Re: [SLUG] A little script help

2010-03-18 Thread Matthew Hannigan
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 06:56:54PM +1100, Peter Chubb wrote:
> I find password generated like that to be too hard to remember.

Yeah, same


I like http://www.multicians.org/thvv/gpw-js.html

The source is available also, in C and java versions.

So with a bit of coding you can adjust the length and
throw in numbers and punctuation if you like.

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Skype submitting SILK codec to IETF

2010-03-18 Thread Glen Turner
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 19:44 +1100, Amos Shapira wrote:
> What do people have to say about Skype open-sourcing and submitting
> their SILK codec to IETF as a proposed standard
> (http://share.skype.com/sites/en/2010/03/advances_in_audio.html)?

The IETF accepts RFCs which require patents in order to implement
as long as the submitter provides a patent license on RAND terms.

RAND terms without a royalty-free license are of no use for free
software.

In that respect this small print on the blog post is not promising:

> * Use of SILK is subject to the applicable licensing terms.
>   For more information please contact us.

But conversely https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1164/ says:

> Skype is currently contemplating the licensing terms. It is the
> intention that there will be a royalty free license option
> available to companies implementing the standard.

So we will just have to wait and see.

In practice, RFCs containing non-RF RAND patents have had a great
deal of difficulty progressing down the IETF standards track in
recent years (eg, Microsoft's terms for its patents in SenderID
doomed the progress of that draft RFC).

-- 
 Glen Turner
 www.gdt.id.au/~gdt

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Skype submitting SILK codec to IETF

2010-03-18 Thread Glen Turner
Let's see how this goes:

Subject: SILK IP License Request
From: Glen Turner
To: SILK Support
Message-ID: <1268956113.2084.30.ca...@ilion>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:18:35 +1030

Name: Glen Turner
Title: N/A
Company: N/A
Address: XX XX XX, X XX , Australia
E-mail: x...@xxx.xx.xx
Phone: +61 XXX XXX XXX (UTC+10:30)
SkypeID (optional): N/A
Product Name (optional): gstreamer
Description of how you intend to use SILK (optional): Implement a SILK
codec plugin for the GNOME gstreamer media processing libraries.
gstreamer is used by many Linux distributions for media support.

I note Skype's IPR Declaration to the IETF at
  https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1164/
states:
> Skype is currently contemplating the licensing terms. It is
> the intention that there will be a royalty free license
> option available to companies implementing the standard.


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] Skype submitting SILK codec to IETF

2010-03-18 Thread Amos Shapira
What do people have to say about Skype open-sourcing and submitting
their SILK codec to IETF as a proposed standard
(http://share.skype.com/sites/en/2010/03/advances_in_audio.html)?
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html