Re: [SLUG] Federal Gov Open Source Policy

2011-02-06 Thread Kevin Saenz
Also the problem is that Open source needs to jump through the same hoops 
proprietary software. That is a majority of the time they would need to be DSD 
approved and each open source project would need to pay a minimum of $50k to 
get DSD to qualify it. Without DSD approval open source will not get a look in 
when it comes to networks that are rated Protected and higher.



 imho, I would have thought that Open Standards are for more critical for a
 government to require the use and enforcement of.. But even this would be a
 great win for open source in general as this would also force big companies
 to support properly open standards in their own products, which then also
 increases the viability of open source products that also support the
 standard in the future when migrations are considered.
 
 But as far as active participation in open source is concerned, it would
 be great if any software commissioned by the government was then released as
 open source. This may be problematic though, as the government would
 (presumably) never actually write the software itself, but would outsource
 it's development. Companies that do write the software would then have an
 active interest in some kind of maintenance or ongoing support program with
 the government, and would probably see releasing the code to the public as
 an active threat to that interest. Still, the government could insist (as a
 large enough customer), and that would be beneficial too
 
 That said, obviously there are OS business models that work based upon the
 ongoing technical support requirements of organisations that do adopt the
 software, so working with a vendor that does this necessarily means that any
 bugs or features that the government finds or requires would be given back
 to the community as well.
 
 Anyway, at least it something, and in general I think that Kate Lundy has
 her head screwed on and is pushing in the right direction
 
 On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Kevin Saenz kevsa...@spinaweb.com.auwrote:
 
 It's been a while since I have responded to slug emails.
 
 You need to put this in to perspective. There are a number departments that
 actually use open source, to some extent. You must bear in mind that there
 are others who have a strictly microsoft.
 
 I know of one department 6 years ago required the skills of Linux and Unix
 people to convert the department from opensource to microsoft only
 environment, because said department employed a microsoft ranger, and to
 this date he is still their CIO.
 
 What you have to be aware to be successful with tenders or projects you
 need to sit on a board of vendors to even be considered for a job or
 contract for a scope of work. the Federal government is a large market and
 you have fight your case on a departmental and divisional level.
 
 there are other departments who employed the same web technology as
 President Obama.
 Yes Open source has a place in Public sector IT but sadly it's not in
 business critical areas of the sector, and it has been visible for a long
 time.
 
 
 
 
 
 The policy includes three principles as well as some draft text for
 government departments and agencies to include in future RFT documentation:
  * Principle 1:  Australian Government ICT procurement processes must
 actively and fairly consider all types of available software.
  * Principle 2: Suppliers must consider all types of available software
 when dealing with Australian Government agencies.
  * Principle 3:  Australian Government agencies will actively
 participate in open source software communities and contribute back where
 appropriate.
 
 http://www.katelundy.com.au/2011/02/03/welcome-news-for-open-source/comment-page-1/
 
 
 Policy available in HTML at
 
 http://www.finance.gov.au/publications/guide-to-open-source-software/index.html
 
 
 Marghanita
 --
 Marghanita da Cruz
 http://ramin.com.au
 Tel: 0414-869202
 
 
 --
 SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
 Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
 
 
 --
 SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
 Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
 
 -- 
 SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
 Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
 

--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] REMINDER: SLUG Monthly Meeting: 4th February 2011 - Lightning Talks!

2011-02-06 Thread Tim Ansell
They are held at the Google offices opposite Star City casino in the
Accenture building.

The address is level 5, 48 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont.

Tim
On Feb 4, 2011 10:10 AM, Kevin Waterson ke...@phpro.org wrote:
 Where are SLUG meetings held these days?

 K
 On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 11:20 +1100, Tim Ansell wrote:
 Just a reminder that SLUG is going ahead this Friday.

 There where a lot of awesome stuff at Linux.conf.au, if you went
 please give a lightning talk!

 Tim

 On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Tim Ansell mit...@mithis.com wrote:
  PLEASE NOTE: Due to a conflict with Linux.conf.au, the January SLUG
  meeting will be held a week later on **4th February 2010**.
 
  The following SLUG meeting will return to the last Friday of the month
  schedule, the date being the 25th of February.
 
  Location
  Google Sydney - 48 Pirrama Road, Pyrmont
 
  Summary
  * Date: Friday, 4th February 2011
  * Start time: Arrive at 6pm for a 6:30pm start
  * Format: Lightning talks - Theme; what I did at LCA.
  * == RSVP at [[http://slug.eventbrite.com]] ==
  * Suggest or sign up for a talk on the wiki[1]
 
   Details 
  This month we will only be having lightning talks[2]. We're looking for
  as many talks of a 5-7 minute duration as possible. If you are
interested
  in talking, please sign up on the wiki[1].
 
  [1] http://wiki.slug.org.au/january2011lightningtalks
  [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning_Talk
 
  Giving a lighting talk is a great way to show of the cool things you
are doing!
  You don't have to create slides or even be well prepared, just come
along and
  talks.
 
  Don't think you can give a talk, but have an idea for a talk you'd
  like to see? Add it to the **Talks I'd like to see** on the wiki page
[1]
 
  === Afterwards ===
 
  We'll be aiming to finish by 8 and will be heading
  to the Pyrmont Bridge Hotel afterwards.
 

