Re: [SLUG] Brain Freeze - ADSL

2006-12-12 Thread Zhasper

On 12/12/06, Oliver Hookins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Not quite right, you still have layer 2 frames which are disassembled
and reassembled. However your device is operating as a simple ethernet
(or ATM if your ISP supports it) bridge rather than also encapsulating
the traffic in PPP which is the norm, hence less overheads.


IIRC (and I'm sure someone will correct me if I don't), the famous
1492-byte MTU on DSL connections is caused by the 8 bytes of  PPPoE
headers taking up part of the 1500-byte ethernet frame.

Switching to L2 removes that overhead, which has a few benefits:
avoids mysterious MTU issues, means that 1500-byte packets on the
ethernet segment don't have to be re-packaged as 1492-byte packets to
go over the DSL segment (I think this is what O was talking about),
etc.

/me sits back and awaits flameage


--
There is nothing more worthy of contempt than a man who quotes himself
- Zhasper, 2004
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Brain Freeze - ADSL

2006-12-12 Thread Michael Fox


On 12/12/2006, at 8:12 PM, Zhasper wrote:


On 12/12/06, Oliver Hookins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Not quite right, you still have layer 2 frames which are disassembled
and reassembled. However your device is operating as a simple  
ethernet
(or ATM if your ISP supports it) bridge rather than also  
encapsulating

the traffic in PPP which is the norm, hence less overheads.


IIRC (and I'm sure someone will correct me if I don't), the famous
1492-byte MTU on DSL connections is caused by the 8 bytes of  PPPoE
headers taking up part of the 1500-byte ethernet frame.

Switching to L2 removes that overhead, which has a few benefits:
avoids mysterious MTU issues, means that 1500-byte packets on the
ethernet segment don't have to be re-packaged as 1492-byte packets to
go over the DSL segment (I think this is what O was talking about),
etc.

/me sits back and awaits flameage


I personally use PPPoA from my Cisco and this solves the PPPoE MTU  
problem too :)

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] Re: Brain Freeze - ADSL

2006-12-12 Thread Ben Buxton
Zhasper wrote:
 On 12/12/06, Oliver Hookins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

 Not quite right, you still have layer 2 frames which are disassembled
 and reassembled. However your device is operating as a simple ethernet
 (or ATM if your ISP supports it) bridge rather than also encapsulating
 the traffic in PPP which is the norm, hence less overheads.
 
 IIRC (and I'm sure someone will correct me if I don't), the famous
 1492-byte MTU on DSL connections is caused by the 8 bytes of  PPPoE
 headers taking up part of the 1500-byte ethernet frame.
 
 Switching to L2 removes that overhead, which has a few benefits:
 avoids mysterious MTU issues, means that 1500-byte packets on the
 ethernet segment don't have to be re-packaged as 1492-byte packets to
 go over the DSL segment (I think this is what O was talking about),
 etc.
 

There's more to it that that. If it's telstra DSL, there's also L2TP
overhead - that's the tunnel that takes a load of aggregated PPP
sessions and dumps them onto your ISPs ppp termination box.

The actual telstra-recommended MTU that ISPs generally force is more
like 1452.

BB

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Brain Freeze - ADSL

2006-12-12 Thread O Plameras

Oliver Hookins wrote:

O Plameras wrote:

Voytek Eymont wrote:

On Mon, December 11, 2006 11:21 am, Scott Waller (Lots of Watts) wrote:
 Finally changed over to Layer2 1.5 meg
 

blah blah blah.  And am having problems with my setup.



Scott, dumb question:
  


I thought about this.


what's the advantage of having a 'Layer2' connection over the usual
'userid/password/login' connection ?


  


Better throughput than Layer3, in general.  Devices on Layer2  work  
less as hard than
devices on Layer3. Layer3 assembles data before send and 
dis-assembles at receive.

Layer2 does not. So, less latency.


Not quite right, you still have layer 2 frames which are disassembled 
and reassembled. However your device is operating as a simple ethernet 
(or ATM if your ISP supports it) bridge rather than also encapsulating 
the traffic in PPP which is the norm, hence less overheads.

A somewhat detailed description.

1. Layer 2 networks are connected together using hubs, bridges and 
switches. Common denominator
is that these devices only forward frames. None of these devices have to 
disassemble or reassemble data.

