engines (this is tricky). Some of the smaller things have escaped this
initial deployment - but hey, when you release something to a wide
audience - you instantly get a set of good bug reports :)

 SLUGGers should not be deluded - good web sites only come from hard
 work, good content and attention to detail (just like programming) and
 not from having graphics designers using the latest fashion in
 typefaces and colour schemes.  A good website is not made by deluding
 oneself that your own site is the best, and that critism is
 inappropriate or the critic must be a nasty person.

Exactly. We've tried to keep to these principles with the new LA site. Of
course, some things slip through - but they're easily fixed :)
A lot of hard work has gone into this one :)

 Designing website is now a technology taught at TAFE (there are heaps
 of books on usability) and has not been a guru craft or a black art
 since 1998. Wages for people who build build sites have fallen from
 $130 per hour to $30 per hour.

But *good* sites that are standards compliant, cross-rendering engine and
compatible with accessibility stuff is hard. People still get paid very
well for being able to do this.
I'm not an expert, and either is most of the other people working on the
team - but we do know some, and they've been invaluable over the
development period of giving us some assistance when they can.
I strongly encourage experts to help us :) contributions are welcome!

 1.  The logo on the main page can be clicked, and when it is, it
 displays the SAME page again.  Whilst it is normal for the logo when
 clicked to return to the home page or all subsidiary pages, this is a
 big no-no on the main page.  All textbooks on usability recommend
 against having anything which simply displays the same page, as users
 find it very confusing.

Good argument - but point is arguable... consistency across each page?
Hrrm... one for thought. May change it... not sure...

 2.  None of the images are sized with width= and height= tags.  This
 causes the page to jump around while it's loading, and this is even
 more annoying on dial up lines and on the first visit.  The worst
 example is the main logo, because it's above the fold on the first
 page.

Yes - this is a known flaw with the current layout. I plan to fix this by
going through with id's and css foo sometime soon. It was not deemed a
show stopper.

 3. The Linux Australia title includes a trailing space.

Bug - will be fixed.

 4.  The menu choice at the top left includes links to things on the
 site and off the site.  This is bad practice (a) it confuses the users
 and (b) Do your really want to provide links for your users to leave
 your site at the top of your main page.  (you are a dill if you do).

(top right i hope you mean... unless some bug has crept in :)

These 'external' sites are actually run by linux australia. Linux.conf.au
comes under our banner (even though it is very much delegated to the lca
organisers). We also run the opensource.org.au domain.
We don't see these to be problematic - far from it, we see them as useful
links into the .au open source space.
 5.  The font at the very bottom of the page is far too small.  It's
 only minor info to be sure, but the font is still too small.  If it's
 not to be read, then simply take it off.  Also, this bit has weird
 added spaces which are just confusing and do not add to the enjoyment.

Bug has crept in - someone changed the CSS to have a hard font size of 9.
Will fix this to be a relative size.
 6.  Under the heading Sept 10th, RSS, there is a  symbol, which is
 perhaps trying to look like a diamond replacing a dot point.  It's made
 out of the gt and lt characters.  In fact it looks weird, like a coding
 error to anyone who has seen faulty web pages (all of us). Why not just
 use a bolded asterisk???

Will examine - the RSS stuff has gone through a couple of revisions and
we're still getting everything working just right.
 7.  At the top, the link to linux.conf.au does not work.  Was there any
 testing at all???  The destination underneath is not the same as the
 displayed text neither. The www (and the trailing slash for
 directories) should be on all href= links.

Currently fixed. Was a fault in the migration process (not as easy as
you'd think).
 8.  The main page link Membership goes to the Membership Database
 which is not the same thing, and confusing to users.  Closer reading of
 the Membership Database page does tell how to join. 

Re: [SLUG] New website rocks!

2004-09-16 Thread Terry Collins
someone training for user support {:-) wrote:

 Are you sure it's not a problem at your end?

ROFL.

Nope, it was definitely a site problem.
Working now.

Definitely slow.

I preferred the old one myself. There wasn't this question of where to
find stuff?.

-- 
   Terry Collins {:-)}}} email: terryc at woa.com.au  www:
http://www.woa.com.au  
   Wombat Outdoor Adventures Bicycles, Computers, GIS, Printing,
Publishing

 People without trees are like fish without clean water
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [Linux-aus] Re: [SLUG] New website rocks!

2004-09-16 Thread Stewart Smith
Paul Robinson said:
 Looks great and works fine in Firefox 0.9.

rockin!

 Checked it in IE 6 SP1 and I can't click on any link or select text on
 the left hand half of the front page. Looks like a div is overlaying
 it.  This wouldn't be a problem except the people we're trying to move
 away  from windows would most likely be using IE. (exact version is
 6.0.2800.1106 if anyone else can confirm).

Okay... thanks for the report. We're aware of some more issues with IE. It
seems that IE can behave *very* differently depending on what version of
Windows your running. I only have an NT4 license, so have been doing
testing on it. It looks like i'm going to have to get an XP one just for
this.
We are currently investigating this issue though, and it will be fixed
shortly.
 Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Pia Smith
http://www.linux.org.au
Rock on Australia,
Phwoar! Sweet! ROCK ON AUSTRALIA!

ahh yes... we rock.

-- 
Stewart Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.flamingspork.com


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [Web-team] Re: [SLUG] New website rocks!

2004-09-16 Thread James Gregory
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 14:56 +1000, Stewart Smith wrote:

 Yes. Will be clarified in the next memberdb release. Wit the main website
 largely done now (apart from fixups and maintenance) i should be able to
 spend more time getting memberdb up to scratch. In my defense - i'm only
 currently calling it version 0.2 :)
 
 Thank you very much for your valuable feedback - it is much appreciated.

Any chance you could make the source available? That way you can get
patches from web-ninjas everywhere to make it better.

James.

-- 
James Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED]


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Re: [Web-team] Re: [SLUG] New website rocks!

2004-09-16 Thread Stewart Smith
James Gregory said:
 Any chance you could make the source available? That way you can get
 patches from web-ninjas everywhere to make it better.

This probably does make sense, yes.

We'll discuss this within ctte/web team - i don't forsee any objections,
probably just do a quick check to make sure there's nothing in the history
that needs protecting.
Since (very occationally) we need to restrict parts of the website (namely
sections of minutes) - often for legal reasons - we may have to work
something out there.
We keep the site in tla (GNU Arch), so publishing an archive is easy
(mmm... merges :)
Will keep you posted.

-- 
Stewart Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.flamingspork.com


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Re: Re: How to fix a memory leak in an old kernel

2004-09-16 Thread amos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2004 12:21:59 +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(with JRE 1.4.2-05) been more useable, but even then, when Eclipse 
runs out of memory, I have to reboot the machine.

That's very strange - have you tried restartting Eclipse? How about 
increasing the JVM's
memory limits (the -Xmx/-Xms flags)?

When Eclipse runs out of memory, I can't restart it because it crashes 
with an java.lang.OutOfMemoryError. That's why I reboot my machine.

As for increasing the memory limits, once Eclipse runs out of memory, no 
amount of memory flag tweaking will make Eclipse run again until I 
reboot the machine.

In general - a program shouldn't cause the system to require a reboot 
just by hogging memory.

I agree. However, since I'm using an earlier version of the kernel, I'm 
suspecting a kernel problem. But that's my guess.
After reading what you wrote above I agree - it sounds like a kernel
memory leak. Do you have statistics about the kernel memory usage (e.g.
vmstat)?
--Amos
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html