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] REMINDER: SLUG Monthly Meeting: 4th February 2011 - Lightning Talks!

2011-02-06 Thread Kevin Waterson
Where are SLUG meetings held these days?

K
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 11:20 +1100, Tim Ansell wrote:
 Just a reminder that SLUG is going ahead this Friday.
 
 There where a lot of awesome stuff at Linux.conf.au, if you went
 please give a lightning talk!
 
 Tim
 
 On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Tim Ansell mit...@mithis.com wrote:
  PLEASE NOTE: Due to a conflict with Linux.conf.au, the January SLUG
  meeting will be held a week later on **4th February 2010**.
 
  The following SLUG meeting will return to the last Friday of the month
  schedule, the date being the 25th of February.
 
  Location
  Google Sydney - 48 Pirrama Road, Pyrmont
 
  Summary
   * Date: Friday, 4th February 2011
   * Start time: Arrive at 6pm for a 6:30pm start
   * Format: Lightning talks - Theme; what I did at LCA.
   * == RSVP at [[http://slug.eventbrite.com]] ==
   * Suggest or sign up for a talk on the wiki[1]
 
   Details 
  This month we will only be having lightning talks[2]. We're looking for
  as many talks of a 5-7 minute duration as possible. If you are interested
  in talking, please sign up on the wiki[1].
 
[1] http://wiki.slug.org.au/january2011lightningtalks
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightning_Talk
 
  Giving a lighting talk is a great way to show of the cool things you are 
  doing!
  You don't have to create slides or even be well prepared, just come along 
  and
  talks.
 
  Don't think you can give a talk, but have an idea for a talk you'd
  like to see? Add it to the **Talks I'd like to see** on the wiki page [1]
 
  === Afterwards ===
 
  We'll be aiming to finish by 8 and will be heading
  to the Pyrmont Bridge Hotel afterwards.
 

-- 
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


Re: [SLUG] Federal Gov Open Source Policy

2011-02-06 Thread Marghanita da Cruz

Hi All,

Following up on the postings here and Friday night's brief
discussion at SLUG, I have now created a page on the SLUG
wiki under advocacy.

See
http://wiki.slug.org.au/advocacy

Marghanita
Kevin Saenz wrote:

Also the problem is that Open source needs to jump through the same hoops 
proprietary software. That is a majority of the time they would need to be DSD 
approved and each open source project would need to pay a minimum of $50k to 
get DSD to qualify it. Without DSD approval open source will not get a look in 
when it comes to networks that are rated Protected and higher.




imho, I would have thought that Open Standards are for more critical for a
government to require the use and enforcement of.. But even this would be a
great win for open source in general as this would also force big companies
to support properly open standards in their own products, which then also
increases the viability of open source products that also support the
standard in the future when migrations are considered.

But as far as active participation in open source is concerned, it would
be great if any software commissioned by the government was then released as
open source. This may be problematic though, as the government would
(presumably) never actually write the software itself, but would outsource
it's development. Companies that do write the software would then have an
active interest in some kind of maintenance or ongoing support program with
the government, and would probably see releasing the code to the public as
an active threat to that interest. Still, the government could insist (as a
large enough customer), and that would be beneficial too

That said, obviously there are OS business models that work based upon the
ongoing technical support requirements of organisations that do adopt the
software, so working with a vendor that does this necessarily means that any
bugs or features that the government finds or requires would be given back
to the community as well.

Anyway, at least it something, and in general I think that Kate Lundy has
her head screwed on and is pushing in the right direction

On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Kevin Saenz kevsa...@spinaweb.com.auwrote:


It's been a while since I have responded to slug emails.

You need to put this in to perspective. There are a number departments that
actually use open source, to some extent. You must bear in mind that there
are others who have a strictly microsoft.

I know of one department 6 years ago required the skills of Linux and Unix
people to convert the department from opensource to microsoft only
environment, because said department employed a microsoft ranger, and to
this date he is still their CIO.

What you have to be aware to be successful with tenders or projects you
need to sit on a board of vendors to even be considered for a job or
contract for a scope of work. the Federal government is a large market and
you have fight your case on a departmental and divisional level.

there are other departments who employed the same web technology as
President Obama.
Yes Open source has a place in Public sector IT but sadly it's not in
business critical areas of the sector, and it has been visible for a long
time.






The policy includes three principles as well as some draft text for

government departments and agencies to include in future RFT documentation:

 * Principle 1:  Australian Government ICT procurement processes must

actively and fairly consider all types of available software.

 * Principle 2: Suppliers must consider all types of available software

when dealing with Australian Government agencies.

 * Principle 3:  Australian Government agencies will actively

participate in open source software communities and contribute back where
appropriate.



http://www.katelundy.com.au/2011/02/03/welcome-news-for-open-source/comment-page-1/


Policy available in HTML at


http://www.finance.gov.au/publications/guide-to-open-source-software/index.html


Marghanita
--
Marghanita da Cruz
http://ramin.com.au
Tel: 0414-869202


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html


--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html






--
Marghanita da Cruz
http://ramin.com.au
Tel: 0414-869202



--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/
Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html