Specifically,

1.1 Hubs take each frame that is received and send duplicate frames 
simultaneously out to all other ports.


1.2 Bridges forward broadcasts between two connected networks until they 
have located all hosts.


1.3 Switches forward broadcast traffic only when it doesn't know where a 
host is.


1.4 Because nothing is done to the data along the way, layer 2 networks 
are often

considered to be 'faster' than a layer 3 network.

2. Layer 3 networks are built to run on top of layer 2 networks.

2.1 In an IP  layer 3 network, the IP  portion of the datagram has to be 
read.


2.2 This requires stripping off the datalink layer frame information.

2.3 Once the protocol frame information is stripped, the IP  datagram 
has to be reassembled.


2.4 Once the IP  datagram is reassembled, the hop count has to be 
decremented,
the header checksum has to be recalculated, a lookup for routing must be 
made,
and only then can the IP datagram be chopped back up and inserted into 
frames

and transmitted to the next hop. All of this takes extra time.


O Plameras

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] ADSL without paying for a phone line?

2006-12-12 Thread Adam Kennedy

If it exists in your area, the best you can hope for is cable.

This is pretty fast down, pretty slow up.

But if you aren't running a home webserver or doing a lot of 
bittorrenting, it should be just fine.


At least _I_ think it's just fine... compared to the 
100Mb-ethernet-to-the-bedroom I had at university (the perk of being the 
network sysadmin at the college) all this stuff is slow anyway.


Personally I don't find the difference between cable and ADSL very 
large, and the cable is MUCH MUCH MUCH more reliable. As in I've only 
ever heard of one person that has ever had trouble reliable.


And I can get 1Mb a second to my server in the US, so that's everything 
I need ok :)


Adam K

Sonia Hamilton wrote:

(slightly OT...)

Is there a way of getting ADSL at home without paying for a landline? I
use my mobile for everything, and don't use the landline but am paying
for it to run ADSL on.

I know there's things like wireless from http://www.unwired.com.au/, but
to get decent downloads the costs would work out the same.


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] ISP in Sydney??

2006-12-12 Thread Nathan Eckenrode
My wife and I are quite possibly moving to Sydney - maybe to Manly - in a 
couple of months. I go to school online and need a high speed connection, 
preferrably one with a static IP address, any recommendations for which ISP 
is 'best'?

Thanks.

PS coming from New York and I'm the only Yank in the family.
-- 
Nathan D.Eckenrode
www.EckenrodeHouse.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
646.942.7669


pgpEYhalRsHDa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Re: [SLUG] ISP in Sydney??

2006-12-12 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Nathan Eckenrode wrote:

 My wife and I are quite possibly moving to Sydney - maybe to Manly - in a 
 couple of months. I go to school online and need a high speed connection, 
 preferrably one with a static IP address, any recommendations for which ISP 
 is 'best'?

Hi Nathan,

You should probablt get ADSL, but don't expect it to be as cheap or
as fast as what you get in the US :-).

Best advice is to avoid the big ISPs like Telstra (Bigpond) and
Optus because they are usually pretty clueless. 

The best bet would be to look here in the broadband choice :

http://bc.whirlpool.net.au/

and chose an ISP that way.

Erik
-- 
+---+
  Erik de Castro Lopo
+---+
We can build a better product than Linux -- Microsoft
Corp.'s Windows operating-system chief, Jim Allchin.
One has to wonder why, with their huge resources, they haven't.
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] ISP in Sydney??

2006-12-12 Thread DaZZa

On 12/13/06, Nathan Eckenrode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

My wife and I are quite possibly moving to Sydney - maybe to Manly - in a
couple of months. I go to school online and need a high speed connection,
preferrably one with a static IP address, any recommendations for which ISP
is 'best'?


Nathan.

Until you actually get here and decide where you're living, it's
really difficult to say.

What I can say is for you to NOT expect the broadband offerings in
Australia to be either as cheap or as fast as the mainstream cities in
the US have available.

Currently, you can get ADSL 1 almost everywhere in Sydney - with
Telstra's recent decision to uncap the artificial ADSL download speeds
they have previously imposed, you can get up to 8 meg download. If
you're fortunate enough to live somewhere close to an exchange which
has ADSL2+, you can get up to 20 meg download speed through Telstra,
22 meg through some of the alternate providers.

