[SLUG] Re: [chat] yet another reason to advocate Linux

2010-04-15 Thread meryl
... the point of the article was that MS  Apple are using exploitative
child labour in sweatshop conditions. 

It's an interesting article, well worth the read. 

Meryl
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Re: [chat] yet another reason to advocate Linux

2010-04-15 Thread David Lloyd

Don't let this become a Linux only thing - whether one thinks Free as in
FSF, open source as in the OSI or supports proprietary Microsoft...child
labour is abhorrent regardless and has nothing to do with the freedom of
software.

It is, plain and simple, wrong.

DSL

-Original Message-
From: meryl gnu...@aromagardens.com.au
To: slug@slug.org.au
Subject: [SLUG] Re: [chat] yet another reason to advocate Linux
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:40:54 +1000

... the point of the article was that MS  Apple are using exploitative
child labour in sweatshop conditions. 

It's an interesting article, well worth the read. 

Meryl


-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Re: [chat] yet another reason to advocate Linux

2010-04-15 Thread Daniel Pittman
David Lloyd lloy0...@adam.com.au writes:

 Don't let this become a Linux only thing - whether one thinks Free as in
 FSF, open source as in the OSI or supports proprietary Microsoft...child
 labour is abhorrent regardless and has nothing to do with the freedom of
 software.

 It is, plain and simple, wrong.

...and don't mistake that this actually has much to do with those vendors: the
hardware you run Linux on is probably made in similar conditions, as are many
of the other facets.

(Also, don't mistake that just closing sweat-shops is the best answer, since a
 terrible job might be better than no job, and sometimes that is the result.
 Which really sucks, because those conditions *should* not exist, IMO.)

Daniel

Complexity, ain't it grand. :(

 -Original Message-
 From: meryl gnu...@aromagardens.com.au
 To: slug@slug.org.au
 Subject: [SLUG] Re: [chat] yet another reason to advocate Linux
 Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:40:54 +1000

 ... the point of the article was that MS  Apple are using exploitative
 child labour in sweatshop conditions. 

 It's an interesting article, well worth the read. 

 Meryl

-- 
✣ Daniel Pittman✉ dan...@rimspace.net☎ +61 401 155 707
   ♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] THE PIA wallet

2010-04-15 Thread jam
Guys
I've just setup an eeepc for my wife that runs karmic notebook remix

Minor fun-n-games to get the wireless to work, but all sorted except this PIA
If anybody has wise words it'll save me ages ...

Autologin and I get invited to enter the wallet password to enable the 
wireless. 
How do I do away with that, to have nm automatically start?

(yes I googled. yes tried libpam-keyring all else fails I'll build 
pam_keyring)

Thanks
James
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] THE PIA wallet

2010-04-15 Thread Martin Visser
Interestingly, I just installed Ubuntu 10.04 Beta 2 and if you don't specify
a password when asked to  store your WPA2 key, it warns you it is storing it
insecurely, but then you are done.

Regards, Martin

martinvisse...@gmail.com


On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:08 PM, jam j...@tigger.ws wrote:

 Guys
 I've just setup an eeepc for my wife that runs karmic notebook remix

 Minor fun-n-games to get the wireless to work, but all sorted except this
 PIA
 If anybody has wise words it'll save me ages ...

 Autologin and I get invited to enter the wallet password to enable the
 wireless.
 How do I do away with that, to have nm automatically start?

 (yes I googled. yes tried libpam-keyring all else fails I'll build
 pam_keyring)

 Thanks
 James
 --
 SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
 Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] THE PIA wallet

2010-04-15 Thread Ca'l
? Is the PIA Wallet a Cultural Cache for Pia Waugh ?;)

On 15 April 2010 19:08, jam j...@tigger.ws wrote:
 Guys
 I've just setup an eeepc for my wife that runs karmic notebook remix

 Minor fun-n-games to get the wireless to work, but all sorted except this PIA
 If anybody has wise words it'll save me ages ...

 Autologin and I get invited to enter the wallet password to enable the
 wireless.
 How do I do away with that, to have nm automatically start?

