[SLUG] olympics viewing

2008-08-12 Thread Luke Vanderfluit

Hi.

Does anyone know of a site where I can watch the olympics using a linux 
(non-windows) codec?
I cant stand au.yahoo. Most other major sites are for their national 
viewing only (NBC, BBC etc.)

It seems youtube is removing posts of events.

I could go the torrent route but maybe there's a site out there that has 
what Im looking for...



Kind regards.
Luke.
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] olympics viewing

2008-08-12 Thread Ian Wienand
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Luke Vanderfluit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Does anyone know of a site where I can watch the olympics using a linux
 (non-windows) codec?

As much as flash is a Linux codec, you could try the instructions for
viewing on Youtube at [1]

[1] http://valleywag.com/5034896/how-to-crack-youtubes-olympics-channel

-i
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] olympics viewing

2008-08-12 Thread Ken Foskey

http://newblogonstuff.blogspot.com/2008/08/how-to-watch-live-olympics-on-linux.html

I cannot get it working because I cannot get the XML file.  I think that
the service has blocked new users by removing the XML.

Here is teh GUI version of the above (0.4) download the deb and install
I am using amd64 so force architecture.

http://ubuntu-virginia.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=728683

sudo dpkg -i --force-architecture ../gsopcast_0.4.0-2_i386.deb 


All of this is useless without the channel information that is just not
working right now.  If anyone has a copy please forward me a copy.

Ta
Ken
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Email Domains --- handling of invalid email addresses

2008-08-12 Thread Ken Foskey
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 13:29 +1000, R.G.Salisbury wrote:

 Some ISP's do bounce a message , so you know the status , so you know it is 
 futile to try again to the same address.

Knowing the dictionary attacks that spammers do and how often I get
thousands (litterally) of bounced emails that they send out using my
email address,  I vote for no response.  If the email server spec allows
you to tell when the mail is sent that is different,  just that bounced
reply is a very bad idea.

Ken

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Email Domains --- handling of invalid email addresses

2008-08-12 Thread Mary Gardiner
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008, R.G.Salisbury wrote:
 Do the RFCs suggest a recommended policy?

RFC 2821: Simple Mail Transfer Protocol

It includes the following:

... a formal handoff of responsibility for the message occurs: the
protocol requires that a server accept responsibility for either
delivering a message or properly reporting the failure to do so.

If an SMTP server has accepted the task of relaying the mail and later
finds that the destination is incorrect or that the mail cannot be
delivered for some other reason, then it MUST construct an
undeliverable mail notification message and send it to the originator
of the undeliverable mail (as indicated by the reverse- path). Formats
specified for non-delivery reports by other standards (see, for example,
[24, 25]) SHOULD be used if possible.

That said, many mail server administrators accept and eat viruses and
sometimes spam without ever sending an error. (Spam may or may not be
stored somewhere where the addressee can optionally retrieve it, viruses
not so much.) It's far less common to accept and eat mail to entirely
non-valid addresses. The standard practice as far as I know is to reject
them immediately whereever possible (ie not to accept them, go check
with the list of valid users, and then generate a bounce and send it out
separately).

-Mary
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Email Domains --- handling of invalid email addresses

2008-08-12 Thread Peter Chubb
 R == R G Salisbury R.G.Salisbury writes:

R Some ISP's (exetel ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]) is one, that do
R not bounce notices when you send to an invalid email address).

R Some ISP's do bounce a message , so you know the status , so you
R know it is futile to try again to the same address.

The best thing to do is to refuse to accept a  message for an invalid
user at SMTP conversation time.  That way the sending MX gets to
notice the problem, and generate a bounce iff appropriate.


As a general rule bounces are evil.  I'm planning to give a talk at
SLUG on this next month, if the committee agree
--
Dr Peter Chubb  http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au  peterc AT gelato.unsw.edu.au
http://www.ertos.nicta.com.au   ERTOS within National ICT Australia
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Email Domains --- handling of invalid email addresses

2008-08-12 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Peter Chubb wrote:

 I'm planning to give a talk at
 SLUG on this next month, if the committee agree

I'm not on the committee, but if I was, I'd be voting +1 on
this :-).

Cheers,
Erik
-- 
-
Erik de Castro Lopo
-
Every method you use to prevent or find bugs leaves a residue of
subtler bugs against which those methods are ineffectual.
-- Bruce Beizer's Pesticide Paradox
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] Re: Email Domains --- handling of invalid email addresses

2008-08-12 Thread Rob Weir
On 13 Aug 2008, R. G. Salisbury wrote:
 Some ISP's  (exetel ... [EMAIL PROTECTED])is one, that do not
 bounce notices when you send to an invalid email address).

 Some ISP's do bounce a message , so you know the status , so you know
 it is futile to try again to the same address.

 Why ISP exetel doesn't bounce messages

That is fine.  They should /reject/ mails sent to non-existent
addresses, and then /your/ MTA could generate a bounce.  They don't even
seem to do that, and instead just accept mail for any user, which is
silly.

-- 
-rob

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html