It's probably already been pointed out, but you should look at the
following web site

http://bc.whirlpool.net.au

Once you've got your place and phone installed, you can check out the
options there and find the best plan. Depending on how financially
conscious you are, I'd suggest *not* using Telstra except as a last
resort - they are the most expensive option available.

DaZZa
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] Gnome WeatherApplet

2006-12-12 Thread John

Hi,

Is there a reason why I cannot get the BoM radar map to show in the Gnome
WeatherApplet after I input the url into :preferences:general:?

John
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] ISP in Sydney??

2006-12-12 Thread Carlo Sogono

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:

You should probablt get ADSL, but don't expect it to be as cheap or
as fast as what you get in the US :-).


When shopping for ISP's you would often encounter the word quota, a 
word that I believe is non-existent in American ISP's. =P



Best advice is to avoid the big ISPs like Telstra (Bigpond) and
Optus because they are usually pretty clueless. 


I have had consistent download speeds with Internode. In 90% of the time 
I get to utilise my 1.5Mbps connection. 150k/sec steady downloads on 
most sites including non-Aussie ones.


Hope that helps,
Carlo



The best bet would be to look here in the broadband choice :

http://bc.whirlpool.net.au/

and chose an ISP that way.

Erik


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Gnome WeatherApplet

2006-12-12 Thread John Clarke
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:03:40 +1100, John wrote:

 Is there a reason why I cannot get the BoM radar map to show in the Gnome
 WeatherApplet after I input the url into :preferences:general:?

It works for me.  The URL I'm using is:

http://mirror.bom.gov.au/radar/IDR033.gif

(for Sydney).


Cheers,

John
-- 
Minis on the other hand are just the wrong size. Too small to work on 
directly and too large to put upside down on the workbench.
-- Craig 'Stevo' Stephenson
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] ISP in Sydney??

2006-12-12 Thread Rev Simon Rumble
This one time, at band camp, Carlo Sogono wrote:

 When shopping for ISP's you would often encounter the word quota, a 
 word that I believe is non-existent in American ISP's. =P

You'll also encounter the word unlimited, which is never the case.

Similarly when looking at mobile and home phones, you'll get the concept 
of a cap, which is nothing like what you expect from the term.

Oh and when you order your phone line, make sure you get the rep to put 
ADSL Required on the order, or you might not be able to get it.

-- 
Rev Simon Rumble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rumble.net


If I were on life-support, I'd rather have it run by a Gameboy
 than a Windows box.
 - Cliff Wells in comp.lang.python
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Gnome WeatherApplet

2006-12-12 Thread John

Thanks John. It helps if you use the right url :-)

J

On 12/13/06, John Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:03:40 +1100, John wrote:

 Is there a reason why I cannot get the BoM radar map to show in the
Gnome
 WeatherApplet after I input the url into :preferences:general:?

It works for me.  The URL I'm using is:

http://mirror.bom.gov.au/radar/IDR033.gif

(for Sydney).


Cheers,

John
--
Minis on the other hand are just the wrong size. Too small to work on
directly and too large to put upside down on the workbench.
-- Craig 'Stevo' Stephenson
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Determining PCI version

2006-12-12 Thread Rev Simon Rumble
This one time, at band camp, Howard Lowndes wrote:
 I need to be able to determine whether a mobo I have can handle PCI v2.2
 
 What is the best way of doing this?

Indeed, I'm having a similar problem in that my server's mobo is very 
finicky about the PCI cards it accepts.

My approach so far, though I haven't got anything definitive right now, 
is to look up the chips for the PCI bridge reported by lspci.  This 
might help you.

-- 
Rev Simon Rumble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rumble.net


 Bore, n. A person who talks when you wish him to listen.
- Ambrose Bierce: The Devil's Dictionary
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Determining PCI version

2006-12-12 Thread David Gillies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Howard Lowndes wrote:
 I need to be able to determine whether a mobo I have can handle PCI v2.2
 
 What is the best way of doing this?
 

dmidecode may give you some extra info. I'm looking now, it doesn't
specifically state the PCI version, but it reports other info which may
help.

- --
dave.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFf00MhPPdWeHRgaoRAoAVAJ9X+bovJ4wNcItyIjHzQsh/XJjLDgCfZQfa
l2wIQ5gBJmMI1QR4LG0qfWQ=
=TLiW
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html