 (yes I googled. yes tried libpam-keyring all else fails I'll build
 pam_keyring)

 Thanks
 James
 --
 SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
 Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html




-- 
may you be guided by the trust
may truth be your rear guard
may you be placed in the void
Tibetan Book of the Dead
Trans: Evans-Wentz
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


[SLUG] slow webmail

2010-04-15 Thread Voytek Eymont
since yesterday, my Squirrel web mail is extremely slow, often to the
point of being unusable

other php pages also seem slower than normal
html pages seem to be served OK

but, Squirrel shows the problem most

looking with 'top' over 10 or 15 minutes, cpu oscillates from 0.3 to 30%

top - 08:04:09 up 885 days,  1:46,  2 users,  load average: 0.25, 0.37, 0.36
Tasks: 197 total,   3 running, 188 sleeping,   0 stopped,   6 zombie
Cpu(s):  2.3% us,  0.7% sy,  0.0% ni, 94.4% id,  2.6% wa,  0.0% hi,  0.0% si
Mem:   2336088k total,  2062432k used,   273656k free,   592732k buffers
Swap:  2031608k total,   408572k used,  1623036k free,   362396k cached

how can I t/shoot this further ?


-- 
Voytek

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Re: [chat] yet another reason to advocate Linux

2010-04-15 Thread Marghanita da Cruz

Daniel Pittman wrote:
snip

 Which really sucks, because those conditions *should* not exist, IMO.)

snip

It may be useful to consider Linux, FOSS and OSS in the 
context of

Peter Singer's 1971 article:
Famine, Affluence, and Morality
http://www.utilitarian.net/singer/by/1972.htm

Marghanita
--
Marghanita da Cruz
http://ramin.com.au
Tel: 0414-869202


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] slow webmail

2010-04-15 Thread Voytek Eymont

On Fri, April 16, 2010 9:07 am, Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
 Whoa!  You've got 400 MB of swap used.  That will slow things down.
 What's using the memory?  (You can get a process listing by memory
 usage in top; or install htop, it's a bit easier to navigate and
 prettier.)
 To sum: reduce memory usage or add RAM.

Aleksey, thanks

htop sorted by MEM% says:


  CPU[||  3.9%] Tasks: 196 total, 1 running
  Mem[|1073/2281MB] Load average: 0.92 0.60 0.45
  Swp[|||   398/1983MB] Uptime: 885 days(!), 04:13:36

  PID USER PRI  NI  VIRT   RES   SHR S CPU% MEM%   TIME+  Command
14346 clamav16   0  307M  274M  1376 S  0.0 12.0 33:34.01 clamd
14347 clamav16   0  307M  274M  1376 S  0.0 12.0  0:00.96 clamd
20232 amavis16   0 93580 79720  3248 S  0.0  3.4  0:14.29 amavisd
(ch7-avail)
20928 amavis20   0 88200 74256  3256 S  0.0  3.2  0:14.17 amavisd
(ch3-avail)
11290 amavis16   0 81756 68084  2756 S  0.0  2.9  0:05.96 amavisd
(master)
26064 root  16   0  100M 25096   860 S  0.0  1.1  0:46.86
/usr/sbin/saslauthd -m
26065 root  16   0  101M 25012   844 S  0.0  1.1  0:47.45
/usr/sbin/saslauthd -m
26068 root  17   0  100M 24868   844 S  0.0  1.1  0:47.25
/usr/sbin/saslauthd -m
26067 root  16   0  100M 24668   844 S  0.0  1.1  0:47.00
/usr/sbin/saslauthd -m
26066 root  16   0  100M 24508   844 S  0.0  1.0  0:46.89
/usr/sbin/saslauthd -m
  809 mysql 16   0  117M 22740  3272 S  0.0  1.0 20:58.79
/usr/sbin/mysqld --bas
  832 mysql 16   0  117M 22740  3272 S  0.0  1.0  0:00.00
/usr/sbin/mysqld --bas
(18 more 'mysqld lines)
...
11848 apache15   0 40268 22732  4660 S  0.0  1.0  0:06.59 /usr/sbin/httpd
12839 apache15   0 40336 22448  4336 S  0.0  1.0  0:06.82 /usr/sbin/httpd
(15 more 'httpd' lines)
...
15101 apache15   0 38344 19440  3360 S  0.0  0.8  0:01.65 /usr/sbin
18672 root  16   0 27144 14232  7064 S  0.0  0.6  0:01.53 /usr/sbin/httpd
21402 cacti 17   0 20412 10156  3856 S  0.0  0.4  0:00.28 php

server-status says:

Current Time: Friday, 16-Apr-2010 10:35:26 EST
Restart Time: Friday, 16-Apr-2010 08:11:38 EST
Parent Server Generation: 1
Server uptime: 2 hours 23 minutes 48 seconds
Total accesses: 5083 - Total Traffic: 160.3 MB
CPU Usage: u61.6 s6.03 cu.02 cs0 - .784% CPU load
.589 requests/sec - 19.0 kB/second - 32.3 kB/request
9 requests currently being processed, 11 idle workers

__..RCR_._CCCCC__..W_...






-- 
Voytek

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] slow webmail

2010-04-15 Thread Jobst Schmalenbach


Since squirrelmail needs to access a mailserver (imap) this could
be a case of comm problems between the 2.

check the logs of the imap server and see whether there are any problems.

it surprises me that you have 408572k of swap used  


this is not a flamebait
I know that people like long uptimes, but rebooting **DOES** solve some
problems  cause you have 888 days, have you considered???
/this is not a flamebait






On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 08:08:45AM +1000, Voytek Eymont (li...@sbt.net.au) 
wrote:
 since yesterday, my Squirrel web mail is extremely slow, often to the
 point of being unusable
 
 other php pages also seem slower than normal
 html pages seem to be served OK
 
 but, Squirrel shows the problem most
 
 looking with 'top' over 10 or 15 minutes, cpu oscillates from 0.3 to 30%
 
 top - 08:04:09 up 885 days,  1:46,  2 users,  load average: 0.25, 0.37, 0.36
 Tasks: 197 total,   3 running, 188 sleeping,   0 stopped,   6 zombie
 Cpu(s):  2.3% us,  0.7% sy,  0.0% ni, 94.4% id,  2.6% wa,  0.0% hi,  0.0% si
 Mem:   2336088k total,  2062432k used,   273656k free,   592732k buffers
 Swap:  2031608k total,   408572k used,  1623036k free,   362396k cached
 
 how can I t/shoot this further ?
 
 
 -- 
 Voytek
 
 -- 
 SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
 Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

-- 
#include signature.h

  | |0| |   Jobst Schmalenbach, jo...@barrett.com.au, General Manager
  | | |0|   Barrett Consulting Group P/L  The Meditation Room P/L
  |0|0|0|   +61 3 9532 7677, POBox 277, Caulfield South, 3162, Australia
-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] slow webmail

2010-04-15 Thread Daniel Pittman
Jobst Schmalenbach jo...@barrett.com.au writes:

[...]

 this is not a flamebait
 I know that people like long uptimes, but rebooting **DOES** solve some
 problems  cause you have 888 days, have you considered???
 /this is not a flamebait

It would probably help this suggestion if you provided some supporting
evidence for your position.  My first question, as you might imagine, is
which problems does this solve?

My usual follow-up to that is: are you actually solving the problem, or just
the current pain — taking a pain killer rather than fixing the bad back — and
probably destroying your chance to find the real cause of the problem in the
process?


Anyway, without your providing something to back up your statement it is as
meaningless as someone asserting the opposite: that rebooting is never the
right answer. :)

Daniel

-- 
✣ Daniel Pittman✉ dan...@rimspace.net☎ +61 401 155 707
   ♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] slow webmail

2010-04-15 Thread Voytek Eymont

On Fri, April 16, 2010 10:56 am, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:

 Since squirrelmail needs to access a mailserver (imap) this could
 be a case of comm problems between the 2.
 check the logs of the imap server and see whether there are any problems.
 it surprises me that you have 408572k of swap used 

Jobst,

the actual imapd utilization seems to have gone low during this time

http://sbt.net.au/imapd.gif

the actual problem seems to have stopped since about this morning

I haven't as yet looked through the logs


-- 
Voytek

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html